Sunday, April 28, 2019

Mini Reviews for April 22-28, 2019

Rervierws.

Movies

Her Smell (2019)
Her Smell hits almost all the beats of a traditional musician biopic (on paper, there's not a lot separating the plot of this movie from, say, Walk the Line), but what sets it truly apart as something special, not just among the stale annals of musician biopics but among 2019 cinema in general is just how much it lingers over the unexplored margins of these beats. In fact, Her Smell does almost nothing but linger; consisting of just five protracted scenes, the movie takes pieces that usually amount to just a few minutes of screentime (the pre-show green room, the recording booth, the rural "sobering up" cabin, etc.) and spends dozens of minutes allowing these scenes to spool out in haphazard and unpredictable ways that force us viewers to reckon with characters caught in the ligature of their lives—always in motion, always unsteady, always precarious. And hoo boy, is it a ride. Those who squirm at Alex Ross Perry's typical chamber misery beware: Her Smell has all the excruciatingly detailed human cruelty of Listen Up Philip with the unflinching, fevered style of Queen of Earth; I started the movie assuming I was watching these characters (especially Elizabeth Moss's Becky) at their lowest, only to be shown again and again just how much lower they could all go—rendered both exhilarating and oppressive by the cavernous space Perry gives these scenes. And yet... somehow this manages to be Perry's most hopeful movie thus far. It's a movie that shows the true work of recovery in the way that those hoary biopic tropes so rarely do, and by the end, there's something legitimately uplifting about the film. Exhausting at every turn, for sure, but that's the point, isn't it? It can't be easy. Grade: A-

High Life (2019)
In the same way that Interstellar and Tarkovsky's Solaris consciously evoked 2001: A Space Odyssey in order to revise it in significant ways, Claire Denis pointedly recalls both of those movies with High Life and comes out the other side with something that feels both bleeding-edge fresh and also in conversation with a pretty rich tradition of arthouse sci-fi. Via these austere space epics, there's a real, decades-long discourse being had about the nature of humanity's relationship with itself and the way that relationship refracts inward and fractures in key places within the context of 1. sexual encounters, 2. reproduction, and 3. eons of time. Whereas 2001 positions humanity as a mere mythological construct and both Tarkovsky and Nolan advance an essentialist view of human nature, one reflected at every turn (sometimes to ironic/hollow effect, particularly in Tarkovsky's work) by the physical universe, Denis answers the question of the human identity with an absurdly tactile response, that human beings are sacks of fluid tenuously held together by some vertebrae and social constructs. I'm being kind of academic here, so let me be clear: this idea is very, very scary and gross as rendered here—it's a film rife with rape (really: two rape scenes, and a sort of systematic rape/destroyed body autonomy throughout) and despair and spilled guts. It leans into the trappings of sci-fi horror a lot more than its most immediate cinematic precedents, perhaps because of the intrinsic terror of considering human life as a purely biological growth, and there are long sections of this movie that feel like a waking nightmare in the vein of David Lynch cross-pollinated with Alien. At the same time, the cross-cutting of this horror with the benign purity of the scenes of a father (Robert Pattinson) with his daughter gives us an existentialism-brand hope in the sense that it basically argues that life's meaning isn't solely mired in the visceral muck of our biology but also in what we build on top of that biology; to put it another way, it matters whether or not our bodies create a sex-fascist sperm cult, or a nurturing family. For all the despair of the movie, there's a cock-eyed, urgent optimism at work here, not nihilism. It's not going to be everyone's cup of tea, and it wasn't even always mine, but when it was mine, I loved it. Grade: B+

