Hey, I ranked The Beatles' albums this week. Otherwise, nothing new here.
Movie Reviews
Color Out of Space (2019)
There is a not inconsiderable percentage of this movie that involves a very keyed-up Nicolas Cage performance that never quite coheres to the rest of the movie, so your mileage will probably vary to the usual degree that it does with keyed-up Nic Cage performances. The rest of the movie, though, is really strong. The original Lovecraft story that this is based on is notoriously inadaptable to film (how do you represent a color that humankind has never seen before?), and except for a few throwaway lines that are essentially meaningless (it's pink, Nic; the color is pink), the movie largely sidesteps that element in favor of environmental horror. The text of the movie is about an alien force, but the subtext is strongly about the people who are considered collateral damage for larger infrastructural and manufacturing projects that reminds me of none other than last year's underseen Dark Waters: depicting a rural community who experiences extreme bodily harm and mutilation at the hands of an environmental contamination—there's even some talk about factories being built in the area. The movie's aesthetic is basically a feature-length commitment to the distorted VHS footage in that Dark Waters scene with the mutilated cattle. If you can get past some of the overt goofiness of the movie's surface, there's a pretty chilling tale underneath. Grade: B+
Rocks in My Pockets (2014)
A wonderfully inventive animated personal essay about the reflections of the writer/director/animator (Signe Baumane) on her family history and the struggles with mental illness endured by the female members of her family. It's made all the more engaging by the extremely evocative decision to make all backgrounds and non-human objects from photographs of hand-made models (sometimes static, sometimes moving in stop-motion), over which Baumane draws her loopy, sometimes surreal animated characters. I wish Baumane had more resources to make her animation more fluid—we're looking at maybe like 5 fps or something here, which is VERY choppy in a way that is a disservice to the honestly astounding designs and ideas in the animation. I'm also not completely sold on her take on medication, though given the intensely subjective, personal nature of this film, that's probably beside the point. The story told here is complex and fascinating, full of terrific little detours and ellipses, and an astonishing sense of scope for a movie that doesn't even last 90 minutes. Grade: B+
One from the Heart (1981)
It's entirely understandable why audiences didn't embrace this movie: though I have a soft spot for the naked desperation of both lead characters, the romance frankly sucks, largely because a limp Frederic Forrest makes his pairing with the ever-radiant Teri Garr damagingly lopsided in a way that never really works, and the Tom Waits + Crystal Gayle soundtrack is cool but definitely keeps us viewers at arms-length. But holy cow, literally everything else about this movie! I've never seen a movie that tries to make every one of its shots be the greatest shot in cinema history. It's completely overwhelming. Grade: A-
Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter? (1957)
For a studio picture, a surprisingly focused and vicious satire of postwar consumer culture and media, though I'll admit that a lot of the satire hit me more in an "I see what you did there" way than in a completely effective one. I'd be interested in knowing how much of the cast was in on the joke. Some of the humor here is pretty broad for my tastes, too, though there are quite a few very funny moments—my favorites being "You're the best thing since chlorophyll" (such a wonderfully specific hyperbole) and the whole bit with Catherine the Great: "Who was that communist princess?" "Catherine the Great? She was a czarina, not a communist" "I don't care what was wrong with her!" I also got a lot out of the scene where Tony Randall says "poop" a lot, though I imagine that hits differently now than in 1957 (or does it? When did poop start meaning "feces"?) Grade: B
At this point, nothing more than the musings of a restless English teacher on the pop culture he experiences.
Sunday, July 26, 2020
Friday, July 24, 2020
Ranking The Beatles' Albums
There's this little band from Liverpool called The Beatles. You may have heard of them. My childhood had a lot of Beatles in it; I can't even remember when I heard The Beatles for the first time. Beatles albums were some of the first CDs I bought on my own. I've listened to those CDs a lot. Maybe I'm just grasping for comfort in a Dionysian year, but for some reason I thought it would be a good idea to track down the last couple Beatles albums that I didn't own (Yellow Submarine and Beatles for Sale, for the record) and commemorate that pointless achievement with a list. So here's the list.
A quick note: I know it says "albums" there in the title, but what I'm actually ranking is what Wikipedia calls the band's "core catalog"—that means none of the U.S. albums (sorry, Yesterday and Today fans). It also means that I'm including one release on this list that's not technically an album (Magical Mystery Tour) but not including compilations like the two Past Masters releases or remixes like Let It Be...Naked, since they came out later.
I also tried really hard to relisten to this music with fresh ears when I was making this list, if it's even possible to hear this music fresh. It may have worked; albums that in my head I had ranked as among my favorites actually didn't hold up as well, and a few other albums that I'd not quite held as fondly shot up to near the top.
Anyway, as always, let me know what you think. This ranking is almost certainly wrong, so be sure to tell me the right one.
13. Yellow Submarine
This one's position at the very bottom is a no-brainer for most Beatles fans and even The Beatles themselves, who released it basically as a contractual obligation. It's technically the band's 10th studio album, but it's barely an album. Half of it is an orchestral re-recording of the score George Martin wrote for the movie of the same title, a movie which the actual Beatles had almost nothing to do with outside of a short vocal cameo at the end. It's not a terrible score in the context of the movie itself, but it's a snooze here. The other half of the record includes the material The Beatles actually wrote, but of those six songs, two had already appeared on previous Beatles projects ("Yellow Submarine" and "All You Need Is Love"), while the remaining four include the single worst song in the Beatles canon ("All Together Now"), a very good Sgt.-Pepper-style psychedelic song ("It's All Too Much"), a perfectly passable Sgt.-Pepper-style psychedelic song ("Only a Northern Song"), and a moderately interesting blues rocker ("Hey Bulldog"). It's not completely unlistenable, but it's the only Beatles album that I think is anything less than "good." And lord, do I hate "All Together Now."
12. With the Beatles
Even The Beatles couldn't avoid the dreaded sophomore slump. With the Beatles, their second LP, contains the worst tendencies of their early career—vanilla covers of iconic songs by Black artists, the fill-in-the-blank dopey adolescent innocence—without a compelling display of that era's best qualities. Alongside Yellow Submarine, it's the rare Beatles album with no iconic tracks, which makes this an album that doesn't have much of an identity within the broader sweep of The Beatles' career: The Beatles without the mythology, as if we're getting a peek into an alternate version of Please Please Me for a parallel universe in which The Beatles never became famous. None of this is to say that the album isn't still a fun listen; it is, and the Lennon-McCartney originals (plus one George Harrison song!) are generally good. It just never rises beyond its station, and I can't imagine why anyone would want to listen to The Beatles' takes on "Please Mr. Postman" and "Roll Over Beethoven" when the original versions exist.
11. Beatles for Sale
This is apparently the first album The Beatles made after they discovered Bob Dylan and weed, and you can kind of tell if you squint really hard: songs like "No Reply" and "I'm a Loser" are a tad more structurally and melodically ambitious than most of their early work, and they have a darkness and introspection uncharacteristic of their early music, too. "Eight Days a Week" is of course the one song from the album that everyone is pretty much guaranteed to know, but there are some other great Beatles songs lurking around the corners of this record (I've already named two of them) that people don't give quite as much attention. And then the covers: there are a lot of them. Not really to worry, though: the "Kansas City / Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey!" medley that ends Side One tries a little too hard, but the rest are good, especially "Rock and Roll Music," which is the best product of the early Beatles' Chuck Berry fixation, and the climactic take on Carl Perkins's "Everybody's Trying to Be My Baby," which is a ton of fun and a great way to end the record. Still, given the context of the songwriting tours de force sandwiching this album in Beatles history (A Hard Day's Night and Help!), it's hard not to feel like an album so reliant on covers is a comparatively minor, placeholder work—one most bands would kill to achieve, though, I'm sure.
10. Rubber Soul
I actually think For Sale is a more consistent record than Rubber Soul, and while I understand the instrumental reasons why a lot of people consider this The Beatles' first mature work, I don't really share that feeling. Yes, the boys expand their instrumental ambition tremendously here, including sitars, tambourines, maracas, a harmonium, and a host of other instruments that would not have found a place on the straightforward rock and soul of their early work, and the lyrics are intriguingly oblique in unexpected ways. But as a complete object, this really doesn't feel like a huge departure for the band—maybe it's just knowing that Revolver and Sgt. Pepper were both on the horizon, but to me, a lot of the album sounds full of tentative half measures of experimentation before they truly let go, and the songwriting suffers as a result: the lighthearted stuff like "Drive My Car" and "What Goes On" seem to me like they'd have been better suited by the straightforward approach of their earlier albums, and of the serious tracks, you have at least a few that feel more reigned in than they ought to be (I'm thinking especially of "Nowhere Man"). And then there's "Run For Your Life," which is something of a different category, being just a loathsome song in general: stuck halfway between an awkward Elvis homage and some of the ugliest lyrics that John Lennon wrote prior to his solo career (when he sings about being "cruel to [his] woman" on Sgt. Pepper, it's hard not to imagine songs like this and wonder how autobiographical they are). It's not that these songs are bad (except for "Run For Your Life," of course); I mean, we're still dealing primarily with Lennon-McCartney tunes. They just don't feel as fully realized as they could have been. But I've put it before For Sale based entirely on the merits of two songs that stand as gleaming beacons of what the rest of Rubber Soul could have been: "Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)" and "In My Life." The former is the one track that truly leans into Rubber Soul's reputation as a folk album, being basically an English folk tune (accentuated with some psychedelic effects) that tells a bizarre black comedy tale about a failed affair, and it's both traditional and modern, beautiful and hilariously base, all in equal measure in a way that 100% anticipates the psychedelic and eventually postmodern directions The Beatles would soon go. The latter song, "In My Life," isn't nearly so musically and instrumentally complicated (though it does have a harpsichord-sounding piano solo), but it makes up for that by being simply the best Beatles song of all time; Lennon's lyrics form an unbelievably profound rumination on memory and love whose sophistication was never again matched either within the band's remaining output nor in any of the individual members' post-Beatles efforts, and the music, though simply rendered, is every bit as piercing and poignant and sweet as it needs to be to keep up with the lyrics. I have some mixed feelings about a lot of Rubber Soul, but "Norwegian Wood" and "In My Life" really put a finger on the scales in this album's favor.
9. The Beatles
There are stretches of "The White Album" where I think that I'm listening to the greatest Beatles album ever—e.g. the opening "Back in the U.S.S.R." / "Dear Prudence" suite or the run of tracks that starts at "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" and then goes all the way through "Blackbird." Then again, there are other parts of the record that feel like they must be part of the worst Beatles album ever; "Piggies" through "Why Don't We Do It in the Road" is pretty weak, as is "Birthday" through "Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except for Me and My Monkey" (all the more so for the supposedly brash opening for the second LP). So I really don't know how I feel about the album as a whole, as sprawling and diverse as it is, which is realize is 100% The Point of an exercise like The Beatles. But like... what are you supposed to do with a record where part of The Point is that parts of the album are much worse than other parts? I certainly don't know. But it's an endlessly fascinating document, as wonderful as it is frustrating, and even though the album itself spawned a mini-genre of indulgent double LPs that make a virtue of messiness and stylistic diversity, there still really isn't anything quite like The Beatles in the rock canon. It's also sneakily a concept album, something I don't think people talk about very much—fittingly, an album named The Beatles is basically entirely about The Beatles, in terms of their mythology ("Glass Onion"), their intersection with the whole teeming corpus of mass media ("Revolution 9," i.e. a wild sound collage that forms a soup of 20th century media and then links it to a single Beatles studio session), or even just the current album ("Savoy Truffle"), and the songs that don't deal with this are mostly about the musical DNA that formed The Beatles in the first place, making smirking, ironic simulacra of the individual genres that birthed the band: for example, the blues ("Yer Blues"), surf rock ("Back in the U.S.S.R."), socially conscious folk ("Blackbird"), mid-century chamber music ("Good Night"), and doo-wop (the last and longest section of "Happiness Is a Warm Gun"). It's basically an out-of-body experience for the group, the moment The Beatles briefly stepped out of their role as one of the primary cultural products of the era and examined that role from an alternatingly bemused and bitter distance—without a doubt, the most conceptually complex of any of The Beatles' albums, which is funny because Sgt. Pepper gets all the noise about being a concept album. This sort of self-reflexivity and focus on pastiche/reproduction makes The Beatles a fundamentally postmodern record, honestly, probably the most widely distributed work of postmodernism ever—which is an analysis I was feeling pretty clever for having made myself until I saw that the first paragraph of the album's Wikipedia article says the same thing. Just when you think you've got a fresh take on The Beatles...
