Sunday, August 28, 2022

Mini Reviews for August 22 - 28, 2022

Got nothing to say up here. Move on to the reviews.

Movies

Men (2022)
I think people are being a little hyperbolic about how bad this is; the sound design/music is terrific, and there are enough arresting images to suggest that if the movie had just gone complete avant-garde waking nightmare, it could have been special. But regardless, this still isn't good, mostly because, as those hyperbolic pans have explicated, the movie is insistent on being about a central metaphor that is by turns convoluted and just not very interesting. When I was taking creative writing classes, almost every professor I ever had told the class that, unless you have something truly special to say, you should never to write any story in which the main character is a writer because it had been done to death. Perhaps screenwriters should institute such a guideline regarding screenplays that are "about trauma when you really think about it," because the well is quickly running dry. Grade: C

Déjà Vu (2006)
Great fun and a great example of auteurism in the original sense, i.e. a director leaving a personal stamp despite the formulaic restrictions of the studio system. It's not hard to imagine a more robust sci-fi blockbuster interrogation of institutional failure in the Bush administration (it already kind of exists, and it's called Minority Report), which is 100% what this is for maybe an hour before it gets wrenched back toward convention. But 1) Tony Scott is super good at those conventions, and 2) the questions and pathos of the opening hour are strong enough that they haunt the rest of the film regardless, even as it starts to become recognizably Bruckheimerian. Denzel is of course incredibly watchable, and despite Scott's considerable talents, I'm not sure this would work half so well without our man in the lead. Grade: A-

The Mind's Eye (1990)
Surprisingly rad. I wouldn't have pegged myself as a "vaporwave Koyaanisqatsi" guy, but here I am. I gotta watch the rest of these. Grade: B+

 

 

 

 

 

Crimewave (1985)
I'm usually very onboard with movies that are really committing to the live-action cartoon bit, and that's exactly what this movie is doing, structuring setpieces as if they were Looney Tunes shorts and stitching them together into a 90-ish minute montage that purports to be a crime thriller. But I sure was not onboard with this. Any individual bit would probably work well enough on its own, but taken as a whole, it's just tedious and nonsensical in a way that feels counterproductive after a while. And so much shouting. So much. I want to believe there's a good Sam-Raimi-directed, Coen-brothers-scripted slapstick comedy to be made, because that sounds like a peanut-butter-and-chocolate situation to me (imagine Raimi directing Burn After Reading!), but sadly, I think we're well past the point in either of those parties' careers where that's a realistic possibility anymore. Grade: C

 

Desperate Living (1977)
Wild and at times wildly incoherent, even for John Waters, and the surreal fantasy of this film makes his other films feel like gritty realism. I've seen a lot of Salò, and maybe I'd make that comparison, too, if I'd seen that movie. To me, this feels like Waters's take on Fellini, if Fellini had a more rigorous political conscience. I don't think any other Waters movie I've seen has more contempt for the ruling class and bourgeois norms, which is really saying something. I'm unsure how to feel about this movie's relationship with sex and gender, but the good thing about John Waters movies is that they are more self-evident forces of nature than they are fodder for takes, so I guess I'll just duck that issue. Also, the ending is incredible. Truly made me want to stand up and cheer. Grade: B

 

Rabid (1977)
Some real hair-brained logic here from Cronenberg: a plastic surgery mishap gives someone a vaginal cavity in their armpit, and inside the cavity is a thing that bites people, and this creates a zombie apocalypse. I might have enjoyed this a little more if it were more phantasmagorical, a la an Italian movie from the same time period, but early Cronenberg is unrelentingly beige, which gives the film a weirdly dry quality for as nutso as it is. Still, there are some good sequences and a terrific ending. Grade: B-

Sunday, August 21, 2022

Mini Reviews for August 15 - 21, 2022

In case you aren't following The Newbery Chronicles elsewhere, I just wanted to mention here that the podcast my wife and I are doing has a new episode! You can listen to it here.

Movies

DC League of Super-Pets (2022)
Pretty awful for a variety of reasons:
-That full title
-Really forced Lord-and-Miller-esque humor (Lord and Miller themselves are usually pulling it off by the seat of their pants, and this is a great example of what happens when it's not them and not good)
-Tedious comic book references
-A surprisingly dull Marc Maron vocal performance (surprising after his surprisingly good vocal performance in The Bad Guys just earlier this year)
-Cloying, unearned sentimentality (the movie begins with a tear-jerking destruction of Krypton for some misbegotten reason)
-A Chekhov's gun device that promises early in the movie that Superdog will poop out a piece of kryptonite, only to resolve itself off-screen and completely without fanfare (not sure what's worse: the fact that the movie forced me to look forward to Superdog pooping, or that all we get is a post-hoc "oh, I guess I pooped already, trust me, let's go").

