Showing posts with label Wes Craven. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wes Craven. Show all posts

Sunday, October 23, 2022

Mini Reviews for October 17 - 23, 2022

Nothing new to report up here. Here's an obligatory link to the podcast episode my wife and I released last week.

Movies

The House with a Clock in Its Walls (2018)
A perfectly serviceable (and no more than that) piece of family entertainment that is directed by Eli Roth for some reason. There are some fun, distinctive bits (I liked the evil pumpkins!), but I'm finding it hard to have much to say about a movie that is mostly pretty anonymous. Still, if you'd like to hear me try to say something about it, I was part of Episode 426 of the Cinematary podcast, which discussed it as part of the "Horror for Kids" series. Grade: B-

 

 

 

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991)
This movie opens with a hilarious premise that had me hoping for the best: it is ten years in the future, and Freddy has killed literally every teenager in Springfield except one, and he's out to get that one. Gold. The rest of the movie is really dull, though; a weird mix of unbearably try-hard goofy (Freddy trapping a dude in a video game and then killing him using an actual Nintendo Power Glove) and incongruously dark (the protagonists are all kids from a shelter for homeless or troubled teens, and they have some too-real, un-fun issues, e.g. one of them is suffering from PTSD after having been raped by her father repeatedly as a child). Nothing here is scary, and it's really hard to care about anything that happens, given how the movie can never decide how much contempt it wants to regard these characters with. And the effects aren't even that fun or inventive either. Definitely earns its reputation as the series low point. Grade: C

Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994)
The only one of this franchise after the first one that's even remotely scary, and there's no way not to attribute this directly to the presence of Wes Craven again. I do miss some of the sillier, go-for-broke bonkers setpieces that animated a lot of the sequels, but the consummate professionalism and virtuosic control of tension on display here really can't be beat, especially after so many of the other sequels feeling cinematically complacent outside of the elaborate death scenes. The meta stuff obviously begs comparisons to Scream, and while the latter movie is certainly more clever, I've always found its commentary to be smug and vaguely irritating (despite film being solid overall); New Nightmare is a lot messier and probably not as good holistically, but it's also a lot more lovable—the regard the film has for Heather Langenkamp is genuinely sweet at times, which does a lot to endear the film to me. Anyway, I'm glad the Nightmare series got this little coda, because it would have been a bummer to end the series on a stinker like Freddy's Dead. Grade: B+

Child's Play 3 (1991)
A pretty big step down from the first two entries in this series. Andy goes to military school—pretty boring! I really liked the opening credits (we get to watch Chucky unmelt, which is very cool-looking), and Chucky himself remains a fun presence. But I just am so bored with Andy. Too bad Kyle didn't show up in this movie, because I liked her! On top of that, the movie is pretty tepidly staged—I guess military schools are by-design bland environments, and it feels like even the filmmakers realized they picked a bad setting because they set the climax in a random carnival that appears out of nowhere. Grade: C




Tetsuo: The Iron Man
(鉄男) (1989)
I had heard about the gnarly body horror in this movie, which is indeed gnarly (and if I were slowly turning into metal, I would probably rip up my flesh picking at the metal, too, so it's oddly relatable). But I don't think I was prepared for how stylistically out-there this is, which was a fun surprise. I was ready for a lo-fi gross-out, but the way the film has one foot in the avant-garde makes this a lot more engaging than it would have been for me otherwise. Also, terrific sound design—some just incredible squishy noises. Made my skin crawl. Grade: A-

 

 

 

Books

White Noise by Don DeLillo (1985)
As one of the seminal postmodern novels, I expected this to be a little more out-there than it was, and so reading this fairly dry, sardonic book grounded in middle-class alienation caused by the absurdities of postwar American consumerism required a little bit of a mental readjustment to get into. It still wasn't exactly my thing, but I had come around to it by the end. At first, the wry narration, which felt like DeLillo was smirking or rolling his eyes at every sentence, was a little grating to me, but eventually, I felt in on the joke, e.g. the "Hitler Studies" professor whose most pressing concern is whether or not the fact that he doesn't know German undermines his credibility to talk about the fascist leader. Everything is surface and self-presentation. By the end, the book finds a melancholy groove in the hollowness of everything the characters do, until that hollowness has become an abyss with the grave at its bottom. That's the good stuff. I'm curious how I will feel about this book if (when?) I read more Don DeLillo. Anyway, for now: Grade: B

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Mini Reviews for April 13-19, 2020

Quarantine, Week 6: Hey, at least I did an interview! With a really good poet and friend! Read it here if you missed it.