8. Please Please Me
Sometimes a band just get it right the first time. There is nothing especially profound or complicated about Please Please Me, the debut record from a little Liverpool band rock band named The Beatles; it's just all executed to near-perfection. Bookended by two of the best songs the band would ever record, "I Saw Her Standing There" and "Twist and Shout" (the latter the being single best cover song The Beatles would ever do and the only one in which the band feels at-home in their own identity rather than play-acting as one of their heroes), the album finds an extremely winning groove of mixing soul/R&B covers (basically presenting themselves as a gender-flipped girl group) with original songs by the now-famous Lennon-McCartney songwriting team. A lot of British bands went to this formula, including The Beatles themselves at various times over the couple of years following this album, but I don't think it was ever improved upon. To get better, The Beatles would have to find a new formula, which they would soon enough.
7. Magical Mystery Tour
This release is the reason that I hemmed and hawed about this list being all of their "core catalog," not just their albums. This is technically a double-EP, the first EP being songs from the Magical Mystery Tour film and the second being a collection of the non-album singles the band released in 1967. This used to be one of my favorite Beatles releases, though as I revisited it for this list, it struck me that the film-related material is definitely the weak link here, relatively, compared to the second EP, which is comprised basically front-to-back of some of the best songs The Beatles ever did (I know some people hate the hippy drippiness of "All You Need Is Love," which I understand, but I love the song anyway), but even then, "Flying" and "Blue Jay Way" are the only songs on the first EP that feel at risk of ever becoming less than good, while "I Am the Walrus" is one of the band's great freakouts. And of course, that second EP is nigh unimpeachable; "Strawberry Fields Forever" is an easy top-5 Beatles song for me, and the rest aren't far behind. Whether it's an album or not, it's still one of the definitive documents of the band's psychedelic era.
6. Let It Be
There are a lot of people who dislike this album, cobbled together as it was from the band's last, rankled studio sessions, but I have an enormous soft spot in my heart for it. The idea for the record (originally titled Get Back) was that the band would strip back all the studio trickery that had defined their recent output and delivery a back-to-basics release—the original album art was even a riff on the cover of Please Please Me. Obviously, this didn't quite work out, and the band basically disintegrated in the process of making the record (what parts of it hadn't already disintegrated during the acrimonious White Album sessions). While that's maybe a tragedy in the context of the Beatles mythos, it's actually a grace note for the version of the album that we did end up getting; the shagginess of the recordings here make Let It Be the loosest, warmest album in the band's history, a roots-rock record full of studio chatter and dead ends and jokes ("I hope we've passed the audition") and weird larks (e.g. the John Lennon falsetto at the end of "Dig It" that introduces "Let It Be"). It helps that the songwriting is generally tremendous and, fitting of the roots-rock milieu, unlike most of the group's previous work, even outside the uncharacteristic looseness: the gospel hymn of "Let It Be," the '50s-rock throwback "One After 909," the molasses soul of "Dig a Pony," the skiffle of the "Maggie Mae" fragment, the chugging revival tent blues of "I've Got a Feeling"—those are all great songs and weird, interesting, hairy directions to take The Beatles as they staggered through their last days as a group. Sure, "The Long and Winding Road" sucks, even the stripped-down, non-Phil-Spector version, but as I see it, that is literally the only bruise on this otherwise great set.
5. Help!
People talk about Rubber Soul being the turning point for The Beatles, but I present Help! instead (released just a few months before Rubber Soul, too). Songs like "The Night Before," "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away," "I've Just Seen a Face," and of course "Yesterday" (just a perfect gem of a song, that one) show the Lennon-McCartney songwriting stretching itself into new (to The Beatles) genres like folk, which is exactly what Rubber Soul does, too, albeit a bit more enthusiastically. But unlike Rubber Soul, literally all of the songs on this album are Great (except "Act Naturally," I guess, but that's basically just a goof anyway), and none of them have that half-measure feel in their embrace of new sounds; this is still very much an early Beatles record, which helps the new genres pop in ways that they rarely do on Rubber Soul. Other than comparing it favorably to Rubber Soul, I don't really have anything too clever to say about the album, though; it just slaps, front to back.
4. Abbey Road
From here on out, it's basically just unqualified masterpieces, and any given one of these could be my favorite Beatles album, depending on how the wind blows or on which side of the bed I get up. Abbey Road feels like an album for people who wish that The White Album were more concise, less ironic, and less experimental, and though I don't think I want the last of those, I'm not complaining about the concessions to the first two. Abbey Road is a tight 47 minutes, using every bit of that time to cram in as much songwriting inspiration as possible into the record, up to and including only giving us a minute or so of a song's essential nugget before rushing on to the next, in the case of the famous medley that takes up the majority of Side Two. It's not as wild or groundbreaking as the albums leading up to this one (in fact, unless you count the medley as an innovation, there's nothing in here that couldn't have appeared on their previous records, which is the only post-1965 record of theirs that that's true of), but golly is it a rush of pure joy to the head. It's also achingly sincere, maybe the most sincere Beatles album of them all, full of sunny melodies paired with equally sunny lyrics—lyrics that often risk self-parody as they reach higher and higher for emotionally forthright meaning (I mean... "And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make"?) but somehow skate by unscathed on the euphoria of the music. Even genre riffs like "Oh! Darling" sound like they mean it, a far cry from the barely contained smirking of The White Album. There was a large part of my life when this was my favorite Beatles album, full-stop; since then, I've lost a little patience for "Octopus's Garden," and I now think the medley trips up just a tad as it transitions into the final movement with "Golden Slumbers" / "Carry That Weight" / "The End"—hence the #4 spot. But those minuscule blemishes are the only things I can bring against the record, and when the "You Never Give Me Your Money" reprise hits during "Carry That Weight," none of those blemishes matter one little bit.
3. A Hard Day's Night
Obviously from this ranking, I think there are other Beatles albums that are more exquisitely put together as complete album experiences, but if I'm looking at records on a song-by-song basis, this is simply the best collection of songs in the band's history. Not to slander the fine talents of George Harrison and Ringo Starr (whose songwriting, particularly the former's, wouldn't really flower until the late years of the band), but it's no accident that this coincides with its being the only Beatles album to be comprised entirely of Lennon-McCartney songwriting. A Hard Day's Night represents basically the perfection of that Beatlemania-era Lennon-McCartney partnership, the moment when John and Paul first managed to truly cease mimicking their idols and actually become their equals. Each song is a sparkling gem of melodic and lyrical craft around which the entire band thrives, and lest it sound like I'm marginalizing Ringo and George's contributions, let me be clear that this album works as well as it does because of the synthesis of the entire group. This album shows a harmony among all of the members' ambitions unparalleled anywhere else in the band's catalog, and it's a fleeting moment of collective optimism before these personalities and musical ideas would begin to sour in relation to one another; the record simply would not be the same without, for example, Ringo's resounding snare-drum smack opening "Any Time at All" or George's twisty guitar chords building tension over Ringo's drum fills in "Tell Me Why." The Lennon-McCartney songwriting is the impeccable backbone, but it's the whole band that gives the meat. Without a doubt the platonic ideal of the pre-psychedelia Beatles as well as the group's most perfect record, if not their flat-out best.
2. Revolver
I mean, I don't know what else I can say about this album that hasn't already been said ad nauseum. #1 and #2 on this list are gigantic clichés as far as ranking The Beatles goes, and I went into my re-listen of the band's discography defiant and prepared to skirt this trope. But I just couldn't. I couldn't. The following are the all-time great songs on Revolver, all-time great in the context of the history of rock music, not just The Beatles: "Eleanor Rigby," "I'm Only Sleeping," "She Said She Said," "Good Day Sunshine," "And Your Bird Can Sing," "For No One," "I Want to Tell You," "Got to Get You into My Life." The songs I haven't listed are "merely" great in the context of The Beatles, except for "Yellow Submarine," which is a song I would have put in the above list when I was a six-year-old, and "Tomorrow Never Knows," which is not just great but among the greatest musical compositions of the 20th century (alongside a couple other Beatles songs, tbh). Like, let's just talk about "Tomorrow Never Knows" for a second. There are less than four years separating the releases of the Beatles' debut single ("Love Me Do") and the song "Tomorrow Never Knows" in the U.K., and it's only about three years between their debut single in the United States ("Please Please Me") and "Tomorrow Never Knows" (only about two years between their Ed Sullivan debut and "TNK"). Imaging being a freshman in high school who became a Beatles nut after watching Ed Sullivan; by the time you had finished your junior year, your favorite band had gone from doing mostly girl-group covers and Chuck Berry mimicry to the bleeding edge of avant-garde rock without losing one ounce of the immediacy or songwriting sheen. Just mind-boggling. And if that weren't enough, I already have a huge soft spot for Revolver, because it was the first Beatles album I ever bought on my own (Wal-Mart in Collierville, TN, what's up!).
1. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
I really, truly tried to make this list end more surprisingly, but here we are. There's a lot of hyperbole surrounding this album (it's neither the first album-oriented rock LP, nor the first concept album), but my revisiting the music of The Beatles has confirmed for me that at least one thing often said about Sgt. Pepper that isn't hyperbole: it's the best Beatles album. And I mean album. This is the quintessential "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" record; I've already listed Beatles records that have more consistently great individual songs (definitely #2 and #3 on this list, I'd say, and maybe #4 and #5, too, depending on how I'm feeling about "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!"), but when listened to front-to-back, all the songs have a collective power that far eclipses their individual merits. It's not even that the record is all that clever; it quickly exhausts its supposed "concept" of having The Beatles play-act as a fake band, only to then, like a marathon runner who has a van pick him up at mile 5 and then drop him off at mile 25, lazily act like they kept it up the whole time by finishing out the album with a return to the concept. Rather, I'm talking about how the sounds and sequencing of this album make its 39 minutes and 36 seconds feel like a journey like no other in The Beatles' catalog. Songs crossfade from one to the next in arresting blends, they bounce off each other in striking contrasts: the hypnotic George Harrison groove "Within You Without You" is punctuated by Paul McCartney and his bouncy clarinets on "When I'm Sixty-Four"; "Fixing a Hole" feels like a psychedelic mirror inversion of "Getting Better" when the two play one after the other, the vocal harmonies around the high notes echoing each other—the album is a prismatic accumulation of dozens of such moments until the whole record shimmers against itself in this transcendent effect. It doesn't hurt that it ends with "A Day in the Life," the only Beatles song that is a serious contender for unseating "In My Life" as the band's best; the most exciting single moment in all of Beatles music is the second orchestral glissando that ends with the emphatic, cosmic final piano chord rung simultaneously by John, Paul, Ringo, and roadie Mal Evans, and as that sustained sound fades into the largest emptiness in recorded rock history, you feel the album just twinkle out of existence in the most sublime way possible. Like, I dunno, maybe sometimes the consensus is right.
