Showing posts with label Alex Ross Perry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alex Ross Perry. Show all posts

Sunday, November 28, 2021

Mini Reviews for November 15 - 28, 2021

I'm back, baby! One day late, admittedly. Life's busy these days.

Movies

Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday (1993)
Mostly trash. Tries to shake up the incredibly stale formula of the series and ends up with something even worse and more generic. I do appreciate the (comparatively to the previous couple movies in the series) goofy characters, but the charm wears off fast. Once you're about thirty minutes in, it becomes clear that this movie doesn't know at all what to do, and so it just starts making up this bizarrely convoluted mythology that the series never needed (though it does finally explain how Jason is alive in Pt. 2 after being dead in the first movie, if that was the discontinuity in this series keeping you up at night). Anyway, full disclosure, I basically checked out of this movie about halfway through and started watching a video of some dude speedrunning Dark Souls in under an hour, which I guarantee was a video that took more skill to make than anything in Jason Goes to Hell. THE NEXT MOVIE IS THE SPACE ONE, THOUGH. I'M ALMOST THERE. Grade: C-

Impolex (2009)
Nobody's going to mistake this for a movie not inspired by Gravity's Rainbow: a dude named "Tyrone S." is wandering around looking for a bomb, and there's an octopus and stuff. But it's more like pieces of the book thrown into a blender with mumblecore tropes, which is already a lot more interesting than a lot of mumblecore movies by virtue of having something going on besides disaffected twentysomethings just shooting the breeze, and there is a kind of logic in distilling the spirit of Pynchon's digressive sprawl into the rambling, improvised dialogue of, like, a Joe Swanberg movie. It really snaps into focus at the end as mumblecore as seen through a Pynchon-shaped lens rather than the other way around, which squares with the scene Alex Ross Perry came out of. That said, it would be interesting to see a fully matured ARP with a modern ARP budget taking another stab at Pynchon, given that the writerly and filmmakerly tics he ended up developing into his signature style would lend themselves to some interesting results when given Pynchon material—both Tom and Alex have a penchant for cramming as much information as possible into every moment of their work, and it would be fun to see those things bounce off one another. As for the Impolex we actually got, it's basically a really talented amateur film that is way more "hmm, this is theoretically interesting" than "hmm, this is actually pretty good," unfortunately. I was ready for ARP to take me on a journey here. Grade: C

La Commune (Paris, 1871) (2000)
I've been chewing on this movie for over a week before writing this review. Which makes me wish I had something more profound to say about it after all this time, given that I found the movie pretty profound. But I dunno, bursting at the seams even as it clocks in at six hours, the movie kind of speaks for itself. A breathtaking, comprehensive re-enactment of the Paris Commune, with the meta gloss of having the whole thing being told via pastiche of various forms of news media, which makes the film as much about how we talk about radical politics as it is about radical politics itself. Really, really worth the watch if you're at all interested in those things, or are just interested in learning about one of the most unsung pivotal moments in Western Europe. People are always like, "Michael, you gotta watch this limited series, it's only like seven episodes!" and while I don't have anything against TV series (or especially limited series/miniseries), and I usually justify not watching more TV because "I don't have time." But somehow, I parceled out this movie's six hours into episode-length snippets over a few days and completely knocked it out without any struggles with my schedule, so I guess I'm just a liar. But I found this thrilling. Grade: A

Lord of the Flies (1990)
Clearly made by people who either didn't understand or didn't care enough about the political parable of the original novel to know what particulars of the book were important to keep vs. throw away in the adaptation process. Which would be fine except that the movie is still too attached to the big particulars of the book to allow it to be just an engaging survival thriller outside of the portent of the book. As a result, it's fundamentally boring, though the score is okay and there is some good nature photography. Grade: C-

 

 

American Revolution 2 (1969)
An often chaotic, hard-to-follow document of Chicago leftist organizing following the '68 DNC, but it's ultimately all the more exciting for it as the bones of what would become the "Rainbow Coalition" arises from the disorder by the film's conclusion. I'm ultimately happy that I watched this after its chronological follow-up (the vital, monstrously depressing The Murder of Fred Hampton, the titular action of which happening just a few months after the release of American Revolution 2), since viewing this last ends it on an ellipsis that gives the illusion that that beautiful, tragically short moment in American leftism could last forever. An exquisite vision of what could have been. Grade: A-

