Showing posts with label Phoebe Waller-Bridges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Phoebe Waller-Bridges. Show all posts

Sunday, June 23, 2019

Mini Reviews for June 17-23, 2019

HELLO! The randomly selected reader suggestion for this week is Chuck & Buck! I'll keep the rest of the suggestions in the pool, and if you want to put in a suggestion for next week (or put in another one), here's the link:

Just click here to submit a suggestion for next week's review post!

Movies

Chuck & Buck (2000) Reader Suggestion!
The heavy film grain and high-wire threading of black comedy, sentimentality, and a fascination with outsiders is vintage '90s American indie. Like a lot of those movies, I'm not sure how successfully on a moment-by-moment basis the movie walks its balance between making its clearly-traumatized-yet-creepy protagonist the butt of our ridicule/disdain and inviting our investment in the guy regardless. But by the end of the movie, it's clear that the holistic thrust of the film is one of compassion. Mike White (who also wrote the movie) stars as a mostly closeted gay man whose only connection as a child to a loving world growing up in his (it is implied) abusive household is his both emotional and physical relationship with his friend Buck, a relationship he desperately and obsessively clings to as an adult. Though the movie doesn't shirk from extreme discomfort with the actions White's protagonist takes in pursuing this relationship, the film also has a deep regard for the work he must do to create a happy life virtually ex nihilo, and when he finally manages to do so by the movie's end, it's a meaningful and sweet conclusion to an otherwise hair-raising journey. Grade: B

Everybody Knows (Todos lo saben) (2018)
Asghar Farhadi movies usually hinge on critical moments of ambiguous epistemology: how do we know what we know, and how many pieces of that process can we remove before we have to relinquish certainty? As the title implies, Everybody Knows involves a twist on that concept in the sense that it's an exploration of what happens at critical moments of certain epistemology: what happens when enough people know for certain information that had once been considered secret? When a child is kidnapped from a wedding reception, the movie's crisis is (in addition to the kidnapping itself) how this traumatic event reveals just how many people knew the supposed "secret" of this child's parentage—a sort of inverted About Elly. It lacks the brutal precision of some of Farhadi's more iconic films (including About Elly), but it's also a clear attempt by Farhadi to do something fundamentally new within his normal genre trappings, which I think is admirable and at times super effective. It is a thriller, after all, and while it's too long to be the punch to the gut Farhadi's other thrillers are, I can't say that I wasn't thrilled at times nonetheless. Grade: B+

Gloria Bell (2018)
Julianne Moore is a stunning light at the center of this movie, playing the titular "woman of a certain age" with a barbed sensitivity. Barring some really nice, expressionistic lighting, there really isn't a whole lot going on with this movie, though—the plot is aimless, the divorcée drama feels a little forced, and none of the secondary characters (including one played by a disappointingly staid John Turturro) make much of an impact, though credit where credit is due, the script puts some sharp dialogue in these characters mouths occasionally. So it's all the more impressive that Moore is able to carry the movie as far as she is. Grade: B-



Birds of Passage (Pájaros de verano) (2018)
Basically The Godfather as seen from the other side of the border: a years-spanning Colombian crime epic that depicts the way that assimilation with the craven relentlessness of North American capitalism rots a society and destroys an indigenous culture. The film's ideas are striking, as are its depictions of indigenous traditions and practices in the context of the encroaching Westernness, which does a lot to spice up the pretty staid crime epic patterns that the movie otherwise falls into. But the movie still is beholden to some pretty rigid patterns, and the style is probably a little too chilly-arthouse for its own good, so there's a good portion of the film that's neither exciting on a plot level nor energetic enough to make the predictable plot exciting either. Nevertheless, I appreciate the new perspective this brings to the old crime epic genre. Grade: B

Red Hook Summer (2012)
Red Hook Summer is messy in the way that Spike Lee's 2010s output has often been. There are stylistic flourishes and scenes and plot threads and whole performances that just kind of amble forward without a ton of momentum or seeming purpose; most naggingly of all that is how Jules Brown and Toni Lysaith give two entirely wooden performances, and I can only imagine that their stammering, stiff line deliveries and postures are intentional for effect, but I'll be damned if I can parse what that effect is supposed to be. But this is also Spike Lee's most dedicated engagement with religion in general and Christianity in particular, and specifically, how Christianity intersects community writ large and its role as a deeply ingrained institution and also as something of a relic of the past that the community is evolving past. It is, in short, a dissection of faith by way of a dissection of a lushly vibrant community, a dissection built on bold contradictions and juxtapositions—cresting with the image of an abusive pastor contorted like Jesus, wearing his own tambourine as a crown of thorns—maybe the most audacious image of Spike's career. And if y'all think I can resist that, you folks are sorely mistaken. There's a late-breaking plot development that makes the whole movie, messiness and all, snap into focus. It's maybe not a focus I can entirely articulate right now, but it's one with a tremendous aesthetic and theological thrust, a story of a Christ who just happens to be white in his paintings and a pastor who just happens to lead a church in decline and a Brooklyn that just happens to be pushing its poorest residents to the far tip of the borough until they can see Lady Liberty's face—and how none of this actually "just happened" after all. I won't go so far as to put it among Spike Lee's very best (to my mind: Do the Right Thing, Malcolm X, The 25th Hour), but it's certainly among his best of this decade—maybe the best. Grade: A