A quick note: I know it says "albums" there in the title, but what I'm actually ranking is what Wikipedia calls the band's "core catalog"—that means none of the U.S. albums (sorry, Yesterday and Today fans). It also means that I'm including one release on this list that's not technically an album (Magical Mystery Tour) but not including compilations like the two Past Masters releases or remixes like Let It Be...Naked, since they came out later.
I also tried really hard to relisten to this music with fresh ears when I was making this list, if it's even possible to hear this music fresh. It may have worked; albums that in my head I had ranked as among my favorites actually didn't hold up as well, and a few other albums that I'd not quite held as fondly shot up to near the top.
Anyway, as always, let me know what you think. This ranking is almost certainly wrong, so be sure to tell me the right one.
13. Yellow Submarine
This one's position at the very bottom is a no-brainer for most Beatles fans and even The Beatles themselves, who released it basically as a contractual obligation. It's technically the band's 10th studio album, but it's barely an album. Half of it is an orchestral re-recording of the score George Martin wrote for the movie of the same title, a movie which the actual Beatles had almost nothing to do with outside of a short vocal cameo at the end. It's not a terrible score in the context of the movie itself, but it's a snooze here. The other half of the record includes the material The Beatles actually wrote, but of those six songs, two had already appeared on previous Beatles projects ("Yellow Submarine" and "All You Need Is Love"), while the remaining four include the single worst song in the Beatles canon ("All Together Now"), a very good Sgt.-Pepper-style psychedelic song ("It's All Too Much"), a perfectly passable Sgt.-Pepper-style psychedelic song ("Only a Northern Song"), and a moderately interesting blues rocker ("Hey Bulldog"). It's not completely unlistenable, but it's the only Beatles album that I think is anything less than "good." And lord, do I hate "All Together Now."
12. With the Beatles
Even The Beatles couldn't avoid the dreaded sophomore slump. With the Beatles, their second LP, contains the worst tendencies of their early career—vanilla covers of iconic songs by Black artists, the fill-in-the-blank dopey adolescent innocence—without a compelling display of that era's best qualities. Alongside Yellow Submarine, it's the rare Beatles album with no iconic tracks, which makes this an album that doesn't have much of an identity within the broader sweep of The Beatles' career: The Beatles without the mythology, as if we're getting a peek into an alternate version of Please Please Me for a parallel universe in which The Beatles never became famous. None of this is to say that the album isn't still a fun listen; it is, and the Lennon-McCartney originals (plus one George Harrison song!) are generally good. It just never rises beyond its station, and I can't imagine why anyone would want to listen to The Beatles' takes on "Please Mr. Postman" and "Roll Over Beethoven" when the original versions exist.
11. Beatles for Sale
This is apparently the first album The Beatles made after they discovered Bob Dylan and weed, and you can kind of tell if you squint really hard: songs like "No Reply" and "I'm a Loser" are a tad more structurally and melodically ambitious than most of their early work, and they have a darkness and introspection uncharacteristic of their early music, too. "Eight Days a Week" is of course the one song from the album that everyone is pretty much guaranteed to know, but there are some other great Beatles songs lurking around the corners of this record (I've already named two of them) that people don't give quite as much attention. And then the covers: there are a lot of them. Not really to worry, though: the "Kansas City / Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey!" medley that ends Side One tries a little too hard, but the rest are good, especially "Rock and Roll Music," which is the best product of the early Beatles' Chuck Berry fixation, and the climactic take on Carl Perkins's "Everybody's Trying to Be My Baby," which is a ton of fun and a great way to end the record. Still, given the context of the songwriting tours de force sandwiching this album in Beatles history (A Hard Day's Night and Help!), it's hard not to feel like an album so reliant on covers is a comparatively minor, placeholder work—one most bands would kill to achieve, though, I'm sure.
10. Rubber Soul
I actually think For Sale is a more consistent record than Rubber Soul, and while I understand the instrumental reasons why a lot of people consider this The Beatles' first mature work, I don't really share that feeling. Yes, the boys expand their instrumental ambition tremendously here, including sitars, tambourines, maracas, a harmonium, and a host of other instruments that would not have found a place on the straightforward rock and soul of their early work, and the lyrics are intriguingly oblique in unexpected ways. But as a complete object, this really doesn't feel like a huge departure for the band—maybe it's just knowing that Revolver and Sgt. Pepper were both on the horizon, but to me, a lot of the album sounds full of tentative half measures of experimentation before they truly let go, and the songwriting suffers as a result: the lighthearted stuff like "Drive My Car" and "What Goes On" seem to me like they'd have been better suited by the straightforward approach of their earlier albums, and of the serious tracks, you have at least a few that feel more reigned in than they ought to be (I'm thinking especially of "Nowhere Man"). And then there's "Run For Your Life," which is something of a different category, being just a loathsome song in general: stuck halfway between an awkward Elvis homage and some of the ugliest lyrics that John Lennon wrote prior to his solo career (when he sings about being "cruel to [his] woman" on Sgt. Pepper, it's hard not to imagine songs like this and wonder how autobiographical they are). It's not that these songs are bad (except for "Run For Your Life," of course); I mean, we're still dealing primarily with Lennon-McCartney tunes. They just don't feel as fully realized as they could have been. But I've put it before For Sale based entirely on the merits of two songs that stand as gleaming beacons of what the rest of Rubber Soul could have been: "Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)" and "In My Life." The former is the one track that truly leans into Rubber Soul's reputation as a folk album, being basically an English folk tune (accentuated with some psychedelic effects) that tells a bizarre black comedy tale about a failed affair, and it's both traditional and modern, beautiful and hilariously base, all in equal measure in a way that 100% anticipates the psychedelic and eventually postmodern directions The Beatles would soon go. The latter song, "In My Life," isn't nearly so musically and instrumentally complicated (though it does have a harpsichord-sounding piano solo), but it makes up for that by being simply the best Beatles song of all time; Lennon's lyrics form an unbelievably profound rumination on memory and love whose sophistication was never again matched either within the band's remaining output nor in any of the individual members' post-Beatles efforts, and the music, though simply rendered, is every bit as piercing and poignant and sweet as it needs to be to keep up with the lyrics. I have some mixed feelings about a lot of Rubber Soul, but "Norwegian Wood" and "In My Life" really put a finger on the scales in this album's favor.
9. The Beatles
There are stretches of "The White Album" where I think that I'm listening to the greatest Beatles album ever—e.g. the opening "Back in the U.S.S.R." / "Dear Prudence" suite or the run of tracks that starts at "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" and then goes all the way through "Blackbird." Then again, there are other parts of the record that feel like they must be part of the worst Beatles album ever; "Piggies" through "Why Don't We Do It in the Road" is pretty weak, as is "Birthday" through "Everybody's Got Something to Hide Except for Me and My Monkey" (all the more so for the supposedly brash opening for the second LP). So I really don't know how I feel about the album as a whole, as sprawling and diverse as it is, which is realize is 100% The Point of an exercise like The Beatles. But like... what are you supposed to do with a record where part of The Point is that parts of the album are much worse than other parts? I certainly don't know. But it's an endlessly fascinating document, as wonderful as it is frustrating, and even though the album itself spawned a mini-genre of indulgent double LPs that make a virtue of messiness and stylistic diversity, there still really isn't anything quite like The Beatles in the rock canon. It's also sneakily a concept album, something I don't think people talk about very much—fittingly, an album named The Beatles is basically entirely about The Beatles, in terms of their mythology ("Glass Onion"), their intersection with the whole teeming corpus of mass media ("Revolution 9," i.e. a wild sound collage that forms a soup of 20th century media and then links it to a single Beatles studio session), or even just the current album ("Savoy Truffle"), and the songs that don't deal with this are mostly about the musical DNA that formed The Beatles in the first place, making smirking, ironic simulacra of the individual genres that birthed the band: for example, the blues ("Yer Blues"), surf rock ("Back in the U.S.S.R."), socially conscious folk ("Blackbird"), mid-century chamber music ("Good Night"), and doo-wop (the last and longest section of "Happiness Is a Warm Gun"). It's basically an out-of-body experience for the group, the moment The Beatles briefly stepped out of their role as one of the primary cultural products of the era and examined that role from an alternatingly bemused and bitter distance—without a doubt, the most conceptually complex of any of The Beatles' albums, which is funny because Sgt. Pepper gets all the noise about being a concept album. This sort of self-reflexivity and focus on pastiche/reproduction makes The Beatles a fundamentally postmodern record, honestly, probably the most widely distributed work of postmodernism ever—which is an analysis I was feeling pretty clever for having made myself until I saw that the first paragraph of the album's Wikipedia article says the same thing. Just when you think you've got a fresh take on The Beatles...
8. Please Please Me
Sometimes a band just get it right the first time. There is nothing especially profound or complicated about Please Please Me, the debut record from a little Liverpool band rock band named The Beatles; it's just all executed to near-perfection. Bookended by two of the best songs the band would ever record, "I Saw Her Standing There" and "Twist and Shout" (the latter the being single best cover song The Beatles would ever do and the only one in which the band feels at-home in their own identity rather than play-acting as one of their heroes), the album finds an extremely winning groove of mixing soul/R&B covers (basically presenting themselves as a gender-flipped girl group) with original songs by the now-famous Lennon-McCartney songwriting team. A lot of British bands went to this formula, including The Beatles themselves at various times over the couple of years following this album, but I don't think it was ever improved upon. To get better, The Beatles would have to find a new formula, which they would soon enough.
7. Magical Mystery Tour
This release is the reason that I hemmed and hawed about this list being all of their "core catalog," not just their albums. This is technically a double-EP, the first EP being songs from the Magical Mystery Tour film and the second being a collection of the non-album singles the band released in 1967. This used to be one of my favorite Beatles releases, though as I revisited it for this list, it struck me that the film-related material is definitely the weak link here, relatively, compared to the second EP, which is comprised basically front-to-back of some of the best songs The Beatles ever did (I know some people hate the hippy drippiness of "All You Need Is Love," which I understand, but I love the song anyway), but even then, "Flying" and "Blue Jay Way" are the only songs on the first EP that feel at risk of ever becoming less than good, while "I Am the Walrus" is one of the band's great freakouts. And of course, that second EP is nigh unimpeachable; "Strawberry Fields Forever" is an easy top-5 Beatles song for me, and the rest aren't far behind. Whether it's an album or not, it's still one of the definitive documents of the band's psychedelic era.
