Hi, everyone! Welcome to Prog Progress, a blog series in which I
journey through the history of progressive rock by reviewing one album
from every year of the genre's existence. You can read more about the
project here. You can learn about what I think are some of the roots of progressive rock here. You can see links for the whole series here.
I should probably create a boilerplate for what I'm about to say, given that I've said it to one degree or another in the past three posts of this series: 1981 was not a particularly notable year for progressive rock.
As before, this is partially because a lot of the classic '70s bands had either disbanded (this year, none other than Yes kicks the bucket, albeit temporarily) or moved on to other sounds, like pop (Rush[1] comes out with the all-timer Moving Pictures, for example, and if you've heard one Rush song on mainstream rock radio, it's almost certainly "Tom Sawyer") or some other unclassifiable direction (King Crimson's Discipline isn't really prog in the classical sense so much as it is experimental new wave, while as always, who knows what Frank Zappa is doing on something like You Are What You Is). It's also partially because there just wasn't a ton of young creative energy surrounding the genre in 1981, though by this time, you're starting to see a little bit of the shape of prog to come with some new bands forming—1981 sees the formation of Queensrÿche, for example, who would go on to take the vanguard of progressive metal in the '80s, while Marillion and Twelfth Night, who would both become pivotal to neo-prog, had already been active for a few years. But none of these bands had yet recorded anything close to their definitive work, nor had they caught on in any meaningful way with listeners, which yet again leaves the broader direction of progressive rock meandering.
So as with 1980, I'm using my 1981 post as a way to fill in some of gaps that I left in continental European prog while I mainly focused on British prog in the '70s. Last time, it was Germany's krautrock/kosmische musik. This time: zeuhl!
I imagine that there is a not insubstantial subset of readers[2] whose first reaction to the previous sentence is, "What the hell is zeuhl?", and unless you are French, that would be an understandable response. Unlike krautrock, none of the bands associated with zeuhl have ever really broken out into the broader English-speaking mainstream, which makes it a somewhat obscure corner of the prog world, even today when most of recent music history rests at the fingertips of anyone with a Spotify account. And then I chose to cover Dün in this post, which makes this extra fun, because that means I get to talk about an obscure piece of an already obscure corner of a somewhat niche genre. Blogging is a wonderful thing.
So anyway, what the hell is zeuhl? Hold on. This will take a minute.
So while the UK was busy being the international face of progressive rock, a lot of the rest of Europe was having its own take on the genre: prog had a strong pull in Italy, for example, and I've already talked about Germany's prog last time. Each country's national scene had its own quirks, but France's takes the cake. See, in France there's this band called Magma; other French prog bands exist, but Magma is far and away the most famous and also the one that's relevant to zeuhl. Magma was started by a drummer named Christian Vander. Like a lot of first-wave prog bands, the band started coming together in 1967 (though they wouldn't be fully active until 1969) at the height of the counter-cultural psychedelia movement. Unlike a lot of prog bands of the era, though, the band's genesis wasn't Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band or an acid trip[3]; rather, it was the sudden death of John Coltrane in July of that year. Vander was apparently so distraught by Coltrane's death that it sent him on a spiral that caused him to quit the band he was in at the time and travel abroad. When he returned to France older and wiser in 1969, he put together what would become Magma in, as Wikipedia puts it, "an attempt to fill the void" left by Coltrane.
The Coltrane influence is pretty apparent on Magma's recordings, which share the spiritual/cosmic fervor of the last few years of Coltrane's output, as well as having obvious compositional similarities in the sense that they are jazzy and unpredictable and built around improvisation. It doesn't really sound like Coltrane, though; being a prog band, Magma had some orchestral ambitions, with a lot of brass and woodwind and even female choirs[4] in their music, and also, being a prog band, Magma also built their discography around this really wild sci-fi concept in which each album was a continuation of a story involving a group of humans who escape a dying Earth to go live on Kobaïa (a planet of Vander's invention). Presumably, at least; I honestly can't understand a word of the lyrics, and it's not because I don't know French. No, it's because most of the time, Magma isn't singing in any human language as we know it but rather in Kobaïan, a language that Vander invented to be the spoken tongue on the planet Kobaïa, so you get song titles like "Rïah Sahïltaahk" and "Kreühn Köhrmahn Ïss Dëh Hündin," and it's anyone's guess what those mean, because they aren't translated into French (or English) in the liner notes. Apparently, Kobaïan is a language "spoken from the heart," without any real semantic meaning, which as far as I can tell means, "made up as we went along [5]," so I guess that makes translation difficult, but we do have at least one word translated for us: zeuhl, which means "celestial."
In case you haven't noticed, this is pretty goofy, even for prog.
Magma, perhaps tongue-in-cheekedly—it's really hard to tell how much of this is meant to be taken seriously—called the music that they made "zeuhl music," and as kooky as a lot of this stuff is on paper, in fairness to them we probably did need a special term for this music, because it is unlike anything else I have ever heard. Philosophically, the expansion of rock instrumentation to orchestral grandeur with the purpose of realizing some big sci-fi concept fits right in with the general prog ethos, but sonically, this is something entirely its own. The mix of jazz improvisation, the guitar wails, the choral chants, the conlang thing—it accumulates into something pretty stunning on an audio level. That contrast between the ludicrously whimsical stuff on the textual level and transcendent, serious stuff on the musical level feels like the key to the particular heady, hair-brained alchemy Magma achieve, like the comedy rock undergirded by virtuosic instrumentation that Frank Zappa traffics in swallowed whole by a group of space aliens and taken to the stars. When I'm listening to it, I find myself often caught up in its sweep while simultaneously being pretty amused that something so goofy not only exists but also has sweep in the first place. It's otherworldly and completely itself, so it's no surprise that they basically ended up defining French prog in the long run and practically inventing a whole subgenre as other French bands started to mimic their sound.
So anyway, that's zeuhl: a bunch of French bands paying tribute to a Coltrane tribute gone wild.
Magma doesn't have any 1981 albums, but their footprint has a strong showing that year, because while 1981 may have been a weak year for prog in general, it's a pretty strong year for zeuhl music. You have Eskaton's 4 Visions, for example, as well as Eider Stellaire's self-titled debut, and that's only a couple from an overall pretty full offering—a nice reminder that the focus on British prog you usually see from English-speaking dorks like me elides some pretty great music from the rest of the world, and just because the British movement was in decline doesn't mean that the rest of the world's prog was.
At any rate, the zeuhl album I've chosen for 1981 is Eros, the only record ever released by the zeuhl band Dün, and in the spirit of zeuhl's often potent mix between great music and ludicrous concepts, I've mostly picked Dün because in addition to making pretty solid music, they are whimsical and amusing to the max.
Dün begin in 1976 as a Mahavishnu Orchestra cover band called Vegetaline Boufiol, and I would just like to begin this by highlighting the sort of ludicrous and surprising fact that a world exists where the demand for a Mahavishnu Orchestra cover band would be high enough for one to actually materialize. Google Translate isn't returning anything for "Vegetaline Boufiol," which kind of crushes my hopes of this band having some ludicrous vegetable-adjacent name in French, but don't worry, we get to more ludicrousness soon enough. By 1978, the band had changed its name from Vegetaline Boufiol to Kan-Daar, and by this time, they had accumulated quite a cadre of musicians playing instruments ranging from the traditional guitar and drums to relatively atypical things like flute[6]. I guess the vaguely orientalist leanings of that name didn't quite sit well with the band, so they soon changed their name again. Apparently guitarist Jean Geeraerts and flutist Pascal Vandenbulcke were big fans of the novel Dune, so they renamed the band... Dune. Then I guess they decided that that was maybe too on-the-nose, so they made the final change and started calling their band Dün, because nothing disguises your sci-fi dorkdom like an umlaut. They must not have been too insecure about their fandom, though, because two of the four tracks on Eros have Dune-inspired titles: "Arrakis" and "L'épice" (French for "spice"). I love the unbridled frivolity of all this; it's so transparently the product of a bunch of nerdy dudes just hanging out and enjoying each other's company—so silly but so pure, and there's something kind of sweet about the fact that the band clearly never wanted to be anything more than that. Dün eventually opened for Magma at a local festival, and, probably as a result of that connection, they were invited to join Henry Cow's Rock in Opposition movement[7], but they never did get around to joining—"due to neglect and laziness," according to the liner notes of the 2012 reissue of Eros[8]. Ah, Dün. Just bros hanging with bros, ya know?
This ethos ran basically throughout everything the band did. Perhaps most notably and entertainingly, Dün was totally down with the bros just straight-up inventing their own instruments and debuting them onstage. To wit: Vandenbulcke, in addition to playing the flute, also was proficient in an instrument called the gruyèrophone, which he had created himself. If the sheer delightfulness of this is not readily apparent, let me add that this instrument was otherwise known as the "swisscheesophone," and involved, as Vandenbulcke himself described it, "a wind instrument belonging to the hunting horn family, with a tube mouthpiece and a square-shaped bell into which small bits of Swiss cheese are introduced. The technique is not unlike that of a bagpipe. When the player is tired of blowing the instrument, the small holes in the Swiss cheese then burst, taking over from the performer and allowing him to catch his breath." It seems uncharacteristically empathetic of Swiss cheese to know when a musician is tired of blowing, and I'm a little foggy on the mechanics of the whole operation, and sadly, as wonderful a place as the internet can be for this kind of delirious absurdity, it is not wonderful enough to have a clip of someone playing a swisscheesophone that I can find[9]. The sweet sounds of the swisscheesophone also never made it onto any of the band's studio recordings, and I don't think any live recordings of the band exist (can you imagine this band having the wherewithal, either financial or motivational, to make a live recording?), which means that the sands of time have tragically robbed the modern world from experiencing the dulcet tones of the swisscheesophone[10].
But at any rate, I guess I should probably get around to talking about the studio recordings themselves. Unlike Magma, the Dün bros seemed more interested in chillaxin' and jammin' with the boys than in writing lyrics, so they don't have any lyrics, Kobaïan or otherwise, which is fine: Eros's four tracks ("L'épice," "Arrakis," "Bitonio," and "Eros") are all hard-nosed experimental prog whose effect would probably have been disrupted by zeuhl's usual silliness, especially since I can only imagine what kinds of lyrics would have formed from the band responsible for the swisshcheesophone. In fact, the music on Eros is shockingly serious and technical, not just for an album that was halfway inspired by Dune but also for a band as seemingly intent on goofing off as Dün was. For as much time as I've spent in this post talking about the goofy context to Eros, you probably wouldn't find much of the actual music goofy at all if you didn't know all the culture surrounding the album. Each track plays with a foreboding, pulsing intensity built from the complex interplay of Vandenbulcke's flute, Geeraerts's guitar, and Bruno Sabathe's piano/synth keyboards. Sometimes this takes the form of these instruments trading solos (as they do in the opener, "L'épice"), and other times they pile on top of one another in a clashing cachophony (as in the climax of the closing title track); always, the music is driven forward relentlessly by the swirling dual percussion of Phillippe Portejoie's drums and Alain Termolle's inventive and entrancing... something—I don't always know what Termolle is banging on (the liner notes cite xylophone, vibraphone, and "percussion"[11]), but his beats in particular are mysterious and exquisite. The whole record just gels in this off-kilter but kind of tremendous way.