Movies

Band of Robbers (2015)
Pretty dumb. Advertises itself as a modern-day-set adaptation of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn—in reality, it's 97% Tom Sawyer, with the only part from Huckleberry Finn being that bit at the end of the book that hardly anybody likes where Tom impersonates Sid to try to save Jim (Jorge here). The movie somehow simultaneously treats its story less seriously but also less irreverently than Twain's original, and the whole thing has a major case of Early2010sitis, full of low-rent Wes Andersonisms and forced twee. Parts of this were amusing, but on the whole, it's a pretty shoddy effort. Do you want to see Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn (and Joe Harper—hey, good to see that dude get a shout-out for once) drinking craft beer? Then by all means, hit this movie up before it leaves Netflix. Grade: C

The Devil's Rejects (2005)
A pointedly and unbelievably cruel movie, the hicksploitation of something like The Hills Have Eyes or (less this time around than in the original House of 1,000 Corpses) The Texas Chainsaw Massacre blown out to the grand scope of America itself, a pointedly and unbelievably cruel country if there ever was one. It's an interesting and often compelling decision of Zombie's to refuse mythologizing its central Bonnie-and-Clyde-esque clan, who spend the majority of the movie literally torturing the people they encounter. We Americans love the idea of our outlaws, but this movie makes hay out of the way that that that love is a fair-weather facade that drops the moment we're confronted with outlawism's brutal realities. I'm not sure Zombie or this movie really do much to recognize that, for example, the sexual violence perpetrated by its central family is as totemic as the psychotic cop's embodiment of the faux-respectable post-'70s American Establishment, and I'm hesitant to embrace sincerely the "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" logic that I've seen some people use when talking about the purportedly melancholy ending—or maybe the movie does recognize it, and the famous "Free Bird" finale is just a winking, ironic piece of nihilism showing one American demon brutalizing another. My relatively middle-of-the-road rating speaks to the fact that I'm not really that interested in the way the movie lingers lasciviously over this brutality, but the fact that I am thinking about it this much speaks volumes about how rich this movie can be at times. Also, God, please let me become that Groucho Marx enthusiast when I grow up. Grade: B

Joker (2019)
I liked it—just wanted to make that clear before I get into a list of complaints. I probably made a mistake by putting off seeing Joker for as long as I did, as almost every shot, it seems, I had already seen in some awards-season highlight reel. That said, it probably would have felt familiar anyway, since (as has been widely broadcast) this movie is basically conceived as the intersection of King of Comedy and Taxi Driver within an alternate DC universe. I don't know that Joker does much that those two movies don't already do other than to throw a coat of class warfare over the whole thing, a coat that begins well enough (the defunding of social services as a catalyst for social unrest and individual misery, for example) but kind of feels thin by the end, as the movie, for as much as its "You get what you deserve!" finale gestures toward a leftist rage, takes on a pretty dim view of the proletariat, presenting them as society's mindless id held in sway by a nihilistic icon (another example: the garbage collection strike is multiple times blamed for Gotham's filthy condition rather than whatever poor wages and working conditions these folks are presumably striking about). I did get a chuckle out of the Thomas Wayne / Mike Bloomberg parallels ("anti-rich sentiments!"), though speaking of that, what ultimately happens with the Wayne subplot feels merely like a DC genre obligation, which is disappointing for a movie loudly declaring itself as a work not beholden to the same rules as other superhero movies, and I would have liked to see something more unpredictable play out there; the same goes for the movie's setting in the early 1980s, which feels more like an impulse to appear within the same world as the Scorsese movies it's referencing than an artistically vital choice of its own—it's obviously futile to imagine versions of movies we never got, but I can think of a much more cutting iteration of Joker set in a gentrifying, post-Giuliani (or whatever the DC version of Giuliani is) Gotham, where the class issues are no less urgent but also significantly more papered over by the facade of the ruling class. But anyway, I did begin this review by saying I liked this movie, and I do; for as much as this movie's reach exceeds its grasp regarding all the above issues, it works tremendously as a character study. Joker understands the Joker as a human being more so than any other movie iteration of the character has, and the combination of Joaquin Phoenix's performance and the writing create a richly rendered person whose journey feels true. As much as I don't think the movie quite succeeds in scaling up the Arthur's personal issues to society-wide movements, I think it works great in the opposite direction, showing how broader social movements have personal effects on Arthur himself—it's been done before (again, Taxi Driver, King of Comedy), but Joker does a good job of showing how the Great Society's collapse manifests itself on the psychology of those already living on the margins, and his descent into destructive nihilism is entirely convincing, an effect that I don't think was necessarily a sure thing, even mimicking the movies it does. To end this scattered review on a different note: for as much as this movie's been talked to death in the discourse, I've not seen a ton of discussion about the score by Hildur Guðnadóttir, which is really solid and probably at least as worthy of acclaim as the Phoenix performance most people centered on. I don't know if I'd put it above Little Women's score (probably my pick of the Academy Award nominees), but there's definitely no shame in the Oscars picking this one. Grade: B