Regardless, this was something of a rite of passage for me, as it's the first movie I've gone to solely because I knew my son would love it, even though I was fairly confident beforehand that I would hate it. A real bummer that the first weekend I've been able to take him to a movie since Encanto has nothing for kids but this playing. My son did indeed have a great time, so I guess I'm just taking one for the team here. He watches PBS Kids and My Neighbor Totoro at home, so here's hoping that this unexpectedly ribald feature isn't going to send him down a dark path. Grade: C-

Prey (2022)
This was pretty good, and of the three Predator movies I've seen, it's almost as good as the first one and significantly better than the second. The setting in 18th-century Comanche territory is a terrific touch, and I'm 100% with the memes calling for Predator sequels in other historic time periods. That said, this movie looks terrible, and I'm not sure who to blame; the shot compositions are fine, but something is very wrong with the lighting, which makes everything looks washed out in the daylight scenes and nearly incomprehensible in the nighttime scenes. Whatever has happened to night photography in the streaming era needs to stop, because this is such a widespread problem. Grade: B-

 

Of Time and the City (2008)
A frequently gorgeous, thoroughly bitter little essay film. Terence Davies hates Liverpool as only someone who knows a place intimately can, and the same goes for his clear affection for a certain version of the place. I know nothing about Liverpool, but like so many Davies movies, watching this dreamy, aesthetic object makes me feel as if I've been dipped in the consciousness of someone who does. Very much feels like the documentary corollary to The Long Day Closes, both in terms of how it looks as well as its slippery approach to the poetry of memory. Grade: A-

 


Topical Malady (สัตว์ประหลาด) (2004)
The bifurcated structure of this film really is one of the great rug-pulls in recent(ish) cinema history, especially if you're used to the typically languid pace of later Apichatpong Weerasethakul features. I spent the first half of this, which is a lovely, poignant love story, charmed but somewhat perplexed at the uncharacteristically straightforward and (relatively) conventional plot. But then after about 50 minutes we get a black screen, and BAM, we're neck-deep in the cosmic viscosity of one of film's greatest mystics, who is ready to crack your head wide open. That back half also simultaneously defamiliarizes the first half, recontextualizing it as the first act in a story about a longing that exists on the scale of myth. With apologies to an otherwise entirely unrelated author, every love story truly is a ghost story, and I've rarely seen a movie so thoroughly and mysteriously epitomize that. Grade: A-

Lilya 4-ever (Lilja 4-ever) (2002)
I'm not usually a "what's the point?" guy with movies, but man, what's the point of this other than misery? In the early goings, this is a fairly poignant portrayal of a girl on the margins of a crumbling post-Soviet society, and per usual, Lukas Moodysson has a good facility with young performers and the ping-ponging between reckless effervescence and the crushing realities of being young. But once the downward spiral starts, it's just so, so punishingly bleak with little to offer other than some vague sense of the world being a cruel place for young people, esp. young girls, and yeah, sure, but that's such a surface-level idea that I feel like I either must be missing something or Moodysson is just flush with the palpable sense of despair that suffuses the back half of the film. It's not even aesthetically interesting, save for a horrific montage of POV shots at one point. I dunno, I'm probably missing something here, because Moodysson usually seems better than this. Grade: C

 