Turns out these swiss-cheese-blowing boys had some chops; Eros is a really good prog album.
Sadly, Dün never completed another record. Eros had already been a shoestring effort. Like a lot of essentially hobbyist, local-band scenesters, Dün self-financed Eros[12], which resulted in an extremely limited pressing of 1000 copies of the album that the band would sell themselves at shows[13]. The band continued to play live shows for the next couple years, but after a few lineup changes, they disbanded in 1983. Soon after, Vanenbulcke and Geeraerts created a Latin jazz group called Nevrose Spirituals (which seems like a weird direction for these guys, but okay) that lasted a short time before Geeraerts, apparently the most ambitious of the Dün bunch, left to attend the Berklee College of Music, and the new band fall apart. Then there was a brief Dün reunion in 1992 coinciding with a '70s/'80s revival concert in Dün's hometown of Nantes, but that's the last time that the band has ever played. And that was pretty much that.
The only other thing to note is that in a sort of small-scale Velvet-Underground turn, those 1000 copies of Eros became objects of minor cult fascination for record collectors and prog fans, which eventually led to the 2012 CD reissue/remaster that I bought. Aside from the zeuhl connection, this is basically why I wanted to cover Eros; the world of prog is dominated by your Genesises and King Crimsons and Jethro Tulls (and later by your Dream Theaters and Porcupine Trees), all of which still have significant radio play, some sort of current incarnation still performing, and/or at least a significant enough legacy that they stay at the forefront of the (admittedly niche) discourse surrounding prog. The ethos of progressive rock is one of size and grandeur; these bands wanted to be impossible to forget, and as such, compared to a genre like, for example, indie rock (which thrives off obscure corners and cult followings[14]), it's relatively rare in prog to have these obscure mythologies of The Greatest Band You've Never Heard Of, who played Swiss cheese instruments and whose only album was a self-financed LP with only 1000 copies in existence. So I thought it would be fun to explore one of prog's few examples of this.
Actually, this is kind of the mythology of zeuhl as a whole; at least in the English-speaking world (and certainly in the United States), zeuhl is a hyper-underground phenomenon, the province of record collectors with a penchant for the avant-garde, Prog Archives contributors, and pretty much nobody else. The zeuhl albums I bought for this post were certainly the hardest (and most expensive) to acquire of any of the albums I've gotten in this series, and they all had to be ordered from European sellers, even the albums by Magma (far and away the most popular zeuhl band). It's an interesting thing to see obscurity within progressive rock, but if you want it, zeuhl is for you. Plus, there's some pretty great music at the end of the scavenger hunt.
Not bad for a Mahavishnu Orchestra tribute making a tribute to a Coltrane tribute in the form of a Frank Herbert tribute.
See everyone in 1982!
1] I would be remiss not to mourn Neil Peart passing here. We lost probably the single greatest rock drummer of all time, and from what I've seen, he seemed like a pretty cool guy in general.
2] The two readers who even still read this series, that is.
3] Well, I suppose I can't confirm that acid wasn't involved. But it's not typically the reason given.
4] Making Magma one of the only major prog bands I know of to extensively use female musicians (even though most of the core members were male). All rock music is, to a degree, male-dominated, but I can't figure out why prog is such a sausage fest even within rock music. Theories welcome, readers.
5] As fans of Icelandic post-rock may recognize, this is a similar tactic that Sigur Rós employed when inventing their Hopelandic language, though Magma's music is considerably less self-serious and baroque than Sigur Rós's.
6] Though I suppose that in the scope of prog, this one's not atypical at all, given the shadow of Jethro Tull.
7] Sort of the "We demand to be taken seriously" of progressive rock, in which Henry Cow and a bunch of other under-appreciated but innovative bands in progressive rock's avant-garde wing tried to garner a larger following in opposition to what Henry Cow saw as the increasingly corporatized and bland music occupying a lot of labels in the UK. Their slogan was, "The music the record companies don't want you to hear." The messaging was a little melodramatic and more than a little self-aggrandizing—it turns out that "the music the record companies don't want you to hear" was also "the music most people don't want to hear." They weren't really successful, clearly, which is a shame, because there was a lot of interesting music in that lineup.
8] Which is where most of my knowledge of Dün comes from, admittedly.
9] You can, however, get an image of a swisscheesophone on a necktie for $28.75 (plus shipping).
10] I have no idea if Pascal Vandenbulcke is still alive, but if he is, can the internet please make it its collective priority to find this man and record him playing his swisscheesophone? I am but a humble blogger, and I have only this one request.
11] What are the odds that he's drumming on blocks of Swiss cheese?
12] Typical of Dün's proto-slacker ethos, the liner notes mention that "there was never any time spent looking for a record company."
13] Again, the liner notes specify that the Dün dudes did this "without looking for a national or even regional distribution." Given prog's usual outsized ambitions, there's something so refreshing about a band who clearly had no ambitions at all.
14] And actually, Dün's fame-eschewing slacker attitude and DIY production fit pretty nicely with, say, '90s indie rock.
At this point, nothing more than the musings of a restless English teacher on the pop culture he experiences.
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
Sunday, January 26, 2020
Mini Reviews for January 20-26, 2020
Reviewin'.
Movies
1917 (2019)
For a movie named after a major year during the most significant military conflict of the 20th century, 1917 doesn't really have a lot to say about the broader scope of WWI, neither historically nor philosophically. On the philosophic side, I suppose we already have Paths of Glory being the most perfect and profound work we could ever ask a movie to be about the ideological underpinnings of the war, but I'll say that in a world in which our cinematic and cultural history is disproportionally focused on WWII, I would have liked to see a movie that took seriously the historical implications of the war that was such a sickening logical end point for the Industrial Revolution and more generally the European Enlightenment at large that it basically invented modernism ex nihilo. At any rate, neither of those things are what 1917 wants to be, which I suppose is fine in theory, but if it's not going to be that, it should probably have had interesting characters (it doesn't—these are stock war movie types) or an engaging screenplay (it does in fits—the writing veers from very good to very obvious) or at the very least some sort of strong anti-war stance (hardly, even though WWI is a war whose very existence is an anti-war statement—the movie pays some lip service to this idea, but it's clearly not its MO). It's not even that interesting as what it's been marketed as—i.e. a war movie done all in one take; the long takes (which were digitally stitched together into one) are nicely done, but this movie gains absolutely nothing except an abstract conceptual impressiveness from the decision to one-take this thing, and what appears onscreen is virtually interchangeable with any other of the handsome but conventional editing and cinematography usually produced by a Deakins/Mendes pairing. It looks pretty nice, but I've seen movies that look nice like this. Grade: C
Ready or Not (2019)
Pretty solid action-thriller with enough visual panache and attitude to make it feel distinct. Samara Weaving is great as the lead, as is Adam Brody's heel turn. There's not a lot to its general theme that rich people suck, but in fairness, rich people do suck. Grade: B
The Devil Wears Prada (2006)
Gotta admit that it took the better part of the first hour of this movie for me to swallow my intense disdain for New York high fashion and just enjoy this as a snappy character piece, and even then, I'm not thrilled by the movie's imbalance between glamour and critique of the industry, especially when the critique is couched in the ways that in-house politics hurt those who have been loyal to a brand, rather than the pervasive racism, sizeism, classism, etc., of the industry attitudes that Streep's character represents or the fact that Anne Hathaway's character is an assistant to apparently one of the most powerful people in the publishing world and yet can't afford rent. But then again, here I am over here watching and moderately enjoying a Beavis and Butt-Head movie, so it's not as if I have the moral high ground. And the performances are really good in this movie—particularly Streep, who definitely has some proto-Aunt-March energy, and Tucci, who gives probably my favorite performance I've seen from him (and who is the best-dressed of any of the core cast—the hats, Anne, why? You're looking like Stacey Dash in Clueless</i>!). The editing is also super sharp, too—far sharper than the slack style typical of the mid-2000s "professional woman in NYC" movies. I do wish the end of the movie stuck to the more melancholic tone that the situation clearly warrants—Hathaway smiles at Streep from across the street as the triumphant music swells, as if Streep isn't a deeply tragic figure both trapped in a job that virtually mandates cruel and inhumanizing behavior while simultaneously knowing nothing else to do but to continue to fortify the system that's devoured her soul. The sad part about "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven" is that the devil is still in Hell, you know? Grade: B-
Ushpizin (2004)
The filmmaking and tone gives off the same semi-amateur "faith-based film" vibes that I get from Kendrick brothers movies like Facing the Giants. I don't know enough about the Israeli Hasidic Jewish culture this portrays to know if the movie has a more complex interaction with the traditions of its faith than Facing the Giants does, but on its surface, this strikes me as centered on a much thornier and interesting dilemma regarding the intersection of ethics, compassion, and faith than anything the Kendricks have ever come up with. It's sweet while only being a little cloying, and I enjoyed the parable-esque aspects of its plot. Grade: B-
Ruggles of Red Gap (1935)
The warmest, sweetest movie I've seen in a very long time. A dynamite showcase for an off-format Charles Laughton and 100%-effective American myth-making. Grade: A
Television
GLOW, Season 3 (2019)
In its third season, GLOW complicates a lot of the warm solidarity dynamics of its first two seasons, moving its characters past the honeymoon stages of their wrestling camaraderie and into the thorny implications of their roles within the wrestling world. What does the rampant cultural mockery within the GLOW act mean once the characters actually begin to come to terms with it? How to do closeted characters who feel a covert freedom within the world of wrestling navigate their relationships with those who are fighting for more open LGBT acceptance? What does it mean for these characters when some have more powerful creative and executive roles within GLOW than others? What does "female liberation" mean when women have vastly different goals for success? A lot of chickens come to roost in this season, which is tremendous, and you get series-best arcs for Bash, Debbie, and Sheila. The rest of the cast has that familiar problem for a show of GLOW's structure, which is that a dozen half-hour episodes don't really give enough time to fully flesh out their arcs, though most of the characters get some tremendous moments. Marc Maron is basically off doing his own thing the whole season, and for as much as I like Marc in this show a lot and his isolation fits thematically, I have to think that the time spent on his LA showbiz arc might have been better spent giving more screentime to, for example, the fascinating dynamic between Melanie and Jenny. As it is, the show's a lot messier than last season, which is occasionally to its benefit, but not always. Grade: B+
