Sunday, December 25, 2016

Mini-Reviews for December 19 - 25, 2016

Merry Christmas! Let's talk about movies and stuff!

Movies

Moana (2016)
The usual issues with modern Disney features persist here, from the rather plastic-y skin textures to the haphazard plottingthe latter especially rears its head here, as the existential threat to Moana's homeland is basically ignored for the duration of the second and third acts, making for a movie of confused stakes. But you know what? Moana is still really freaking good! It's the best Disney musical since Mulan, maybe even Aladdin"How Far I'll Go" has only "Let It Go" to contend with for the best Disney song of the past decade, and the rest of the songs (and yes, unlike Frozen, there are actually lots of songs!) are no slouch either. It's even got a song where Jemaine Clement reprises his Flight of the Conchords David Bowie role, only this time as a crab, and if that doesn't get you pumped, there's not a lot I can say for you. Animation-wise, Disney CG has never looked better, from the phenomenal water animation (you know Disney's on its game when it even beats out Pixar in technical wondersorry Finding Dory) to the ingenious integration of 2D hand-drawn with computer-rendered 3D. Plus, as much as I was out-thinking the movie up at the top of this review, Disney films are always more of heart-over-head endeavors, and on that metric, Moana delivers in spades. I'll be darned if I wasn't majorly verklempt by the reprise of "How Far I'll Go." This is a feeling that's been percolating in me for a while now, but after this year and especially after Moana, it's solidified: Disney has surpassed Pixar as the American animation studio whose features I look forward to most each year. Grade: A-

Florence Foster Jenkins (2016)
It's a solid biopic with an appropriately hammy Meryl Streep performance, and a big part of the biopic's solidity has to do with the nice tightrope that performance walks. Streep's acting these days tends to suck all the air out of the room, but that's kind of a function of her character here, a singer whose skills (or lack thereof) are no match for her ambitions as an opera hall star. Knowing nothing of the real-life basis for this movie,  I can't weigh in on how well Streep's character fits the specifics of this woman's legacy. But with Ms. Jenkins, the movie character, Streep has found a role uniquely suited to her late-career acting tics, and that's pretty cool. Grade: B+


I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House (2016)
A horror movie with scares of the arthouse variety, not ones that jump out and say "Boo!" but instead ones that walk up softly behind you and ask you how your day was in a low whisper, and it only slowly dawns on you that they have forked tongues or something. All of which is to say that I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House will not make you jump, but it might make your skin crawl just a bit. Only a bitthis thing's pretty slow, and while generously crafted, maybe a bit too mannered for its own good. Grade: B




Sunset Song (2015)
Every inch of this film is gorgeousit's a painterly, languishingly detailed depiction of rural Scotland that by sheer visual weight alone justifies the occasional note of nostalgia. That, and the movie is also really well-acted. The plot itself isn't handled quite as deftly, and this piece is really, really obviously an adaptation of a novel, what with the copious voiceover and artistic jumps in timethe whole thing is just so literary, which is fine if your story is, you know, a work of literature, but as a piece of cinema, it risks feeling just a bit airless at times. It doesn't help that its storycentering on the abuses, struggles, and quiet triumphs that its women facealready deals in archetypes to such an extent that it can be stiff. But I'm being overly negative here: this is a good movie with consistently great technical work, and if you're looking for a richly textured period piece, look no further. Grade: B+

Big Star: Nothing Can Hurt Me (2012)
As a tribute to one of the greatest cult bands in rock history, Nothing Can Hurt Me works well; it works just as well as a salute to the bygone years of Stax Records and the scrappy, blockbuster Memphis music scene of the '60s and '70s. The movie ambles through the Big Star chronology (including the post-breakup solo efforts of Alex Chilton and Chris Bell) with a little too much looseness to ever give the movie any sort of urgency, and as a piece of documentary filmmaking, it's not going to blow any minds as far as technical craft goes. It's just a solid and loving profile with some interesting Memphis talking heads thrown in, to boot. Grade: B



