Showing posts with label Derek Jarman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Derek Jarman. Show all posts

Sunday, October 3, 2021

Mini Reviews for September 27 - October 3, 2021

We're three days into October, and I've only watched one proper horror movie. What's wrong with me?

Movies

Come True (2020)
An exceptionally cool movie whose ending takes one of the clumsiest nosedives into stupidity that I've ever seen. Before that, though, it's a very stylish little bit of light sci-fi about a girl with night terrors going to a sleep study—complete with some fantastic dream sequences that indicate that somebody was paying close attention to Possessor last year (though it's never as cerebral as that other, superior film). Solid, even top-shelf stuff, until lordy, the ending. Though to be fair, it's not as if the movie doesn't have its warning signs earlier on: most notably, the supposed-to-be romance between the protagonist and some thirtysomething dude, the only thing about which you need to know is that there's barely a single line of dialogue separating this high school girl's declaration that she's eighteen years old and the jump cut to the two passionately humping in bed. Yikes, movie. Grade: B-

The Limey (1999)
A pretty engaging crime thriller with buttery smooth direction from Steven Soderbergh—the kind of direction he can probably do in his sleep by now (exactingly precise yet somehow hangout-y, with light experimental touches), but oh boy, does it scratch an itch in my brain. Really great, surprisingly winsome villain performance from Peter Fonda, too. Grade: A-

 

 

 

Blue (1993)
It's really hard to say anything about this movie that isn't expressed to such perfection in the movie itself that it would be profane to try to explain it. An unspeakably pained, unspeakably beautiful work of art. Grade: A

 

 

 

 

The Rapture (1991)
There are very few pop works of religious skepticism that both take religious claims seriously while also keeping a critical edge—the New Atheism movement, for example, has always felt somewhat anemic to me because it largely refuses to consider religion as anything except its ostensibly obvious contradictions with scientific materialism; there's of course value in critiquing the limitations of religion's ability to explain the world, but there's a stubborn literalism in the obsession to prove religion "wrong" that itself feels stuck in fundamentalist apologetics' binaries. This is maybe one of the reasons that Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy stuck with me as a young evangelical Christian over, say, Christopher Hitchens: it actually engages Christianity on its most basic terms, which makes the grip of its critiques that much tighter. The Rapture (a movie that would have absolutely ruined my year if I had watched over the same summer I was reading The Golden Compass) does something similar. It takes with complete sincerity a woman's arc of conversion and radicalization into a post-Jeus-Movement charismatic Christianity during what turns out to be the actual for real for real biblical End Times, and I truly don't think I've ever seen anything like it outside of actual Christian films. I could nitpick about the depiction of theology here: there's a curious emphasis on "loving God" over "accepting Christ," which maybe I could chalk up to a difference in milieu from my own upbringing, which was Baptist-y and Southern instead of the Pentecostal-y and Californian world of this movie. But I dunno, there's something about the film's understanding of the emotional realities of the Christian faith (or at least the born-again variety depicted here) that feels more powerful than whatever hairs I could split about the theology: the way that Christianity provides a framework of meaning for unspeakable tragedy, the striking transformation of the converted into someone with an almost unrecognizable personality, the mingled grief and joy in the face of death, which separates loved ones on earth but reunites them in heaven. The movie walks this incredibly fine line between accepting these emotions are true while also problematizing them: giving actual believers a ring of recognition followed by a bleak chill. And that goes doubly for the titular event at the movie's climax, which is nothing less than a completely straight depiction of the Premillennial understanding of the Second Coming, and throughout the entire sequence, I was incapable of picking up by jaw from the floor. Growing up, I was never part of a church that explicitly taught Premillennialism, nor would I have said I believed in it myself, but this stuff was so thoroughly infused in the water of '90s/2000s conservative Christianity that even now, when I am further removed from Premillennialism than ever, watching that imagery of trumpets and horsemen and people talking about "wars and rumors of wars" and being "caught up in the air" made my hair stand on end with a shock of deeply rooted familiarity. The Rapture understands what I think few explicitly Christian media will admit, which is that eschatology—particularly the Premillennial kind—is really, really scary: the idea of the earth suddenly flooded with these mysterious cosmic forces whose purpose is to purge humanity is not that far removed from Lovecraft, and I remember this sort of stuff being seriously spooked about this as a kid, even if that feeling was confusingly mixed with the excitement of seeing Jesus and going to heaven (unless you were, per one of the most chilling verses in the Bible, one of those unfortunate people who only thought they were a Christian before being told by Christ that "I never knew you"). Left Behind popularized a kind of stupid (and honestly materialist) understanding of the End Times where the locusts in Revelation are Apache helicopters or whatever, which I think was in-part an attempt to soften the terrifying otherworldiness of Revelation (and the end of the Book of Daniel) by grounding it in a known "reality," but The Rapture has no interest in softening anything, becoming something that feels more in the vein of Frank Peretti's eerie novel The Door in the Dragon's Throat (a children's book, no less—evangelical Christianity is weird), where an archeological dig discovers an unopenable door behind which dwell the buzzing hordes of supernatural forces to be released on Judgement Day, only unlike in Peretti's novel, we actually get to see those forces released here. The Rapture is nothing short of a horror movie by the end, both in terms of what we see onscreen and in the ideas about God and Christian belief that its ending confronts. Its horrors are so grounded in the specifics of a certain kind of understanding of the world that I wonder if people without any background in these beliefs are going to find it effective or even conceptually horrifying (instead of silly, which it also kind of is at times). But wow, did it work on me. Frightening, incredible. Grade: A