Music
Matthew Sweet - 100% Fun (1995)
As pure and as infectious as a power pop album has ever been. By 1995, Sweet had finally shed all of his '80s alt-rock scruffiness (even Girlfriend had a lot of that) and found his baby-faced pop soul underneath, and I am here for it. Grade: A
Movies
1917 (2019)
For a movie named after a major year during the most significant military conflict of the 20th century, 1917 doesn't really have a lot to say about the broader scope of WWI, neither historically nor philosophically. On the philosophic side, I suppose we already have Paths of Glory being the most perfect and profound work we could ever ask a movie to be about the ideological underpinnings of the war, but I'll say that in a world in which our cinematic and cultural history is disproportionally focused on WWII, I would have liked to see a movie that took seriously the historical implications of the war that was such a sickening logical end point for the Industrial Revolution and more generally the European Enlightenment at large that it basically invented modernism ex nihilo. At any rate, neither of those things are what 1917 wants to be, which I suppose is fine in theory, but if it's not going to be that, it should probably have had interesting characters (it doesn't—these are stock war movie types) or an engaging screenplay (it does in fits—the writing veers from very good to very obvious) or at the very least some sort of strong anti-war stance (hardly, even though WWI is a war whose very existence is an anti-war statement—the movie pays some lip service to this idea, but it's clearly not its MO). It's not even that interesting as what it's been marketed as—i.e. a war movie done all in one take; the long takes (which were digitally stitched together into one) are nicely done, but this movie gains absolutely nothing except an abstract conceptual impressiveness from the decision to one-take this thing, and what appears onscreen is virtually interchangeable with any other of the handsome but conventional editing and cinematography usually produced by a Deakins/Mendes pairing. It looks pretty nice, but I've seen movies that look nice like this. Grade: C
Ready or Not (2019)
Pretty solid action-thriller with enough visual panache and attitude to make it feel distinct. Samara Weaving is great as the lead, as is Adam Brody's heel turn. There's not a lot to its general theme that rich people suck, but in fairness, rich people do suck. Grade: B
The Devil Wears Prada (2006)
Gotta admit that it took the better part of the first hour of this movie for me to swallow my intense disdain for New York high fashion and just enjoy this as a snappy character piece, and even then, I'm not thrilled by the movie's imbalance between glamour and critique of the industry, especially when the critique is couched in the ways that in-house politics hurt those who have been loyal to a brand, rather than the pervasive racism, sizeism, classism, etc., of the industry attitudes that Streep's character represents or the fact that Anne Hathaway's character is an assistant to apparently one of the most powerful people in the publishing world and yet can't afford rent. But then again, here I am over here watching and moderately enjoying a Beavis and Butt-Head movie, so it's not as if I have the moral high ground. And the performances are really good in this movie—particularly Streep, who definitely has some proto-Aunt-March energy, and Tucci, who gives probably my favorite performance I've seen from him (and who is the best-dressed of any of the core cast—the hats, Anne, why? You're looking like Stacey Dash in Clueless</i>!). The editing is also super sharp, too—far sharper than the slack style typical of the mid-2000s "professional woman in NYC" movies. I do wish the end of the movie stuck to the more melancholic tone that the situation clearly warrants—Hathaway smiles at Streep from across the street as the triumphant music swells, as if Streep isn't a deeply tragic figure both trapped in a job that virtually mandates cruel and inhumanizing behavior while simultaneously knowing nothing else to do but to continue to fortify the system that's devoured her soul. The sad part about "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven" is that the devil is still in Hell, you know? Grade: B-
Ushpizin (2004)
The filmmaking and tone gives off the same semi-amateur "faith-based film" vibes that I get from Kendrick brothers movies like Facing the Giants. I don't know enough about the Israeli Hasidic Jewish culture this portrays to know if the movie has a more complex interaction with the traditions of its faith than Facing the Giants does, but on its surface, this strikes me as centered on a much thornier and interesting dilemma regarding the intersection of ethics, compassion, and faith than anything the Kendricks have ever come up with. It's sweet while only being a little cloying, and I enjoyed the parable-esque aspects of its plot. Grade: B-
Ruggles of Red Gap (1935)
The warmest, sweetest movie I've seen in a very long time. A dynamite showcase for an off-format Charles Laughton and 100%-effective American myth-making. Grade: A
Television
GLOW, Season 3 (2019)
In its third season, GLOW complicates a lot of the warm solidarity dynamics of its first two seasons, moving its characters past the honeymoon stages of their wrestling camaraderie and into the thorny implications of their roles within the wrestling world. What does the rampant cultural mockery within the GLOW act mean once the characters actually begin to come to terms with it? How to do closeted characters who feel a covert freedom within the world of wrestling navigate their relationships with those who are fighting for more open LGBT acceptance? What does it mean for these characters when some have more powerful creative and executive roles within GLOW than others? What does "female liberation" mean when women have vastly different goals for success? A lot of chickens come to roost in this season, which is tremendous, and you get series-best arcs for Bash, Debbie, and Sheila. The rest of the cast has that familiar problem for a show of GLOW's structure, which is that a dozen half-hour episodes don't really give enough time to fully flesh out their arcs, though most of the characters get some tremendous moments. Marc Maron is basically off doing his own thing the whole season, and for as much as I like Marc in this show a lot and his isolation fits thematically, I have to think that the time spent on his LA showbiz arc might have been better spent giving more screentime to, for example, the fascinating dynamic between Melanie and Jenny. As it is, the show's a lot messier than last season, which is occasionally to its benefit, but not always. Grade: B+
Music
Matthew Sweet - 100% Fun (1995)
As pure and as infectious as a power pop album has ever been. By 1995, Sweet had finally shed all of his '80s alt-rock scruffiness (even Girlfriend had a lot of that) and found his baby-faced pop soul underneath, and I am here for it. Grade: A
Sunday, January 19, 2020
Mini Reviews for January 13-19, 2020
Ya know, just reviewin'.
Movies
An Elephant Sitting Still (大象席地而坐) (2019)
I spent about three of this movie's four hours being mostly worn out by the relentless misery of the plot. It is every bit the product of someone who was the actual student of Béla Tarr—a slow endurance test of a film that obsesses over meticulously detailed depictions of human anguish, though Hu Bo makes his movie markedly more eventful and quick than what I've seen of Tarr's (and less aesthetically striking, too, tbh). But the final hour reaches some magnificent pay-offs for the preceding 180 minutes, and its final sequence arrives at such a graceful note of optimism and human connection that it retroactively made me feel pretty kind about the other 75% of the movie. For all the talk about the bleakness of this movie and of its director's death (Hu Bo committed suicide prior to the release), An Elephant Sitting Still really is a hard-won celebration of life, and the endurance it takes to even get to that celebration is entirely the point. Grade: B
42 Up (1998)
I only watched this movie a few days ago, but already I'm having trouble remembering which parts were from this movie and which were from 35 Up. It's also becoming apparent to me just how much the runtimes of these movies are padded by recapping footage from previous installments. Both of those are kind of my fault in a sense, because these movies were designed to be watched seven years apart, and if I'd done that (instead of watching two in four days), I probably would have needed all the reminders from the previous films (I already was struggling to remember a lot of stuff after a several-years-long break between 28 Up and 35 Up), and I probably also would have had a stronger sense of what happens in each entry. But at the same time, given the magnificent scope of the project, I do kind of wish the individual pieces were a bit more consistently magnificent on their own. That said, it is genuinely heartening to see Neil back on his feet, and I really truly do wish that guy the best, so if these movies just become opportunities to drop in to cheer for Neil, I guess I'm okay with that. Grade: B
Beavis and Butt-Head Do America (1996)
I never watched a ton of Beavis and Butt-Head, but the fact that my sheltered pre-adolescent self even knew these guys existed in the '90s is a testament to the mindnumbing miracle that a creation this grimy and weird became so ubiquitous. In my head, I usually associate Mike Judge with King of the Hill and Office Space, the two works of his that I've spent the most time revisiting, but both of those have a sort of humanity and cock-eyed sincerity to them that Beavis and Butt-Head utterly lacks (and in fairness, King of the Hill is probably more Greg Daniels than Mike Judge), and it's worth reminding myself every once in a while that, as with Matt Groening, the purest distillations of Judge's sensibilities had both feet planted in the often kind of off-putting and dissonant world of '80s alt-comedy and alt-comics—this movie's bizarrely exaggerated character animations and picaresque, occasionally surreal shaggy-dog storytelling have as much in common with, like, Bill Plympton as they do with other popular animated media from the same era, and Beavis and Butt-Head themselves feel almost Lynchian in their total surrender to barely human, disconcerting tics. But somehow millions of people in the '90s lapped this stuff up; monoculture may have been a cruel mistress, but you gotta admit that it was an occasionally surprising one, too. Watching this in 2020, I can't really get my head out of the space of viewing this pretty exclusively as a fascinating cultural artifact (in mostly a positive sense, though there is a current of sexism here that's ironic but not very fun), but I did get some genuine laughs out of this one—and a legitimately loud one at that part when all the senators start chuckling, Beavis-and-Butt-Head-style, at the mere mention of boobs. Quality cinema, right there. Grade: B-
Falling Down (1993)