Books

Harry Potter and the Cursed Child by Jack Thorne (2016)
You know one Harry Potter device I've always disliked? The Time-Turner. You know what I've always disliked even more than the Time-Turner? The Deathly Hallows epilogue. So I suppose it's a triumph of sorts that a book whose premise is basically to stretch the epilogue to a feature-length story involving Time-Turners was able to get me to like it even a little. I do like this book. A little. The Time-Turner stuff isn't anything greatdon't get me wrong, I love a good time-travel/butterfly-effect story, but The Cursed Child isn't a good time-travel/butterfly-effect story; it's an average one in service of an even more average villain plot that sort of reminds me of how for a while, every Zelda game involved revealing that the game's villain was trying to resurrect Ganon. It's a tremendously unnecessary and undeserved story, but there's good here, too. For starters, while a lot of the returning cast (particularly poor Ron) gets flattened into their movie-version caricatures—and let us not speak of Ginny, who was never really anyone to begin withHarry himself is rendered wonderfully and unsentimentally as an adult; maybe I'm just mean, but I get immense satisfaction out of the fact that a canonical entry in the series has finally embraced that Harry Potter is a bit of a self-involved douchebag. Even better is the way the story approaches the issue of the Hogwarts houses, always one of the most thematically troubling of Rowling's inventions in the original series—young Albus Severus Potter does, as he fears, land in the Slytherin house, and the results are the first time outside of the character of Draco Malfoy (who also returns to great effect here) that the series has paid anything more than cursory lip service to the idea that the members of Slytherin aren't automatically unrepentant minions of evil. In fact, the play's generosity toward characters of all stripes is its biggest strength, and its update of the original series's theme of friendship as a restorative and even life-saving force is welcome. This is a story about the outcast and the lonely—the converse, of course, of friendship and belongingand in the play's best scene, Draco tells Harry that he envied Harry and his friends when they were students at Hogwarts. Harry, the play argues, will never truly understand the isolated misery that defines the lives of those (including his own son) he has scorned, and its this misery that drives people toward cruelty and darkness. It's a powerful idea and one that's considerably more morally sophisticated than most of what Rowling attempted in her novels. It's unfortunate that the play's not a better vehicle for these ideas, though—the recent Fantastic Beasts movie approaches some of these same themes with considerable more success as a story, which leaves The Cursed Child as the awkward, inferior Rowlingverse work of 2016. Cursed child indeed. Grade: B-

Music


Brian Eno - The Ship (2016)
At this point in his career, I'm not sure exactly what we're supposed to expect from a Brian Eno record, especially since I haven't listened to any of his post-'80s work. I know this much, though: The Ship is nice little rainy-afternoon album, with the spacious, ambient/electronic textures of its 21-plus-minute title track and 18-minute followup, "Fickle Sun (I)" taking a detour into spoken-word before arriving at a closing, cathartic cover of The Velvet Underground's "I'm Set Free." Even knowing nothing of Eno's career in the past 20 years, I suspect that nothing here is going to surprise fans. But the album's almost linear progression toward that point of catharsis shows a fantastic control of mood and pacing, and man, that "I'm Set Free" cover is super nice. Grade: B

Sunday, December 18, 2016

Mini-Reviews for December 12 - 18, 2016

Second-to-last reviews post of the year! Excitement!