The Haunted Palace (1963)
Most of these Corman/Poe adaptations are fundamentally good because at the very least they feature one great Vincent Price performance. The Haunted Palace is a step above the rest in this respect because it features two great Vincent Price performances. The rest of the movie is kind of unremarkable, other than the fact that it's apparently a Lovecraft adaptation, despite billing itself as a Poe adaptation, which is hilarious to me. But with two Vincent Price performances, the scales balance out to a net positive. Grade: B

 

 

House of Usher (1960)
For once, a more or less faithful adaptation of a Poe story from Corman, and it makes sense: "The Fall of the House of Usher" is one of Poe's most visually rich works, conjuring some of the most exquisite gothic imagery in the history of English letters, so you would be a fool to diverge too much from that when adapting that to the cinema. Corman's no fool, and he's also no slouch—the story's iconic setting is evoked magnificently, and everything here just feels so terrifically spooky and portentous, weighted with a palpable sense of history and eons of time. A lot of these Poe/Corman adaptations have a kind of low-budget charm to them, where you can see the seams and that makes it all the more captivating that they're as competently done as they are, but House of Usher is different; it feels like the genuine object, immersive in ways that the "really good community theater" vibe of the other films could only dream of being. Part of this is obviously pretense; it's only 80 minutes long, but its first four minutes are occupied by one of those "Overture" screens that you might see in Ben-Hur or some other classic Hollywood epic. But the fact that that feeling of watching something epic and arch doesn't disappear with the overture is a testament to how honestly the rest of the movie comes by that effect. This is just top-to-bottom great. Of course, an all-time-great Vincent Price performance doesn't hurt—but that already goes without saying in any of these Poe adaptations, right? Grade: A

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Favorite Movies of 2019

2019 sucked. It sucked on a personal level for me and my family, it sucked on a national level, it sucked on a global level.

My son was born, though, which is just such a wonderful ray of positivity in my life while at the same time ushering in a kind of mournfulness for him and the world he will inherit from my generation and the ones prior. I want my son to have a world full of joy and beauty, and while certainly those things will persist, they will do so alongside God only knows what horrible inheritance of the modern age. But in the absence of a material reality that's going to leave a more beautiful world for my son, there is at least art and the legacy it can leave on the human earth for my son to encounter, and readers, you all know that the cinematic arts are near and dear to my heart.

So here are my favorite movies of the year. When my son asks me about this year (if he cares to—and honestly, why would he? I certainly wouldn't want to hear about 2019), I'll have to tell him about children in cages and my brother's death and my grandfather's decline and Jeff Bezos hoarding his billions like a really boring version of a fairy tale dragon. But I also hope to be able to tell him about what made me feel awe and wonder and that rush of being alive, and these movies will undoubtedly be a part of that.

Anyway, enough hand-wringing. Here's the list. As always, it's limited to movie that had either a streaming or theatrical release in the United States during 2019. Also limited to the movies I actually had a chance to see in 2019. So before you ask, no, I didn't get to see Knives Out or Rise of Skywalker.

Also, don't forget about my Favorite Music of 2019 post, in case you missed it and are interested!

Favorite Movies

1. Long Day's Journey Into Night
Filmmakers have long compared cinema to dreaming, but when the protagonist of Bi Gan's towering Long Day's Journey Into Night falls asleep, it results in one of the most thrilling and transporting sequences of film I've ever seen: an hour-long single take that affirms that filmmaking is the nexus between waking and dreaming, heaven and earth. The movie is one half mystery and one half that dream sequence, and honestly, I couldn't describe much more about the opaque plot. But it doesn't matter when it's composed of some of the most dazzling minutes of film ever. The Wizard of Oz for the arthouse. This is why I love movies.

[Read original review]

2. The Lighthouse
Both an unsettling dream of a film and also the funniest comedy of the year. Melville meets Beckett meets whatever strange thought is in director Robert Eggers's head. Willem Dafoe is mesmerizing. The cinematography is lush. The Lighthouse is God. Why'd ya spill yer beans?