The Hills Have Eyes (1977)
Starts really good with some strong "A Good Man Is Hard to Find" vibes before basically settling into a pretty typical grindhouse/exploitation second half. The movie does such a good job of establishing the "normal" family as a thoroughly unlikable locus of white, middle-class, anti-rural entitlement that it's really hard for me to get invested in those same people defeating the mutant hillbillies (who have, moreover, clearly seen the butt-end of the U.S. government a la nuclear testing, eminent domain, etc.). Not really sure how to reconcile those two halves, but maybe that's part of the point, I dunno. Anyway, pieces of this are strong enough that I'm landing positive on the whole. Grade: B


God Told Me To (1976)
An utterly deranged police procedural turned sci-fi pulp turned ecstatic messianic dystopia. Starts as a relatively straightforward investigation of mass killings whose perpetrators claim to be directed by God, and then becomes something else entirely very quickly, something wild and unclassifiable, with shades of The Last Temptation of Christ and preemptive shades of David Lynch. It does not—I repeat, does not—hang together on a moment by moment basis, with scene transitions often feeling like they leave out narrative in between. And it has a, to be charitable, problematic posture toward its African-American characters. But I also can't think of a movie prior to this one that has a more innovative and cosmic-minded approach to the crime thriller format except maybe Kiss Me Deadly. Whacked-out, messy, weirdly compelling. Grade: A-

Season of the Witch (1972)
I started laughing when Donovan's "Season of the Witch" started playing at one point, because it's such a hilariously on-the-nose choice to have that song play in a movie of the same name at the precise moment when the main character is getting into witchcraft. This became less funny when I found out that the movie's original title was Hungry Wives and was marketed as a softcore film ("Caviar in the kitchen, nothing in the bedroom"), but then again, that's funny in its own way, because this movie barely has any nudity and is mostly concerned with suburban couples at dinner parties arguing about if anyone is going to hurry up and smoke some weed already—very sexy, ya know. So I get that this movie was kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place w/r/t the title, but then again, the fact that the movie stuck between the rock and the hard place is a snore to begin with couldn't have helped. Sorry, George A. Romero. You make good movies—just not this one. Grade: C

Images (1972)
In a world where Repulsion exists, I guess it's not surprising that this has a reputation as something of an also-ran. But it is really good (though admittedly, not Repulsion good), anchored by a deliriously off-brand John Williams score (Academy Award nominated), some really tremendous editing by Graeme Clifford, as well as a dynamite central performance by Susannah York, without any of which the movie wouldn't have worked at all. I'm not exactly sure how I feel about the story—there's a lot regarding coercive men as well as the collateral damage of York's character's self-destructive tendencies, but I'm not particularly interested in the whole "woman has crippling guilt over infidelity" angle, which is what this movie is going for probably 50% of the time. But the whole package is freaky and disorienting enough that I'm willing to put style over substance if I have to. Altman's reputation is kind of staked on his use of shaggy, improv-y ensemble pieces, but between this and 3 Women, I think there's ample evidence that he was at least as good at assembling meticulously planned cinematic work, too. Grade: B+

Television

Barry, Season 1 (2018)
I was skeptical of Barry at first; "aspiring actor moonlights as a hitman" sounds like an unintentional parody of the typical post-Breaking Bad "Peak TV" series, and the first couple episodes didn't really make me feel more confident, either, as they're basically the most obvious way to play out that premise. But then it gets good. It's not that Barry does something radically different from what its premise promises—this is exactly that story. But the seriousness and dramatic complexity with which the show ultimately bears out the balls set in motion by its first couple episodes lend Barry a terrific weight, and as the show makes abundantly clear by having its last several episodes revolve around a stage performance of Macbeth, what Barry is ultimately going for (and ultimately succeeds at being) is Shakespearean tragedy. The final two episodes are as breathtaking and bleak as Act V of Macbeth, and in fact, I can't really think of a TV show that's been as successful at this format since Breaking Bad itself. Grade: A-