Movies

Moonlight (2016)
The first narrative section of this movie's three isn't much different from what you've seen from other inner-city-set indies (or even TV's The Wire). No, where Moonlight's brilliance is to be found is in its two subsequent parts, which explore how human beings both change and remain static over time with a nuance and piercing insight that I've seldom seen (and of all things, Mad Men seems the closest corollary as far as how it handles human relationships over long periods of timeand honestly, the same goes for the dialogue, which walks a wonderful line between literary and achingly human). This is the story of Chiron: gay, African-American, projects-raisedthe movie smartly doesn't make any of those characteristics a central premise for the character (although he would be greatly changed were any of those things to be different), and what we're left to grapple with instead is the titanic beauty and pain of the human experience in general, and the way that those two (beauty and pain) can occur within the space of the same moment or drawn out over years. Don't miss this one. Grade: A

Into the Inferno (2016)
We've been lucky enough to have two Werner Herzog documentaries in 2016, and I don't want to spit on that. Both are good, engaging films, but I've got to give the edge to Lo and Behold over this one. Although both films are scattered, Lo and Behold makes this a feature of its structure, employing intentionally episodic section breaks, Into the Inferno just meanders forward without any clear structure to hang its scenes on. This movie feels fitfully too long and pointless, and that's unfortunate, considering that there are some tremendous, classic Herzog humans to be found here (a late-film fossil hunter that feels like a Jeff Goldblum character come to life is a particular highlight). And the footage of the magma flows is never less than awe-inspiring. That's less true of a detour into North Korea. Grade: B

Nostalgia for the Light (Nostalgia de la Luz) (2010)
A documentary that finds thematic connections between astronomy and the horrors within the Pinochet dictatorship should be a bit too far-reachingly literary for its own good. And Nostalgia for the Light probably is, honestly. That doesn't stop it from being an engaging watch, though, and its depiction of human grief and obsession is pretty great. Grade: B+






Lost Highway (1997)
The basic critical breakdown on Lost Highway seems to be that Lynch diehards regard it as a masterpiece, while everyone else just sort of dislikes it. I'm feeling in the middlethis is nowhere near Lynch's magnum opus, and while the filmmaking on display is certainly no slack, the overall effect is way more muddled than it should be (the soundtrack [usually a Lynch highlight] does the movie no favors, either, what with the abundance of mid-'90s hard rock screamers that, given my age, I'm in no position to decide whether have aged poorly or were simply no good to begin with). Also, let the record show that this is the first Lynch movie I've seen that I found genuinely troubling in its depiction of women, particularly one woman: Patricia Arquette, who, for the movie's primary female avatar, spends entirely too much time engaged in twisted coital scenarios and general femme fatalery. That said, Lynch movies are unparalleled in their ability to unsettle and bend standard noir plots toward the metaphysical, and this one does not disappoint on either of those counts. In fact, through a certain lens, Lost Highway feels like an early draft of Lynch's later actual masterpiece, Mulholland Drive, and the intertextual ideas between those two films are rich. They might be richer if this movie's execution were just a little tighter, though. Grade: B

Television

Adventure Time, Season 4 (2012)
Season 4's major innovation is the weaving of the previous season's loose collection of threads into a coherent (and even intermittently serialized) world. I'm mostly ambivalent on this forward momentum as a whole, because while it pays off wonderfully in this season, there's no denying that it also tames the show a bit, or at least has the potential toonce you give characters consistent motivations and ongoing arcs, the opportunities for the free-wheeling, adventurous absurdity that have been the show's bread-and-butter grow smaller, and the pieces available to sacrifice for whimsical shock diminish. Basically, we probably aren't going to be getting another episode like the one where Tree Trunks disappears with a *poof*/cut to credits. But as I said, the intensified focus on character development and mythology growth works like gangbusters in this season, and as a result, we're gifted with some mighty fine television indeed. The Princess Bubblegum-Finn-Fire Princess love triangle is sweetly mature; the season-ending multiverse cliffhanger is appropriately nail-biting; and the Ice King/Marceline-focused "I Remember You" is simply one of the most beautiful episodes of TV I've ever seen. In fact, don't mind my griping; this season's great. Grade: A-