The Beyond (...E tu vivrai nel terrore! L'aldilà) (1981)
I only knew what was going on like half the time, but it looked pretty cool, and the gore effects were incredibly gnarly. Looks like it's an Italian horror film! I don't really have a lot to say about it. I liked it, and people say this is one of the best Italian horror movies, but honestly I'm not sure I could tell a significant difference in quality from the other Italian horror I've seen, except maybe that the gore was a little more extreme. Grade: B

Sunday, February 14, 2021

Mini Reviews for February 8 - 14, 2021

Just counting the days until this winter is over.

Movies

The Whistlers (La Gomera) (2019)
At what point do I throw up my hands and admit that I just don't connect to Romanian movies? It seems so absurd that an entire country's cinematic output feels at arm's length from me, but every time I watch a Romanian movie, I just feel my brain smooth over, and the movie slides right off it. I don't know what's wrong with me. This is a lot more conventionally exciting than a lot of the New Wave, being basically an explicit neo-noir with gunplay and backstabbing and everything. And it's also a lot more stylistically considered than a lot of the New Wave films I've seen (I don't think there is any handheld camera here!), which should mean that this is a lot more accessible to my tastes than the others. There are some admittedly very cool sequences, and I was pretty entertained throughout those. But I dunno, I just couldn't get into this as a whole. The nonlinear storytelling feels like an unnecessary wank, the characters feel like shells walking through a bunch of tropes, and there are out-of-nowhere quotes of, like, Psycho and stuff that I don't really understand the purpose of. Also, this has the most interesting premise (people using an obscure whistle-based language to perform a heist) that it buries in all its clever hard-boiledness. I hate to be the philistine who just wants things to be "cool," but I wish they had done cool stuff with the whistles instead of making it basically a subplot after the first 30 minutes. Grade: C+

Belly (1998)
I didn't know what was happening about 60% of the time, compounded by the fact of the very busy sound mixing and that the DVD I watched this on didn't have captions. But that said, this is pretty good as basically a feature-length application of music video techniques and highlights the extent to which music videos are basically fevered-dream psychedelia. I feel like music videos usually being only like 3-4 minutes long kinda sneaks the wild craft past our conscious minds, but at 90+ minutes, this movie makes you just sit there and confront how seriously radical the music video style can be. Grade: B

 

 

Mars Attacks! (1996)
There's a lot of latent hostility in blockbuster films that show you a bunch of stuff being destroyed in some sort of apocalypse, so it makes sense that under the directorship of Tim Burton, whose classic work harbors a lot of latent hostility itself, such a movie would become almost explicitly a celebration of humanity's destruction. Once the violence starts, it's basically wall-to-wall scenes of barely contained glee as the kinds of people Burton and screenwriter Jonathan Gems hate (e.g. patriots, businessmen, politicians) meet their grisly demise. Not every moment works, but like a lot of good Tim Burton, the movie as a whole has this ineffable something about it, a vaguely sinister sense of camp and mayhem, that just works for me. It's probably the last Burton film to have that X factor, unfortunately. He'd make good movies after this, but nothing that really taps into that particular feeling. Grade: B