6. Let It Be
There are a lot of people who dislike this album, cobbled together as it was from the band's last, rankled studio sessions, but I have an enormous soft spot in my heart for it. The idea for the record (originally titled Get Back) was that the band would strip back all the studio trickery that had defined their recent output and delivery a back-to-basics release—the original album art was even a riff on the cover of Please Please Me. Obviously, this didn't quite work out, and the band basically disintegrated in the process of making the record (what parts of it hadn't already disintegrated during the acrimonious White Album sessions). While that's maybe a tragedy in the context of the Beatles mythos, it's actually a grace note for the version of the album that we did end up getting; the shagginess of the recordings here make Let It Be the loosest, warmest album in the band's history, a roots-rock record full of studio chatter and dead ends and jokes ("I hope we've passed the audition") and weird larks (e.g. the John Lennon falsetto at the end of "Dig It" that introduces "Let It Be"). It helps that the songwriting is generally tremendous and, fitting of the roots-rock milieu, unlike most of the group's previous work, even outside the uncharacteristic looseness: the gospel hymn of "Let It Be," the '50s-rock throwback "One After 909," the molasses soul of "Dig a Pony," the skiffle of the "Maggie Mae" fragment, the chugging revival tent blues of "I've Got a Feeling"—those are all great songs and weird, interesting, hairy directions to take The Beatles as they staggered through their last days as a group. Sure, "The Long and Winding Road" sucks, even the stripped-down, non-Phil-Spector version, but as I see it, that is literally the only bruise on this otherwise great set.
5. Help!
People talk about Rubber Soul being the turning point for The Beatles, but I present Help! instead (released just a few months before Rubber Soul, too). Songs like "The Night Before," "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away," "I've Just Seen a Face," and of course "Yesterday" (just a perfect gem of a song, that one) show the Lennon-McCartney songwriting stretching itself into new (to The Beatles) genres like folk, which is exactly what Rubber Soul does, too, albeit a bit more enthusiastically. But unlike Rubber Soul, literally all of the songs on this album are Great (except "Act Naturally," I guess, but that's basically just a goof anyway), and none of them have that half-measure feel in their embrace of new sounds; this is still very much an early Beatles record, which helps the new genres pop in ways that they rarely do on Rubber Soul. Other than comparing it favorably to Rubber Soul, I don't really have anything too clever to say about the album, though; it just slaps, front to back.
From here on out, it's basically just unqualified masterpieces, and any given one of these could be my favorite Beatles album, depending on how the wind blows or on which side of the bed I get up. Abbey Road feels like an album for people who wish that The White Album were more concise, less ironic, and less experimental, and though I don't think I want the last of those, I'm not complaining about the concessions to the first two. Abbey Road is a tight 47 minutes, using every bit of that time to cram in as much songwriting inspiration as possible into the record, up to and including only giving us a minute or so of a song's essential nugget before rushing on to the next, in the case of the famous medley that takes up the majority of Side Two. It's not as wild or groundbreaking as the albums leading up to this one (in fact, unless you count the medley as an innovation, there's nothing in here that couldn't have appeared on their previous records, which is the only post-1965 record of theirs that that's true of), but golly is it a rush of pure joy to the head. It's also achingly sincere, maybe the most sincere Beatles album of them all, full of sunny melodies paired with equally sunny lyrics—lyrics that often risk self-parody as they reach higher and higher for emotionally forthright meaning (I mean... "And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make"?) but somehow skate by unscathed on the euphoria of the music. Even genre riffs like "Oh! Darling" sound like they mean it, a far cry from the barely contained smirking of The White Album. There was a large part of my life when this was my favorite Beatles album, full-stop; since then, I've lost a little patience for "Octopus's Garden," and I now think the medley trips up just a tad as it transitions into the final movement with "Golden Slumbers" / "Carry That Weight" / "The End"—hence the #4 spot. But those minuscule blemishes are the only things I can bring against the record, and when the "You Never Give Me Your Money" reprise hits during "Carry That Weight," none of those blemishes matter one little bit.
3. A Hard Day's Night
Obviously from this ranking, I think there are other Beatles albums that are more exquisitely put together as complete album experiences, but if I'm looking at records on a song-by-song basis, this is simply the best collection of songs in the band's history. Not to slander the fine talents of George Harrison and Ringo Starr (whose songwriting, particularly the former's, wouldn't really flower until the late years of the band), but it's no accident that this coincides with its being the only Beatles album to be comprised entirely of Lennon-McCartney songwriting. A Hard Day's Night represents basically the perfection of that Beatlemania-era Lennon-McCartney partnership, the moment when John and Paul first managed to truly cease mimicking their idols and actually become their equals. Each song is a sparkling gem of melodic and lyrical craft around which the entire band thrives, and lest it sound like I'm marginalizing Ringo and George's contributions, let me be clear that this album works as well as it does because of the synthesis of the entire group. This album shows a harmony among all of the members' ambitions unparalleled anywhere else in the band's catalog, and it's a fleeting moment of collective optimism before these personalities and musical ideas would begin to sour in relation to one another; the record simply would not be the same without, for example, Ringo's resounding snare-drum smack opening "Any Time at All" or George's twisty guitar chords building tension over Ringo's drum fills in "Tell Me Why." The Lennon-McCartney songwriting is the impeccable backbone, but it's the whole band that gives the meat. Without a doubt the platonic ideal of the pre-psychedelia Beatles as well as the group's most perfect record, if not their flat-out best.
2. Revolver
I mean, I don't know what else I can say about this album that hasn't already been said ad nauseum. #1 and #2 on this list are gigantic clichés as far as ranking The Beatles goes, and I went into my re-listen of the band's discography defiant and prepared to skirt this trope. But I just couldn't. I couldn't. The following are the all-time great songs on Revolver, all-time great in the context of the history of rock music, not just The Beatles: "Eleanor Rigby," "I'm Only Sleeping," "She Said She Said," "Good Day Sunshine," "And Your Bird Can Sing," "For No One," "I Want to Tell You," "Got to Get You into My Life." The songs I haven't listed are "merely" great in the context of The Beatles, except for "Yellow Submarine," which is a song I would have put in the above list when I was a six-year-old, and "Tomorrow Never Knows," which is not just great but among the greatest musical compositions of the 20th century (alongside a couple other Beatles songs, tbh). Like, let's just talk about "Tomorrow Never Knows" for a second. There are less than four years separating the releases of the Beatles' debut single ("Love Me Do") and the song "Tomorrow Never Knows" in the U.K., and it's only about three years between their debut single in the United States ("Please Please Me") and "Tomorrow Never Knows" (only about two years between their Ed Sullivan debut and "TNK"). Imaging being a freshman in high school who became a Beatles nut after watching Ed Sullivan; by the time you had finished your junior year, your favorite band had gone from doing mostly girl-group covers and Chuck Berry mimicry to the bleeding edge of avant-garde rock without losing one ounce of the immediacy or songwriting sheen. Just mind-boggling. And if that weren't enough, I already have a huge soft spot for Revolver, because it was the first Beatles album I ever bought on my own (Wal-Mart in Collierville, TN, what's up!).
1. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
I really, truly tried to make this list end more surprisingly, but here we are. There's a lot of hyperbole surrounding this album (it's neither the first album-oriented rock LP, nor the first concept album), but my revisiting the music of The Beatles has confirmed for me that at least one thing often said about Sgt. Pepper that isn't hyperbole: it's the best Beatles album. And I mean album. This is the quintessential "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" record; I've already listed Beatles records that have more consistently great individual songs (definitely #2 and #3 on this list, I'd say, and maybe #4 and #5, too, depending on how I'm feeling about "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!"), but when listened to front-to-back, all the songs have a collective power that far eclipses their individual merits. It's not even that the record is all that clever; it quickly exhausts its supposed "concept" of having The Beatles play-act as a fake band, only to then, like a marathon runner who has a van pick him up at mile 5 and then drop him off at mile 25, lazily act like they kept it up the whole time by finishing out the album with a return to the concept. Rather, I'm talking about how the sounds and sequencing of this album make its 39 minutes and 36 seconds feel like a journey like no other in The Beatles' catalog. Songs crossfade from one to the next in arresting blends, they bounce off each other in striking contrasts: the hypnotic George Harrison groove "Within You Without You" is punctuated by Paul McCartney and his bouncy clarinets on "When I'm Sixty-Four"; "Fixing a Hole" feels like a psychedelic mirror inversion of "Getting Better" when the two play one after the other, the vocal harmonies around the high notes echoing each other—the album is a prismatic accumulation of dozens of such moments until the whole record shimmers against itself in this transcendent effect. It doesn't hurt that it ends with "A Day in the Life," the only Beatles song that is a serious contender for unseating "In My Life" as the band's best; the most exciting single moment in all of Beatles music is the second orchestral glissando that ends with the emphatic, cosmic final piano chord rung simultaneously by John, Paul, Ringo, and roadie Mal Evans, and as that sustained sound fades into the largest emptiness in recorded rock history, you feel the album just twinkle out of existence in the most sublime way possible. Like, I dunno, maybe sometimes the consensus is right.
Sunday, July 19, 2020
Mini Reviews for July 13-19, 2020
Light week.