Music

Maps Need Reading - Mapsynapse (2016)
Knoxville's burgeoning progressive rock scene is at the exciting phase where the groups who first expanded the scene with promising debut singles, EPs, and live shows are beginning to release full-lengths. White Stag had their long-ish EP Eos Crux earlier in 2016 (and, given their FB activity, looks to be on the brink of releasing something else in the near future), and now we have Maps Need Reading with their own LP. While White Stag seems to be carving out their sound in the prog metal tradition and Lines Taking Shape are doing their math-y King Crimson thing, Mapsynapse seems to position Maps Need Reading more along the lines of Steven Wilson's prog-revival sound: a mix of soft rock, folk, Pink Floyd atmospherics, and full-on laser-light-show guitar jams. The album is clearly a step forward for the band, and as a collection of proggy setpieces, it's accomplished and ambitious. That said, there's still quite a bit to tighten up as far as production and songwriting goes (Steven Wilson, let's not forget, is an absolute master mixer, and these guys are not Steven Wilson). So what this feels like is less a definitive statement than it is another stepping stone toward some later, greater work. And that's okay; historically, prog bands have taken several albums to fully bloom. Maps Need Reading is getting there. Grade: B

Sunday, December 11, 2016

Mini-Reviews for December 5 - 11, 2016

Here they are. Enjoy.

Movies

13th (2016)
13th, an activist documentary about the racism inherent in the prison system from Selma director Ava DuVernay, amplifies both the strengths and the weaknesses of the activist documentary format. As becomes abundantly clear in 13th's opening third, which sprints through a century of American history, documentary filmsparticularly this type of documentary filmaren't actually that good at argumentation in the traditional evidence-based ways that we might expect of a paper or a nonfiction book or even a well-researched newspaper feature; similar to most films of this type, 13th presents facts through a montage of talking heads that allude to broad trends without always pointing to specific pieces of evidence besides the mere credibility of these (often unnamed) talking heads. As such, I'm not sure how successful movies like this will ever be at "convincing," one of the ostensible purposes of activist journalism. For someone who is inclined to disagree with the film, it's far too easy to deconstruct the reality presented here, questioning implications, identifying generalizations, critiquing the lack of hard-enough evidence (very little evidence is ever hard enough if you want to argue with a point of view)believe me, I've done it plenty of times with docs I don't believe. This documentary will probably not change any minds except those already in the process of changing. I do believe this documentary, though; I strongly agree that the current prison system (and the society that feeds it) has gigantic systematic issues that disproportionately (and racistly) affect communities of color in America, and so my own reaction to the film was a powerful one. What 13th finds instead of persuasive weight is the true power of this sort of movie, which is the force of rhetoric coupled with montage as a way of bolstering the urgency of an issue. At its strongest, 13th presents a flurry of images and audio whose sheer emotional impact is hard to ignore. One particularly effective moment late in the movie cross-cuts between audio of Donald Trump political rallies (this movie is nothing if not of-the-moment) with nearly perfectly corresponding images and speeches from the Jim Crow South. That's the kind of power this movie wields, the kind of thing that no amount of logical and counterclaiming can allow you to ignore. If I've made this movie sound like propaganda, I've done it a disservice. As the movie itself points out, leveraging the impact of images (even images over whatever logic the opposition brings) is a long-standing tactic of civil rights activism, from abolition all the way to the contemporary world of caught-on-phones YouTube. Argumentation you can debate; images, you can't. 13th isn't interested in debate. Grade: B+

Hell or High Water (2016)
It should come as no surprise that one of the best screenplays of the year is, of course, anchored to one of the best films of the year. But that Hell or High Water finds fresh humanity in its musty archetypes is a bit more unexpected: Gil Birmingham's character's subtle body language at Jeff Bridges's character's carelessly racist humor, Chris Pine's character's talk with his son, the entire freaking ending following a shootout that make me literally gasp out loudthis movie's funny, moving, and smart, but it's these little touches that make it truly great. Somewhere, the Coen brothers are very proud. Grade: A