[Read original review]






3. Little Women
The kind of movie that makes you glad you were alive to see it. I wouldn't be surprised if after repeat viewings, this became my favorite movie of this year.

[Read original review]








4. The Irishman
Scorsese's death-obsessed swan song for the modern gangster genre is one of the man's best. Like Silence a few years ago, it's about grasping for God and some sense of meaning within a life that has caused immeasurable suffering and resulted in crushing isolation: a bleak rumination on fevered and heartbreaking memories that try desperately (and unsuccessfully) to obscure the wasted life and rotten soul of the protagonist.

[Read original review]




5. Uncut Gems
The most intense movie on this list by far. Adam Sandler's turn as a jeweler who pays his debts with gamble upon gamble is one of the more visceral depictions of the aftershocks of the Great Recession put onscreen (the movie takes place in 2012), Darius Khondji's grainy, nervous cinematography and Daniel Lopatin's relentless, pulsing score highlighting the sweaty desperation of Sandler's character. It's a movie of almost transcendent griminess, and when it reaches its inevitable, heart-stopping conclusion, you'll realize you haven't taken a breath for two hours.

[Read original review]


6. Parasite
Twisty and tense, provocative in its ideas—Gatsby-esque in its critique of capitalism and the pretensions of the upper class, Hitchcock-esque in its propulsive, deadpan drive.

[Read original review]







7. Hustlers
The best mainstream Hollywood release of the year (if we don't count Little Women); the best Goodfellas riff since the OG itself; a rip-roaring heist film by way of a female friendship dramedy. A lot of the movies on my list appeal pretty much to my own niche set of interests, and Hustlers does that, too, but it's also far and away the biggest crowdpleaser of all ten here. I can't say enough good things about it.

[Read original review]




8. Her Smell
Terrible title. Good movie. I can't think of a "rise and fall and rise of a musician" movie that does that arc more effectively than this one. One of Alex Ross Perry's best.

[Read original review]







9. Us
Get Out's messier, more ambitious younger sibling. There's an intensity to the sheer commitment to its host of wild ideas, and the resulting movie is breathtaking in its scope. Jordan Peele's got it, that mad Twilight Zone energy. Lupita Nyong'o's got them, the best performance(s) of the year.

[Read original review]






10. Transit
Transit takes a WWII novel and transplants it into contemporary Europe, provoking questions like: What if there were Nazis in 2019? What if they marched through the streets to round up refugees? What if they didn't wear swastikas and stuff and instead just had on riot gear and police uniforms? Weird, right? Guess we'll never know what that would be like.

[Read original review]





Appendix: Miscellaneous Movies Also Worth Noting

Best Screenplay: High Flying Bird—I'm pretty sure it's Little Women. But if it isn't Little Women, then it's certainly Tarell Alvin McCraney's electric writing on High Flying Bird. And I don't even follow basketball.

Best Florence Pugh in a Flower Crown: Midsommar—Again, this maybe should go to Little Women. But this one gets bonus points for putting Pugh in a flower dress, too. I admire the commitment to the bit.

Best Action: John Wick 3: Parabellum—I mean, it's John Wick. He has a fight on top of a galloping horse.


Animated Corner Award: I Lost My Body—At least among the ones I saw, 2019 was a distressingly weak year for animated movies, hence nothing making my top 10. But animation is also the thing I love most about cinema, so I feel weird leaving it off completely, so here's this movie that was interesting but that I wasn't super enthusiastic about.

Documentary Corner Award: Apollo 11—On the other hand, this was a tremendous year for documentaries (honestly, a great decade for documentaries, which is a relief after the 2000s were a nadir for the form), and Apollo 11, the movie made of mostly previously unseen footage of the original moonshot, is the very best. Its focus on the mundane details of the mission and the spaces around its most famous moments cut through the cultural mythology of the event and emphasis just what a jaw-dropping feat of engineering and physical dexterity landing on the moon was. Stunning.

"Documentary" Corner Award: Rolling Thunder Revue: A Bob Dylan Story—Too good not to include, too fake to call a documentary.