Television

Better Call Saul, Season 6 (2022)
BCS has done an admirable job thus far at not positioning itself in relationship to Breaking Bad, but it's unavoidable as the show comes to a close, not just because of how it must connect the dots between the events of the show to the immediate before-and-after context of Breaking Bad but also because this show's final season ends with a structure that conspicuously mirrors the end of its predecessor. Both shows had final seasons broken in half by a hiatus, both present their protagonists as amoral shells of themselves where the primary question is not the fate of the protagonist but instead whether or not their more sympathetic partner will escape with their soul/life intact, both conclude with the protagonists doing something faintly noble that allows them to accept the consequences of their actions on their own terms. But Better Call Saul has long been the more ambitious show of the two, which makes its conclusion far more fascinating than Breaking Bad's. In terms of the "prequel" story that has occupied the lion's share of this show, it basically wraps up a few episodes after the hiatus with an incident of collateral damage so cataclysmic that it more or less shatters all of the existing dynamics of the series, which means that a large portion of this final season gets devoted to the black-and-white, post-Breaking-Bad Omaha storyline, which serves as both an epilogue to the Saul Goodman saga but also to Breaking Bad; it's in this section that we see that Saul and Kim have more or less "gotten away with it," improbably managing to slough off their old identities as scamming lawyers and put on a duller yet safer existence in anonymity in, respectively, Nebraska and Florida. Whereas the early seasons of BCS emphasized the precarity of Jimmy's life as his attempts at legitimacy were forever frustrated, the Omaha episodes show a man who has, like a cockroach, survived improbable peril and thus has convinced himself of his own invincibility; Kim, on the other hand, lives with crushing guilt at the idea of her survival. What this dichotomy eventually becomes is a climactic interrogation of the ultimate question of human relationships; the BCS/BB universe is preoccupied with power and its monstrous effects, but by setting a third of its final season after the events of Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul is able to wrestle with something that its more breakneck forebear never had time to more than gesture toward: given that we live in a harsh world built upon corrosive power dynamics, what do we owe one another? It's kind of the "so what?" of the entire universe of these two series, and a perfect send-off to the world I've spent the last decade-plus inside. Grade: A

The Rehearsal, Season 1 (2022)
One of the wildest, most unpredictable seasons of television I've ever seen. What initially begins as a kooky but fairly straightforward follow-up to Nathan For You (in this case, Nathan Fielder offers the "service" of allowing people to rehearse difficult life situations before they happen) rapidly morphs into something far stranger. It's tough to describe, both because of how ridiculously elaborate and complex it becomes but also because half of the experience of the show is watching it transform on an episode-by-episode basis as new layers and complications are added to Nathan's concept of "rehearsal," but suffice to say, by the end The Rehearsal is a knotty interrogation of authenticity and control. How does one truly know another person? How can any of our social interactions be genuine when we are often enigmas to each other and ourselves? How can we make informed decisions in our lives when the world is such a chaotic, uncontrollable place? Can any of this even be ethically explored within the artifice of a TV show, even one that purports to be a "reality" show? Improbably, The Rehearsal is able to engage these questions in a way that is pretty rigorous and intense while also being hysterically funny for the majority of its runtime. Utterly deranged, compelling TV. I have no idea how there could be a second season of this, but apparently they're going to try, and I'll be there for it. Grade: A

Sunday, August 14, 2022

Mini Reviews for August 1 - 14, 2022

Sorry for missing last week! Be sure to check out the next episode of the podcast my wife and I are doing if you're interested!

Movies

Crimes of the Future (2022)
Cronenberg's back, baby, and I really dig how this time, he's just kinda riffing on the aesthetic possibilities of finding and then transcending the limitations of the human form. It's less "body horror" than it is "body avant-garde," which is interesting and cool. Of course, this being Cronenberg, who is as invested in exploring the tiers of power within hyperreal society as he is in exploring the vanguard of good taste, the movie is also a pretty fascinating what-if about what the politics of power would look like in a world in which radical politics and radical artistic statements simultaneously find their future in the human body. It's also a pretty funny movie. There's this whole long sequence in which we watch this dude who has surgically covered himself with ears dance around, and I was like, "Whoa, that's pretty cool," and then Viggo Mortensen shows up and is like, "Wow, this dude is such a poser," which made me laugh pretty hard—ya got me, Dave. Grade: A-

The Outfit (2022)
There's not really a ton going on here under the hood, and the plot twists are fairly obvious. But Mark Rylance is good in his role as a cutter whose store is being used as a meeting location by the mob, and this is an entertaining-enough one-room crime thriller that I feel like there are probably some people out there who will get a kick out of it. Plus, there is some nice footage of tailoring. Grade: B-

 

 

 

Felidae (1994)
I watched that anthology called Cartoon Noir a little while back, but honestly this is the movie that should have had that title. A truly nasty bit of nihilistic film noir, only it's cats, and they're animated. The plot feels like it's stuck in fast-forward, and it probably leans a little too hard into its penchant for edgy violence (this is really violent—like, viscera and stuff). But it also doesn't necessarily feel like it's trying to impress anyone either, like so much of adult-oriented animation tends to feel. It's just what it is, and if you're at all into that, then this is for you. All others: probably best to stay away, because again, it's gruesome. Grade: B+

 

 