Movies
Palm Springs (2020)
It's really interesting to see a genre emerge, as one certainly has around these "time loop" stories, from a single work, i.e. Groundhog Day. I can't think of another example of that except maybe the Christmas Carol-type story? Anyway, I feel like the trajectory with this genre has been a slow move away from recreating the beats of Groundhog Day (a meticulously documented setup of the repeated day, followed by a long period of time wherein we see the protagonist question their sanity/deny the looped reality, only to eventually accept it and go on a ridiculous, nihilistic/hedonistic spree, etc.—y'all know the drill) to an understanding that the beats of Groundhog Day are familiar enough to the audience that they can be gestured toward with shorthand or even transformed/done away with completely. For me, the tipping point seemed to be Netflix's Russian Doll show, which did some really fascinating work digressing from the familiar thematic ambitions and outcomes of the genre, but now Palm Springs confirms retroactively that there was a tipping point to begin with, since it is build with the abstract tropes of the Groundhog Day premise not as something to be explained to an unsuspecting audience but as a set of assumptions to be recognized by and subverted for a savvy audience. I'm not going to say that this is the most experimental film of all time or anything (the visuals are pedestrian to a fault, e.g.), but there is something revolutionary within the specific context of this genre to have a time loop story in which two people (three, actually, but that's kind of its own thing) cycle through the loop. The complete isolation of Groundhog Day's existential fable becomes a story that's no less existential (the idea of creating meaning in an absurd universe remains at the forefront of this movie's mind, often explicitly in dialogue) but also ends up being far less isolated on a metaphysical level and ultimately a lot more human. For as much as I love Groundhog Day (and I do looove Groundhog Day) and its children, these sorts of stories often struggle to make the secondary characters who aren't stuck in the loop anything more than just NPCs in the protagonist's personal journey of enlightenment. By having multiple characters go through the loop, the story forces itself to reckon more fully with the significance of people's experiences outside of a single person's point-of-view, and in a way, the whole movie then becomes about not just creating a meaningful existence out of life's absurdity but also in recognizing and interacting with the meaningful existences that other humans around you have built. There's a reductive take on this movie that basically just boils down to "Groundhog Day, but a rom-com," but the actual effect of this movie is way more complex than that. It's not just a genre slapped on top of another genre (as much fun as Happy Death Day is, it's never really more than just "Groundhog Day, but a slasher"); it's a movie that makes genres interact with each other in productive and even profound ways. I find it really exciting that movies in this mold can be more than just "Groundhog Day, but..." It's weird to say that I responded to this as strongly as I did Bona-Fide Cinephile Classic(TM) Pickpocket, but there's a specific energy to this movie that has a strong resonant frequency with the way that since March I've basically been living the same day over and over again with my wife in our house and trying to figure out what that means. It's also weird that I apparently relate to media on COVID terms and feel okay ending this review with a "movie for our unsettled times" observation. I dunno, what can I say, I yam what I yam. Oh, and P.S., the mid-credits scene was super confusing to me, full disclosure. Grade: A-
Kes (1969)
I see this all the time with children, including the students I teach: these wonderful creatures whose abilities, interests, and/or life circumstances are ill-suited to the industrialized (or increasingly post-industrialized) world that they must inhabit as they grow older, and the process of inhabiting this world is also the process by which the things they find joy in are stamped out of their lives; this is obviously more acutely compounded if your only future is in a coal mine, as is our protagonist's here. I know the "loss of innocence" is a tale as old as time or whatever, but there's something specifically cruel about the way innocence is crushed in a mechanized world in which human life is only a component part of the machine that feeds production. Completely heartbreaking. Grade: A-
Pickpocket (1959)
Feels a lot like Dostoevsky, which is not a criticism at all; the intersection of Crime and Punishment and Notes from Underground is a place cinema has fruitfully occupied for a long time (not the least of which by one Paul Schrader, who is apparently obsessed with this film), and it's cool to see its origins (or something close to it—I'm sure there's some other precedent that I'm missing). I'll have to think more about this movie beyond that, though. It feels vaguely unsettling, with a final scene that feels a little like Crime and Punishment's controversially redemptive conclusion or Taxi Driver's "happy" ending, both of which are still things I'm trying to work out in my head. But still, this is Good Cinema, a lot more immediate than the other Bresson I've seen (though I definitely prefer more overtly Christian Au hasard Balthazar), and it's a movie I'll probably return to sooner rather than later. Grade: A-
The Stranger (1946)
A pot-boiling Hitchcock knock-off directed stylishly by Orson Welles (such a shadowy movie). It's notable how anti-Nazi this movie is, almost as much so as the propaganda pieces like Lifeboat that Hitchcock directed during the war. It's a little inconsistent in interrogating Nazi ideology—one minute, you have scathing indictments like documentary footage of the Holocaust or a scene in which the Nazi says that Karl Marx doesn't count as a German because he was a Jew (darkly hilarious that this is what outs him as a Nazi to the U.S. government official, considering that the United States would be saying similar things about communists within ten years during the Red Scare), but then the next minute, the movie will lean into generic Movie Evil like how Nazis are bad because they will murder their wives with their bare hands. The clocktower climax is magnificent, though (is there a clocktower climax that isn't? Maybe the most reliable setting in film history), and generally, Welles's direction is strong enough to give some urgency to even the less engaging moments. Grade: B
Movies
Palm Springs (2020)
It's really interesting to see a genre emerge, as one certainly has around these "time loop" stories, from a single work, i.e. Groundhog Day. I can't think of another example of that except maybe the Christmas Carol-type story? Anyway, I feel like the trajectory with this genre has been a slow move away from recreating the beats of Groundhog Day (a meticulously documented setup of the repeated day, followed by a long period of time wherein we see the protagonist question their sanity/deny the looped reality, only to eventually accept it and go on a ridiculous, nihilistic/hedonistic spree, etc.—y'all know the drill) to an understanding that the beats of Groundhog Day are familiar enough to the audience that they can be gestured toward with shorthand or even transformed/done away with completely. For me, the tipping point seemed to be Netflix's Russian Doll show, which did some really fascinating work digressing from the familiar thematic ambitions and outcomes of the genre, but now Palm Springs confirms retroactively that there was a tipping point to begin with, since it is build with the abstract tropes of the Groundhog Day premise not as something to be explained to an unsuspecting audience but as a set of assumptions to be recognized by and subverted for a savvy audience. I'm not going to say that this is the most experimental film of all time or anything (the visuals are pedestrian to a fault, e.g.), but there is something revolutionary within the specific context of this genre to have a time loop story in which two people (three, actually, but that's kind of its own thing) cycle through the loop. The complete isolation of Groundhog Day's existential fable becomes a story that's no less existential (the idea of creating meaning in an absurd universe remains at the forefront of this movie's mind, often explicitly in dialogue) but also ends up being far less isolated on a metaphysical level and ultimately a lot more human. For as much as I love Groundhog Day (and I do looove Groundhog Day) and its children, these sorts of stories often struggle to make the secondary characters who aren't stuck in the loop anything more than just NPCs in the protagonist's personal journey of enlightenment. By having multiple characters go through the loop, the story forces itself to reckon more fully with the significance of people's experiences outside of a single person's point-of-view, and in a way, the whole movie then becomes about not just creating a meaningful existence out of life's absurdity but also in recognizing and interacting with the meaningful existences that other humans around you have built. There's a reductive take on this movie that basically just boils down to "Groundhog Day, but a rom-com," but the actual effect of this movie is way more complex than that. It's not just a genre slapped on top of another genre (as much fun as Happy Death Day is, it's never really more than just "Groundhog Day, but a slasher"); it's a movie that makes genres interact with each other in productive and even profound ways. I find it really exciting that movies in this mold can be more than just "Groundhog Day, but..." It's weird to say that I responded to this as strongly as I did Bona-Fide Cinephile Classic(TM) Pickpocket, but there's a specific energy to this movie that has a strong resonant frequency with the way that since March I've basically been living the same day over and over again with my wife in our house and trying to figure out what that means. It's also weird that I apparently relate to media on COVID terms and feel okay ending this review with a "movie for our unsettled times" observation. I dunno, what can I say, I yam what I yam. Oh, and P.S., the mid-credits scene was super confusing to me, full disclosure. Grade: A-
Kes (1969)
I see this all the time with children, including the students I teach: these wonderful creatures whose abilities, interests, and/or life circumstances are ill-suited to the industrialized (or increasingly post-industrialized) world that they must inhabit as they grow older, and the process of inhabiting this world is also the process by which the things they find joy in are stamped out of their lives; this is obviously more acutely compounded if your only future is in a coal mine, as is our protagonist's here. I know the "loss of innocence" is a tale as old as time or whatever, but there's something specifically cruel about the way innocence is crushed in a mechanized world in which human life is only a component part of the machine that feeds production. Completely heartbreaking. Grade: A-
Feels a lot like Dostoevsky, which is not a criticism at all; the intersection of Crime and Punishment and Notes from Underground is a place cinema has fruitfully occupied for a long time (not the least of which by one Paul Schrader, who is apparently obsessed with this film), and it's cool to see its origins (or something close to it—I'm sure there's some other precedent that I'm missing). I'll have to think more about this movie beyond that, though. It feels vaguely unsettling, with a final scene that feels a little like Crime and Punishment's controversially redemptive conclusion or Taxi Driver's "happy" ending, both of which are still things I'm trying to work out in my head. But still, this is Good Cinema, a lot more immediate than the other Bresson I've seen (though I definitely prefer more overtly Christian Au hasard Balthazar), and it's a movie I'll probably return to sooner rather than later. Grade: A-
The Stranger (1946)
A pot-boiling Hitchcock knock-off directed stylishly by Orson Welles (such a shadowy movie). It's notable how anti-Nazi this movie is, almost as much so as the propaganda pieces like Lifeboat that Hitchcock directed during the war. It's a little inconsistent in interrogating Nazi ideology—one minute, you have scathing indictments like documentary footage of the Holocaust or a scene in which the Nazi says that Karl Marx doesn't count as a German because he was a Jew (darkly hilarious that this is what outs him as a Nazi to the U.S. government official, considering that the United States would be saying similar things about communists within ten years during the Red Scare), but then the next minute, the movie will lean into generic Movie Evil like how Nazis are bad because they will murder their wives with their bare hands. The clocktower climax is magnificent, though (is there a clocktower climax that isn't? Maybe the most reliable setting in film history), and generally, Welles's direction is strong enough to give some urgency to even the less engaging moments. Grade: B
Sunday, July 12, 2020
Mini Reviews for July 6-12, 2020
Blah.
Movies
The Nightingale (2018)
A fairly typical idea in stories of revenge is the old "when you seek revenge, dig two graves" adage—i.e. you're going to destroy yourself, too. But by framing a rape-revenge story within the hell that was British colonialism, Jennifer Kent does something pretty interesting in The Nightingale; the protagonists—one an Irish convict who has been serially raped by British officers who eventually murder her husband and infant child (all of which is shown in brutal, explicit detail, btw, so viewers beware), another an Aboriginal man who as a child was kidnapped from his people by the British—have already had their lives effectively ruined by colonial forces, so they care very little for their own lives as they go to take the lives of the men directly responsible for the Irish woman's trauma, making the "two graves" cliché moot. But the genre conventions still mean that whatever catharsis revenge offers be ultimately hollow, so Kent's approach is to make the film's ultimate bloody encounter not only psychologically but systemically unfulfilling, and the film ends with the Aboriginal protagonist screaming futilely to an unmoved ocean about his human dignity. Those responsible for the specific rape/murder at the beginning of the film have been punished, but even before that happens, it's made abundantly clear that punishing these specific men will do nothing to stop the colonial brutality that caused that rape/murder (and the Aboriginal genocide) to begin with—the protagonist's entire trek to find revenge is frequently punctuated by encounters with one colonialist atrocity after another, rarely ones that the individual villains of the film are directly responsible for, and at both climaxes of the film in which each protagonist gets to respectively attack (one verbally, the other physically) the offending officers, a sea of white, British faces looks on in the background—fellow conspirators in the entire cruel project of colonialism. Kent's observation is not the old chestnut about revenge's self-destructive component, as if the victims of colonialism had any destruction not already experienced; instead, it's basically revised for revenge against systemic atrocities: not that you'll have to dig two graves but that you as an individual will never be able to dig enough graves. The narrative glamor of individual acts of resistance will never be an adequate replacement for a collective dismantling of oppressive systems. The movie is way too long and can never seem to make up its mind if its a slow-burn character piece or a shocking exploitation flick, but there's a compelling power to the bleakness of its core idea. Grade: B