The Jungle Book (2016)
This is, without a doubt, a might good-looking movie, and what's more, and impressively good-looking one (famously, Neel Sethi's Mowgli is the only notable non-CGI presence in the film). The Jungle Book has a great eye for setting up the iconography of its narrative as something both playful and mythic, although the screenplay less sothe bigger (often darker) thematic concerns of the identity of mankind in nature makes odd bedfellows with the callbacks and straight-up quoting of the original 1967 Disney classic. Look, I love "The Bare Necessities" as much as everyone else, but did it really need to be recontextualized within this movie? The core is solid enough that Disney probably could have done without the barrage of nostalgia and ended up with a better movie. Grade: B

Knight of Cups (2015)
Knight of Cups represents the first significant step forward for Terrence Malick since his landmark The Tree of Life five years agogood thing, too, after the colossal bore that was 2013's To the Wonder. With this one, Malick finds new ways to render his pet tropesthe whispery voiceovers, lingering landscape shots, impressionistic editingby recontextualizing them within a bundle of new forms, both structural (the film's sections are both modeled after Pilgrim's Progress and the tarot deck) and aesthetic (this movie is the first notable use of digital cameras in Malick's filmography). Of course, visual beauty is something of a given in Malick's films, even To the Wonder, and the philosophical ponderousness, though probably structured more rigorously than in past Malick movies, isn't unprecedented either. But put together in this specific way, they feel fresh and vital, and I dig that. Those looking for the warmth of The Tree of Life are probably in for a disappointment, and if your noise wrinkled at the Pilgrim's Progress-cum-tarot premise up there, then you'll probably want to skip. But if you're in for a movie with enthralling visuals and a good deal of intellectual (if not emotional) meat, then check it out. Grade: B+

My Golden Days (Trois souvenirs de ma jeunesse) (2015)
My Golden Days is at least an interesting film, what with its genre switching (an extended sequence resembles a spy thriller, for example) within the larger teen romance genre. But as a romance, the film felt pretty unengaging to me, and the segmented structure that allows for that cool genre kaleidoscope also makes the movie feel ungainly and meandering, which is no fun. Also, it's worth noting that this movie is technically a prequel to 1996's My Sex Life... or How I Got into an Argument, a movie that I haven't seen and likely won't (not with that title). But perhaps I would have appreciated this one more if I'd seen the earlier one it's supposedly leading up to? Grade: B-


The Palm Beach Story (1942)
An utterly charming and frequently hilarious piece of screwball comedy that, if not quite up to its reputation as the genre's best, is so effortlessly entertaining that it really doesn't matter whatever reputational baggage it bringseven (especially) with an absolutely insane ending twist that throws the whole movie even further into farce. This is just really solid Classic Hollywood cinema, and I'm into it. Grade: A-






Music

Jenny Hval - Blood Bitch (2016)
Part dream pop, part noise, part feminist manifesto, part weird conceptual art project about menstruation and vampiresthis is a weird one. It's also a very good one. While not quite as great as Hval's release last year (Apocalypse, girl), Blood Bitch still delivers an album that's both captivating in its melodies and freaky enough in its lyrics and sonic left turns to give that captivation the hint of unease. Grade: B+

Sunday, December 4, 2016

Mini-Reviews for November 28 - December 4, 2016

Only got around to movies this week. Lots of B+ movies, too. That's alright, though.