Spring Breakers (2012)
Basically takes the cultural meme of Spring Break and transforms it into this dreamy allegory for the predatory excesses of suburban, majority-white culture. There are a lot of gestures in a lot of interesting directions that I wish were explored more thoroughly, like the parallels between the traditional youth group experience and the ecstatic heights of Spring Break hedonism; there's also the whiff of "having cake and eating it, too" here regarding how the movie portrays both blackness and femininity that makes me uneasy at times—on the one hand pointedly showing the ways in which these folks are exploited and coerced into their ultimately self-destructive social roles by those with more cultural power, while on the other hand indulging in a pretty gazey camera that lingers salaciously over nude female bodies and "gangbanger" caricatured African Americans (this would maybe be a little easier to swallow except for my memories of the movie's ad campaign using these specific elements to sell the movie way back when this first came out). But you know, that hypocritical posture toward the marginalized people whose plight it explicates is something that's also true of The Great Gatsby, and that's one of my favorite novels of all time (and clearly a heavy influence on this movie), so what can I say. Besides, it's really hard to say no to a movie with THAT James Franco performance and THAT Britney Spears singalong. Grade: B+

Anvil! The Story of Anvil (2008)
As a documentary, it's haphazardly put together, and parts of this movie practically scream of the filmmakers having primed the pump in order to address the film's narrative. It also softballs its subject matter, not nearly digging deeply enough into the tragic, even self-destructive elements of Anvil's continued drive (or delusion, depending on who you're asking) toward heavy metal stardom. Also, I dunno, even for a movie that obviously baits a This Is Spinal Tap comparison, some of the stuff just feels too cute and... I dunno, setting off my baloney sensor? Like, they visit Stonehenge? Their drummer is named Robb Reiner? These are either the greatest coincidences in music-doc history, or there's something fishy afoot. But honestly, whatever; I'd be lying if I didn't find this (esp. the central figure of "Lips" Kudlow and his relentless Canada Nice) endearing to a surprising degree. For all the doc's faults and foibles, there's a beating human element that's irresistible. Grade B-

La Pointe Courte (1955)
Though it's nowhere near as effective as Cléo from 5 to 7, the first feature from Agnès Varda most people seem to talk about, it's at least as interesting as that film is as an expression of the mid-century European New Wave. This predates Wild Strawberries by two years; The 400 Blows by four; Breathless and La Dolce Vita by five—and yet, it seems to anticipate a lot of what feels so distinctive about those films, from the abstraction of classic film tropes to the intentional, modernist shot composition. Getting somewhere first isn't worth everything, but just sayin', Varda arrives at the famous "Persona shot" in 1955. And plus, as a film divorced from its context, it's pretty good! The mix of traditional narrative film with pseudo-documentary footage is something I'm told Varda gets much better at later in her career, but as is, it's a really interesting, often compelling how this movie juxtaposes the discursive, very movie-ish conversations of the foregrounded marriage-in-crisis plot with the documentary-ish footage of the working-class goings on of the fishing village in which that plot takes place. I dig it. Grade: B+

Television

Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, Season 4 (2018-19)
The end. It's a sad day for me and the twelve other people who watch this show. Not too sad—the show was clearly running out of gas, as evidenced by the relative dearth of songs this season as well as the increasingly spotting plotting for all the show's secondary characters. Even Rebecca's arc, one that centers on her efforts to create a stable, healthy life in the context of her mental health struggles, is hit-and-miss. But where else on TV would you even get a season-long plot about the work of creating stability within a mental-health context? Where else on TV would this have been told through song? Where else on TV would you have gotten this winning combination of snark and raunch and heart and soul? Whether or not Crazy Ex-Girlfriend should have continued (it probably shouldn't have, both because the creators said they were done and because the series was definitely running short on ideas by the end), the television landscape is much poorer without this show giving its burst of idiosyncrasy each week, and I'll miss it badly. We were lucky to get the four years we did. Grade: B-

Sunday, April 21, 2019

Mini Reviews for April 15-21, 2019

Happy Easter to all who celebrate!