This is basically an ideas movie wrapped in the shell of a '90s thriller, and if I'm being charitable about those ideas, I'd summarize them as being a somewhat ambivalent critique of the way that a certain brand of white and male privilege knows how to do nothing but express violent and sometimes self-destructive rage at the pileup of indignities forged by post-war, post-Reagan neoliberalism. I say "ambivalent" because I think there's an extent to which the protagonist's anger is supposed to be righteous anger, (albeit misapplied into terrorist violence), and even though the main character is compared to a literal Neo-Nazi at one point, there's a kind of petty sympathy this movie is raising for the "we live in a society" grievances that its protagonist monologues incessantly about—which is kind of interesting, since it in theory draws a line from feelings some of the audience themselves may have felt at one time or another toward either nihilistic vigilantism or even full-on Nazism, and invites people to consider the latent aggression (and even racism) in commonly stated aphoristic complaints. But I say I'm being "charitable" here not just because a lot of this does just reads as unironic "angry white guy screed" with minimal social commentary, but also because the "grievances" expressed in this movie are comically broad and petty: "Coca-Cola is more expensive than it used to be!" "Sometimes fast-food places won't let me buy from the breakfast menu, even when I'm only a couple minutes past the cutoff between breakfast and lunch!" I dunno, it's just hard to take seriously even to the slightest extent with the idea that these complaints are connected with homicidal rage. Maybe this is a satirical point about the absurdity of male entitlement or something, but if so, I would have liked to see the movie put a finer point on it. And when the grievances aren't trifling, they're just short-sighted and empty: "There are gangs!" "The ocean is polluted!"—basic, blunt descriptions of modern problems that anyone who has skimmed news headlines could come up with, with absolutely zero hint at any sort of broader context or nuance to explain, for example, why young men of color sometimes get into gangs or why corporations are able to pollute the oceans, etc. You could also probably argue that the myopia is another part of the point, but lord, couldn't this point have been made within a more probing screenplay? And besides, I'm skeptical that it actually is part of the point, at least to the extent that I think it needs to be, given that the movie has a dignified member of the LAPD explicitly state the moral of the film at the end, which, in 1993, not even a year after the heinous acquittal of the boys in LAPD blue who assaulted Rodney King, strikes me as the height of white myopia. I probably could have guessed all of the above based solely on the fact that this is one of those "angry white dude" '90s movies, but what I'm actually disappointed is that as a thriller (or hey, even an ideas movie) how completely bland and anonymous every piece of filmmaking in this movie is. I've only seen three Joel Schumacher-directed movies prior to this: The Lost Boys and his pair of Batman movies, and say what you will about those movies (I have: didn't really care for them), but they are anything but anonymous. Grade: C-
Books
The Beautiful by Renée Ahdieh (2019)
A young woman is adrift in late-19th-century New Orleans; she has dark secrets, but oh look! She meets a sexy, mercurial bad boy who might have dark secrets of his own! But oh no! He might be a werewolf or a vampire! I've not read a ton of Anne Rice, but this strikes me as basically Anne Rice, but boring. Very boring. At the very least, it could have done something interesting with its New Orleans setting, but aside from place names, this could have been set in New York or London or Paris or Berlin or literally anywhere else. My school librarian has said she's going to stop letting students pick the book for our school book club for a while and start choosing the books herself, and with choices like this, I say: take the power back, Emily! Please! Grade: C-
Music
Cykada - Cykada (2019)
Yet another very cool fusion/world beat album to come out of the London jazz scene. As I mentioned in my year-end list for 2019, the highlight is the closing track, the 11-minute "Third Eye Thunder," which takes the tropes of fusion and goes full-on progressive rock with them, but the rest of the album is song, too: a percussive, heavy record with a particularly exploratory guitar sound that at times feels like it reaches nearly to outer space. It's a debut, so its energy makes up for some of its compositional murkiness, and I'm exciting to see what this six piece does in the future. Grade: B+
Movies
An Elephant Sitting Still (大象席地而坐) (2019)
I spent about three of this movie's four hours being mostly worn out by the relentless misery of the plot. It is every bit the product of someone who was the actual student of Béla Tarr—a slow endurance test of a film that obsesses over meticulously detailed depictions of human anguish, though Hu Bo makes his movie markedly more eventful and quick than what I've seen of Tarr's (and less aesthetically striking, too, tbh). But the final hour reaches some magnificent pay-offs for the preceding 180 minutes, and its final sequence arrives at such a graceful note of optimism and human connection that it retroactively made me feel pretty kind about the other 75% of the movie. For all the talk about the bleakness of this movie and of its director's death (Hu Bo committed suicide prior to the release), An Elephant Sitting Still really is a hard-won celebration of life, and the endurance it takes to even get to that celebration is entirely the point. Grade: B
42 Up (1998)
I only watched this movie a few days ago, but already I'm having trouble remembering which parts were from this movie and which were from 35 Up. It's also becoming apparent to me just how much the runtimes of these movies are padded by recapping footage from previous installments. Both of those are kind of my fault in a sense, because these movies were designed to be watched seven years apart, and if I'd done that (instead of watching two in four days), I probably would have needed all the reminders from the previous films (I already was struggling to remember a lot of stuff after a several-years-long break between 28 Up and 35 Up), and I probably also would have had a stronger sense of what happens in each entry. But at the same time, given the magnificent scope of the project, I do kind of wish the individual pieces were a bit more consistently magnificent on their own. That said, it is genuinely heartening to see Neil back on his feet, and I really truly do wish that guy the best, so if these movies just become opportunities to drop in to cheer for Neil, I guess I'm okay with that. Grade: B
Beavis and Butt-Head Do America (1996)
I never watched a ton of Beavis and Butt-Head, but the fact that my sheltered pre-adolescent self even knew these guys existed in the '90s is a testament to the mindnumbing miracle that a creation this grimy and weird became so ubiquitous. In my head, I usually associate Mike Judge with King of the Hill and Office Space, the two works of his that I've spent the most time revisiting, but both of those have a sort of humanity and cock-eyed sincerity to them that Beavis and Butt-Head utterly lacks (and in fairness, King of the Hill is probably more Greg Daniels than Mike Judge), and it's worth reminding myself every once in a while that, as with Matt Groening, the purest distillations of Judge's sensibilities had both feet planted in the often kind of off-putting and dissonant world of '80s alt-comedy and alt-comics—this movie's bizarrely exaggerated character animations and picaresque, occasionally surreal shaggy-dog storytelling have as much in common with, like, Bill Plympton as they do with other popular animated media from the same era, and Beavis and Butt-Head themselves feel almost Lynchian in their total surrender to barely human, disconcerting tics. But somehow millions of people in the '90s lapped this stuff up; monoculture may have been a cruel mistress, but you gotta admit that it was an occasionally surprising one, too. Watching this in 2020, I can't really get my head out of the space of viewing this pretty exclusively as a fascinating cultural artifact (in mostly a positive sense, though there is a current of sexism here that's ironic but not very fun), but I did get some genuine laughs out of this one—and a legitimately loud one at that part when all the senators start chuckling, Beavis-and-Butt-Head-style, at the mere mention of boobs. Quality cinema, right there. Grade: B-
Falling Down (1993)
This is basically an ideas movie wrapped in the shell of a '90s thriller, and if I'm being charitable about those ideas, I'd summarize them as being a somewhat ambivalent critique of the way that a certain brand of white and male privilege knows how to do nothing but express violent and sometimes self-destructive rage at the pileup of indignities forged by post-war, post-Reagan neoliberalism. I say "ambivalent" because I think there's an extent to which the protagonist's anger is supposed to be righteous anger, (albeit misapplied into terrorist violence), and even though the main character is compared to a literal Neo-Nazi at one point, there's a kind of petty sympathy this movie is raising for the "we live in a society" grievances that its protagonist monologues incessantly about—which is kind of interesting, since it in theory draws a line from feelings some of the audience themselves may have felt at one time or another toward either nihilistic vigilantism or even full-on Nazism, and invites people to consider the latent aggression (and even racism) in commonly stated aphoristic complaints. But I say I'm being "charitable" here not just because a lot of this does just reads as unironic "angry white guy screed" with minimal social commentary, but also because the "grievances" expressed in this movie are comically broad and petty: "Coca-Cola is more expensive than it used to be!" "Sometimes fast-food places won't let me buy from the breakfast menu, even when I'm only a couple minutes past the cutoff between breakfast and lunch!" I dunno, it's just hard to take seriously even to the slightest extent with the idea that these complaints are connected with homicidal rage. Maybe this is a satirical point about the absurdity of male entitlement or something, but if so, I would have liked to see the movie put a finer point on it. And when the grievances aren't trifling, they're just short-sighted and empty: "There are gangs!" "The ocean is polluted!"—basic, blunt descriptions of modern problems that anyone who has skimmed news headlines could come up with, with absolutely zero hint at any sort of broader context or nuance to explain, for example, why young men of color sometimes get into gangs or why corporations are able to pollute the oceans, etc. You could also probably argue that the myopia is another part of the point, but lord, couldn't this point have been made within a more probing screenplay? And besides, I'm skeptical that it actually is part of the point, at least to the extent that I think it needs to be, given that the movie has a dignified member of the LAPD explicitly state the moral of the film at the end, which, in 1993, not even a year after the heinous acquittal of the boys in LAPD blue who assaulted Rodney King, strikes me as the height of white myopia. I probably could have guessed all of the above based solely on the fact that this is one of those "angry white dude" '90s movies, but what I'm actually disappointed is that as a thriller (or hey, even an ideas movie) how completely bland and anonymous every piece of filmmaking in this movie is. I've only seen three Joel Schumacher-directed movies prior to this: The Lost Boys and his pair of Batman movies, and say what you will about those movies (I have: didn't really care for them), but they are anything but anonymous. Grade: C-
Books
The Beautiful by Renée Ahdieh (2019)
A young woman is adrift in late-19th-century New Orleans; she has dark secrets, but oh look! She meets a sexy, mercurial bad boy who might have dark secrets of his own! But oh no! He might be a werewolf or a vampire! I've not read a ton of Anne Rice, but this strikes me as basically Anne Rice, but boring. Very boring. At the very least, it could have done something interesting with its New Orleans setting, but aside from place names, this could have been set in New York or London or Paris or Berlin or literally anywhere else. My school librarian has said she's going to stop letting students pick the book for our school book club for a while and start choosing the books herself, and with choices like this, I say: take the power back, Emily! Please! Grade: C-
Music
Cykada - Cykada (2019)
Yet another very cool fusion/world beat album to come out of the London jazz scene. As I mentioned in my year-end list for 2019, the highlight is the closing track, the 11-minute "Third Eye Thunder," which takes the tropes of fusion and goes full-on progressive rock with them, but the rest of the album is song, too: a percussive, heavy record with a particularly exploratory guitar sound that at times feels like it reaches nearly to outer space. It's a debut, so its energy makes up for some of its compositional murkiness, and I'm exciting to see what this six piece does in the future. Grade: B+
Sunday, January 12, 2020
Mini Reviews for January 6-12, 2020
RIP winter break.