The Last of England (1987)
Derek Jarman's grieving elegy to the pre-Thatcher, pre-HIV queer England and his scorched-earth middle finger to everything else. It's moving and sad in a way that I don't usually see from the avant-garde, and even though I came here for Tilda Swinton and was surprised at just how little she figures into the movie, she definitely makes the most of the maybe 7 minutes total she's onscreen. A completely wild, fiercely experimental experience that I dug completely. Grade: A-

 

 

Caravaggio (1986)
A slow but nevertheless chaotic rendering of the life of Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, full of intentional anachronisms and extremely good-looking cinematography. It's nice to see an example of irreverent cinema that's not bratty and bro-ish. It's also nice to see baby Tilda Swinton and baby Sean Bean in this—both of their film debuts, apparently! Of the two Jarman movies I've seen, I think I prefer The Last of England, but this is such a different thing than that film that it's honestly kind of hard to compare beyond a general sense of fury simmering beneath the surface of both. Grade: B+

I was part of a conversation about this movie on the Cinematary podcast this past week, if anyone is interested in that! Here's the link.

 

The Fabulous Baron Munchausen (Baron Prášil) (1962)
Basically what I imagine would have happened if Georges Méliès had made a feature film. Predictably, the plot is entirely secondary to the movie's unfettered fantasy imagery and logic, and I actually had a pretty hard time following it. It would probably have made more sense to me if I were more familiar with the original Baron Munchausen stories. But honestly, it doesn't really matter, because you don't come to a dream for the plot. Grade: B+

 

 

 

Books

A Children's Bible by Lydia Millet (2020)
There are probably other examples, but this is the first novel that I've read that I would call "Climate Change Fiction," in the sense that it is explicitly about the dangers of climate change and the psychological toll of climate anxiety. A group of children vacationing with their parents have formed an autonomous society apart from their parents, having become fed up with their parents' hedonistic, solipsistic behavior, and just when they do this, a hurricane of biblical proportions tears through the United States, forcing the kids to fend for their survival as society comes apart at the seams. And I do mean biblical proportions, because alongside a somewhat straightforward apocalypse plot, the book has this magical-realist sensibility wherein the events the children experience start to mirror stories from the Bible. By mixing the mythical with the contemporary, Millet is able to be playful enough with the subject to avoid turning A Children's Bible into an "issues novel" while at the same time taking climate change seriously on a level I can't think of in narrative art outside of Darren Aronofsky's Noah movie, folding it into the very fabric of some of our oldest stories until the two become indistinguishable. For those afraid of the world-rending potential of climate change (most of us at this point, I hope), large sections of this book should, by all rights, be feel-bad disaster porn, and I guess on some level, they are, but Millet's blending in of religious signifiers makes it feel a lot less nihilistic than the subject matter might tempt the book to be. It's also very funny at times, in ways that specifically de-fang climate nihilism; the narrator, one of the children, is a hilarious voice animated by an open contempt for her parents' impotent despair at the state of the world, and this is counterbalanced by a sincere sense of wonder, too—another effect of the integration of biblical iconography. Despite a plot that, on paper, should scan as pessimistic, there's a keen sense of humor and hope in A Children's Bible, if not that human civilization can be redeemed then certainly that there is beauty to be found in the twilight of our world, which is its own sort of redemption. I would call this a masterpiece if it weren't for a somewhat bizarre section involving some one-dimensionally evil dudes who feel like they walked out of a more conventional apocalypse novel (and whose depiction traffics in some ableist characterizations, I think). I'm not really sure what to do with that part, and until the heavily magical resolution to this subplot, I'm not sure what to do with this part. But otherwise, this is great, and hopefully more fiction can wrestle with climate change with the grace that this one does. Grade: A-

Music

Eiko Ishibashi - contentless dream (2021)
A random Bandcamp find. It's a single 36-minute track that forms a dreamy soundscape out of some droning loops and scattered piano musings. Also, in the middle of it, a phone notification goes off, which I'd like to think was a perfect little accident that Ishibashi decided to keep in. The album is beautiful anyway, but there's a sense of humor about that phone sound in the middle of this otherwise ethereal album that I find delightful. Grade: B+