Communion (1989)
I used to read a ton of alien abduction stories when I was younger (nonfiction library call numbers from 000-100, what's up!!), which generally terrified me for two reasons: 1. the idea of the totalitarian government conspiracy to keep the aliens secret from the public, and 2. the sheer otherworldliness of the aliens themselves and the unknowable experiments they conducted on their abductees. Something like The X-Files does a really great job of exploring that first fear, but until Communion, I hadn't seen too much media that really digs into that second fear; most of the time, the thing that's scary about the aliens is the invasion part (e.g. War of the Worlds), and if there's no immediate colonial threat, we get stuff like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, which is somewhat unsettling at parts but mostly just awestruck. Ah, but Communion on the other hand: the sequences with the aliens are bugged-out freaky, man! There's a kind of dreaminess to those moments that veers wildly from stuff that's pretty overtly goofy (the conspicuous rubberiness—even muppet-ness—of the alien creatures, the way the aliens give Christopher Walken a high five) to the almost incomprehensibly horrific cosmic unknowability of the "true" face of the aliens or the way the Walken doppelgänger's voice decays into robotic static as he talks, and somehow, in an effect I've not seen anywhere besides the work of David Lynch, the juxtaposition of goofy artifice and unknowable terror somehow only bolsters the terror half of the equation. It's wild. The rest of the movie isn't nearly so out-there, but it's still pretty weird—you've got Walken giving a very Walken performance that feels often dissonant from what else is going on onscreen, for example, and also a score composed by Eric Clapton(??), as well as a pretty unconventional editing rhythm, too. There's also the way that this movie understands the proximity of the culture of alien abduction narratives to New Age spirituality. The movie eventually turns into an off-center search for meaning in the presence of all this fear, embodied best by the support group Walken visits in which abductees talk about being survivors or "participants" of abductions—cool that the movie goes into this, because not a lot of media about alien abductions does, and also cool because I can't think of another New Age horror movie. This movie probably won't work for everyone, but I totally understand the cult fandom surrounding it. Grade: A-
Coonskin (1975)
A lot of Ralph Bakshi's work has an edgelord sensibility where transgression is an end to itself, and even when he does social commentary, it usually gets caught up and muddled and sometimes even lost in the whole whirlwind of intentional ugliness and risibility. Coonskin doesn't lack for transgression—I don't think it would be an exaggeration to call this the single most transgressive movie I've ever seen, both in terms of social mores (which wantonly pisses on good taste and chases racial stereotypes with a corrosive abandon) and style (which mixes live-action and animation indiscriminately). But it's also the most focused Bakshi movie I've seen in terms of the target of that trangression: that target being American racism and specifically the racism perpetuated by one Walt Disney's Song of the South, which this movie viciously satirizes at every turn. The plantation frame story turns into a prison; the rural adventures of Br'er Rabbit and co. are transposed into a '70s NYC, where they take up the tradition of minstrel children like Bugs Bunny and play tricks on white cops and ethnic Europeans and Uncle Toms and everyone who perpetuates systemic racism; the animation-mixed-with-live-action becomes a vehicle for juxtaposing the grotesquely stereotyped cast with a grimy, teeming, crushingly realistic New York urbanscape. For as improvisational and sloppy a storyteller and stylist as Bakshi can be, it's an astoundingly tight execution of an already tight idea, and the result is an acid bath of a movie. This would probably be flat-out great if it weren't for Bakshi's usual misogyny; the idea of America personified as a woman who seduces black men before killing them is at least thematically resonant—but why literally every woman who comes onscreen gets sexualized and usually stripped of clothing is beyond me, except that Bakshi is a gross, leering dude. Anyway, even considering that, this is probably Bakshi's masterpiece, grading on the curve required for this guy's work. Grade: B
Funeral Parade of Roses (薔薇の葬列) (1969)
I know nothing about the Japanese New Wave, but if this movie is any indication, I need to seek out more, pronto. Like some sort of gonzo blend of Andy Warhol and Jean-Luc Godard, it radiates an intoxicating sense of late-'60s "cool" as it chronicles its sometimes silly, sometimes deadly serious vignettes from the underground queer scene in Tokyo. But it's also far more emotionally forthright than either of those two influences—especially with the documentary sequences that pull back to show the production of the film itself and interview the actors about their involvement, a meta flourish that might have given the movie a chilly distance if it hadn't shown to much care for the human beings involved: checking to see that they were comfortable in the filming of the sex scenes, asking them about their journey with their gender identity. It is, more than any other "counterculture" movie I've seen, ultimately sweet in addition to the playfully transgressive and tragic modes I'm used to. Grade: B+
The Young Girls of Rochefort (Les demoiselles de Rochefort) (1967)
Thoroughly charming—of course it is; it's a Demy musical. I like the music a lot better than the music in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (no surprise: I generally prefer musicals with distinct songs rather than the sung-through thing that Umbrellas does), but Young Girls's wafer-thin story has exactly zero of the resonance that Umbrellas's deeply melancholy one has, so who knows which is the superior film in the Great Demy Musical ranking. I will say that I admire this movie's ballsiness in casting Gene Kelly and then having him barely dance. Stone-cold IDGAF energy, that. Grade: B+
Television
When the Levees Broke (2006)
Spike Lee's documentary series on Hurricane Katrina and its impact and aftermath on New Orleans is probably the essential media on that tragedy, whipping between visceral grief for the lives and culture lost and the furious anger at the systemic neglect experienced by the city not just in the decades leading up to it but in the days and months that followed the storm that allowed for that loss to happen at the scale that it did. There's an enormous amount of human suffering to take in here, and Spike doesn't softball any of it—the same conversation that people are having around the exploitativeness of the archival footage of death in BlacKkKlansman and Da 5 Bloods might also be applicable to this work, too, especially one particular montage of neglected and distended dead bodies about midway through. But I dunno, having experienced the media coverage of Katrina in real time (and having had some very bad takes on the whole situation—I was dumb and uncaring as a teen), nobody was covering this like Spike does here just a few months after the events in question, and there really is something to be said for shocking your viewers into having some measure of compassion by forcing them to see misery after misery and loss after loss until they break. It's also has an eerie amount of foresight, too, predicting with pretty stunning accuracy the gentrification that would reshape New Orleans in the years following Katrina and the other coastal cities that would be impacted by hurricanes in the future. Also, a young Kanye West makes an appearance, and RIP the thoughtful and lucid gentlemen seen here. Sobering and essential viewing (for way more than just Kanye, obvs). P.S. It also features some of composer Terence Blanchard's best work with Spike Lee—perhaps no surprise, given his personal connection to New Orleans. Grade: A
Books (all plays, in this case)
Joe Turner's Come and Gone by August Wilson (1988)
It's an incredibly ambitious idea to embody the entire African-American experience within a single boarding house, which is what this play does, and I admire that ambition even though I don't think the play quite lands it—and I have my doubts about what the play is trying to do with Harold Loomis learning "the song of self-sufficiency" at the end. In bits and pieces, this is great, especially the religious ecstaticism that undergirds the whole thing, but I don't think the whole comes together as well as it should. That said, I would pay good money to see Delroy Lindo and Angela Bassett respectively play Loomis and his wife. Grade: B-
Dutchman by Amiri Baraka (1964)
Molten-lava theater. An uncompromisingly brutal allegory of American racism, as told within a single subway car. It's all kind of inscrutable at first, but by the end, it snaps into sharp focus. Of course this is exactly my thing. Grade: A
The Slave by Amiri Baraka (1964)
Not nearly as successful as Dutchman, in my opinion, especially considering the rather intense homophobic language used throughout the first half of the play (I realize that Baraka may have himself been gay and trying to deflect, but this only makes me sad, not any more interested in the device). But the play is no less incendiary than its immediate predecessor. You can see the simmering of Baraka's early Black nationalism here, and the context of the race war in the play's background (and the bits and pieces we get of the history leading up to the war—the alluded-to white-liberal betrayal is poignant and searingly spot-on) feels as contemporary today as it no-doubt did in 1964. But these characters never become more than opaque, and I don't think they even rise to the level of symbolism like they do in Dutchman. There's a lot of great material to recommend in the play, and I'm willing to accept that I Didn't Get It. But on the whole, this feels a lot shakier in execution than I'm comfortable with. Grade: B-
Movies
The Nightingale (2018)
A fairly typical idea in stories of revenge is the old "when you seek revenge, dig two graves" adage—i.e. you're going to destroy yourself, too. But by framing a rape-revenge story within the hell that was British colonialism, Jennifer Kent does something pretty interesting in The Nightingale; the protagonists—one an Irish convict who has been serially raped by British officers who eventually murder her husband and infant child (all of which is shown in brutal, explicit detail, btw, so viewers beware), another an Aboriginal man who as a child was kidnapped from his people by the British—have already had their lives effectively ruined by colonial forces, so they care very little for their own lives as they go to take the lives of the men directly responsible for the Irish woman's trauma, making the "two graves" cliché moot. But the genre conventions still mean that whatever catharsis revenge offers be ultimately hollow, so Kent's approach is to make the film's ultimate bloody encounter not only psychologically but systemically unfulfilling, and the film ends with the Aboriginal protagonist screaming futilely to an unmoved ocean about his human dignity. Those responsible for the specific rape/murder at the beginning of the film have been punished, but even before that happens, it's made abundantly clear that punishing these specific men will do nothing to stop the colonial brutality that caused that rape/murder (and the Aboriginal genocide) to begin with—the protagonist's entire trek to find revenge is frequently punctuated by encounters with one colonialist atrocity after another, rarely ones that the individual villains of the film are directly responsible for, and at both climaxes of the film in which each protagonist gets to respectively attack (one verbally, the other physically) the offending officers, a sea of white, British faces looks on in the background—fellow conspirators in the entire cruel project of colonialism. Kent's observation is not the old chestnut about revenge's self-destructive component, as if the victims of colonialism had any destruction not already experienced; instead, it's basically revised for revenge against systemic atrocities: not that you'll have to dig two graves but that you as an individual will never be able to dig enough graves. The narrative glamor of individual acts of resistance will never be an adequate replacement for a collective dismantling of oppressive systems. The movie is way too long and can never seem to make up its mind if its a slow-burn character piece or a shocking exploitation flick, but there's a compelling power to the bleakness of its core idea. Grade: B
Communion (1989)
I used to read a ton of alien abduction stories when I was younger (nonfiction library call numbers from 000-100, what's up!!), which generally terrified me for two reasons: 1. the idea of the totalitarian government conspiracy to keep the aliens secret from the public, and 2. the sheer otherworldliness of the aliens themselves and the unknowable experiments they conducted on their abductees. Something like The X-Files does a really great job of exploring that first fear, but until Communion, I hadn't seen too much media that really digs into that second fear; most of the time, the thing that's scary about the aliens is the invasion part (e.g. War of the Worlds), and if there's no immediate colonial threat, we get stuff like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, which is somewhat unsettling at parts but mostly just awestruck. Ah, but Communion on the other hand: the sequences with the aliens are bugged-out freaky, man! There's a kind of dreaminess to those moments that veers wildly from stuff that's pretty overtly goofy (the conspicuous rubberiness—even muppet-ness—of the alien creatures, the way the aliens give Christopher Walken a high five) to the almost incomprehensibly horrific cosmic unknowability of the "true" face of the aliens or the way the Walken doppelgänger's voice decays into robotic static as he talks, and somehow, in an effect I've not seen anywhere besides the work of David Lynch, the juxtaposition of goofy artifice and unknowable terror somehow only bolsters the terror half of the equation. It's wild. The rest of the movie isn't nearly so out-there, but it's still pretty weird—you've got Walken giving a very Walken performance that feels often dissonant from what else is going on onscreen, for example, and also a score composed by Eric Clapton(??), as well as a pretty unconventional editing rhythm, too. There's also the way that this movie understands the proximity of the culture of alien abduction narratives to New Age spirituality. The movie eventually turns into an off-center search for meaning in the presence of all this fear, embodied best by the support group Walken visits in which abductees talk about being survivors or "participants" of abductions—cool that the movie goes into this, because not a lot of media about alien abductions does, and also cool because I can't think of another New Age horror movie. This movie probably won't work for everyone, but I totally understand the cult fandom surrounding it. Grade: A-