Music

Paul Simon - Stranger to Stranger (2016)
Paul Simon has, alongside Randy Newman, unobtrusively remained one of the more vital Boomer legacy artists still making new material, and 2016's Stranger to Stranger is probably the best of his legacy period. A quiet, quietly powerful rumination on love, class, despair, and hope, Stranger to Stranger finds Simon with some of his cleanest melodies of recent years, as well as some of his sharpest lyrical turns. Early in the record, he sings that "most obits are mixed reviews," and he's sure to get one when the inevitable happens (criticisms of cultural appropriation will no less dog this album than his earlier efforts); but for the positive portions of the eulogies, I hope people remember this record. Grade: A-

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Mini Reviews for October 7-27, 2019

It's been several weeks since I've made a blog post, and for those of you who don't know, this is because my brother died two weeks ago. It's been a difficult time for my family, and even though I was still reading books, watching movies, etc., I really didn't feel like writing about them until just a few days ago. I don't know how much my brother read this blog, but my relationship with him casts a long shadow over my reviews. Who I am as a viewer and critic is inextricable from my relationship with him. A lot of our childhood together was spent—as is the case with most siblings, I'd guess—sharing movies, music, and television. We watched Batman: The Animated Series and played "Batman and Robin" together (though neither of us liked being Robin); we rented The Iron Giant from Blockbuster and liked to joke about "coco-lax"; we spent a lot of time doing Toy-Story-inspired surgery on stuffed animals we had. When we were teens, there was a lot of arguing over media, particularly music: he was into blink-182 and Sum 41, whereas I was a budding indie-rock snob. We both liked Dark Side of the Moon, though, and I remember loaning him my CD a lot in high school at night so he could go to sleep to that beating heart. The music fights died down once we were no longer living together and subjecting each other to each other's taste, but I still think about those fights sometimes and the ways in which I've decided he was right and I was wrong (Rage Against the Machine, for example: I of course realize now that they rock).

When somebody close to you dies, the impulse is to try to conceptualize the entire person in your mind, since that's all you have left, but it's hard to the point of impossible to fit a whole human being inside your head because when they're alive, there's no need—what forms in the mind is the organic outgrowth of life and the afterimages of experiences. So when I think about my brother now, it's only pieces of who he is that come to me at a time. Right now, as I'm putting together this blog post, it's these little fragments of shared media that bob to the surface. We are everyone we have ever known, and our relationships with art are part of that, since our experience of art is the collection of these relationships' intersections with the now. To write a review is to remember what fragments you can, as incomplete of a reckoning of a whole life as that is.

Anyway, here are the reviews.

Movies

The Lighthouse (2019)
Man, how do I even describe The Lighthouse? I guess I can now call it a hallmark of writer/director Robert Eggers that his films are heavily steeped in a meticulous recreation of arcane English dialects; in the same way that The Witch had its characters speak in Puritan English, The Lighthouse has its Willem Dafoe character go full-on Captain Ahab/Mr. Krabs seaman English—whatever that's called. The degree to which that sounds goofier than The Witch is a good indication of the difference between the two projects: The Lighthouse is the unhinged-to-the-point-of-hilarity but no less frightening cousin to The Witch's relatively serious drama of isolation. There's a lot to, uhh, behold in The Lighthouse, from its deeply rattling evocation of post-Romanticism "weird" fiction like Melville and Lovecraft to its smotheringly lush late-1800s sea-shanty production to its fevered imagery and unstable reality to its (I kid you not) mermaid genitalia, but the absolute best of it all for me is the complete and total control Eggers and Dafoe have over the effect of this dialect. Long, careening scenes will take hairpin turns of tone bent around ornate speeches and turns of phrase: Dafoe goes from lamenting that Robert Pattinson's character doesn't like his cooking to delivering two minutes of the most elaborate, blistering maritime curse I've ever heard then finally to a small, tender word all in the space of like five minutes, and it's by turns riveting and funny and scary and kind of sad—amazingly, without ever feeling unnatural or out of place. It all just is, spewing forth from this totemic force of a man inside this totemic force of a movie, high and low brows crashing together like waves whipped up by a nor'easter emanating from the deepest well of the masculine psyche. The movie is, among other things, about all the ways in which we humans—but especially we males—cloak our basest urges in all sorts of hierarchies and rituals and how quickly these hierarchies and rituals become indistinguishable from those base urges themselves when we cling to them tight enough. Dafoe's intricate dialect is a vehicle of both his rigid rules for keeping up the lighthouse and also these deeply ancient curses and superstitions that envelope his rules like a force of nature. It's bewildering, terrifying, and very, very funny. Martin Scorsese says that Marvel movies are like amusement park rides, but honestly, none of them ever took me on a ride as wild and thrilling as this. Grade: A