Predator (1987)
The "slasher, but make it a meathead hard-bodies commando movie" conceit is a lot of fun, and once we get to the "final girl" sequence with Arnie that occupies somewhere around the last 30 minutes of the movie, it becomes top-tier great. I really didn't have a ton of patience for the setup, though, where it takes forever to introduce exactly two very obvious things: 1) the CIA set these guys up, and 2) there are some really annoying guys in this group who are going to get got first. I guess the moral is that if you're going to make a slasher movie, you better give it a slasher-movie efficiency, even if you're going through the motions of another genre. Still, good times to be had once this finally gets rolling. Grade: B

 

Predator 2 (1990)
I was briefly amused by the extremely cartoony (and extremely reactionary) depiction of 1997 Los Angeles as a war-torn hellscape where Jamaican "Voodoo" kings preside over militarized street gangs, but once this settles into basically a cop thriller, this is punishingly dull. I like the idea of a franchise choosing a new genre to riff on in each sequel, but the thing about that is that you've got to actually make a good riff on the genre you pick. Danny Glover is pretty cool, though. Grade: C-

 

 

 

Pickup on South Street (1953)
A really mean, lean noir that somehow has a happy ending? Weird choice. I was very keyed into this movie, especially Thelma Ritter's character, but it loses some verve once she exits, and I don't know how I feel about the whole project. But it has some very good details. I can't believe how incredible it is that there's a character in here named Skip McCoy, and he's a professional pickpocket. If there's an American counterpart to Dickensian naming traditions, that's an example of it, for sure. Grade: B

 

 

Othello (1951)
I haven't read/seen performed the Shakespeare play in at least ten years, which makes this a weird watch. I remember enough to know that Welles isn't quite doing a traditional take on the material, despite staying true to the fundamental structure, but I also don't have whole scenes practically memorized in the way that I do of, for example, Macbeth or Hamlet or Romeo and Juliet, so it's hard for me to pinpoint the finer details of how Welles is shaping the source material. Regardless, I don't really think Welles did the right thing casting himself in the titular role; he's just not right for the role, and his archly pompous screen presence never feels more than an affect (I saw someone say that he should have played Iago, which I think would substantially improve this movie). Anyway, aesthetically this looks pretty cool: all shadowy and tense, and there are some genuinely freaky moments, like when he smothers Desdemona. But compared to his Macbeth, this feels stylistically tame. I know that former film was made to look the way it was out of necessity, but it looked incredible and unlike any other Macbeth film, whereas this is just a slightly more stylized version of the kind of movie anyone would make. Maybe I would feel differently if I had a stronger memory of the play. Grade: B-

 

Books

Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes (1615)
It's become something of a personal tradition to read some canonical doorstop novel over summer vacation, and I have to admit, in the few years I've been doing this, Don Quixote is probably my least-favorite among the ones I've read. That's not to say it's not good—who am I to come along after 400 years of acclaim to say that no, Don Quixote is bad, actually? No, I think this is more a Me Problem. There are long stretches of this book (at least 60%-70%) that I found uproariously funny, or at least amusing, and as with the case with books this old and this revered, it's way bawdier and scatological than its reputation usually indicates, which I'm 100% in favor of. I also thought the meta games were fun: the whole second part (published a decade after the first part) involves Don Quixote and Sancho being aware of not only the first volume of Cervantes's novel but also of the fraudulent sequel written by Alonso Fernández de Avellaneda in the interim between the Cervantes volumes, which is great fun and also surprisingly philosophical about the nature of storytelling. But the rest of the book I found not nearly as engaging (it's probably just the nature of reading a nearly 1000-page book, but as I got closer and closer to the end, I got less and less patient with the constant digressions that seemingly had little to do with Don Quixote or Sancho), and some of it I've got to admit that I just didn't get. I say this is a Me Problem because, as people are probably aware, Don Quixote is satire of/commentary on medieval romances, which is not a genre I'm particularly familiar with outside of the basic ideas about chivalry that everyone probably knows, so I'm not approaching this book with the knowledge that it assumes in its readers; I'm curious what I would have gotten out of some of these allegedly boring sequences if I were more well-versed in the conventions of the genre. At any rate, I was into enough of this to enjoy my time with the book overall, but I can't help but feel that I should have studied a little to get a richer experience with it. Grade: B

Sunday, August 7, 2022

No Reviews Post This Week

Hi everyone! I've been swamped this week with back-to-school stuff, so I don't have enough things to write about to make a whole post worthwhile. I'll hopefully be able to make a post next week.

In the meantime, my wife and I have published our next episode of The Newbery Chronicles, our podcast where we discuss every book to win a Newbery Medal. You can listen to it here if you're interested

Until next week!