Veiled Aristocrats (1932)
There are some really interesting ideas about the concept of racial passing at the heart of this film, and the movie is smart to hinge its emotional weight on those ideas. But also, it's convoluted and tedious in the way that a lot of Micheaux movies can be, so it's not like it's a rollicking ride or anything. Grade: C







Within Our Gates (1920)
Easily the best Oscar Micheaux feature I've seen thus far. It's not that the movie is less flawed than the director's other movies: Within Our Gates still has that propensity for tediously convoluted domestic drama, it still feels painted with an overly broad moralism, the acting and writing are still stiff as boards. However, the movie also shares Micheaux's frequent obsession with all facets of the early-20th-century African-American experience, an obsession that links the domestic stretches of this movie to a series of the most well-observed character vignettes of his career, involving small indignities oriented around assimilation, uplift, education, class, and racism of all stripes—all of which culminates in a climactic depiction of a lynching that makes absolutely clear that every piece, no matter how small, of a racist society is ultimately complicit in horrific violence. It's by far the most bracing thing I've seen in Micheaux's work, and one of the most bracing things I've seen in silent cinema in general. Grade: B+

P.S. I (and a couple of folks much smarter than I am) talked about Within Our Gates on episode 252 of the Cinematary podcast, which you can listen to here.

Television

Fleabag, Series 2 (2019)
The second (and presumably final) series of Phoebe Waller-Bridges's Fleabag is an improvement over its first at every turn: funnier, sadder, more profound. It opens with a gonzo single-scene Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf-esque family dinner episode that surely cements Waller-Bridges's place among the current pantheon of electric television writers, maybe the best episode of TV I've seen all year this side of Russian Doll (and even then, perhaps it tops even that), and while none of the subsequent episodes are as viscerally wrenching as that opening salvo, they're all every bit as smart and considered. The series opens with Waller-Bridges's Fleabag character, nose mysteriously bloodied, looking into the camera and telling us that "This is a love story," and she's not wrong. This year (three years after the airing of the original Fleabag but only "371 Days, 19 Hours & 26 Minutes Later" in the show's time), Fleabag has fallen for a Catholic priest, a setup that is Shakespearean in its tragedy, given Fleabag's sexual thirst and the priest's obvious celibacy. But the depths this season plumbs are far more profound than the sacriligious carnal/sanctified dichotomy that her pairing with the priest initially suggests; this series's six episodes take love not just as the material intersection of two people but also in its holistic emotional, spiritual, and even transcendent dimensions of two people who find connection with one another. The religion invoked by the presence of a priest character is not simply the setup to a sexual conflict but also the beginning of a serious exploration of the ways that existential meaning, the search for the divine, and the true understanding of who another human being is all intersect in messy and otherworldly ways, and one of the most shocking moments of television I've seen in years—as shocking as the edgiest twist in the tightest thriller—is built from a brief instance of profound connection that wraps together love and interiority and the divine all in one fleeting glance. I won't spoil that moment, but I literally gasped out loud. This is Great Television, folks. Grade: A

Books

Night Shift by Stephen King (1978)
Stephen King's first short story collection is, alongside his run of '70s novels, sort of the ur-text for understanding King's place in pop culture. A lot of these stories were adapted into movies, and often quite famous ones at that: to name just a few, "Children of the Corn," "The Lawnmower Man," "The Mangler," "Graveyard Shift," "Quitters, Inc.," and "The Ledge" (the last two of which formed sections of the 1985 anthology film Cat's Eye). So yeah, this collection casts a long shadow on King's legacy. Like his '70s novels, the stories in this collection often lack the nuance and complexity of his later work and instead evoke a sort of bemused, b-movie sensibility that's meaner than later King would be, and that's not always a bad thing, given how cumbersome and self-impressed some of King's work could get during the worst impulses of his writing in the '80s and especially the '90s. There's something to be said for the quick-and-dirty ethos that goes into these stories, the complete lack of futzing around. Some of it is kind of dumb—I'm astounded that "Trucks," easily the worst story here, is the one King decided to adapt into his sole effort at directing a film, Maximum Overdrive—but the majority of the stories are at least fun, and a few of them are quite chilling. My two favorites, "Graveyard Shift" and "The Lawnmower Man," are both really great at being kind of laughable in premise but get-under-your-skin creepy in execution. Like any short story collection, there's a bit of unevenness from tale to tale, but on the whole, it's a solid read. Grade: B+

