Sunday, June 27, 2021

Mini Reviews for June 21 - 27, 2021

I wasn't sure I was going to be able to post this blog today because my daughter was just born a few days ago (!!!!!), but I forgot how much newborns sleep, so here you go!

Movies

Spider-Man: Far from Home (2019)
I had decided that I was going to step off the MCU train with Endgame, but sitting in a hospital room for 48 hours straight (nothing serious, my wife just had a baby) will push you to worse extremes than this, and this movie was the only on-demand movie on the room's TV I was even close to being interested in, so here I am. My reaction to this is basically emblematic of my feelings on the MCU as a whole, which is that it's vaguely entertaining while also being completely frustrating in its insistence on muddying its own shape in the service of leadenly tying in to the larger MCU and its refusal to prod at its more interesting possible subtexts (in this case, the Mysterio / SFX-oriented movie-making connections). It also kind of sucks that these two MCU Spider-Man movies have such a winsome cast for the teen characters but then have those teen characters only do thin comic relief the whole time; one of the special things about Spider-Man to me was always that his web of civilian relationships were as interesting as his actual superhero stuff and even made the superhero stuff more compelling as a foil/dramatic wedge, and I think a movie that would actually give the space to let the cast develop these high school scenarios more would actually be really good. But instead the movie is more interested in who the next Tony Stark is than who Peter Parker and his friends are, which is what you get when the whole franchise is more narratively important than the individual movies, I guess. The Peter and MJ stuff was sweet at the end, though. Grade: C+

Grave Encounters (2011)
Pretty rote found-footage horror stuff. I'm not exactly sure why this has garnered a cult following, except that it's poking fun at those paranormal investigator shows, but that's something that Ghostwatch did way better decades prior to this, so I dunno. I did like some of the House of Leaves-type architectural horror, with the asylum looping around on itself in impossibly big spaces, but that's a relatively small part of the movie. Grade: C

 

 

 

Moolaadé (2004)
Feels a little too much like a "social issue" drama at times, though of course the social issue itself (female genital mutilation) is serious and worth making a movie against. But pleasantly, this movie feels a lot lighter than the typical issue drama; it's actually very funny given the subject matter, and the depiction of the community is vibrant and nuanced. This is also, by virtue of the local Burkinabe fashion, a wonderfully colorful movie, and because of that it's nice to look at throughout. I should watch more of Ousmane Sembène's movies—I should watch more African cinema in general, because I've seen embarrassingly few movies from that continent. Grade: B

 

The Murder of Fred Hampton (1971)
Just a truly stunning document, inspiring and brutally depressing in equal measure. Inspiring for the half of the film that lays out Hampton's vision: outside of the labor movement, probably the closest anyone ever got to realizing honest-to-God socialism in the industrialized United States, and as basically a teenager, too—it sucks so much that hippies are the cultural legacy of the '60s counterculture, because this is the counterculture that actually mattered. When Republicans accuse Democrats of being radical leftists or whatever (conservatives yet again threatening us with a good time), they should be made to watch the first half of this film to see what the real deal is. Depressing for the absolutely heinous assassination that is the focus of the second half of the doc: honestly astounding that the filmmakers got some of this footage, which, as I understand it, they obtained by just darting into the crime scene before they could be stopped. But nonetheless, it's beyond sobering to think about the lengths to which the United States will go to stop someone who envisions a world without racism or capitalism, and the apparatus against that sort of vision has only gotten stronger since. Hard to wrap my mind around the fact that this documentary and the COINTELPRO unveiling were released to the public within months of each other—like, how do you weather a one-two punch like that and not just immediately become a revolutionary? Grade: A

Sunday, June 20, 2021

Mini Reviews for June 14 - 20, 2021

In case you missed it, here's the link to the latest progressive rock post earlier this week, this time about Iron Maiden!

Movies

In the Heights (2021)
A lot of caveats here. As a movie musical, it feels like every other shot of choreography has some sort of cramped and wonky composition that obscures its imagery, and the editing is worse, twitchily cutting about twice as often as feels necessary. And as we all know by now, Lin-Manuel Miranda is an extraordinarily corny writer, and in long stretches, so is this movie. It's also got some big pacing issues, and the movie just kind of plods along once we get past the central plot point of the blackout. This is to say nothing of Miranda's politics, which pinball between a wide-eyed idealism in the American Dream and a simple "certain kinds of people have unique struggles"; while the latter isn't a terrible starting point, this movie never moves beyond that starting point, which makes it feel (despite the movie occasionally saying otherwise) that issues like gentrification and immigration injustice are just personal struggles to be overcome, and as the characters themselves overcome their personal struggles with that aforementioned wide-eyed idealism, the urgency of these issues falls away. But I still enjoyed this movie a ton. Maybe every other shot is wonky, but that also means the other 50% of the shots are dazzling (this is stupid math, but what if we cut out all the weird shots, editing only half as often and letting the good shots last twice as long? This movie becomes way better), and the choreography and performances are legitimately great, which makes it hard not to get caught up in the emotional sweep and sensationalism of it all, despite the indulgent pacing—isn't that what we want from a musical? And even with the editing, there are some grade-A unassailable sequences of movie musical magic, like the gravity-defying "When the Sun Goes Down" balcony scene, the impressionist personal history of "Paciencia y Fe," and the intoxicated whirl of "The Club." It's just all so lovely and, moreover, sincere; so many genre movies nowadays seem embarrassed of the genre they're in—Disney animated movies make jokes about being princess movies, Marvel movies have characters roll their eyes about how absurd their characters are—but In the Heights makes no apologies for what it is: a big, loud, schmaltzy spectacle in which characters break into song and dance to express their enormous feelings. Zero winks at the audience. Not a single one. It's incredible just how much that level of self-actualized sincerity can just pave over any reservations. I hadn't realized how starved I was for this kind of heart-on-sleeve big-tent show until certain moments gave me waves of euphoria, and while this isn't the first movie I've seen in a theater post-vaccine, it's the first movie that's given me that heady movie-theater feeling (impossible to know how much that buoyed this movie above its flaws for me, but it certainly was a factor). Oh, and re: the politics, they're still there, but they're a lot easier to take when they're in service of hometown pride rather than national history by way of Ron Chernow. I'm just a dumb ol' Tennessee boy who's never been to Washington Heights and spent a good part of the movie confused as to whether that neighborhood was in Manhattan or the Bronx, so who knows how this scans to the actual natives. But I thought this did a great job of warmly evoking a very specific community within its musical fantasia, and that sort of affection makes it hard for me to be too grumpy about Miranda's neoliberal tendencies. Grade: B+