Movies

Vox Lux (2018)
When I was watching Vox Lux, I assumed that this story of a school-shooting survivor turned pop star was taking the tired position of having the pop music machine represent the vapid squalor of modern American society. And it's not not that—the journey of Celeste, the movie's pop-star protagonist, is clearly supposed to be an illustration of the way our society feels more comfortable in trading banal platitudes rather than actually grapple with and address legitimate trauma like mass shootings. As such, I also assumed that the director, Brady Corbet, was having a joke at pop music's expense by having the music of the film (written by none other than Sia) be intentionally thin and bad. But then, after I finished the film, I read a few interviews with Corbet where he spoke in rather glowing terms about the film's music and insisted that he loved pop music and was interested in the intersection of the the corporate, exploitative side of the industry with the artists within it making music people find legitimately meaningful, and like... I dunno, maybe this is just me being a snob, but to my ears the movie's pop music is incredibly generic and uninteresting and, ya know, bad, which seems like a complete failure in execution of Corbet's exploration of at least one side of that intersection. And without any sort of investment on my part with the film's music, it's hard to feel like the central symbolism of pop music representing America isn't just thin and cheap—not helped by the fact that the movie jumps right from 9/11 to sometime in 2017, thus robbing us of a lot of the symbolic narrative. Like, those Bush/Obama years are crucial to the ways in which our current society treats national traumas, right? Corbet has some interesting aesthetic ideas, but in lieu of a more fleshed out story and verisimilitude, I just can't get too excited about the thematic aims of the movie. Grade: C+

Unexpected (2015)
A completely forgettable and heavily tropey pregnancy movie that chooses the easiest path at every turn. You've seen every piece of this movie already elsewhere, only this time, any interesting or thorny texture has been sanded off. Even the differences in class and race between the movie's two protagonists—a dynamic that has the chance to be the movie's heart—is only gestured at in the most gentle ways, until it culminates in an argument scene that only tells us about the differences between the protagonists rather than showing or dramatizing it meaningfully—lazy writing that tries to make up for its laziness in the laziest way possible. On a completely different note, I was struck by some of the school details early in the movie; maybe it's just the difference between teaching in Knoxville versus teaching in Chicago, or maybe it's the difference between the rural(ish) school I teach at versus the urban school featured in this film, but I spent way more time than I should have being kind of blown away by how foreign the school environment seemed: teachers openly swearing in front of students? teachers personally driving students home? a school clinic giving out free condoms to students? This is a different universe. Grade: C-

Norma Rae (1979)
It's far from perfect—the pacing is pretty dodgy, and I don't think the movie ever quite justifies the amount of time it spends developing the platonic relationship between the union organizer Reuben and Norma (largely because Reuben really doesn't have a lot going on as a character, being basically a laundry list of "New York Jew" stereotypes). But when this movie is on, it's on. Sally Field is radiant, and the movie has a strong finger to the pulse of the nuances of the gender dynamics of the idea of a woman doing the work of union organizing. Also, on that note, I really appreciate how this movie depicts the process of political activism; sometimes it seems like the narrative that gets peddled is that people (be it a marginalized racial ground, a gender, a group of workers) are just waiting to be liberated by an activist, when in reality, the extent to which, say, workers have internalized the company line is much thornier to untangle, and Norma Rae does a great job dramatizing the work of organizing in a divided community that not only has a lot to gain but potentially a lot to lose (from some people's perspective) by unionizing. It's deeply empathetic, but also deeply aware of the frustrations of dealing with people in the flesh—as famous as the movie is for the pure idealism of the "Norma stands in the factory holding the UNION sign" scene, the majority of the movie has a lot more dirt under its fingernails. Grade: B+

Harlan County, USA (1976)
One of the most bracing cinematic documents of the praxis of speaking truth to power I've ever seen. At least as portrayed in this searing documentary, this is an entire community bent around the support of labor, not just the cessation of work but also the challenging of law enforcement and the seizure of public assets and the carving out of public spaces for organizing to the blistering life of the region's musical culture to the very real blood on the picket line. On the one hand, there's something a little dispiriting about how distant this Appalachia of forty years ago feels from the region's 2019 present--de-industrialization and the erosion of any kind of communal public life and the dominance of mass media and its erasure of cultural and social history have left deep scars on the area. But at the same time, the meticulous vivacity of the people captured on film here is a rousing inspiration. The world has changed in forty years, but the potential of the human spirit remains the same. Grade: A

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Mini Reviews for April 8-14, 2019

Light week because fatherhood and teacherhood are conspiring together against this blog.