Movies
Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019)
I dunno if I have a ton more to say than everyone has already hashed out ad nauseum, but this was super bad. Simultaneously overlong and rushed, too fan-servicey and not validating enough of the fan commitment to the franchise, mind-numbingly illogical and yet somehow too obsessed with explaining the connection between everything—and above all, just flabbergastingly, stupifyingly dumb, especially in regards to its characters. This sequel trilogy has been far from perfect, but one thing I liked from the get-go is the ways in which its core cast consists of characters who are uneasy with the archetypes that the mythic tropes of the franchise have given them, which, at some of the trilogy's better moments (Finn's abandonment of the First Order in The Force Awakens, Kilo Ren's disillusionment with the Jedi/Sith binary and Rey's discovery that her parents are "nobodies" in The Last Jedi), has given the trilogy the feeling of these people not just doing the whole Joseph Campbell "Refusal of the Call" thing but full-on fighting the meta-authority of the oppressive mandates of their own franchise—a delicious and cosmic (if inconsistently implemented) idea that's super interesting. But Rise of Skywalker throws all that out; Rey just becomes Luke 2.0, Kilo just becomes Vader 2.0, etc., and we're treated to a very dull and undercooked retread of some of Return of the Jedi's more iconic structures without the benefit of the weight that a trilogy of well-crafted characters would lend those structures. I do think people are a little bit over-stating the extent to which this movie "undoes" The Last Jedi (though there are inarguably a few tweaks, most notably the capriciously diminished role of Kelly Marie Trans—Keri Russell's masked newcomer, whom we know and care nothing about, gets exponentially more screentime, for example, and I'm crying foul). Because of the proxy war against toxic fans that most of these movies are forced to be weapons in, people don't seem to remember (or like to bring up) that The Last Jedi itself walks back a good deal of its subversiveness in its final act, and Rey's embrace of the musty mythic hero archetype at the end of that movie probably laid a lot more ground work for the dull pileup of lazy character beats in The Rise of Skywalker than people would like to admit. Still, surely there was a way to leverage the somewhat conventional landing of The Last Jedi into a more interesting movie than this. Even reliable staples of excellence within the Star Wars franchise like creature design and the John Williams score are asleep at the wheel here, and this is probably the ugliest, most visually anonymous of the numbered Star Wars episodes (though I still think Solo takes the cake for the franchise overall). I can't say that I'm disappointed, both because I waited long enough before seeing this that I basically had heard a bunch of the fan grumbling beforehand and also because I've been only tepidly a Star Wars fan since the prequels shook me out in middle school. But at least the prequels were full of good ideas (albeit muddled with dodgy execution). The Rise of Skywalker is just bad ideas executed badly. Grade: C-
The Farewell (2019)
Some of this meandered in a way I didn't entirely think was productive—e.g. the running thread about the Guggenheim Fellowship—but the cast is uniformly excellent, and the "wedding" scene is one of the best movie scenes of 2019. Also, while it's definitely more of the "point-and-shoot" style of modern American indie films than some wildly formally inventive movie a la Gaspar Noé or Bi Gan, Lulu Wang's direction is still way more full of ideas than its "heartwarming family indie" milieu necessitates: not just the showy scenes like the pivoting camera at the circular wedding table moment or the slow-motion sequences but also small touches like the stark and subtly striking ways that the characters are blocked so close to the camera in several scenes. Good stuff. Grade: B+
35 Up (1991)
It's a little hard to review these movies individually, both because it's more about the decades-spanning scope of the project than any one entry and also because it's been a long time since I've seen the last installment (not quite the seven years that people watching this series in real time had, but not too far off either). So I don't really know if 35 Up is any better or worse than 28 Up—though it definitely feels less game-changing, mostly because the ways that the subjects have grown isn't quite so stark as in 28 Up. But these individuals have also grown into increasingly more intense versions of themselves, usually skewing toward either more self-reflexivity or more resolute acceptance of the increased stasis of their circumstances, and both make for some fascinating, soulful interviews. As with 28 Up, Neil is the one who sticks out most here, given his physically/mentally dire straights and philosophically minded answers to the film's questions. Really good to see the guy doing a bit better than he was in the last movie, although it's still heartbreaking to hear him talk with such frankness about his realistic prospects as an economically unstable man with mental illness in the early '90s. Grade: B+
Once Upon a Time in America (1984)
First things first: this movie is, like, stunningly similar to The Irishman, right? An aging filmmaker of Italian heritage makes a ridiculously long, deliberately slow movie in which an aging Robert De Niro reflects back with some regret over his life in organized crime and the way it has had repercussions on his relationships with the women in his life and also on a close male friend (who is also deeply connected with the Teamsters' union)? Just wanted to throw that out there since I haven't seen a ton of people make the connection. At any rate, unlike The Irishman, Once Upon a Time in America unfortunately finds none of its major talents (except maybe De Niro, who is stellar here) consistently at the heights of their abilities. Ennio Morricone, for example, gives a score that is uncharacteristically drippy for long stretches, and Sergio Leone himself drains his direction of virtually all of the giddiness of his westerns in the interest of delivery a Stately and Important Movie that nonetheless wallows in some of his worst impulses as a director, such as his pretty callous attitude toward his female characters—the movie undeniably paints it as a Bad Thing that, for example, one of our main characters rapes not one but two women (in scenes of punishing length, no less, practically wallowing in the ugliness and pain), but resolutely frames these rapes in terms of how bad they are for the rapist (he loses his girlfriend! oh no!), barely giving a passing glance at the psychological toll on the women. At the same time, not having these talents consistently at the heights of their abilities doesn't mean that they can't be inconsistently at the heights of their powers, and there are definitely stretches of Once Upon a Time in America where it achieves with stunning success the towering grandeur of its vision: a movie in which intimate personal drama and widescreen historical sweep intersect to form a dazzling work reminiscent of that old era of classic Hollywood epics like Doctor Zhivago. Morricone's score may turn to syrup more often than not, but it is also capable of moments of sublimely classical beauty; Leone's direction may have none of the zip of something like The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, but it preserves what is probably Leone's signature directorial flourish, which is the willingness to pull and stretch a dialogue-free scene to such excruciating lengths that it becomes a nearly abstract collage of long takes, repeated sounds, and potent silences. There are definitely scenes here—none of them with much dialogue—that rank among the best that Leone ever did, and that's enough to gesture tantalizingly at the great cinematic statement on American history and masculinity a la The Godfather Part II that Once Upon a Time in America could have been. Instead, we got this deeply flawed opus that's as ugly and imperfect as it is beautiful—I mean, I guess "THAT'S AMERICA, kids," and maybe it's just my tragic internalizing of American myth that makes me want this to be less compromised than the country it claims to embody. But hey, I'm American, too, so lemme keep reachin' for that dream, baby. Grade: B
Books
The Encyclopedia of Early Earth by Isabel Greenberg (2013)
This isn't an encyclopedia, don't worry. It's actually a graphic novel about storytelling and myth and folklore, and I thought it was great! In the tradition of ancient epic poetry, it follows around a hero on a quest (in this case, a boy looking for his other half—it's a little complicated) that frequently takes breaks to digress into the deep past and the mythologized sociopolitical history of the lands the hero travels through. These digressions themselves are infused with echoes of the mythology from our real world, with echoes of Genesis and The Odyssey and all sorts of other ancient stories. The result is a book that has the texture of Tolkien in the sense that its own lore feels real and profound, having found just the right balance of original material and established folkloric flavors to scan as "authentically" mythic. Some of the end feels rushed—I would have happily read another 100 pages, and that's probably what the book needed—but overall, it's very cool and very fun. Grade: A-
Music
DARK THOUGHTS - MUST BE NICE (2019)
There's nothing particularly special about DARK THOUGHTS (either here nor in 2018's AT WORK), but they do this whole Ramones-y raggedy pop-punk thing pretty well, and at only 19 minutes, they know exactly how long to hang around before they wear out their welcome. The closer (and title track) is retroactively one of my favorite songs of 2019, too. Grade: B
Movies
Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019)
I dunno if I have a ton more to say than everyone has already hashed out ad nauseum, but this was super bad. Simultaneously overlong and rushed, too fan-servicey and not validating enough of the fan commitment to the franchise, mind-numbingly illogical and yet somehow too obsessed with explaining the connection between everything—and above all, just flabbergastingly, stupifyingly dumb, especially in regards to its characters. This sequel trilogy has been far from perfect, but one thing I liked from the get-go is the ways in which its core cast consists of characters who are uneasy with the archetypes that the mythic tropes of the franchise have given them, which, at some of the trilogy's better moments (Finn's abandonment of the First Order in The Force Awakens, Kilo Ren's disillusionment with the Jedi/Sith binary and Rey's discovery that her parents are "nobodies" in The Last Jedi), has given the trilogy the feeling of these people not just doing the whole Joseph Campbell "Refusal of the Call" thing but full-on fighting the meta-authority of the oppressive mandates of their own franchise—a delicious and cosmic (if inconsistently implemented) idea that's super interesting. But Rise of Skywalker throws all that out; Rey just becomes Luke 2.0, Kilo just becomes Vader 2.0, etc., and we're treated to a very dull and undercooked retread of some of Return of the Jedi's more iconic structures without the benefit of the weight that a trilogy of well-crafted characters would lend those structures. I do think people are a little bit over-stating the extent to which this movie "undoes" The Last Jedi (though there are inarguably a few tweaks, most notably the capriciously diminished role of Kelly Marie Trans—Keri Russell's masked newcomer, whom we know and care nothing about, gets exponentially more screentime, for example, and I'm crying foul). Because of the proxy war against toxic fans that most of these movies are forced to be weapons in, people don't seem to remember (or like to bring up) that The Last Jedi itself walks back a good deal of its subversiveness in its final act, and Rey's embrace of the musty mythic hero archetype at the end of that movie probably laid a lot more ground work for the dull pileup of lazy character beats in The Rise of Skywalker than people would like to admit. Still, surely there was a way to leverage the somewhat conventional landing of The Last Jedi into a more interesting movie than this. Even reliable staples of excellence within the Star Wars franchise like creature design and the John Williams score are asleep at the wheel here, and this is probably the ugliest, most visually anonymous of the numbered Star Wars episodes (though I still think Solo takes the cake for the franchise overall). I can't say that I'm disappointed, both because I waited long enough before seeing this that I basically had heard a bunch of the fan grumbling beforehand and also because I've been only tepidly a Star Wars fan since the prequels shook me out in middle school. But at least the prequels were full of good ideas (albeit muddled with dodgy execution). The Rise of Skywalker is just bad ideas executed badly. Grade: C-