Kindred (2020)
Look, Rosemary's Baby and Get Out are both great, but I'm begging rookie indie-horror directors to watch some other horror movies or at least pretend like they have. I feel like I've seen this movie a dozen times already. Grade: C-

 

 

 

 

I Am a Sex Addict (2005)
Radical honesty is a really cool idea that I think is worth aspiring to, but one of the central problems with it as a life-defining ethos is that I'm not sure we can ever know ourselves completely enough to be as honest as is necessary to fight deception, particularly self-deception. It's strikingly obvious that Caveh Zahedi sometimes (oftentimes) uses his "honesty" as a shtick to give an implicit post-hoc justification for his deeply, deeply harmful behavior, and the more I see of his work, the more I'm convinced that the question of whether or not Caveh realizes that he's doing this is one of the central tensions of his career. There's something to be said for the vulnerability of any one instance of Caveh's humiliating disclosures, and of course recovery from compulsion and addiction requires an ability to be straightforward about one's own actions. But I dunno, compiled as a feature-length (and then career-length) accumulation of such moments, there's something really uncomfortable for me about the way that Caveh's wide-eyed, seemingly guileless screen persona is able to in-the-moment ingratiate me to some really vile stuff. Maybe that's a Me problem, but regardless, I was never quite sure if I was intentionally being sold something here, right up to the inclusion of his actual final(?) marriage ceremony at the end, which is really disarmingly sweet but also exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about where it's using vulnerability to paper over the lack of reflection over all the people Caveh talks about having hurt along the way. Also, from the post-Show About the Show perspective of right now, it's pretty depressing to watch, knowing that Caveh's self-destructive drive for seemingly full disclosure is going to destroy this marriage, too. Grade: C

Tommy (1975)
The original Tommy album by The Who has some highlights but isn't something I have a ton of affection for, so I'm probably less offended than most that Ken Russell takes the album and makes a movie adaptation that is balls-to-the-wall bananas from front to back, a wild cornucopia of bonkers psychedelia, over-the-top Freudian imagery, homoeroticism, and almost certainly intentional self-parody (e.g. Roger Daltrey with that White-Jesus hair hang-gliding in shirtless to save the say). It is intoxicating, and honestly the only thing holding this movie back from unfettered greatness is the original Tommy album itself—not so much the music (which is often improved by this movie's musical-theater approach, e.g. Tina Turner as the Acid Queen—I know this is sacrilege, but I don't care) but the story, which is just kind of stupid at best and pretty tacky at worst. This movie also makes the completely unforced error of adding one really unnecessary bit of homophobia regarding Uncle Ernie, which is a shame and also kind of unbelievable given how gay the rest of this movie feels. But past those caveats is one of the most maximalist and fevered movie musicals I've ever seen, and I legit love that. Grade: B+

Hospital (1970)
I had gotten used to early Wiseman documentaries being seethingly angry, depicting broken institutions hurting people. But Hospital took me completely by surprise by depicting the titular hospital with such openly humanist love—maybe not for the hospital itself but for the workers there and the patients seeking treatment. It's so bursting with human life in this liminal way that blurs the line between this world and the next. I found this tremendously moving, especially in the couple of scenes where doctors desperately advocate for their patients in ways that try to circumvent the limitations of the (mostly unseen) broken health and law bureaucracy that rules over all of this. Would make for a profound (if queasy) double feature with Brakhage's The Act of Seeing with One's Own Eyes. Grade: A-