Movies

Creed II (2018)
A weirdly structureless movie that never really figures out what it wants to be so instead just floats around a lot of different plot points without ever finding any momentum forward. Is it how Adonis wrestles with balancing family with his newfound fame? Is it a tale of revenge and redemption for the events of Rocky IV (never mind that Rocky IV is itself a tale of revenge and redemption for the events of Rocky IV)? Is it about the self-destructive ramifications of athletes' drive to be The Best? Is it just a straight-up inspiration Rocky picture? What it is, I'll tell ya, is intermittently dull and a huge step down from the original Creed. The Rocky sequels spiraled out, quality-wise, pretty quickly, too, but at least they all had the decency to aspire to a kind of glorious kitsch. Creed II still has all the serious-minded, "realistic" sensibilities of its predecessor, while still being, like Rocky IV a movie about punching a Russian. At least I would have hoped to have gotten whatever the 2018 equivalent of "Living in America" is—but no dice. Grade: C+

Transit (2018)
A few hours before I watched this movie, I listened to a Latina activist talk about the experiences of Latinx undocumented immigrants in the state of Tennessee, and it was unnerving how much of that talk was reflected in Transit: the limbo of assuming a new identity in a foreign country, the unknowability of the whereabouts/health of family and friends, the malaise of confusion and ambiguity that hangs over all daily public interactions and creates opportunities for exploitation, the creeping anti-immigrant brutality of law enforcement largely unrecognized (or tolerated) by the mainstream public, etc. Transit is essentially a WWII story (its source novel is from 1942) set in the present day, a Casablanca without the distancing fireworks (nor the uplift) of a classic Hollywood screenplay/era, and while of course I'm not saying it's impossible to make a period film with contemporary resonance (and fair, my Americentrism is definitely showing with what I'm calling "resonant"), making the period "now" sure does the trick. Grade: A-

Shrek Retold (2018)
Having 200 people remake Shrek shot-for-shot (give or take) is a neat little microcosm of what's happened to the original film once subjected to Web 2.0—a veritable army of humans across the internet re-sculpting the DreamWorks Animation smash in their own image (some of the most notable of which [e.g. Neil Cicierega] appear here among the 200 creators). By now, I know Shrek better as a meme than as a film, having only seen the movie twice (I think?) in its entirety but having listened to Mouth Sounds dozens, nay HUNDREDS of times, and I spent a good portion of my time with Shrek Retold trying to remember which bits were dadaist internet jokes and which bits actually were part of the old film. Whether or not my low view count is accurate of everyone, I suspect that at least the meme-before-film part is true of most of us who reside at all within the "online" spaces of the internet, and it's kind of fascinating to see that collective awareness of a memetic Shrek work itself out in feature film form by varying degrees of sincerity/irony and craftsmanship. The original movie was very much a sort of postmodern blender of late-'90s mainstream kitsch, and I honestly can't think of a more appropriate way to remake that particular work than with this particular work: a deranged Frankenstein's monster birthed as much from the looming succubi of YouTube and Netflix and image macros as the original sprang from the ascendency of butt rock and Disney over the cultural imagination. The quality of the product fluctuates wildly from creator to creator, but hey, what's more internet than that? Grade: B

The Stepford Wives (1975)
Honestly, it's kind of thinly made. The acting is stiff (the performances that aren't, you know, supposed to be stiff), the screenplay is blundering, the cinematography is overlit and dull in this very TV-movie type of way—which is maybe sort of the point, I guess, but call me two-faced for not wanting my critique of cardboard delivered on a cardboard plate. But man, does virtually everything in the movie's final twenty-ish minutes work like gangbusters, and "because we can" is such an ice-cold chill of a moment that even knowing it was coming, I was shook. It's not hard to understand why this became such an iconic film, though it's also not hard to see how it also became one of those movies whose premise has more staying power than the actual film attached to it. Grade: B