Pericles, Prince of Tyre by William Shakespeare [maybe?] (c. 1606-1608)
Uh... wut. Easily the most bizarre play attributed to Shakespeare that I've read (and even that attribution has a lot of asterisks by it, as the historical record is unclear—but he probably wrote at least part of it). Its meandering, picaresque plot jumps ridiculously through time and space by ease of one ridiculous plot twist after another, plot twists involving presumed dead-characters being discovered alive, pirates hitherto unmentioned storming the stage to kidnap a character about to be murdered, and more shipwrecks that you can count. Honestly, it feels like every time the story was getting boring, the playwright was just like, "Hey, let's throw in a shipwreck to spice things up." It's wild and not particularly good outside of how wild it is. "Exit, pursued by a bear" ain't got nothing on this one. Grade: C+

Music

William Basinski - On Time Out of Time (2019)
An ambient drone made from processed space sounds—specifically, as Basinski says in the liner notes, "recordings from the interferometers of LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) capturing the sounds of the merging of two distant massive black holes, 1.3 billion years ago." I don't have much more to say about this; I like space and black holes, and I like this album a whole lot. Grade: A-

Sunday, June 16, 2019

Mini Reviews for June 10-16, 2019

HELLO! The randomly selected reader suggestion for this week is Big Daddy! I'll keep the rest of the suggestions in the pool, and if you want to put in a suggestion for next week (or put in a second one), here's the link:

Just click here to submit a suggestion for next week's review post!

Please, if you have good cheer for your fellow man in your hearts, don't put any more Adam Sandler movies in there.

Movies

Big Daddy (1999) Reader Suggestion!

This movie is so bereft of good ideas. Like, I can't think of a single one here. The plot, in which Adam Sandler has to take care of an unaccompanied minor, is full of the stalest "haha, clueless parent does inappropriate things" tropes until it veers into some deep sentimentality, and neither mode works at all. The humor isn't funny, and it's disappointingly short on the madcap energy of something like Billy Madison; Sandler's typical '90s man-child performance is dialed down to a sleepy lull here, which is weird, given that he's playing opposite an actual child, and the few jokes that aren't hinged on this dynamic are bizarrely hung up on shaming Leslie Mann's character for having worked at Hooters. Then the sentiment feels cloying and unearned, not to mention wanting to have its cake and it eat regarding the level of knowing ironic distance from said sentiment. Also, it's a cheap shot because most kid actors are bad, but man alive are Dylan and Cole Sprouse bad here—this is, like, sub-Olsen-Twins-in-Full-House bad. I hope they let both of the Sprouse twins pee on the side of a building with Sandler, though, because that was probably a good time. A better time than I had watching this movie, to be sure. Grade: D+

The Son of Joseph (Le Fils de Joseph) (2016)
You would think this would be exactly up my alley: a satirical domestic drama based on recurring motifs from the Bible and the visual arts in a completely audacious way that flirts with sacrilege before landing at deep piety. And when the movie gets to that moment in its final few minutes, it's pretty breathtaking. But the movie is just so suffocatingly affected in its style that I feel a thousand yards away from anything happening in this movie. I enjoyed La Sapienza, writer-director Eugène Green's 2015 feature, but that movie's self-conscious emphasis on architecture made a lot more sense with the static shots and direct camera addresses than the considerably more human subject matter does here. Grade: B-


Mother (마더) (2009)
A somewhat standard crime procedural—a mother must sleuth around to prove her accused son's innocence—until the final fifteen minutes make it something much bleaker and more heartbreaking, as unflinching a stare into the void as I've seen in a while. The movie probably hangs too much on the standard genre tropes being completely shattered by the existential and ethical terror of the movie's end as its hook, and for pretty decent stretches, it's only engaging in an autopiloted kind of way. But whew, when you get to the end, boy, that's rough. Grade: B+




Barking Dogs Never Bite (플란다스의 개) (2000)
Huh. So Bong Joon-ho's debut is this utterly bizarre dark comedy about a man who murders dogs and fights with his wife about whether it is 50 or 100 meters to the corner store. Didn't see that coming. Parts of it are very good (I really like the whole pissing match about the distance to the corner store, which culminates in a very weird toilet-paper-themed setpiece), but the pieces come together into such an ungainly whole that I can't say I enjoyed the experience overall. Also, there's certainly something satirical going on here, but I lack the context to understand what specifically. Grade: C+