Glen or Glenda (1953)
I guess if I were being charitable, I could chalk up this movie's reputation as "one of the worst of all time" to the fact that it's rife with pseudo-science and outdated terminology/ideas about gender and genderqueer & trans identities. There are some Not Good things articulated here, for sure, like linking gender nonconformity to a bad childhood, and whatever the historical context of this movie and Ed Wood's own life, it's undeniable that some parts of this feel pretty bad nowadays. But I'm not feeling particularly charitable right now, so I'm just going to assume that this movie's "worst of all time" legacy is largely due to some noxious mix of laughing at Ed Wood's idiosyncratic and borderline amateur filmmaking choices and just straight-up dismissively laughing at the trans and genderqueer people depicted in this movie. For the latter, it's worth pointing out that the movie itself assumes its audience is laughing, as the narrator literally says so before pleading for love and understanding for the people depicted here, which is heartbreaking considering the film's eventual disgraced legacy. And regarding the former, I can see how a low-budget, fully camp, at times nearly avant-garde personal essay in the guise of an educational sexploitation film would perplex people who are used to watching only Hollywood narrative films, but it's inexcusable for a professional critic like Leonard Maltin to act as if this is unwatchable dreck when it's a genuinely interesting and even visionary use of the form, however amateur Ed Wood's outward trappings seem. Considering what a YouTube video essay looks like now, it's impossible for me to watch this and not find it decades ahead of the curve. Anyway, besides all that, I just found this to be really moving at points, too. It's just this achingly sincere appeal for acceptance from someone who clearly experienced a lot of suffering regarding his gender identity, and in a way, the retrospectively dated ideas about gender kind of reinforce that, too, because for someone's mind to be so colonized that they view their identity (an identity that this deeply conflicted film at times argues should be normalized and destigmatized) as something to be "cured," they must have faced some truly oppressive reinforcement of gender norms. Like, I almost started crying at the part where Glen wants to wear a dress to a Halloween party, and his dad won't let him until his mom saves the day and lets Glen go dressed how he wants. There's just so much pain in this movie, and people have really spent decades pointing at that pain and going, "lol, wow, this movie sucks." After watching both this and The Room within about a week of each other, I feel like there's something about really sincere depictions of pain onscreen that makes people just want to ridicule, as if vulnerability is something to be mocked. I'm not saying that there's not funny stuff in either of these movies or that either movie is above criticism, but there's a fine line between the culture of ridiculing bad movies and reinforcing oppressive norms. Grade: B

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Prog Progress 1984: Iron Maiden - Powerslave

Hi, everyone! Welcome to Prog Progress, a blog series in which I journey through the history of progressive rock by reviewing one album from every year of the genre's existence. You can read more about the project here. You can learn about what I think are some of the roots of progressive rock here. You can see links for the whole series here.

 

Since the very early goings of this series, I've been foreshadowing that metal would one day play an important role in the progress of progressive rock, and now, my dear dedicated few readers who have stuck with this series, we're here! The moment when heavy metal and progressive rock truly converge! Can you feel the tingling on the back of neck? The sudden impulse to thrash your head back and forth? The undeniable urge to make edgy allusions to Satan to discomfort your parents? Yeah baby! Here we go! 

I should say first that I am not anything close to a metal expert; metal music communities thrive on hyper-specific knowledge that I simply do not have. I enjoy this music, and I hope I've represented it to the best of my abilities. But there are probably going to be some factual errors and oversimplifications here. If so, please let me know!

But wait; per tradition, here's some history. As you may have guessed, neither 1984 nor Iron Maiden's Powerslave are the first time that progressive rock and heavy metal have overlapped. I talked about their interplay way back on my 1970 post about Black Sabbath's Paranoid, and I still basically stand by the observation that back in the post-'67 explosion of divergent rock music styles and structures, a lot of the people pushing the boundaries of rock music were basically all hobnobbing under the same big tent of rock's vanguard, from the wacked-out avant-gardists like Captain Beefheart to those who would eventually become associated with more commercially viable genres like art rock, hard rock, heavy metal, and progressive rock. I mean, Deep Purple, definitely one of the heavy metal grandaddies, sings about Frank Zappa in "Smoke on the Water"; my impression is that this was all something of a scene, which is kind of wild to think about when you consider how siloed the branches of rock music would become from one another moving forward.

And they did get siloed pretty quickly. As early as 1972 or '73, these definitely felt like completely different wings that may occasionally overlap but generally felt as if they were moving in distinct directions. The avant-garde/experimental folks like Zappa and Henry Cow were off in one corner, doing their thing. Then there was art rock and progressive rock going in their own increasingly florid directions, especially prog, which, as we've discussed, focused on forming complicated, busy compositions that stretched over whole sides of LPs; meanwhile, hard rock and heavy metal traded on one another for the rest of the '70s with bands like Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, and Blue Öyster Cult (all of whom tended to trade in both genres), with hard rock forging a faster, bluesier path and heavy metal leaning on slower, crushing riffs and doomy atmospheres—and despite emerging from the same post-'67 primordial pool, neither sounded especially proggy except on obvious genre experiments like Zeppelin's "Achilles Last Stand." This is all waaay simplifying the evolution here, but hopefully it's not too unfamiliar territory for someone who stuck it out this far in the series. Tons of this is still part of the mainstream rock canon; if you still have a radio, '70s heavy metal and hard rock in particular are all over classic rock radio[1].