Music

Ariana Grande - thank u, next (2019)
We all know that the song "thank u, next," released late last year by surprise, is one of the best pop songs of recent memory. What I don't think we all know, based on the conversation I've seen, is that its attendant album is one of the best pop albums in recent memory. The songs of thank u, next are less colorful than those of Ariana's last release, Sweetener, but in exchange, Ariana made this vibrant, personal statement of a record, a release in which not only are the songs all very good but also cohere together into a whole much greater than the sum of its parts. It's all about the sequencing: for example, "thank u, next," the song, is great on its own, but sandwiched between "7 rings" and "break up with your girlfriend, i'm bored," it takes on a whole new life—no longer just an anthem of self-actualizing romance but a piece in a larger narrative about the cycles of self-destruction, self-loathing, and self-love that tragedy and broken hearts wring an individual through. That's just one example, and the album is full of meaningful suites like that, adding up to a complex and nuanced portrait of a person both on top of the world and at a crippling crossroads. So few pop albums pay attention to track sequencing and the significance of juxtaposing one song with another, and the fact that thank u, next does so is a small miracle and a richly rewarding aural experience. Maybe this says more about how many (read: how few) new albums I've listened to this year, but right now, thank u, next is my favorite album of 2019. Grade: A-

Sunday, April 7, 2019

Mini Reviews for April 1-7, 2019

Mervie rervierws.

Movies

Green Book (2018)
I'm not sure how much new I have to add re: all the problematic racial and historical controversy surrounding this movie's approach to adapting its specific historical events. To be honest, the whole discussion kind of breaks the part of my brain that usually insists that cinema doesn't have to be held to a textbook literalist invocation of historical fact; there's a more productive conversation than The Discourse is currently having as to why I give the willfully history-agnostic depiction of unknowable events a pass in something like Spike Lee's BlacKkKlansman but not in Green Book—and no, I don't mean in some "Spike Lee is the real racist!" gotcha way; I'm talking about a fundamental interrogation of what cinema's hermaneutic of history needs to be and to what standards of factual and ideological responsibility do we hold film. Certainly a key component of that responsibility involves point of view, and not only does the movie's choice of protagonist and point of view flatter the modern-day status quo (as is arguably also the case in BlacKkKlansman), it also consistently lands the movie at glaringly uninteresting ways to dramatize this particular story even within the pretty thin and gentle version of mid-century American racial tension (not in any universe the case in BlacKkKlansman). There's no way I'm the first person to note how devastatingly obvious it is that Mahershala Ali's character should have been the point-of-view character, right? The movie is clearly obsessed with the mere existence of Don Shirley and entirely uninterested in the ethnic-Italian identity of its protagonist outside of the idea of big family dinners and Mortensen's (admittedly likeable) scene-chewing performance, so why not just write the movie from Shirley's perspective? Sure, the screenplay was written by Tony Lip's son, hence the focus on Tony, but that's what rewrites are for, right? Instead, the movie just views Shirley as this fascinating cypher, artificially locking us, the audience, inside the mind of a protagonist with absolutely nothing unique or interesting to tell us about this particular story and in fact a point of view that feels like an inherent liability for telling this story. We get the fun chemistry between the leads and some nice, character-based humor but there's nothing about those beats specific to our seeing the world according to Tony Lip, and this choice to appeal to some misbegotten "everyman mainstream" (in contrast to the "exotic" otherness of a gay black man) has found something dramatically inert, too, in its pursuit of its particular vision of adapting history. This is basically the movie all the way down, with a rigorous insistence on an assumed "universal" pleasantry that ultimately just feels limited by its dive toward the middle. The Sears-Roebuck-catalogue pristine of the sets, the the personality-free cinematography, the gentle humor of the screenplay and the even gentler drama, the fact that we have Peter Farrelly, of all people, in the film's director's chair and it still ends up feeling like an anonymous piece of awards-season filler and not, like, something with at least half the personality of Dumb and Dumber. It's not that there isn't anything to enjoy in this movie; it's that every piece of this movie feels poised to disappear into the cultural static at the intersection every other media depiction of the early '60s and be forgotten right alongside that Pan Am TV series from like seven or eight years ago. Forgotten right up to the moment it won the Best Picture Academy Award, I guess. Even on the bumper-sticker racial front this movie wants to operate on, this movie's pretty dull. Like most of these kind of nostalgic, reassuring parables about bygone racism, there's not a lot that's baldy offensive (to my white eyes, at least) about its politics outside of its perpetuation of certain pious and ahistorical tropes about the "good white people" of the past, and instead it goes way out of its way to comfort its audience with the broadest and softest possible platitudes. Green Book feels especially milquetoast even among its "friendship transcends racism" peers, and its complete and consuming fear of being anything approaching "provocative" robs it of even the interesting nuance of, say, the power dynamics of relative marginalization that Driving Miss Daisy gives its ethnic-but-white-coded co-lead in the context of its black co-lead. Bereft of even that, there are zero things on Green Book's mind besides a frail, frictionless view of the past and the easy chemistry between its co-leads, and for all the charms of the latter, I still am hard-pressed to think of a less-interesting version of this story told by these specific actors and this specific director. Is cinema's theory of history just a battle of who gets to tell the more engaging story? If so, Spike won this round. Grade: C