Movies

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (2016)
Part of what makes the Harry Potter books (and, by extension, movies) so warm and lived-in is that they are about 50 percent just hanging out with characters, which allows J. K. Rowling the opportunity to craft hugely endearing characters to foreground the mystery/epic qualities of the rest of the narrative. Fantastic Beasts allows itself no such breathing room, so it's not surprising that the characterizations suffer. This movie moves, and that's both good in that there's never a dull moment and bad in that it serves to highlight Rowling's weaknesses. Rowling's tendency to write only two dimensional characters is offset in her novels by the sheer amounts of charm she can bestow on them, but without the extended hangouts that lengthy novels allow, we're left with a stable of skilled and charismatic actors fleshing out what are otherwise thin people. That's the bad. The good is pretty much everything else. The movie is a marvel of the densely inventive world-building that made Hogwarts such a rewarding setting; the creature designs are appropriately fantastic and allow Rowling a great opportunity to imbue a rather dark story with some of her keen humor; the story is nuanced in a way that Harry Potter rarely was, even giving the prospective archvillain Grindelwald a coherent motivation beneath his evil schemes that feels much more human than Voldemort's "I'm evil, deal with it"; the plot's central metaphor of oppression, while obvious, is enormously affecting; and as much as I spent the first half of this review complaining about the characters, I'll be jiggered if the film doesn't still manage to find emotional resonance in every one of them, which I suppose sort of renders limp a lot of my earlier gripes about characterization. I suspect the few other minor gripes I have will strike fans as ineffectual, toothe seeds for the sequels feel a bit useless in this movie, for example, and I would have appreciated a sharper visual flair outside of the admittedly excellent creature designs. But on the whole, this is a promising and effective start to what looks to be a vital addition to the Potter franchise. Grade: B+

Love & Friendship (2016)
There have been good Jane Austen movies in the past, but Love & Friendship is the first I've seen since Clueless to have captured that precise combination of affection and bite that makes Austen so readable. It's of course laugh-out-loud funny (an extended sequence involving a misunderstanding of the number of Biblical Commandments [i.e. not ten] stands out) and in turns a vicious indictment of England's fatuous leisure class. But there's also genuine warmth within that indictment, and these characters, though we're asked to laugh at them mercilessly, are also ones you grow rather fond of. It's a trick that Austen managed in each of her novels, but it's one that's been much rarely achieved in film adaptations. As always, Jane Austen's plotting-by-summary makes for a slightly awkward transition into motion picture (as large chunks of exposition are grafted into the speech of the characters)even a writer as talented as Whit Stillman hasn't found a way around that one. On the whole, though, it's a joy of a movie likely to please Austen fans for years. Grade: B+

Lights Out (2016)
Based on an elegant premise first debuted in a 2013 short of the same name (a monster that can only attack in the dark), Lights Out is a formal wonder. Its plot's emphasis on darkness gives the film an phenomenal attention to detail in both lighting and shot composition, as we viewers hunt for any little corner of the frame that may contain darkness and hence the monster. It's the most effective horror device I've seen since It Follows, and the movie is pretty much guaranteed a legendary status because of it. There's also subtext aplenty, though, and while I normally welcome some good old-fashioned subtext in horror (this one's very unsubtly about clinical depression), Lights Out takes this subtext to a frighteningly dark place that is exactly what the modern, social-justice use of the word "problematic" was created for. So that that as you will. Grade: B+

The Garden of Words (言の葉の庭) (2013)
Some of the most drop-dead gorgeous animation I've ever seen is somewhat wasted bringing to life a dull (and, frankly, uncomfortable) plot. But at only 46 minutes, it's really not much plot to endure as the price for basking in that stunning animation. Grade: B







That Touch of Mink (1962)
Did you know that women are too weak to withstand the magnetic attraction of cold, hard cash? Did you know that menespecially the men with the cold, hard cashmust rush in to save women from their weakness? Learn these facts and many more in the timelessly regressive That Touch of Mink. The most joyless Cary Grant performance I've ever seen anchors a slightly less joyless Doris Day for a solid 99 minutes of few laughs. I'll give it this much: the climactic chase sequence is pretty funny. Outside of that, though, it's not so great. Grade: C




Stagecoach (1939)
I'm a sucker for ensemble movies in which the ensemble becomes an ad hoc family, and Stagecoach is a great one in that regard. The sheer warmth with which these characters are drawn is marvelous, and by the end, when these people start looking out for each other, the unironic optimism in human nature on display is, after decades of cynical revisionist westerns, a welcome reminder of the reasons general audiences fell in love with westerns to begin with. Grade: A-

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Mini-Reviews for November 21 - November 27, 2016

I'm thankful for the arts.