Predictably, this all gets shaken up with the emergence of punk, which begins mid-'70s in the United States as kind of a convergent evolution between America's experimental rock and hard rock wings but soon hops across the pond to the UK, where it makes an arguably bigger cultural splash as specifically a movement in defiance of the reigning powers that be in the rock world, which in the UK at the time mean prog and heavy metal. I've talked before about how the narrative that "punk killed prog" is a gross oversimplification, and I would say the same thing of this first wave of heavy metal/hard rock in relation to punk. As with prog, heavy metal/hard rock happened to be undergoing some internal shakeups not directly connected to punk, e.g. Ozzy Osbourne's departure from Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin's increasing trouble with its members' health/behavior, culminating in the death of drummer John Bonham and the group's subsequent dissolution. So as with prog, heavy metal has something of an identity crisis at the end of the '70s[2].

Now unlike prog, which, as we've seen previously in this series, adapted to punk by ultimately just abandoning prog for prog-inflected pop, metal sees punk and its aggression and fleet songwriting and adopts a "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" approach, and what's known as the New Wave of British Heavy Metal (NWOBHM... catchy) forms around a bunch of artists who fuse the speed and scuzziness of punk with the riffs and doom of heavy metal: Motörhead, Saxon, Def Leppard[3], etc. It makes sense; the sneering thrash of punk is a much more obvious cross-pollination with the aggro-postures of metal than it is with the operatic and symphonic sensibilities of '70s prog, so it seems only natural that metal and punk rub off on one another more so than punk and prog do[4].

The funny thing about all of this is that because of prog and metal's at-this-point distant shared ancestors, prog did end up cross-pollinating with punk by proxy of the NWOBHM, whose bands fused the immediate instrumental ferocity of punk with the more grandiose structures of the legacy of that stew of post-'67 rock experimentation. The groups who especially leaned into the latter half of this equation even became known as "progressive metal."

This is more or less where we get to Iron Maiden, not only one of the headlining bands of the NWOBHM but also a key player in the formation of progressive metal. Iron Maiden were formed by bassist/songwriter Steve Harris in London in 1975, and like a lot of bands, the group kind of bounced around various clubs and underwent a number of lineup changes before finally being able to scrounge up enough funds to get themselves into the studio. In 1978, they recorded their very scrappy, self-produced debut, The Soundhouse Tapes: a lean three-song EP written entirely by Steven Harris. It's a fairly modest listen for being the studio debut of one of the most important metal groups of all time, but it's also an early example of the hallmarks of the NWOBHM: DIY production, punk-flavored guitar and vocals, Judas-Priest-inspired edge. At the time, punk, not metal, was the press darling as far as emergent underground rock music in the UK goes, so Iron Maiden, as with most of the New Wave Metal, mostly gained an audience by word-of-mouth and by circulating tapes of this EP (honestly a very punk move) until they found radio and club DJs who were interested. This eventually snowballed into enough popularity that their public release of The Soundhouse Tapes in 1979 sold out all 5000 copies in a matter of weeks. This was enough to get some major label attention, and the group signed to EMI soon after.

I know that this is technically a post about the band's fifth album, Powerslave, but I say all this about their debut EP just to point out that Iron Maiden is truly a fusion of the legacies of all three major strands of left-of-center British rock music: punk and prog and metal. As I pointed out in the previous post in this series, a lot of post-'70s posture towards prog was anything but progressive, attempting to preserve certain characteristics of the genre as if the sea change of the punk/new wave moment at the end of the '80s had never happened[5]. But with Iron Maiden, there is a genuine spirit of synthesizing the old with the new that feels way more in the spirit of their early-'70s forebears than the people who were out there trying to create '70s revivalist music, which I find delightful. Even more delightful is the fact that Iron Maiden don't seem to have envisioned themselves as progressive rockers at all, based on their early, formational work; The Soundhouse Tapes make it clear that punk and metal are the key building blocks, and the music reflects that, with fast-paced, macabre tunes about urban decay ("Prowler"), Vikings ("Invaders"), and the band's spooky persona itself ("Iron Maiden"). None of these songs are over the four-and-a-half minute mark; none of them are particularly indebted to any of the tropes of prog.

That all starts to change with the group's first full-length LP (self-titled, naturally). In some ways, the album is a continuation of what the band started with The Soundhouse Tapes; "Prowler" and "Iron Maiden"[6] are both present in re-recorded versions, and a lot of the rest of the album has the same sort of punk-metal sound. But nestled at the end of Side One is a track called "Phantom of the Opera," a seven-minute, multi-part epic inspired by the titular gothic mystery novel by Gaston Leroux—pretty much a prog hat trick. And with this single track, Iron Maiden's progressive metal is born. Nearly every album from Iron Maiden's classic era (approximately their self-titled through 1988's Seventh Son of a Seventh Son) has some sort of openly operatic composition in this vein, a long, multi-movement song usually drawing on history or classic literature/mythology or sometimes just fantasy or sci-fi more broadly: "Prodigal Son" on Killers, "Hallowed Be Thy Name" on The Number of the Beast, "To Tame a Land"[7] on Piece of Mind, etc. Even the songs that aren't overt epics begin to take on some of the grandeur of their more ambitious siblings—for example, "Flight of Icarus" on Piece of Mind, a song that's not even four minutes long but that still makes time to re-tell the Greek myth alluded to in the title.