The Farewell (2019)
Some of this meandered in a way I didn't entirely think was productive—e.g. the running thread about the Guggenheim Fellowship—but the cast is uniformly excellent, and the "wedding" scene is one of the best movie scenes of 2019. Also, while it's definitely more of the "point-and-shoot" style of modern American indie films than some wildly formally inventive movie a la Gaspar Noé or Bi Gan, Lulu Wang's direction is still way more full of ideas than its "heartwarming family indie" milieu necessitates: not just the showy scenes like the pivoting camera at the circular wedding table moment or the slow-motion sequences but also small touches like the stark and subtly striking ways that the characters are blocked so close to the camera in several scenes. Good stuff. Grade: B+
35 Up (1991)
It's a little hard to review these movies individually, both because it's more about the decades-spanning scope of the project than any one entry and also because it's been a long time since I've seen the last installment (not quite the seven years that people watching this series in real time had, but not too far off either). So I don't really know if 35 Up is any better or worse than 28 Up—though it definitely feels less game-changing, mostly because the ways that the subjects have grown isn't quite so stark as in 28 Up. But these individuals have also grown into increasingly more intense versions of themselves, usually skewing toward either more self-reflexivity or more resolute acceptance of the increased stasis of their circumstances, and both make for some fascinating, soulful interviews. As with 28 Up, Neil is the one who sticks out most here, given his physically/mentally dire straights and philosophically minded answers to the film's questions. Really good to see the guy doing a bit better than he was in the last movie, although it's still heartbreaking to hear him talk with such frankness about his realistic prospects as an economically unstable man with mental illness in the early '90s. Grade: B+
Once Upon a Time in America (1984)
First things first: this movie is, like, stunningly similar to The Irishman, right? An aging filmmaker of Italian heritage makes a ridiculously long, deliberately slow movie in which an aging Robert De Niro reflects back with some regret over his life in organized crime and the way it has had repercussions on his relationships with the women in his life and also on a close male friend (who is also deeply connected with the Teamsters' union)? Just wanted to throw that out there since I haven't seen a ton of people make the connection. At any rate, unlike The Irishman, Once Upon a Time in America unfortunately finds none of its major talents (except maybe De Niro, who is stellar here) consistently at the heights of their abilities. Ennio Morricone, for example, gives a score that is uncharacteristically drippy for long stretches, and Sergio Leone himself drains his direction of virtually all of the giddiness of his westerns in the interest of delivery a Stately and Important Movie that nonetheless wallows in some of his worst impulses as a director, such as his pretty callous attitude toward his female characters—the movie undeniably paints it as a Bad Thing that, for example, one of our main characters rapes not one but two women (in scenes of punishing length, no less, practically wallowing in the ugliness and pain), but resolutely frames these rapes in terms of how bad they are for the rapist (he loses his girlfriend! oh no!), barely giving a passing glance at the psychological toll on the women. At the same time, not having these talents consistently at the heights of their abilities doesn't mean that they can't be inconsistently at the heights of their powers, and there are definitely stretches of Once Upon a Time in America where it achieves with stunning success the towering grandeur of its vision: a movie in which intimate personal drama and widescreen historical sweep intersect to form a dazzling work reminiscent of that old era of classic Hollywood epics like Doctor Zhivago. Morricone's score may turn to syrup more often than not, but it is also capable of moments of sublimely classical beauty; Leone's direction may have none of the zip of something like The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, but it preserves what is probably Leone's signature directorial flourish, which is the willingness to pull and stretch a dialogue-free scene to such excruciating lengths that it becomes a nearly abstract collage of long takes, repeated sounds, and potent silences. There are definitely scenes here—none of them with much dialogue—that rank among the best that Leone ever did, and that's enough to gesture tantalizingly at the great cinematic statement on American history and masculinity a la The Godfather Part II that Once Upon a Time in America could have been. Instead, we got this deeply flawed opus that's as ugly and imperfect as it is beautiful—I mean, I guess "THAT'S AMERICA, kids," and maybe it's just my tragic internalizing of American myth that makes me want this to be less compromised than the country it claims to embody. But hey, I'm American, too, so lemme keep reachin' for that dream, baby. Grade: B
Books
The Encyclopedia of Early Earth by Isabel Greenberg (2013)
This isn't an encyclopedia, don't worry. It's actually a graphic novel about storytelling and myth and folklore, and I thought it was great! In the tradition of ancient epic poetry, it follows around a hero on a quest (in this case, a boy looking for his other half—it's a little complicated) that frequently takes breaks to digress into the deep past and the mythologized sociopolitical history of the lands the hero travels through. These digressions themselves are infused with echoes of the mythology from our real world, with echoes of Genesis and The Odyssey and all sorts of other ancient stories. The result is a book that has the texture of Tolkien in the sense that its own lore feels real and profound, having found just the right balance of original material and established folkloric flavors to scan as "authentically" mythic. Some of the end feels rushed—I would have happily read another 100 pages, and that's probably what the book needed—but overall, it's very cool and very fun. Grade: A-
Music
DARK THOUGHTS - MUST BE NICE (2019)
There's nothing particularly special about DARK THOUGHTS (either here nor in 2018's AT WORK), but they do this whole Ramones-y raggedy pop-punk thing pretty well, and at only 19 minutes, they know exactly how long to hang around before they wear out their welcome. The closer (and title track) is retroactively one of my favorite songs of 2019, too. Grade: B
Sunday, January 5, 2020
Mini Reviews for December 30, 2019 - January 5, 2020
I've read a couple books and listened to some music, but I've also been traveling and thus didn't have a ton of time to write about them. I'll get to them later.
In the meantime, don't forget my pair of "Favorites of 2019" posts. You can find the movie one here and the music one here.
Movies
Cats (2019)
There was probably never going to be a good way to adapt the all-time-terrible Andrew Lloyd Webber Broadway smash Cats (and please, can this movie be the moment when everyone collectively wakes up and realizes that it was never good? That's right, not even "Memory"), but this is definitely one of the worse ways to even attempt to turn that musical into a movie, starting with the choice to superimpose actors faces over CG cat-human hybrid bodies but continuing on down the line to every single filmmaking choice including just the basic shot composition and blocking (which obscures 90% of the CG choreography 90% of the time). Still, I'd be lying if I joined in with the chorus of people calling this the worst movie of 2019—or even if I just said I didn't like it. The worst movies are either ideologically toxic or boring, and Cats is neither. Especially in this age of hyper-cautious movie studios, it's a rare treat to get a movie that goes so disastrously awry at every single turn as this one, and I had a terrific time with it. I can't quite rate it highly enough that I might trick someone into thinking that I recommend this movie on its own terms (half of the theater walked out before the film's halfway point, leaving just me and my friends to have a collective freak out), but, like, as a movie working against itself at every turn on its own sui generis rubric, this is great. Grade: C+
Gosford Park (2001)
I've not watched a ton of post-'70s Robert Altman movies, so my main associations with the man are primarily American, primarily counterculturally informed. So it was interesting to see a movie of his so far out of that milieu: i.e. one that takes place in the intensely buttoned-up, intensely stratified world of early 20th century Great Britain. The verdict is that it's about 70% shaggy Altman-esque ensemble observational drama, about 30% murder mystery that kind of pays off all the kind of aimless observational drama in the preceding hour-plus. The buildup to the murder feels far too long, but then again, once that plot jumps in, it racks the movie into crystal-clear focus on the ugliest, saddest implications of the class tensions that have been waltzing in front of the camera the whole time. I like that. Grade: B
The Wind Will Carry Us (باد ما را خواهد برد) (1999)
As always with Kiarostami and his movies, there's a lot to unpack with The Wind Will Carry Us. My initial takeaway is that this is basically like Kiarostami's take on the whole Hallmark original movie thing where the city slicker goes to the quaint small town and learns to renounce their city-slicking ways and appreciate the slow, personalized pace of the small-time life—in fact, Kiarostami finds the correct way to frame this story, which hinges on the tense interplay between the urban exploitation of rural "quaintness" and the interlocking systems of contemporary life that affect us all. It's a gorgeously shot, strikingly funny movie that's of course a lot more complicated than what I've described, more of a dense modern text of potent symbols and richly evocative scenes than anything like the moralizing narrative I've just framed it as, and I've barely scratched the surface of it myself. But this is a good one, for sure. Grade: A-
Kundun (1997)
I'm 100% here for the Philip Glass score and Thelma Shoomaker editing, but I'm maybe only 50% here for the Martin Scorsese direction and Melissa Mathison screenplay. The music is stunning throughout, and there are some edits here (especially in the final, highly impressionist final fifteen minutes or so) that are just jaw-dropping in their beauty. As for Scorsese/Mathison, Kundun is the first feature for both of them that is outside a Western, Christian milieu, and both the screenplay and the direction have a stuffiness about them that feels like the sort of careful reverence you might use when approaching a tradition you are not a part of. It's stuffy and robs the material of anything like the more incisive moments of either artist's typical work, and it kind of makes me wonder how suitable either one was for this project in the first place (ditto with the choice to have everybody speak in English—come on, Scorsese, even your bud Schrader had his "Asian" film in the regionally appropriate language!). For Scorsese in particular, his beatific stance toward the Dalai Lama is basically the opposite of the thorny complexity he affords his Christian protagonists and even Jesus Christ Himself, and while I completely understand why an outsider wouldn't want to imbue complexity onto a religious/political tradition not their own, it really makes some of Scorsese's work here feel like a noble failure. But that music! Those edits! Grade: B-
Enter the Dragon (1973)
The last new-to-me movie I watched in 2019 (though I did rewatch Frances Ha with my wife sometime later in the evening). Anyway, it's a lot of fun. I've never seen a Bruce Lee movie before, and this seemed like an alright introduction. It was basically a Bond movie, which means that it has the boring stretches and tedious archetypes that usually plague Bond movies, but Bruce Lee kicking and punching his way through the baddies is way more fun than, like, Sean Connery sleeping his way through a small army of women. Also, I like that Bruce Lee's character is just named Lee. Grade: B+
In the meantime, don't forget my pair of "Favorites of 2019" posts. You can find the movie one here and the music one here.