Coonskin (1975)
A lot of Ralph Bakshi's work has an edgelord sensibility where transgression is an end to itself, and even when he does social commentary, it usually gets caught up and muddled and sometimes even lost in the whole whirlwind of intentional ugliness and risibility. Coonskin doesn't lack for transgression—I don't think it would be an exaggeration to call this the single most transgressive movie I've ever seen, both in terms of social mores (which wantonly pisses on good taste and chases racial stereotypes with a corrosive abandon) and style (which mixes live-action and animation indiscriminately). But it's also the most focused Bakshi movie I've seen in terms of the target of that trangression: that target being American racism and specifically the racism perpetuated by one Walt Disney's Song of the South, which this movie viciously satirizes at every turn. The plantation frame story turns into a prison; the rural adventures of Br'er Rabbit and co. are transposed into a '70s NYC, where they take up the tradition of minstrel children like Bugs Bunny and play tricks on white cops and ethnic Europeans and Uncle Toms and everyone who perpetuates systemic racism; the animation-mixed-with-live-action becomes a vehicle for juxtaposing the grotesquely stereotyped cast with a grimy, teeming, crushingly realistic New York urbanscape. For as improvisational and sloppy a storyteller and stylist as Bakshi can be, it's an astoundingly tight execution of an already tight idea, and the result is an acid bath of a movie. This would probably be flat-out great if it weren't for Bakshi's usual misogyny; the idea of America personified as a woman who seduces black men before killing them is at least thematically resonant—but why literally every woman who comes onscreen gets sexualized and usually stripped of clothing is beyond me, except that Bakshi is a gross, leering dude. Anyway, even considering that, this is probably Bakshi's masterpiece, grading on the curve required for this guy's work. Grade: B
Funeral Parade of Roses (薔薇の葬列) (1969)
I know nothing about the Japanese New Wave, but if this movie is any indication, I need to seek out more, pronto. Like some sort of gonzo blend of Andy Warhol and Jean-Luc Godard, it radiates an intoxicating sense of late-'60s "cool" as it chronicles its sometimes silly, sometimes deadly serious vignettes from the underground queer scene in Tokyo. But it's also far more emotionally forthright than either of those two influences—especially with the documentary sequences that pull back to show the production of the film itself and interview the actors about their involvement, a meta flourish that might have given the movie a chilly distance if it hadn't shown to much care for the human beings involved: checking to see that they were comfortable in the filming of the sex scenes, asking them about their journey with their gender identity. It is, more than any other "counterculture" movie I've seen, ultimately sweet in addition to the playfully transgressive and tragic modes I'm used to. Grade: B+
The Young Girls of Rochefort (Les demoiselles de Rochefort) (1967)
Thoroughly charming—of course it is; it's a Demy musical. I like the music a lot better than the music in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (no surprise: I generally prefer musicals with distinct songs rather than the sung-through thing that Umbrellas does), but Young Girls's wafer-thin story has exactly zero of the resonance that Umbrellas's deeply melancholy one has, so who knows which is the superior film in the Great Demy Musical ranking. I will say that I admire this movie's ballsiness in casting Gene Kelly and then having him barely dance. Stone-cold IDGAF energy, that. Grade: B+
Television
When the Levees Broke (2006)
Spike Lee's documentary series on Hurricane Katrina and its impact and aftermath on New Orleans is probably the essential media on that tragedy, whipping between visceral grief for the lives and culture lost and the furious anger at the systemic neglect experienced by the city not just in the decades leading up to it but in the days and months that followed the storm that allowed for that loss to happen at the scale that it did. There's an enormous amount of human suffering to take in here, and Spike doesn't softball any of it—the same conversation that people are having around the exploitativeness of the archival footage of death in BlacKkKlansman and Da 5 Bloods might also be applicable to this work, too, especially one particular montage of neglected and distended dead bodies about midway through. But I dunno, having experienced the media coverage of Katrina in real time (and having had some very bad takes on the whole situation—I was dumb and uncaring as a teen), nobody was covering this like Spike does here just a few months after the events in question, and there really is something to be said for shocking your viewers into having some measure of compassion by forcing them to see misery after misery and loss after loss until they break. It's also has an eerie amount of foresight, too, predicting with pretty stunning accuracy the gentrification that would reshape New Orleans in the years following Katrina and the other coastal cities that would be impacted by hurricanes in the future. Also, a young Kanye West makes an appearance, and RIP the thoughtful and lucid gentlemen seen here. Sobering and essential viewing (for way more than just Kanye, obvs). P.S. It also features some of composer Terence Blanchard's best work with Spike Lee—perhaps no surprise, given his personal connection to New Orleans. Grade: A
Books (all plays, in this case)
Joe Turner's Come and Gone by August Wilson (1988)
It's an incredibly ambitious idea to embody the entire African-American experience within a single boarding house, which is what this play does, and I admire that ambition even though I don't think the play quite lands it—and I have my doubts about what the play is trying to do with Harold Loomis learning "the song of self-sufficiency" at the end. In bits and pieces, this is great, especially the religious ecstaticism that undergirds the whole thing, but I don't think the whole comes together as well as it should. That said, I would pay good money to see Delroy Lindo and Angela Bassett respectively play Loomis and his wife. Grade: B-
Dutchman by Amiri Baraka (1964)
Molten-lava theater. An uncompromisingly brutal allegory of American racism, as told within a single subway car. It's all kind of inscrutable at first, but by the end, it snaps into sharp focus. Of course this is exactly my thing. Grade: A
The Slave by Amiri Baraka (1964)
Not nearly as successful as Dutchman, in my opinion, especially considering the rather intense homophobic language used throughout the first half of the play (I realize that Baraka may have himself been gay and trying to deflect, but this only makes me sad, not any more interested in the device). But the play is no less incendiary than its immediate predecessor. You can see the simmering of Baraka's early Black nationalism here, and the context of the race war in the play's background (and the bits and pieces we get of the history leading up to the war—the alluded-to white-liberal betrayal is poignant and searingly spot-on) feels as contemporary today as it no-doubt did in 1964. But these characters never become more than opaque, and I don't think they even rise to the level of symbolism like they do in Dutchman. There's a lot of great material to recommend in the play, and I'm willing to accept that I Didn't Get It. But on the whole, this feels a lot shakier in execution than I'm comfortable with. Grade: B-
Sunday, July 5, 2020
Mini Reviews for June 29 - July 5, 2020
I guess Kanye West is really running for president.
Movies
Richard Jewell (2019)
The sad story of a man's almost puppy-dog-like love for American institutions that betray him at every turn. Olivia Wilde's character is a mistake—both for having her depict a real journalist who apparently didn't act this way in real life (I would have liked to see her as a fictional composite of a lot of different journalists, tbh) and also for basically embodying some sexist stereotypes about femme fatales and stuff. But otherwise, this is mostly super solid, and Paul Walter Hauser in the lead gives one of the best performances of 2019. Grade: B
Pope Francis: A Man of His Word (2018)
Admitting that this movie probably isn't for me, a lifelong Protestant, there's some surprisingly thin and hagiographic documentary work from Wenders here, though I guess he probably couldn't have gotten this much access to Pope Francis if he didn't go full Vatican-PR mode. Even so, while it's not surprising that the pope wouldn't be particularly excited about feminism or that he'd give strong moral condemnations but little systemic reform to the sexual abuse in the church, it's extremely frustrating that the documentary doesn't interrogate any of this more. One of the major reasons I am not Catholic is that I just cannot get behind the institutional hierarchy of having a pope or a single worldwide church leader like this, but on the other hand, I can't think of a single high-profile Protestant leader who speaks with as much frankness and passion about economic and environmental injustice as Pope Francis does, and they aren't particularly eager to embrace feminism or systematically address abuse either, so maybe I'm just closed-minded. Anyway, the PR might have worked a little here, because the parts of the movie that don't softball important issues I found pretty moving. The pope's words about wealth and the environment are potent coming from a leader of this stature, and even as just a symbolic gesture, the image of a pope (a South-American one at that) blessing those suffering in countries ravaged by centuries of colonialism and capitalism is undeniably powerful—it didn't occur to me until I was watching this that for a pope to take seriously the call of his position means shouldering and ministering to suffering on a global level, and I feel like a documentary that leaned more into the intensity of that idea would have been actually great. There's also something sad about it all, too, knowing the world in contrast to these ideals. Seeing the pope embrace Evo Morales and then go to the United States Congress to urge for the end of weapons trade is retrospectively heartbreaking; I guess even an endorsement from the pope himself can't protect a leftist, indigenous leader from a right-wing coup. Grade: C+
Mohawk (2017)
It's a bad sign when I know already that I will probably forget all about this movie within the month. There is absolutely nothing notable about this except for its indigenous protagonist (though even then, we spend more time with the American villains) and its setting within the War of 1812. We should have more (and more memorable) movies set in the War of 1812, because all I ever learned about that war in school was that that was how "The Star-Spangled Banner" was written. Educate me, cinema! Grade: C-
Blue Valentine (2010)
A good chunk of this, especially the flashbacks to when Gosling and Williams are falling in love, is pretty much peak Millennial Sundance Studio "Indie" (it's a Weinstein Co. production, but it just as easily could have been Fox Searchlight or whatever): the Grizzly Bear score, the use of recognizable Hollywood stars in an otherwise low-budget affect, the prominence of a mix CD, a cute little dance to old-timey music; Ryan Gosling plays a ukulele—in Brooklyn. I mean, wow. It lacks the Wes Anderson mannerisms, but that had kind of run its course by 2010 anyway. None of this is a putdown of the movie, by the way. It's really good and a lot more honest and complex than a lot of these kind of movies tended to be. It's genuinely moving, too, and ranks a little behind Before Midnight and A Separation (but not that far behind them) as one of the definitive marriage-dissolution films of the 2010s (it's way ahead of Marriage Story in that pantheon, btw). If I'd seen this in 2010, it probably would have been my second-favorite movie of that year behind The Social Network, and even though I'm far less into this aesthetic than I was in 2010, I was still blown away by some of the scenes here—the "drunken night in the hotel" sequence is frightening and heartbreaking in impressively equal measures. But at the same time, I also felt kind of outside myself watching this movie because I kept thinking about how of-its-time some of the specifics of this movie are and how weird it is that movies that came out when I was an adult now feel "of their time," with that "time" being "not now"—a weirdly thematically relevant dissonance to feel watching a movie in-part about the passage of time, now that I think about it. There are also some fascinating pieces that show Blue Valentine as an ever-so-slightly transitional work in the spectrum of American indie of its moment: the straight-blue hues of the central hotel room anticipate how monochrome and neon lighting would become the most important aesthetic signifiers of mainstream American indie filmmaking (and eventually some pockets of just straight American mainstream), and the "present-day" parts of this movie definitely feel like a definitive pivot away from the youth-obsessed indie 2000s and toward the "aging Millennial hipsters" 2010s in the same way that like LCD Soundsystem's last album and The National hit big (This Is Happening and High Violet were both 2010, too!). Gosling is definitely rocking that 'stache a few years ahead of time. I dunno. I know this is a lot of musing about cultural stuff that preoccupied a relatively small segment of the population of the United States. I'm having something of a Big Chill moment with this movie. Apologies. Grade: A-
Old Joy (2006)
Probably my favorite Kelly Reichardt movie, which is saying something for a filmography that includes Meek's Cutoff and Wendy & Lucy, two of the best American films of the past two decades. Well, now I know that she's directed three of the best American films of the past two decades. The central relationship between two friends who reunite for a camping trip after not having seen each other in years is so absolutely perfectly well-observed that I want to cry just thinking about it, and I don't think I've ever seen a movie grapple so compassionately with the ways in which male friends inevitably bump against the isolation at the edges of masculine behavioral scripts—and when the two of them finally push past it into the beautiful liminal space beyond for just a few minutes before they have to return to their lives, it's breathtaking and beautiful in a way that I have trouble describing. It's also Reichardt's most meditative movie, with long passages consisting of nothing but shots of nature intercut with other shots of nature with the rhythm of slow intakes of breath. The film is bookended by lengthy sequences in which a character listens to political talk radio during a drive through a city, which is not a terribly unrepresentative distillation of a certain slice of my own life; the roughly 70 minutes in between those bookends, though, are a transcendental voyage into a deeply peaceful, spiritually profound, and (by virtue of its contrast with the alienation and anxiety of real life) ultimately sad space of camaraderie and intimacy. Exactly the movie I needed. Grade: A