One of the things that sometimes goes unremarked-upon about prog is that it is a genre that relies heavily on storytelling. Country and hip-hop get a lot of attention as the "storytelling" genres, and they certainly have earned those accolades. But prog's penchant for conceptual ideas, unself-consciously grand gestures, and the genre's roots in British prep schools make it a little different from the embellished autobiography and folk realism that imbues the country and hip-hop storytellers. Because outside of Pink Floyd's Wish You Were Here or The Wall, proggers tend to shy away from overt autobiography; instead, befitting the genre's grandiose ambitions, when prog tells a story, it tells an epic one: apocalypses, sci-fi sagas, pseudo-Biblical fantasy parables, Tarkuses, to say nothing of the numerous examples of social/political satire that have peppered the genre with big ideas. As much as progressive music has aspired to the mathematical bombast of classical music, so too has its lyrical content often been bent toward the literary classics in either explicit adaptations or pieces that reach for the same philosophical/cultural high-mindedness as the European storytelling canon[8]. I've been a little snarky about some of these storytelling attempts in the past because they are a little cornball at times, and there's something of a "teenaged boy thinks that the most serious stories have battles and brooding men doing important things" vibe to some of this, and critics of prog have certainly used this to lampoon the genre as a bastion of faux-intellectual dorks. But I also have a great deal of affection for the unabashed nerdiness of this kind of thing, and besides, some of this stuff is really cool and interesting and weird, or at least charmingly bookish in a way that most rock music does not allow itself to be. And Iron Maiden definitely slots right into this category.

The funny thing about Iron Maiden is that, despite being named after an instrument of torture and having either Satan, a zombie, or both on every one of their album covers and being one of the key players in a genre notorious for its edge-lord darkness and alleged ability to corrupt the morals of children, Iron Maiden are kind of dorks. To be fair, this is true of many metal bands once you peel back the macabre facade, but it is especially true of Iron Maiden, a band whose lyrics seem intentionally calibrated to be played by high school English and history teachers desperate to prove to their students that they are one of the Cool Ones[9]. The one most responsible for this impulse seems to be Steve Harris, who was initially the primary songwriting for the band. Though the songwriting duties eventually diversified, Harris is far and away the most prolific of the Iron Maiden crew, and his penchant is definitely for these high-school-class-type epics, being the man responsible for all of the songs I named above except for "Flight of Icarus." Under Harris's pen, the band honed what would be Iron Maiden's signature lyrical posture: a macabre gloss over a classical education. I am throwing no shade here; I unabashedly love this about Iron Maiden, and this impulse in the band that I love arguably comes to a head with their fifth album, Powerslave.

Powerslave finds Iron Maiden at their proggiest point yet, in terms of both their music and their lyrics. Just looking at the track listing, you've got the most obvious harbingers of progginess: long songs. Only two of the eight tracks dip below five minutes, and at the album's long-windiest, you've even got a 7-minute song and a nearly 14-minute song. But this is just surface-level; more important is what's actually in those songs, which are loud, brash, and fast in the NWOBHM style but also intricately composed, with winding instrumental passages and multi-movement structures in a way that distinctly recalls the tendencies of prog.

Most importantly for the theme that I've been building in this post, this album is positively brimming with narrative. The record opens with "Aces High," a Harris-penned recounting of a WWII dogfight, followed just a few tracks later by vocalist Bruce Dickinson's "Flash of the Blade," which tells the story of a young boy who grows into a vengeful swordsman, before ending Side One with another Harris lyric, "The Duellists," about a sword duel to the death and named for the Ridley Scott film of the same title (itself adapted from the Joseph Conrad novella The Duel). The other two Side One songs I didn't already mention are "Losfer Words (Big 'Orra)," an instrumental track, and "Two Minutes to Midnight," an apocalyptic anti-nuclear-war banger that, in the grand Sabbath tradition, associates nihilistic war hawks with the demonic—neither free from prog inflections themselves.

Side Two of the record goes even fuller-bore into this grand narrative posture. The first song on Side Two is "Back in the Village," part two of a pair of Iron Maiden songs (the first being "The Prisoner" on their third album, The Number of the Beast) based on the cult-favorite British TV series The Prisoner. Next is "Powerslave" itself, which opens on a Pink-Floyd-sounding bit of spooky sound collage until it bursts forth into a riff-heavy jam whose lyrics form a dramatic monologue of sorts involving a pharaoh on his deathbed raging against the coming darkness. "Powerslave" in particular whips itself up to a rather impressive progressive frenzy, shifting through three very distinct movements, each with their own tempos and technical flair: the first and third comprising the lyrical sections, a grim memento mori growled over hard-hitting riffage, sandwiching the second movement, a lengthy and escalatingly quick passage of guitar pyrotechnics that at times abandons any metal flourishes entirely and becomes definitively neo-prog its its melodic, winding guitar work. At seven minutes, this kind of structure wouldn't feel out-of-place on, say, Yes's Close to the Edge or Marillion's Script for a Jester's Tear.