Movies
Cats (2019)
There was probably never going to be a good way to adapt the all-time-terrible Andrew Lloyd Webber Broadway smash Cats (and please, can this movie be the moment when everyone collectively wakes up and realizes that it was never good? That's right, not even "Memory"), but this is definitely one of the worse ways to even attempt to turn that musical into a movie, starting with the choice to superimpose actors faces over CG cat-human hybrid bodies but continuing on down the line to every single filmmaking choice including just the basic shot composition and blocking (which obscures 90% of the CG choreography 90% of the time). Still, I'd be lying if I joined in with the chorus of people calling this the worst movie of 2019—or even if I just said I didn't like it. The worst movies are either ideologically toxic or boring, and Cats is neither. Especially in this age of hyper-cautious movie studios, it's a rare treat to get a movie that goes so disastrously awry at every single turn as this one, and I had a terrific time with it. I can't quite rate it highly enough that I might trick someone into thinking that I recommend this movie on its own terms (half of the theater walked out before the film's halfway point, leaving just me and my friends to have a collective freak out), but, like, as a movie working against itself at every turn on its own sui generis rubric, this is great. Grade: C+
Gosford Park (2001)
I've not watched a ton of post-'70s Robert Altman movies, so my main associations with the man are primarily American, primarily counterculturally informed. So it was interesting to see a movie of his so far out of that milieu: i.e. one that takes place in the intensely buttoned-up, intensely stratified world of early 20th century Great Britain. The verdict is that it's about 70% shaggy Altman-esque ensemble observational drama, about 30% murder mystery that kind of pays off all the kind of aimless observational drama in the preceding hour-plus. The buildup to the murder feels far too long, but then again, once that plot jumps in, it racks the movie into crystal-clear focus on the ugliest, saddest implications of the class tensions that have been waltzing in front of the camera the whole time. I like that. Grade: B
The Wind Will Carry Us (باد ما را خواهد برد) (1999)
As always with Kiarostami and his movies, there's a lot to unpack with The Wind Will Carry Us. My initial takeaway is that this is basically like Kiarostami's take on the whole Hallmark original movie thing where the city slicker goes to the quaint small town and learns to renounce their city-slicking ways and appreciate the slow, personalized pace of the small-time life—in fact, Kiarostami finds the correct way to frame this story, which hinges on the tense interplay between the urban exploitation of rural "quaintness" and the interlocking systems of contemporary life that affect us all. It's a gorgeously shot, strikingly funny movie that's of course a lot more complicated than what I've described, more of a dense modern text of potent symbols and richly evocative scenes than anything like the moralizing narrative I've just framed it as, and I've barely scratched the surface of it myself. But this is a good one, for sure. Grade: A-
Kundun (1997)
I'm 100% here for the Philip Glass score and Thelma Shoomaker editing, but I'm maybe only 50% here for the Martin Scorsese direction and Melissa Mathison screenplay. The music is stunning throughout, and there are some edits here (especially in the final, highly impressionist final fifteen minutes or so) that are just jaw-dropping in their beauty. As for Scorsese/Mathison, Kundun is the first feature for both of them that is outside a Western, Christian milieu, and both the screenplay and the direction have a stuffiness about them that feels like the sort of careful reverence you might use when approaching a tradition you are not a part of. It's stuffy and robs the material of anything like the more incisive moments of either artist's typical work, and it kind of makes me wonder how suitable either one was for this project in the first place (ditto with the choice to have everybody speak in English—come on, Scorsese, even your bud Schrader had his "Asian" film in the regionally appropriate language!). For Scorsese in particular, his beatific stance toward the Dalai Lama is basically the opposite of the thorny complexity he affords his Christian protagonists and even Jesus Christ Himself, and while I completely understand why an outsider wouldn't want to imbue complexity onto a religious/political tradition not their own, it really makes some of Scorsese's work here feel like a noble failure. But that music! Those edits! Grade: B-
Enter the Dragon (1973)
The last new-to-me movie I watched in 2019 (though I did rewatch Frances Ha with my wife sometime later in the evening). Anyway, it's a lot of fun. I've never seen a Bruce Lee movie before, and this seemed like an alright introduction. It was basically a Bond movie, which means that it has the boring stretches and tedious archetypes that usually plague Bond movies, but Bruce Lee kicking and punching his way through the baddies is way more fun than, like, Sean Connery sleeping his way through a small army of women. Also, I like that Bruce Lee's character is just named Lee. Grade: B+
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Favorite Movies of 2019
2019 sucked. It sucked on a personal level for me and my family, it sucked on a national level, it sucked on a global level.
My son was born, though, which is just such a wonderful ray of positivity in my life while at the same time ushering in a kind of mournfulness for him and the world he will inherit from my generation and the ones prior. I want my son to have a world full of joy and beauty, and while certainly those things will persist, they will do so alongside God only knows what horrible inheritance of the modern age. But in the absence of a material reality that's going to leave a more beautiful world for my son, there is at least art and the legacy it can leave on the human earth for my son to encounter, and readers, you all know that the cinematic arts are near and dear to my heart.
So here are my favorite movies of the year. When my son asks me about this year (if he cares to—and honestly, why would he? I certainly wouldn't want to hear about 2019), I'll have to tell him about children in cages and my brother's death and my grandfather's decline and Jeff Bezos hoarding his billions like a really boring version of a fairy tale dragon. But I also hope to be able to tell him about what made me feel awe and wonder and that rush of being alive, and these movies will undoubtedly be a part of that.
Anyway, enough hand-wringing. Here's the list. As always, it's limited to movie that had either a streaming or theatrical release in the United States during 2019. Also limited to the movies I actually had a chance to see in 2019. So before you ask, no, I didn't get to see Knives Out or Rise of Skywalker.
Also, don't forget about my Favorite Music of 2019 post, in case you missed it and are interested!
Favorite Movies
1. Long Day's Journey Into Night
Filmmakers have long compared cinema to dreaming, but when the protagonist of Bi Gan's towering Long Day's Journey Into Night falls asleep, it results in one of the most thrilling and transporting sequences of film I've ever seen: an hour-long single take that affirms that filmmaking is the nexus between waking and dreaming, heaven and earth. The movie is one half mystery and one half that dream sequence, and honestly, I couldn't describe much more about the opaque plot. But it doesn't matter when it's composed of some of the most dazzling minutes of film ever. The Wizard of Oz for the arthouse. This is why I love movies.
[Read original review]
2. The Lighthouse
Both an unsettling dream of a film and also the funniest comedy of the year. Melville meets Beckett meets whatever strange thought is in director Robert Eggers's head. Willem Dafoe is mesmerizing. The cinematography is lush. The Lighthouse is God. Why'd ya spill yer beans?
[Read original review]
3. Little Women
The kind of movie that makes you glad you were alive to see it. I wouldn't be surprised if after repeat viewings, this became my favorite movie of this year.
[Read original review]
4. The Irishman
Scorsese's death-obsessed swan song for the modern gangster genre is one of the man's best. Like Silence a few years ago, it's about grasping for God and some sense of meaning within a life that has caused immeasurable suffering and resulted in crushing isolation: a bleak rumination on fevered and heartbreaking memories that try desperately (and unsuccessfully) to obscure the wasted life and rotten soul of the protagonist.
[Read original review]
5. Uncut Gems
The most intense movie on this list by far. Adam Sandler's turn as a jeweler who pays his debts with gamble upon gamble is one of the more visceral depictions of the aftershocks of the Great Recession put onscreen (the movie takes place in 2012), Darius Khondji's grainy, nervous cinematography and Daniel Lopatin's relentless, pulsing score highlighting the sweaty desperation of Sandler's character. It's a movie of almost transcendent griminess, and when it reaches its inevitable, heart-stopping conclusion, you'll realize you haven't taken a breath for two hours.
[Read original review]
6. Parasite
Twisty and tense, provocative in its ideas—Gatsby-esque in its critique of capitalism and the pretensions of the upper class, Hitchcock-esque in its propulsive, deadpan drive.
[Read original review]
7. Hustlers
The best mainstream Hollywood release of the year (if we don't count Little Women); the best Goodfellas riff since the OG itself; a rip-roaring heist film by way of a female friendship dramedy. A lot of the movies on my list appeal pretty much to my own niche set of interests, and Hustlers does that, too, but it's also far and away the biggest crowdpleaser of all ten here. I can't say enough good things about it.
[Read original review]
8. Her Smell
Terrible title. Good movie. I can't think of a "rise and fall and rise of a musician" movie that does that arc more effectively than this one. One of Alex Ross Perry's best.
[Read original review]
9. Us
Get Out's messier, more ambitious younger sibling. There's an intensity to the sheer commitment to its host of wild ideas, and the resulting movie is breathtaking in its scope. Jordan Peele's got it, that mad Twilight Zone energy. Lupita Nyong'o's got them, the best performance(s) of the year.
[Read original review]
10. Transit
Transit takes a WWII novel and transplants it into contemporary Europe, provoking questions like: What if there were Nazis in 2019? What if they marched through the streets to round up refugees? What if they didn't wear swastikas and stuff and instead just had on riot gear and police uniforms? Weird, right? Guess we'll never know what that would be like.
[Read original review]
Appendix: Miscellaneous Movies Also Worth Noting
Best Screenplay: High Flying Bird—I'm pretty sure it's Little Women. But if it isn't Little Women, then it's certainly Tarell Alvin McCraney's electric writing on High Flying Bird. And I don't even follow basketball.
Best Florence Pugh in a Flower Crown: Midsommar—Again, this maybe should go to Little Women. But this one gets bonus points for putting Pugh in a flower dress, too. I admire the commitment to the bit.
Best Action: John Wick 3: Parabellum—I mean, it's John Wick. He has a fight on top of a galloping horse.
Animated Corner Award: I Lost My Body—At least among the ones I saw, 2019 was a distressingly weak year for animated movies, hence nothing making my top 10. But animation is also the thing I love most about cinema, so I feel weird leaving it off completely, so here's this movie that was interesting but that I wasn't super enthusiastic about.
Documentary Corner Award: Apollo 11—On the other hand, this was a tremendous year for documentaries (honestly, a great decade for documentaries, which is a relief after the 2000s were a nadir for the form), and Apollo 11, the movie made of mostly previously unseen footage of the original moonshot, is the very best. Its focus on the mundane details of the mission and the spaces around its most famous moments cut through the cultural mythology of the event and emphasis just what a jaw-dropping feat of engineering and physical dexterity landing on the moon was. Stunning.
"Documentary" Corner Award: Rolling Thunder Revue: A Bob Dylan Story—Too good not to include, too fake to call a documentary.
Concert Documentary Award: Homecoming: A Film by Beyoncé—Completely thrillingly assembled footage of the instantly iconic "Beychella" performances. It also probably belongs alongside Rolling Thunder Revue in its work in furthering the mythologizing of its central artist.
Best Outer Space Award: Ad Astra—2019 was a really tremendous year for space movies. If you're looking for "hard sci-fi," you can't get much better than this movie's rigorously thoughtful, realistic depiction of near-future space travel.
Best Philosophical Implications of Outer Space: High Life—I wrote about this at length for Cinematary, if you want to read that.