The Raid: Redemption (Serbuan maut) (2011)
I care not a whit for any of the plot or human beings within this movie. But the action is very super good, y'all. I mean, that's the only thing people talk about with this movie, so it's not like I'm blowing any minds. Sometimes consensus is just right. Grade: B








The Happening (2008)
I'm not going to say that people "misunderstood" The Happening upon its release, because so much of what's here defies the typical sort of appraisal: the dialogue has the almost-human surreality of one of those AI-generated scripts ("We ate tiramisu together, that is it"); Mark Wahlberg and Zooey Deschanel give two of the most idiosyncratic and unnatural performances of 21st-century mainstream cinema; the score is ham-fisted to the point of self-parody; Shyamalan's motif of wind blowing through trees feels laughably flimsy. There's nothing here that's conventionally entertaining, that's for sure, and it's no surprise that audiences and critics bristled at this deeply off-beat horror-melodrama-thriller oddity. But I dunno... I kind of liked it. Kind of. I'm not fully with the re-appraisers who want to call this an outsider masterpiece or whatever, but like most of Shyamalan's movies, there's this undeniable energy to the whole thing that's pretty compelling when it isn't just confounding. The way this threads the needle between an evocation of '50s-style B-movie kookiness, an almost arthouse level of seriousness regarding the lived experience of humanity on the brink, and (intentional?) absurdist comedy is just so undeniably its own thing. To be honest, the alchemy of it all feels just a few clicks away from the otherworldly camp that David Lynch taps into, and if people hadn't taken The Sixth Sense so po-facedly seriously and did the whole "Next Spielberg" jig, we might be talking about Shyamalan more in that vein. Maybe. Like Lynch, it's easy to chuckle at the window dressing, like the off-kilter dialogue and weird acting, but its themes (in this case, ecological collapse and the horrifying unpredictability of human self-destruction) are so unrelentingly bleak and unshakeably tethered to my own real-world terrors that it's hard to feel comfortable sitting unambiguously in the "so-bad-its-good" enjoyment mode. Tell me, what on earth are you even supposed to do with First Reformed as filtered through Plan 9 from Outer Space? Grade: B-

The People Under the Stairs (1991)
This movie definitely bites off more than it can chew as far as ideas go. There's so much crammed into this gleefully dark satire that there are a lot of elements that feel half-baked—including the titular people under the stairs themselves, who are never as engaging or interesting or developed as the children protagonists or the maniacal villains. But holy moly, what works here works. I'm all about this movie's hatred of vulture landlords, and I'm especially all about this movie's villains as the Reagans from Hell. Plus, the "'80s family movie, but a Hard R rating" is a very fun vibe. As a movie, it's a LOT, but gloriously so. Grade: B+



Gremlins 2: The New Batch (1990)
Demented and gonzo to an absurdly delightful degree: I almost died of happiness when the gremlins break out into a big musical number to the tune of "New York, New York." The chief pleasure here is just how anarchic it is (very); the movie opens with an animated bit involving the classic Looney Tunes opening, but with Bugs and Daffy fighting for control over the segment, and this is a pretty great microcosm for the level this is working on—quite explicitly a live-action cartoon. As a result, the movie is a little less sharp in its satirical targets than its predecessor's shredding to pieces of Christmas Americana, but '80s NYC yuppies and real estate barons are still worth the chaos that's wreaked on their world here. In a 2019 in which Donald Trump is leading a quasi-fascist regime seemingly bent on destroying everything I like about America, I can see how some people might feel like this movie softballs its depiction of its very Donald-Trump-in-the-'80s-esque villain (he has a semi-sympathetic redemption arc); however, it is a marvelously bitter pill that The New Batch ends with this theoretically reformed villain cashing in his newfound goodwill by deciding to profit from the mass-manufacturing/exploitation of the first movie's small town. It's not just (as the first movie argues) that the concept of "Americana" is flimsy kitsch that can bear none of the weight of reality; it's that this kitsch is a pandering lie cooked up by a craven corporation, and any humanity that once existed within this concept has been wrung out for all the shareholder value it's worth. It's a good thing this movie is an all-time blast, or the cynicism would collapse under its own weight. Grade: A

Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982)
This movie's reputation as the supreme oddball of the Halloween franchise (taking place in a universe outside the continuity of the Michael Myers entries) led me to believe that it was going to be a lot more meta and self-reflexive in its posture toward the series as a whole. Instead, its relationship with the rest of the series boils down to a few cheeky references, and otherwise, this is a fun little one-off sci-fi horror movie reminiscent of The Stuff and that kind of thing. Most slasher franchises would probably be improved if they eventually just became anthology series like Season of the Witch was apparently trying to make of the Halloween series, so I applaud the attempt here, however unsuccessful. I guess there are already a couple other Halloween continuities we could try this with again, though—get on it, Universal! Grade: B+

Ganja & Hess (1973)
The first Capital-G Great horror movie I saw this October. Spike Lee of course remade Ganja & Hess in 2014, but Lee's somewhat terrestrial preoccupations never manage to hook the deep mysticism of this original. Actually, it's 2012, with Red Hook Summer, that shows ol' Spike most dedicatedly carrying forward this movie's torch—a sprawling, searingly fervent reckoning of Christianity's role in colonialism and slavery, set to wall-to-wall gospel music. Bitter and evocative: eternal life is the price of vampirism, resurrection its perverse horror. But the magic is that oppression never overwhelms the film itself, which blooms into a liberated beauty from the husk of its plot. It is a profoundly spiritual experience—neither the social treatise of Spike's Red Hook Summer nor the neutered eroticism of his remake two years later—but rather inventing its own sublime cinematic language of cross-fades and double-exposures and slow-mo, seemingly from the ground up. Its radical freedom of style and substance forms the perfection of blaxploitation; Curtis Mayfield and stuff form the cultural memory of that movement, a monolith of groovy bass and bottomless cool for semi-ironic appropriation. But at least to me, the elliptical mysticism and self-made mythologizing of this movie (and, to a different degree, Sweet Sweetback) form a much more compelling soul to the whole scene. If you couldn't tell, I loved this. Grade: A

The Blood Spattered Bride (La novia ensangrentada) (1972)
The marketing promises a kind of Spanish giallo, but it plays like a grindhouse take on a Val Lewton picture. Ancient curses and lesbian vampires cooked in a visually rich slow-burn. I'm not always the biggest fan of exploitation cinema, but this is kind of the platonic ideal of it for me: in which it's a trojan horse for the marginalized to wield the lurid tropes of the genre as weapons against its own audience, right up to that final shot, which is probably the most shocked I've been by a movie this whole horror season. It's a pretty nasty movie, and I wish it had made as much space for onscreen queer sexuality as it makes for onscreen sexual violence, but as an indictment of masculine sexual entitlement/aggression, it's damning—not to mention pretty riveting. Grade: B+

Daughters of Darkness (Les lèvres rouges) (1971)
I'm writing this review a couple weeks after I actually saw this movie, and I honestly don't remember the plot hardly at all. But I do remember Delphine Seyrig's wonderful performance—a more sympathetic, vampire iteration of Mrs. Danvers from Rebecca—and I do remember the pretty lush scenery and cinematography, which itself feels like a vampire old-soul version of cinematic styles gone by. Anyway, I remember enjoying this overall. Grade: B






The Velvet Vampire (1971)
A really dope score and some very cool hallucinogenic/dream imagery buoy this movie a bit for me, and there's a deep sadness to the ending that I wasn't expecting. But I guess I'm not really invested enough in vampire stories to begin with to be all that entranced by a revisionist one. Then again, I did love Ganja & Hess, so I dunno why I'm not more excited. Grade: B-







Music

Lover by Taylor Swift (2019)
The first half of this album is fantastic, and things like "Cruel Summer" and "Miss America and the Heartbreak Prince" are some of the best Taylor Swift's ever been at pure pop music: shiny, pristine, hooky, thoughtful. But there's a lot of pretty weak material buried deep in this record, too, material like the lead single "Me!" and the honestly pretty dumb pileup of Britishisms that is "London Boy," and the fact that anything can be buried deep in this album speaks to the biggest issue, which is that it's just too long and, with that, has some really awful track sequencing—the supremely goofy "London Boy" goes right into "Soon You'll Get Better," a song about her mother's battle with breast cancer? Who thought that was a good idea? I'm probably in the minority in thinking that Lover as a whole is a step down from her previous record, Reputation; it lacks that album's thorniness or the arch-villain camp or the thematic complexity. But it's certainly not a weak album, and if we're going just on the basis of high points, Lover has several very high ones. Grade: B