But all of this pales in comparison to the album's 13-minute-and-45-seconds grand finale, the monstrous, sprawling "Rime of the Ancient Mariner." The song is more or less structured like "Powerslave" in that there are two conventional metal sections sandwiching a moodier middle, but the runtime allows for the band to stretch each movement out to heretofore unprecedented levels of detail. By the end, the song has this all-encompassing feel, as if Iron Maiden is trying (and succeeding!) to put everything they know how to do in one song: you've got the heavy riff of the beginning, the NWOBHM "chugga-chugga-chugga" faster section after that, a lengthy atmospheric interlude with minimal instrumentation and melody, a crescendo lifting the song out of atmospherics back into full-throttle metal mode, culminating in a shredding guitar solo, and then an ending that returns to the riff from the beginning of the song. It's incredible, almost certainly the greatest Iron Maiden song of all time as well as one of the greatest heavy metal songs ever. And with that structure, it's of course incredibly proggy.

More than just that, this song feels like an essential link in chronicling the connections between metal and prog. Literary nerds (or just students who have suffered through my 12th-grade English class) will recognize that this song is based on based on the 18th-century Samuel Taylor Coleridge poem of the same name. The poem itself is plenty epic and macabre, more than 600 lines of dark Romanticism wherein Nature is presented as this incomprehensibly large and frighteningly capricious force that tortures those human beings with the arrogance to assume they can tame it, a grisly piece of verse that feels like it was practically tailor-made to be turned into a metal song. People talk all the time about how the posture of prog is basically a space-age lens on Classical and Romantic ideas, but it's not nearly as widely noted that the aesthetics and attitudes of a lot of heavy metal themselves date back to that same period, building on the Gothic and dark-Romantic ideas that proliferated in the more troubled fringes of that same literary/musical movement of the 18th/19th centuries, which means that metal and prog don't just share common ancestry in the post-psych-rock boom of the late 1960s but they also share DNA originating over a century previous to that. The cool thing about a lot of the literary foundations of Iron Maiden's output but especially "Rime of the Ancient Mariner" is that they really highlight that shared DNA.

The effect of that shared DNA is that you can get something like Powerslave: definitively metal but in a way that also scratches that prog itch, too. As I've already pointed out, it's not as if there hadn't already been overlap with these two genres before, but the ways that a lot of '80s metal leans into that overlap feels simultaneously in the prog tradition but also genuinely new. In the most literal sense of the genre's title, what '80s metal does is actually "progressing" rock music, and the intertwining of metal and progressive rock would continue to yield fruit for years to come. Powerslave, while hardly the only album to do that, feels like an epitome of that kind of progress. Besides, it's just a great album regardless.

See you in 1985!


1] Though that said, "classic rock radio" is increasingly oriented around the '80s and '90s, which... well, I would say it gives me consternation, except that it doesn't really, because radio stations are just for waiting rooms now, right? (I love radio, but really).

2] Again, I'm simplifying heavily, and as with prog, there are still plenty of examples of commercially and artistically successful heavy metal artists during the late '70s—for example, Judas Priest, who would go on to have great success in the UK on either side of the punk watershed, as well as Rush on the other side of the Atlantic, who continued to thrive at the intersection of heavy metal, hard rock, prog, and (eventually) pop well into the '80s.

3] In their pre-Pyromania days, at least.

4] Though apparently the punks didn't take too kindly to metalheads showing up at their venues and vice-versa, so this mutual influence happened at the somewhat tense distance between their respective clubs and pubs.

5] I should probably also mention disco: not precisely "rock music" (as obnoxious rock fans have reminded us ever since) but certainly a part of that shifting music landscape by the end of the '70s. As far as I can tell, disco has no influence on Iron Maiden or most of the NWOBHM, though.

6] Making this one of the rare (and always satisfying) examples of an artist with a self-titled album with a self-titled song—as luck would have it, the only other metal band I've covered so far in this series, Black Sabbath, is also part of this club.

7] Which is a retelling of the book Dune, incidentally—not the first time a band in this series has found inspiration in Frank Herbert's work.

8] Noticeably missing (at least, I can't find any) from the list of influences of prog storytellers are the parts of the literary canon that have a reputation for being bawdy: Chaucer, Shakespeare, etc. I personally would love to get a 20-minute rock epic about "The Miller's Tale," with guitar solos and Mellotron and the works.

9] No I've never done this, why do you ask

Sunday, June 13, 2021

Mini Reviews for June 7 - 13, 2021

Sometimes I don't have anything to say here. This week is one of those times.

Movies

Saint Maud (2019)
A psychological horror movie about a recently converted woman purportedly receiving messages from God and going through all the wild, ecstatic medieval prophet experiences. I do love that this movie unironically appropriates a lot of church tradition into its characterization of this woman, and I'm positively elated that this movie reminds us that a lot of people in the first millennium who became saints claimed to get spontaneous orgasms from God—we need to bring back Weird Bodily Christianity. It's also a dialogue with/deconstruction of the idea that piety and suffering are linked, which is interesting, though I do think that the movie could have been more specific with her theology; mostly, the movie just focuses on her feeling guilty about sex (welcome to Christianity, baby) and struggling with silence from God (welcome to the human experience, baby), both of which are fine but kind of broad strokes for a movie about a literal prophet, and I guess I'm the nerd who would have liked for her to have had more space to give her whole manifesto on her beliefs. Also, I didn't think the horror elements added anything to this movie except a marketing angle. So I guess what I'm saying is that I wish this were just First Reformed with ecstatic visions. The way I'm talking about this movie makes it sound like I didn't like it, but I did! It's just the kind of good movie that's easy to imagine being a lot better, which is a nagging feeling to have in a movie. Grade: B