Tale of Tales (2015)
Tale of Tales attempts to revive the old, twisted spirit of the pre-Disney-fied fairy tales, and to be fair, the movie arrives at a wild, bizarre, structureless pandemonium that does a pretty good job of approximating the tales we attribute to Giambattista Basile. Only unfortunately, Basile's versions of fairy tales just aren't that good, and neither is this. Points for the set and costume design and for some richly out-there plot twists. But the interlocking organization of the individual tales does not work at all, and, as with the Basile stories, these stories are collections of very odd and sadistic incidents that have the rambling feel of something made up on the spot—nothing like, for those who are fans of the "old fairy tales," the grotesque precision of the Brothers Grimm collections. Come on, filmmakers! Give us the Brothers Grimm-style fairy tale revival you know we're all clamoring for. Grade: B-

La Ciénaga (2001)
Lucretia Martel's vicious satire of the Argentinian bourgeoisie and its accompanying racism feels like Arrested Development by way of Buñuel, only somehow less funny than either. Instead, a suffocating dread cloaks every inch of the film, a dread that pays off both plot-wise and theme-wise. I'd need to spend a little more time with each of her films to be completely confident in this, but at the moment, La Ciénaga feels like something of a dry run for The Headless Woman and especially Zama in terms of how driven and realized its critiques of class and race in Argentina are, and as such, I probably made a mistake watching it last. Grade: B+



The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)
The title is maddeningly ambiguous. Who's talking: Bond or Amasova?? [*CinemaSins ding*] Anyway, it's kind of dull, kind of fun—a little more fun than dull. Bach is, unfortunately, completely lifeless as Agent Triple X, and I guess I need to watch more Roger Moore movies, because I kept confusing him for all the other dudes in suits onscreen. But also, the henchman in this film is named Jaws and bites people and deflects bullets with his teeth and then, climactically, bites a shark. It's hard to dislike a movie with that situation going on. Grade: B-




Television

You're the Worst, Season 5 (2019)
The final season of You're the Worst sharpens its focus to just the series's core duo, which is probably for the best—most of the rest of the cast has long lost its utility as anything but people for our leads to bump against. This means the season does lack some of the shockingly sharp, out-of-nowhere depth that it would occasionally grant the supporting players (Edgar's PTSD, for example); but it also means that we're mercifully spared any of the time-wasting storylines that have sometimes plagued the show, too, e.g. Paul getting stabbed (and while we're on the subject, I find Paul's pivot away from the alt-right entirely unconvincing). Instead, we're almost (with a few exceptions early in the season) given a season entirely focused on the culmination of the show's central relationship: Jimmy and Gretchen. And it gets real in a sustained and panicked way that the show has rarely settled down enough to pull off in the past. I've dinged the show before for the way it tries to offset its sometimes mean comedic streak with sudden dramatic stakes and unearned forward movement. But this final season finally gets it, and the slow-moving train wreck that is the lead-up to Jimmy and Gretchen's wedding is as bracingly dark and uncomfortably real as the show has ever dared to become, and the final resolution of all that is as mature and poignant an evocation of love as I've ever seen a television show do. There are some bumps along the way—a season-long flash-forward tease is both awkward structurally and ultimately unsatisfying as anything but a cheap device. But on the whole, it's a surprisingly rich and graceful ending for what's been an enjoyable but inconsistent TV series. Grade: A-