Best Conspiracy: Under the Silver Lake—A conspiracy film for the internet era. The biggest conspiracy of them all is that you're inventing it all yourself. Facts may not care about your feelings, but what if they also don't care about making any coherent sense?
Best Ghost Story: Atlantics—It's kind of a ghost story. I dunno. See it yourself and find out.
Best UFO Enthusiast: Ash Is Purest White—You'll know him when you see him.
"More People Should See This" Award: Greta—Don't remember too many people talking about this thriller, but it's a good one. Go see it!
"Thank Goodness I Don't Live In Florida" Award: Crawl—Hurricanes? Alligators? No thanks.
"Nope, Florida's Still Not Worth It" Award: Beach Bum—Not even a ridiculously fun Matthew McConaughey performance and some really cool cinematography can make this place somewhere I want to be. Plus: SHARKS??
"You Do You, Man" Award: Glass—M. Night Shyamalan is just doing his thing, and this year "his thing" was making a logically suspect, bizarrely paced mythological elevation of the Avengers. It's very odd, it's not really that good, and it's entirely a Shyamalan joint. Glad our test-grouped-to-death corporate blockbuster age somehow made room for a movie like this.
Least-Favorite Trend of the Year: "Hello, my name is the Walt Disney Company! Remember that thing of ours that you like? We're here to make it worse!"
Worst Disney: Dumbo—A very crowded field; I can't remember a year in which I found so little to like among the corporate titan's film output. And I didn't even get a chance to see The Lion King. But this completely misbegotten live-action adaptation of the bona fide animated classic gets the dubious honor as my least-favorite out of a whole host of rotten.
Worst Movie of the Year: Climax—Gaspar Noé can go sit on a tack. An LSD-laced tack.
Best Non-2019 Movie I Saw for the First Time in 2019: Dusty Stacks of Mom: The Poster Project—Jodie Mack's beautiful, idiosyncratic, personal re-interpretation of Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, by way of the collapse of her mother's poster business. It's basically perfect, and while it's devilishly hard to track down, if you can do it, DO IT. It's so great.
So here are my favorite movies of the year. When my son asks me about this year (if he cares to—and honestly, why would he? I certainly wouldn't want to hear about 2019), I'll have to tell him about children in cages and my brother's death and my grandfather's decline and Jeff Bezos hoarding his billions like a really boring version of a fairy tale dragon. But I also hope to be able to tell him about what made me feel awe and wonder and that rush of being alive, and these movies will undoubtedly be a part of that.
Anyway, enough hand-wringing. Here's the list. As always, it's limited to movie that had either a streaming or theatrical release in the United States during 2019. Also limited to the movies I actually had a chance to see in 2019. So before you ask, no, I didn't get to see Knives Out or Rise of Skywalker.
Also, don't forget about my Favorite Music of 2019 post, in case you missed it and are interested!
Favorite Movies
1. Long Day's Journey Into Night
Filmmakers have long compared cinema to dreaming, but when the protagonist of Bi Gan's towering Long Day's Journey Into Night falls asleep, it results in one of the most thrilling and transporting sequences of film I've ever seen: an hour-long single take that affirms that filmmaking is the nexus between waking and dreaming, heaven and earth. The movie is one half mystery and one half that dream sequence, and honestly, I couldn't describe much more about the opaque plot. But it doesn't matter when it's composed of some of the most dazzling minutes of film ever. The Wizard of Oz for the arthouse. This is why I love movies.
[Read original review]
2. The Lighthouse
Both an unsettling dream of a film and also the funniest comedy of the year. Melville meets Beckett meets whatever strange thought is in director Robert Eggers's head. Willem Dafoe is mesmerizing. The cinematography is lush. The Lighthouse is God. Why'd ya spill yer beans?
[Read original review]
3. Little Women
The kind of movie that makes you glad you were alive to see it. I wouldn't be surprised if after repeat viewings, this became my favorite movie of this year.
[Read original review]
4. The Irishman
Scorsese's death-obsessed swan song for the modern gangster genre is one of the man's best. Like Silence a few years ago, it's about grasping for God and some sense of meaning within a life that has caused immeasurable suffering and resulted in crushing isolation: a bleak rumination on fevered and heartbreaking memories that try desperately (and unsuccessfully) to obscure the wasted life and rotten soul of the protagonist.
[Read original review]
5. Uncut Gems
The most intense movie on this list by far. Adam Sandler's turn as a jeweler who pays his debts with gamble upon gamble is one of the more visceral depictions of the aftershocks of the Great Recession put onscreen (the movie takes place in 2012), Darius Khondji's grainy, nervous cinematography and Daniel Lopatin's relentless, pulsing score highlighting the sweaty desperation of Sandler's character. It's a movie of almost transcendent griminess, and when it reaches its inevitable, heart-stopping conclusion, you'll realize you haven't taken a breath for two hours.
[Read original review]
6. Parasite
Twisty and tense, provocative in its ideas—Gatsby-esque in its critique of capitalism and the pretensions of the upper class, Hitchcock-esque in its propulsive, deadpan drive.
[Read original review]
7. Hustlers
The best mainstream Hollywood release of the year (if we don't count Little Women); the best Goodfellas riff since the OG itself; a rip-roaring heist film by way of a female friendship dramedy. A lot of the movies on my list appeal pretty much to my own niche set of interests, and Hustlers does that, too, but it's also far and away the biggest crowdpleaser of all ten here. I can't say enough good things about it.
[Read original review]
8. Her Smell
Terrible title. Good movie. I can't think of a "rise and fall and rise of a musician" movie that does that arc more effectively than this one. One of Alex Ross Perry's best.
[Read original review]
9. Us
Get Out's messier, more ambitious younger sibling. There's an intensity to the sheer commitment to its host of wild ideas, and the resulting movie is breathtaking in its scope. Jordan Peele's got it, that mad Twilight Zone energy. Lupita Nyong'o's got them, the best performance(s) of the year.
[Read original review]
10. Transit
Transit takes a WWII novel and transplants it into contemporary Europe, provoking questions like: What if there were Nazis in 2019? What if they marched through the streets to round up refugees? What if they didn't wear swastikas and stuff and instead just had on riot gear and police uniforms? Weird, right? Guess we'll never know what that would be like.
[Read original review]
Appendix: Miscellaneous Movies Also Worth Noting
Best Screenplay: High Flying Bird—I'm pretty sure it's Little Women. But if it isn't Little Women, then it's certainly Tarell Alvin McCraney's electric writing on High Flying Bird. And I don't even follow basketball.
Best Florence Pugh in a Flower Crown: Midsommar—Again, this maybe should go to Little Women. But this one gets bonus points for putting Pugh in a flower dress, too. I admire the commitment to the bit.
Best Action: John Wick 3: Parabellum—I mean, it's John Wick. He has a fight on top of a galloping horse.
Animated Corner Award: I Lost My Body—At least among the ones I saw, 2019 was a distressingly weak year for animated movies, hence nothing making my top 10. But animation is also the thing I love most about cinema, so I feel weird leaving it off completely, so here's this movie that was interesting but that I wasn't super enthusiastic about.
Documentary Corner Award: Apollo 11—On the other hand, this was a tremendous year for documentaries (honestly, a great decade for documentaries, which is a relief after the 2000s were a nadir for the form), and Apollo 11, the movie made of mostly previously unseen footage of the original moonshot, is the very best. Its focus on the mundane details of the mission and the spaces around its most famous moments cut through the cultural mythology of the event and emphasis just what a jaw-dropping feat of engineering and physical dexterity landing on the moon was. Stunning.
"Documentary" Corner Award: Rolling Thunder Revue: A Bob Dylan Story—Too good not to include, too fake to call a documentary.
Concert Documentary Award: Homecoming: A Film by Beyoncé—Completely thrillingly assembled footage of the instantly iconic "Beychella" performances. It also probably belongs alongside Rolling Thunder Revue in its work in furthering the mythologizing of its central artist.
Best Outer Space Award: Ad Astra—2019 was a really tremendous year for space movies. If you're looking for "hard sci-fi," you can't get much better than this movie's rigorously thoughtful, realistic depiction of near-future space travel.
Best Philosophical Implications of Outer Space: High Life—I wrote about this at length for Cinematary, if you want to read that.
Best Conspiracy: Under the Silver Lake—A conspiracy film for the internet era. The biggest conspiracy of them all is that you're inventing it all yourself. Facts may not care about your feelings, but what if they also don't care about making any coherent sense?
Best Ghost Story: Atlantics—It's kind of a ghost story. I dunno. See it yourself and find out.
Best UFO Enthusiast: Ash Is Purest White—You'll know him when you see him.
"More People Should See This" Award: Greta—Don't remember too many people talking about this thriller, but it's a good one. Go see it!
"Thank Goodness I Don't Live In Florida" Award: Crawl—Hurricanes? Alligators? No thanks.
"Nope, Florida's Still Not Worth It" Award: Beach Bum—Not even a ridiculously fun Matthew McConaughey performance and some really cool cinematography can make this place somewhere I want to be. Plus: SHARKS??
"You Do You, Man" Award: Glass—M. Night Shyamalan is just doing his thing, and this year "his thing" was making a logically suspect, bizarrely paced mythological elevation of the Avengers. It's very odd, it's not really that good, and it's entirely a Shyamalan joint. Glad our test-grouped-to-death corporate blockbuster age somehow made room for a movie like this.
Least-Favorite Trend of the Year: "Hello, my name is the Walt Disney Company! Remember that thing of ours that you like? We're here to make it worse!"
Worst Disney: Dumbo—A very crowded field; I can't remember a year in which I found so little to like among the corporate titan's film output. And I didn't even get a chance to see The Lion King. But this completely misbegotten live-action adaptation of the bona fide animated classic gets the dubious honor as my least-favorite out of a whole host of rotten.
Worst Movie of the Year: Climax—Gaspar Noé can go sit on a tack. An LSD-laced tack.
Best Non-2019 Movie I Saw for the First Time in 2019: Dusty Stacks of Mom: The Poster Project—Jodie Mack's beautiful, idiosyncratic, personal re-interpretation of Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, by way of the collapse of her mother's poster business. It's basically perfect, and while it's devilishly hard to track down, if you can do it, DO IT. It's so great.
Labels:
Alex Ross Perry,
best of 2019,
Bi Gan,
Bong Joon-ho,
Christian Petzold,
film,
Greta Gerwig,
Jordan Peele,
list,
Lorene Scafaria,
Martin Scorsese,
Robert Eggers,
Safdie brothers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)