Boxcar Bertha (1972)
Scorsese has always had a streak of economic populism, but it's stronger here than I've ever seen it. There are some absolutely all-timer bits here to that end—I'm a big fan of the scene where the big railroad capitalist gets robbed during a meeting in which he boasts about all the money he's made, and then he starts quoting the Bible to the robbers about how they should store up their treasures in heaven instead. Stuff like that is great. Less great: the characters, the pacing, and the whole "Bertha is a magic sex hobo woman" thing that takes up a pretty sizable chunk of the movie. I guess if you're getting money from Corman, ya gotta pay the piper, but still. Grade: B-



Television


Fleabag, Series 1 (2016)
So Phoebe Waller-Bridges created, wrote, and starred in a BBC television adaptation of her own stage play of the same name, and it's fantastic. The premise—in which a thirtysomething Londoner uses sex and unending snark to cope with the death of her mother, the death of her best friend, a toxic immediate family, and some crushing secrets related to all those things—sounds like a miserable experience, and if I tell you, accurately, that Waller-Bridges's protagonist (credited only as "Fleabag") is constantly breaking the fourth wall to smirk at the camera or give a cheeky aside to us viewers, I wouldn't blame you if you took a pass entirely. And the first episode or two definitely gesture toward the sort of painfully edgy series the premise suggests. But in the same way that the early episodes of BoJack Horseman's first season only do justice to the series's rich emotional landscape, to bail on Fleabag after its first episode or to never watch it at all is to miss an indelible work of tragicomedy of the likes I have never seen. It zigs where most shows would zag, its writing cuts effortlessly deep, the cast is tremendous, Waller-Bridges in particular is effervescent, and the finale made me feel in the best way possible like I could not breath. Like I said, the early goings are a little rocky until you can view them in retrospect, but by the end, it's become something magnificent and essential. Grade: A-

Books


Oblivion: Stories by David Foster Wallace (2004)
David Foster Wallace's final short story collection is something of a résumé of Wallace's fiction-writing talents and aspirations. The byzantine corporate structures juxtaposed with drolly satirical speculative elements and bizarre characters of intense obsessions in "Mr. Squishy" recalls Infinite Jest in microcosm; "Incarnations of Burned Children" is a short, intense piece of the sort DFW occasionally rolled out to show off his virtuosic command of the structures of the English language; the confessional masculinity of "Good Old Neon" feels of a piece with the kinds of stories you might find in Brief Interviews with Hideous Men; "The Suffering Channel," the novella that closes the collection, is yet another treatise on the intersection of irony, art, and mass media. Short fiction has never been my favorite mode for DFW, but nevertheless, some of these stories are great ("Mr. Squishy," "Good Old Neon"), only a couple are hard to get into beyond the audacity of the premise ("Another Pioneer," "Incarnations of Burned Children"), and most of them are good and worth reading. At least one story involves suicide, which gives the collection an (unintentionally?) morbid biographical appeal, which I'm not a huge fan of, but there's probably not a single piece of DFW's life work that isn't haunted by the fact that he eventually took his own life, so here we are. If we have to view it as the semi-prophetic last look into the living mind of one of the late 20th century's most fascinating writers, it could be a lot worse. Grade: B+

Music

Deerhunter - Why Hasn't Everything Already Disappeared? (2019)
It's not like there's nothing to recommend about this album. "Element" is a cock-eyed take on a fun rocker with a singalong chorus; "No One's Sleeping" feels like a lost jangle-pop song from the '80s with a jammy coda; "Greenpoint Gothic" is a moderately interesting instrumental detour. But even those positive moments are ones I ones recommend only half-heartedly, and honestly, y'all, I'm just finding it really hard to muster up any sort of enthusiasm here. It's just a sleepy, mid-tempo indie record from a band that I know as anything but sleepy. Or at least when they are sleepy, they usually have the good sense to give me evocative dreams when I drift off. Here, I'm getting nothing. Grade: C+

Carly Rae Jepsen - Dedicated (2019)
It's hard following up one of the greatest pop albums of the millennium, and Carly Rae Jepsen doesn't try to one-up herself. Dedicated lacks the swing-for-the-fences mega-pop moments like, for example, the exuberant saxophone that opened "Run Away With Me" as if Queen CRJ were entering the city gates riding a unicorn. It even pointedly leaves off some of the poppier singles Jepsen's released in the interim between these two albums, like "Party for One" or "Cut to the Feeling." In place of all that is a slightly dancier, groovier record that's no less full of hooks than Emotion but maybe positions those hooks just a little more cleverly and less immediately: the warbly synth breakdown that greets the final minute of "Julien," the way the melody in "Real Love" pivots from being reminiscent of the "Hush Little Baby" lullaby into the maturely ecstatic mirror image, etc. If Emotion didn't give Jepsen the superstar, headlining status that she deserves, Dedicated is, frustratingly, not going to do that for her either. But it's also a record replete with the kind of sincere, wholesome pop that only Carly Rae is making and for which she absolutely should be given renown on the level of Taylor Swift or Ariana Grande. The fact that that won't happen is pretty much the only disappointment here. Grade: B+