But I'm a Cheerleader (1999)
It's very successful as a camp satire of gender roles/heteronormativity, a success mostly thanks to the tremendous sets/costumes inside the gay conversion center, their garish baby pinks and blues as if a gender-reveal party became sentient and built a commune. The central relationship between Lyonne and DuVall is very cute, too, which is nice: this movie was apparently compared to the work of John Waters when it came out, and I can see that in some of the broad skewering of oppressive hetero-normie life, but what I've seen of Waters's work never quite manages to pivot from seething satire into pure sweetness as handily as this movie does. The same goes for the film's serious undercurrents about the harm of conversion camps; it probably could have gone a little harder into the actual existential threat that these places pose to queer youth (the lifelong trauma and even suicide that comes from these places, god), but it does still manage to incorporate some truly horrific stuff, like parents abandoning their children because the children are gay, within its generally comedic/easygoing tone, which is impressive. That said, there are parts of this movie that are too broad for me, particularly its use of stereotypes to fill out its cast; it's making a point about how people aspire (or are forced to aspire) to social scripts and stuff, and at least a few of the secondary characters get complicated by the film (I really appreciate that at least one person inside the conversion camp is straight but told they are gay because they don't scan as traditionally female). But the movie doesn't have time to do that for everyone, and a lot of the rest of the cast just kind of has to sit on these pretty thin tropes. The "intervention" scene where Lyonne's character is revealed to be gay in a series of escalating lesbian stereotypes is hilarious, though (the Melissa Etheridge poster...), so what do I know. Grade: B+
Books
Long Day's Journey into Night by Eugene O'Neill (1956)
O'Neill's autobiographical, posthumously published final work is very much mid-century theater of the kind that Arthur Miller and the like were making, and at first, this struck me as just a particularly aimless and miserable iteration of that: a son has a terminal illness, a mother has a morphine addiction, a father grapples with the artistic impotence of his career—and they spend the whole play drinking and fighting about all of that. But the moments of piercing, profound clarity in the play's more intimate stretches, when the drunken sniping halts and the characters talk sincerely one-on-one, are so beautiful that they become heartbreaking for how fleeting they are; this is especially true of a late conversation between Edmund (the terminally ill son) and his father, where Edmund articulates basically that: life is a confused and miserable muddle where we wander about in a fog until we stumble upon shining instances of meaning that soon get lost in the haze. Dialogues like this snap the play into focus for me and make it a largely compelling exploration of the spiritual and epistemic alienation of modernity. In the end, this was pretty moving. Grade: A-
Music
Enya - Watermark (1988)
I've never really given Enya a shot. Her reputation is mostly as a New Age artist, but this album kind of rocks. The New Age textures are here, but I'm also getting a lot of Kate Bush, too, which is very cool (and notably, Kate Bush integrates a lot of ambient/New Age sounds into her later work anyway). Very good stuff. I'm sorry to have slept on this artist for so long. Grade: A-
Movies
Richard Jewell (2019)
The sad story of a man's almost puppy-dog-like love for American institutions that betray him at every turn. Olivia Wilde's character is a mistake—both for having her depict a real journalist who apparently didn't act this way in real life (I would have liked to see her as a fictional composite of a lot of different journalists, tbh) and also for basically embodying some sexist stereotypes about femme fatales and stuff. But otherwise, this is mostly super solid, and Paul Walter Hauser in the lead gives one of the best performances of 2019. Grade: B
Pope Francis: A Man of His Word (2018)
Admitting that this movie probably isn't for me, a lifelong Protestant, there's some surprisingly thin and hagiographic documentary work from Wenders here, though I guess he probably couldn't have gotten this much access to Pope Francis if he didn't go full Vatican-PR mode. Even so, while it's not surprising that the pope wouldn't be particularly excited about feminism or that he'd give strong moral condemnations but little systemic reform to the sexual abuse in the church, it's extremely frustrating that the documentary doesn't interrogate any of this more. One of the major reasons I am not Catholic is that I just cannot get behind the institutional hierarchy of having a pope or a single worldwide church leader like this, but on the other hand, I can't think of a single high-profile Protestant leader who speaks with as much frankness and passion about economic and environmental injustice as Pope Francis does, and they aren't particularly eager to embrace feminism or systematically address abuse either, so maybe I'm just closed-minded. Anyway, the PR might have worked a little here, because the parts of the movie that don't softball important issues I found pretty moving. The pope's words about wealth and the environment are potent coming from a leader of this stature, and even as just a symbolic gesture, the image of a pope (a South-American one at that) blessing those suffering in countries ravaged by centuries of colonialism and capitalism is undeniably powerful—it didn't occur to me until I was watching this that for a pope to take seriously the call of his position means shouldering and ministering to suffering on a global level, and I feel like a documentary that leaned more into the intensity of that idea would have been actually great. There's also something sad about it all, too, knowing the world in contrast to these ideals. Seeing the pope embrace Evo Morales and then go to the United States Congress to urge for the end of weapons trade is retrospectively heartbreaking; I guess even an endorsement from the pope himself can't protect a leftist, indigenous leader from a right-wing coup. Grade: C+
Mohawk (2017)
It's a bad sign when I know already that I will probably forget all about this movie within the month. There is absolutely nothing notable about this except for its indigenous protagonist (though even then, we spend more time with the American villains) and its setting within the War of 1812. We should have more (and more memorable) movies set in the War of 1812, because all I ever learned about that war in school was that that was how "The Star-Spangled Banner" was written. Educate me, cinema! Grade: C-
Blue Valentine (2010)
A good chunk of this, especially the flashbacks to when Gosling and Williams are falling in love, is pretty much peak Millennial Sundance Studio "Indie" (it's a Weinstein Co. production, but it just as easily could have been Fox Searchlight or whatever): the Grizzly Bear score, the use of recognizable Hollywood stars in an otherwise low-budget affect, the prominence of a mix CD, a cute little dance to old-timey music; Ryan Gosling plays a ukulele—in Brooklyn. I mean, wow. It lacks the Wes Anderson mannerisms, but that had kind of run its course by 2010 anyway. None of this is a putdown of the movie, by the way. It's really good and a lot more honest and complex than a lot of these kind of movies tended to be. It's genuinely moving, too, and ranks a little behind Before Midnight and A Separation (but not that far behind them) as one of the definitive marriage-dissolution films of the 2010s (it's way ahead of Marriage Story in that pantheon, btw). If I'd seen this in 2010, it probably would have been my second-favorite movie of that year behind The Social Network, and even though I'm far less into this aesthetic than I was in 2010, I was still blown away by some of the scenes here—the "drunken night in the hotel" sequence is frightening and heartbreaking in impressively equal measures. But at the same time, I also felt kind of outside myself watching this movie because I kept thinking about how of-its-time some of the specifics of this movie are and how weird it is that movies that came out when I was an adult now feel "of their time," with that "time" being "not now"—a weirdly thematically relevant dissonance to feel watching a movie in-part about the passage of time, now that I think about it. There are also some fascinating pieces that show Blue Valentine as an ever-so-slightly transitional work in the spectrum of American indie of its moment: the straight-blue hues of the central hotel room anticipate how monochrome and neon lighting would become the most important aesthetic signifiers of mainstream American indie filmmaking (and eventually some pockets of just straight American mainstream), and the "present-day" parts of this movie definitely feel like a definitive pivot away from the youth-obsessed indie 2000s and toward the "aging Millennial hipsters" 2010s in the same way that like LCD Soundsystem's last album and The National hit big (This Is Happening and High Violet were both 2010, too!). Gosling is definitely rocking that 'stache a few years ahead of time. I dunno. I know this is a lot of musing about cultural stuff that preoccupied a relatively small segment of the population of the United States. I'm having something of a Big Chill moment with this movie. Apologies. Grade: A-
Old Joy (2006)
Probably my favorite Kelly Reichardt movie, which is saying something for a filmography that includes Meek's Cutoff and Wendy & Lucy, two of the best American films of the past two decades. Well, now I know that she's directed three of the best American films of the past two decades. The central relationship between two friends who reunite for a camping trip after not having seen each other in years is so absolutely perfectly well-observed that I want to cry just thinking about it, and I don't think I've ever seen a movie grapple so compassionately with the ways in which male friends inevitably bump against the isolation at the edges of masculine behavioral scripts—and when the two of them finally push past it into the beautiful liminal space beyond for just a few minutes before they have to return to their lives, it's breathtaking and beautiful in a way that I have trouble describing. It's also Reichardt's most meditative movie, with long passages consisting of nothing but shots of nature intercut with other shots of nature with the rhythm of slow intakes of breath. The film is bookended by lengthy sequences in which a character listens to political talk radio during a drive through a city, which is not a terribly unrepresentative distillation of a certain slice of my own life; the roughly 70 minutes in between those bookends, though, are a transcendental voyage into a deeply peaceful, spiritually profound, and (by virtue of its contrast with the alienation and anxiety of real life) ultimately sad space of camaraderie and intimacy. Exactly the movie I needed. Grade: A
But I'm a Cheerleader (1999)
It's very successful as a camp satire of gender roles/heteronormativity, a success mostly thanks to the tremendous sets/costumes inside the gay conversion center, their garish baby pinks and blues as if a gender-reveal party became sentient and built a commune. The central relationship between Lyonne and DuVall is very cute, too, which is nice: this movie was apparently compared to the work of John Waters when it came out, and I can see that in some of the broad skewering of oppressive hetero-normie life, but what I've seen of Waters's work never quite manages to pivot from seething satire into pure sweetness as handily as this movie does. The same goes for the film's serious undercurrents about the harm of conversion camps; it probably could have gone a little harder into the actual existential threat that these places pose to queer youth (the lifelong trauma and even suicide that comes from these places, god), but it does still manage to incorporate some truly horrific stuff, like parents abandoning their children because the children are gay, within its generally comedic/easygoing tone, which is impressive. That said, there are parts of this movie that are too broad for me, particularly its use of stereotypes to fill out its cast; it's making a point about how people aspire (or are forced to aspire) to social scripts and stuff, and at least a few of the secondary characters get complicated by the film (I really appreciate that at least one person inside the conversion camp is straight but told they are gay because they don't scan as traditionally female). But the movie doesn't have time to do that for everyone, and a lot of the rest of the cast just kind of has to sit on these pretty thin tropes. The "intervention" scene where Lyonne's character is revealed to be gay in a series of escalating lesbian stereotypes is hilarious, though (the Melissa Etheridge poster...), so what do I know. Grade: B+
Books
Long Day's Journey into Night by Eugene O'Neill (1956)
O'Neill's autobiographical, posthumously published final work is very much mid-century theater of the kind that Arthur Miller and the like were making, and at first, this struck me as just a particularly aimless and miserable iteration of that: a son has a terminal illness, a mother has a morphine addiction, a father grapples with the artistic impotence of his career—and they spend the whole play drinking and fighting about all of that. But the moments of piercing, profound clarity in the play's more intimate stretches, when the drunken sniping halts and the characters talk sincerely one-on-one, are so beautiful that they become heartbreaking for how fleeting they are; this is especially true of a late conversation between Edmund (the terminally ill son) and his father, where Edmund articulates basically that: life is a confused and miserable muddle where we wander about in a fog until we stumble upon shining instances of meaning that soon get lost in the haze. Dialogues like this snap the play into focus for me and make it a largely compelling exploration of the spiritual and epistemic alienation of modernity. In the end, this was pretty moving. Grade: A-
Music
Enya - Watermark (1988)
I've never really given Enya a shot. Her reputation is mostly as a New Age artist, but this album kind of rocks. The New Age textures are here, but I'm also getting a lot of Kate Bush, too, which is very cool (and notably, Kate Bush integrates a lot of ambient/New Age sounds into her later work anyway). Very good stuff. I'm sorry to have slept on this artist for so long. Grade: A-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)