Movies

The Edge of Seventeen (2016)
If it's hyperbolic to declare The Edge of Seventeen one of the best coming-of-age films of all time (maybe I should wait to come off the theatrical high before getting too superlative), there's no doubt that it's at least one of the best coming-of-age films of the new millennium and definitely one of the best movies, period, of 2016. Anchored by the phenomenally entertaining and layered performance of Hailee Steinfeld (remember how good she was in True Grit? Would you believe she's even better here?), the movie is the rare youth-centric one that doesn't shy away from complex emotional territory that doesn't fit within the usual teen tropes or veer toward easy resolution. The Edge of Seventeen brings each one of its charactersbut particularly the principal trio of Steinfeld's Nadine, her brother, and her motherto gasping, bleeding life. The phenomenally sharp writing of Kelly Fremon Craig's screenplay gives these characters both tenderness and bite, sketching them out with an eye observant enough to create humans hard to like but difficult not to love. I really can't stress this enough: The Edge of Seventeen is vital. It's funny. It's nuanced. It's brave enough to look adolescence in the eye and see the selfish, scared, wounded person looking backnot the convenient type of scared presented in teen melodramas, but the real, claustrophobic, utterly isolating panic that can only come from the dread of having to live the rest of your life with yourself. Grade: A

Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016)
The fact that I merely liked Taika Waititi's vampire comedy What We Do in the Shadows puts me kind of in the minority among people of my film-going persuasion, who tend to love it relentlessly. My liking this movie on about the same level as Shadows probably does the opposite for me within that same crowd, but oh well. It's a film that manages to find fresh energy and heart in a thoroughly "mid-2000s indie-land" premise, largely due to the excellent (and hilarious) dialogue and cracker-jack editingexposing, if anything, that the reason those indie tropes became musty to begin with had way more to do with a general passivity in filmmaking than anything with the tropes themselves. Long story short, Wilderpeople's good and, to boot, has the funniest boar disembowelment in cinema history. Grade: B+

The Roost (2005)
By my money, Ti West is one of the best working horror directors out there these days. The Roost is nowhere near his best, in large part due to the general looseness of the screenplaya disappointment, since sharp dialogue and pacing tend to be givens in a Ti West feature. However, it's not all a wash; in fact, I give the movie huge props for just how meticulously and convincingly it recreates the atmosphere and aesthetic of '70s/'80s drive-in horror. The movie isn't great, but its look is. Grade: B




Quiz Show (1994)
Turning the Twenty One quiz show scandal into a searing inquisition into the nature of TVand, relevant even now (especially now), the role of truth in a medium that most often styles itself as entertainmentmust have been relatively easy. Have you read up on the Twenty One quiz show scandal? The themes pretty much develop themselves! Turning it into television's All the President's Men must have been a bit harder, though, because All the President's Men is a fantastic movie. Luckily, so is this one. Grade: A-




Television

You're the Worst, Season 3 (2016)
As a character study (and intermittently, that is exactly what You're the Worst wants to be), it's barely successful; each character has his or her own voice that remains relatively consistent, but the success of the growth of those characters remains frustratingly scattershot. Character moments that pierce deep (Edgar in particular gets a series-best episode focusing on his PTSD) are followed up with either indifference or absurdity (the PTSD thread becomes considerably frayed by the season's end). And that's just with the characters who work—the less said about the maelstrom of incoherence that is Lindsay, the better. So yeah. Character stuff: about the same as always. As a straightforward laughs-per-minute comedy, though, You're the Worst has never been better. The dialogue is as live-wire and audacious as it's ever been, and an increased attention to episode structure leads to some fantastic half-hour-comedy construction. So I guess ask yourself what you want out of the show: plot-wise, character-wise, it's a mess. Laugh-wise, though: top-notch. Grade: B

Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life (2016)
Let's make this clear up front: Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life does, for the most part, a way better job at evoking the tone, texture, and emotional resonance of its original series than any ten-years-later revival of a beloved TV show can ever fairly be expected to do. Lorelei and Rory gab and quip, Luke grumbles and wears a backwards baseball cap, Emily snipes and steals your heart, Kirk engages in half-baked hijinks, and Stars Hollow is as lovably off-beat as ever. That the particular version of all of these things bears a closer resemblance to the later, pricklier seasons of the original Gilmore Girls run than it does the quieter early years, though, is the first in a litany of caveats that must come up when recommending this to series faithfuls. Some of this is good: the fourth, fifth, and sixth seasons of the original series (let us never mention what came after) showed showrunner Amy Sherman-Palladino diving into more complex emotional territory that enriched the characters and helped the show tackle subjects with more nuance than it sometimes could in those earlier seasons, and that nuance and fearless thorniness remains in this revival. Case in point: Emily Gilmore, the stealth best character of the original series and the one who benefits most from the later seasons' less cuddly approach, again gets the best material here. The strongest emotional through-line here is the way the show writes the passing of Edward Herrmann into the narrative—Richard Gilmore has died as well, and a good chunk of A Year in the Life involves the family's grieving, of which Emily takes front and center. It's beautifully done and some of the best work the show has done, ever. Of course, a lot of the later seasons' nuance turned to frustration and soapy twists that undercut a lot of the show's charmthe development of Rory into someone who has been so validated early in life that she has a difficult time coping with freedom and failure in the adult world remains both one of the smartest and one of the most unpleasant characterizations the show ever managed, and *sigh* that's here, too, and all that brings (the Huntzbergers, the Life & Death Brigade, questionable sexual choices). As before, it's both intelligently rendered and entirely irritating. All of this is in the realm of plot and character, which is to say nothing of the actual form the show takes, which is sort of a debacle. The dividing of the season into four 90-minute "episodes" that each span a single season of the year seems like it opens the door for some interesting structural experimentation. But the problem with 90-minute episodes is that that's basically movie-length, which wouldn't be an issue except that Gilmore Girls seems paralyzed by the prospect of structuring its episodes like movies, resulting in a half-committed attempt to stretch typical 45-minute episode fodder out double-length while otherwise trying to cover several episodes' worth of narrative. The results are a sputtering lack of momentum over the character arcs, the freedom to indulge in overlong dialogue interchanges and bizarre one-off sequences (a lengthy Moulin Rouge-esque musical montage with the ever repugnant Life & Death Brigade is among the series' low points), and a season that feels at once too long and too short. Kind of like this review. Grade: B

Books

The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton (1905)
While The Age of Innocence remains her masterpiece in my eyes, The House of Mirth is still further proof Wharton's position among American literature's greats. A savagely bleak portrayal of the New York upper-crust society that's something like Jane Austen filtered through the cynicism of late-19th-century Realism, The House of Mirth is insightful in its telling of one Lily Bart's downward spiral in a way that is both dripping contempt for the social mores of the upper class and careful not to let that contempt obscure the fundamental tragedy of that society's casualties. Lily Bart herself is a wonderful tightrope of a protagonist, a character whose stupidity and frivolity the novel roundly condemns while simultaneously managing to evoke deep sympathy for way that social pressures have pointed her in this direction. Grade: A-


Music

Preoccupations - Preoccupations (2016)
Lots of bands since the late '70s and early '80s have taken inspiration from the post-punk of that era, but with Preoccupations, the band formerly known as Viet Cong has come the closest to sounding exactly like those bands. I'm sure someone will make the argument that this is fruitlessly derivative, that Joy Division only needed to make Closer once and why bother recreate it here? But in my mind, Preoccupations is unequivocally a good thing, derivation and all. Mimicry is much more heinous in an era already flush with imitators, but for better or for worse, the 2010s are pretty short on post-punk revivalists, which makes Preoccupations a treat rather than a glut. Grade: A-