Land (2021)
Woman goes out to the wilds of Wyoming in a possibly self-destructive impulse to isolate herself in a quest to overcome personal tragedy. This movie feels awkwardly positioned between the meditative stillness of Kelly Reichardt and a more conventional grief-recovery drama in the vein of Wild or something like that. It doesn't fully commit to either mode, and as a result, the movie never truly excels at anything either, despite there being some good ideas batted around. I don't know if this makes sense outside of my head, but to me, this movie felt so self-conscious in second-guessing all of those ideas that it could never settle into anything all that interesting. Grade: C

 

Simon Killer (2012)
This definitely feels like a large step down from Afterschool as far as written/directed by Antonios Campos goes, in terms of both its thematic and aesthetic ambitions (neither of which feel as radical or prescient here as in that earlier movie, while also kind of re-treading some of the same ideas re: screens and white male psychology). But it's still a fairly engaging, bleak character analysis, where the slow revelation of the true rottenness of our protagonist's soul is almost as compelling as it is sickening. There are also some really sublime visual moments and needle drops that give me chilly echoes of Lynne Ramsay or Claire Denis—not exactly sure how to square that with this movie's narrative, but it's cool nonetheless. Grade: B

The Room (2003)
Tommy Wiseau is a legitimately riveting screen presence, and there is definitely something sui generis about his bizarre acting inflections and writing style. At this movie's best, there's something truly arresting and surreal about its idiosyncrasies. So I understand completely how this became such an object of fascination, though it seems like willful hyperbole to call this "the worst movie ever made" or even include it in those conversations. But everything else about the movie is either super boring or wildly misogynist, and the whole thing feels kind of sad and immature in a depressing way, so it was hard for me to completely buy into this as a wild laugh-fest either. So I dunno. Eh. The memes are still good, though. Grade: C

The Juniper Tree (1990)
A revisionist take on a Brothers Grimm story with a heavy Ingmar Bergman vibe—this movie is going to probably live and die for you based on how much either of those two things appeal to you. The original Brothers Grimm story is wickedly bizarre, and this version does a good job of making it a story with actual recognizable human beings, so I like that. And you know that I LOVE Ingmar Bergman. Also, this stars pre-Sugarcubes Björk, so it's not as if there was any chance of me not liking this movie at least a little bit. It's good, if a bit stiff in the way that a lot of Bergman imitators can sometimes be. Grade: B+

 

Roger & Me (1989)
I generally find Michael Moore insufferably smarmy and intellectually dishonest, and with this movie, he basically popularized my least-favorite kind of documentary, i.e. the personality-centric, ironic-music-cue-reliant activist doc. But the one thing Moore can usually be counted on is to give his best material when focused on his hometown of Flint, which this film is thoroughly, and the naked populist fury of Roger & Me is virtually unmatched in both Moore's career and the careers of his numerous imitators. You've got the usual Moore shenanigans here, like his mostly worthless "I must talk to GM CEO Roger Smith" quest and the fictitious chronology implied (e.g. acting as if the construction of AutoWorld was in response to GM factory closures despite plans for its construction predating them by at least a decade is dumb, and honestly a truly chronological documentary detailing the decades of public planning failure in Flint could probably have given a more compelling, sobering context to the GM closures), but the film's central issue is so narrow in scope that even these indulgent tangents tie in a lot better than similar gestures do in, say, Bowling for Columbine. Plus, the whole Flint/GM milieu is parochial enough that Moore is actually able to make this movie almost entirely original footage; a lot of later Moore docs rely heavily on already public footage, e.g. George W. Bush reading to school children during the 9/11 attacks, meaning that most of what Moore adds are his irritating self-insert antics, but here instead, while we do get those antics, they're intercut mostly with some truly searing footage taken by Moore's actual crew—genuinely chaotic and heartbreaking stuff like evictions on the one hand, and on the other hand, some absolutely outrageous "bread and circuses" behavior from the wealthy and powerful of Flint. On the latter, I think you'd probably have to go to The Act of Killing or Errol Morris's documentaries on McNamara and Rumsfeld to find a more stunning example of a documentarian allowing his subjects to tie their own nooses. In one scene, a bunch of rich people throw a literal Gatsby party and then, in full roaring twenties attire, talk to the camera about how their daughter got to do ballet so life in Flint isn't so bad and poor people need to stop complaining so much; in another, some other rich people have a party in a soon-to-be-opened prison complex during which the party-goers play-act as inmates and prison guards, joyfully swinging around clubs and sporting riot gear; in another, a GM lobbyist, imagining he is giving some grand rebuttal to Moore's inquiries, says that it's impossible for corporations to care for their workers' well-being under capitalism. Just some of the bleakest, most astounding examples of people unwittingly advocating against their own existence that I've ever seen. Grade: A-

Music

Mdou Moctar - Afrique Victime (2021)
Basically just Tuareg guitarist Mahamadou "Mdou Moctar" Souleymane absolutely shredding over 42 minutes of strongly rhythmic fusion music. A lot of "fusion" is basically just jazz and rock mixed, but in this case, it's Saharan folk mixed with American rock. I can't say that I know a lot about West African music, but on the basis of this record, I would like to learn more, because this rules. One of my favorites of the year. Grade: A-

Sunday, June 6, 2021

Mini Reviews for May 31 - June 6, 2021

Potty training sucks. Luckily, not all of the movies I watched this week do!

Movies

Nomadland (2020)
When I reviewed the other Cloé Zhao feature I've seen, The Rider, I wondered if that film would have been better as a pure documentary rather than the docu-fiction hybrid that we got. Nomadland basically confirms that I was right, being a movie that basically does take a documentary (a nonfiction book, actually—a book documentary, I guess) and smears a coating of narrative filmmaking over it, obscuring the most interesting material here, i.e. the stories of the actual "nomads" that get told. The Rider at least had a nonprofessional actor as the lead, which lent a kind of verisimilitude to the scripted parts. But having big-time Hollywood folks like Frances McDormand and (to a lesser extent, given he's not quite as much of a Movie Star) David Strathairn playing roles that try to make them fit in as they more or less parade through real nomadic encampments and scenes of actual abject poverty is so unbelievably distracting from whatever ostensible gritty realism that the documentary style is supposed to lend that I cannot imagine what the point of having them there is other than to indulge in poverty tourism. Being charitable and assuming that this wasn't just vanity on the part of McDormand and Zhao (who are both among the producers of this film), I'm going to just have to chalk this up to a bad miscalculation, one that, unfortunately, the movie never recovers from for me. A documentary would have preserved Zhao's impressive eye for landscapes and maybe would have also managed to find true compassion for the people it documents, since it would have no millionaire screen presences to get in the way of their lives. Maybe the movie would have even found some way to advocate for these people—something the movie as-is bizarrely sidesteps as it imbues the lives of people who have been destroyed by global capitalism and specifically the 2008 housing crisis with a rugged, apolitical romanticism. Grade: C

The Nest (2020)
The writer-director of Martha Marcy May Marlene (it's taken me all ten years since that movie's release to get that title right on the first try) returns with a movie that's far less mysterious and ominous and instead is just plain bracing. Basically, a charismatic huckster tries to bluster his way into business success in the deregulation gold rush of the '80s and in the process destroys his marriage. It very much feels like an arc of a lost Mad Men character updated for the Reagan/Thatcher era, and given that Mad Men is my favorite TV show of all time, that's not a slight. It does feel a lot more obvious than MMMM, though, so I doubt it will hold my imagination like that one did. But this is still a solid watch. Grade: B+

The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984)
I know this is a cult classic or whatever, but I guess I'm not part of the cult because I found this extremely tedious. It has all the pieces of an enjoyably weird movie (bizarre and dense mythology, camp, fun cast, etc.) but the execution is just so inert. My first exposure to this movie was actually years ago via the Scott Adams/Adventure International text-adventure tie-in game, and that game sucked, too, so maybe I should have heeded the warning. Grade: C-

 

 

 

Body Double (1984)
"Vertigo + Rear Window, but make it explicitly about pornography this time!" is a premise that seems almost certainly taken from Hitchcock's own fantasies, so it's hard to fault De Palma for making a movie that so, uh, nakedly rips off Hitchcock (though it is probably the most shameless Hitch rip-off that I've seen from De Palma). That said, outside the meta games with film history/Hollywood, I'm not 100% sure this movie has much going on under all of its very potent Freudian signifiers. That's not a huge concern when it's as fast-paced and energetic as it is, but still, I kinda wish there were meat on the bones of this movie that didn't immediately turn into self-reflexive post-modern circles. Credit where it's due, though: that self-reflexivity gives us the best moment in the film, i.e. the credits sequence where we see a more or less documentary-like depiction of the filming of a nude scene—as much as Hollywood likes to make movies about Hollywood, I've never seen a scene like that one before, and it's mesmerizing. Grade: B

Piranha (1978)
A neat intersection of the sensibilities of Roger Corman, Joe Dante, and John Sayles, in almost equal measures. You've got the cheapo gore and nudity from Corman; the smirking, sadistic games from Dante; the working-class protagonists and political anger from Sayles. It's not, like, the best '70s movie about killer aquatic life, of course, but it's way better than a Jaws cash-in made for like $3 has any right to be. Grade: B

 

 

 

if.... (1968)
Absolutely gonzo British New Wave cinema—a satire of the hegemonic postwar Western order, embodied by an insular prep school. Malcolm McDowell is lightning onscreen, and the direction feel alternatingly charmingly shaggy and hard-nosedly experimental in the way that a lot of New Wave cinema (regardless of country) tends to be. It also feels unusually perceptive of this movie to, in 1968, basically call out the white counterculture as largely being motivated by a combination of fetishization/appropriation of nonwhite revolutionaries (Che and Mao posters are prominently displayed in dorms, of course) and reactionary impulses that happened to briefly align with progressive causes. The meaning of the ending (*spoilers*: a school shooting, albeit one cloaked in allegorical touches like an actual military being there to oppose the shooters) has perhaps drifted away from the original intent of the filmmakers in the decades since, at least for this American viewer, given the prevalence of actual school shootings in this country, but I can at least still respect the vision here. Grade: A-