Concert Documentary Award: Homecoming: A Film by Beyoncé—Completely thrillingly assembled footage of the instantly iconic "Beychella" performances. It also probably belongs alongside Rolling Thunder Revue in its work in furthering the mythologizing of its central artist.

Best Outer Space Award: Ad Astra—2019 was a really tremendous year for space movies. If you're looking for "hard sci-fi," you can't get much better than this movie's rigorously thoughtful, realistic depiction of near-future space travel.

Best Philosophical Implications of Outer Space: High Life—I wrote about this at length for Cinematary, if you want to read that.

Best Conspiracy: Under the Silver Lake—A conspiracy film for the internet era. The biggest conspiracy of them all is that you're inventing it all yourself. Facts may not care about your feelings, but what if they also don't care about making any coherent sense?

Best Ghost Story: Atlantics—It's kind of a ghost story. I dunno. See it yourself and find out.

Best UFO Enthusiast: Ash Is Purest White—You'll know him when you see him.

"More People Should See This" Award: Greta—Don't remember too many people talking about this thriller, but it's a good one. Go see it!

"Thank Goodness I Don't Live In Florida" Award: Crawl—Hurricanes? Alligators? No thanks.

"Nope, Florida's Still Not Worth It" Award: Beach Bum—Not even a ridiculously fun Matthew McConaughey performance and some really cool cinematography can make this place somewhere I want to be. Plus: SHARKS??

"You Do You, Man" Award: Glass—M. Night Shyamalan is just doing his thing, and this year "his thing" was making a logically suspect, bizarrely paced mythological elevation of the Avengers. It's very odd, it's not really that good, and it's entirely a Shyamalan joint. Glad our test-grouped-to-death corporate blockbuster age somehow made room for a movie like this.

Least-Favorite Trend of the Year: "Hello, my name is the Walt Disney Company! Remember that thing of ours that you like? We're here to make it worse!"

Worst Disney: Dumbo—A very crowded field; I can't remember a year in which I found so little to like among the corporate titan's film output. And I didn't even get a chance to see The Lion King. But this completely misbegotten live-action adaptation of the bona fide animated classic gets the dubious honor as my least-favorite out of a whole host of rotten.

Worst Movie of the Year: Climax—Gaspar Noé can go sit on a tack. An LSD-laced tack.

Best Non-2019 Movie I Saw for the First Time in 2019: Dusty Stacks of Mom: The Poster Project—Jodie Mack's beautiful, idiosyncratic, personal re-interpretation of Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, by way of the collapse of her mother's poster business. It's basically perfect, and while it's devilishly hard to track down, if you can do it, DO IT. It's so great.

Sunday, August 4, 2019

Mini Reviews for July 29-August 4, 2019

Obligatory complaint about school starting.

Movies

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019)
A lot of people have gone on about how this is Tarantino's love letter to the classic Hollywood studio system, and it's not not that; the film languishes over its vast array of period cinema details with a clearly loving eye. But one of the things that's so fascinating and slippery about the movie is those details themselves. Because when tasked with bringing up the things to love about the cinematic world of 1969, I think most of us would be inclined to talk about Butch Cassidy or Easy Rider, but that's not what Tarantino does. As these characters go about their daily lives, we see movie marquees and film sets, but they aren't for the stuff modern film buffs like. They're marquees for the forgotten, mediocre studio-picture pablum that fill most theaters most weeks in most eras; they're sets for television westerns, a genre with some legacy but hardly for what it was doing in 1969. On the one hand, Tarantino seems to be indulging in a kind of snide anti-revisionism, insisting on rubbing our noses in the sheer disposability of the majority of cinema—this is the oft-mythologized studio system: dirty and dumb and square, a bloated self-parody. And yet, on the other hand, this movie is so warmly obsessed with the abject corporate garbage it depicts. I mean, there's even a scene in which the preparation of a dish of Kraft macaroni and cheese is given a meticulous step-by-step montage, complete with yellow "cheese product" powder packet stirred in with care. Tarantino's love of trash is well-documented, but this seems like something different, because it's not unadulterated love. Or at least, it's hard to imagine that it is. There's a scene—one of the film's best—in which Sharon Tate (played magnificently by Margot Robbie) goes to a screening of Wrecking Crew, the Dean Martin vehicle that Tate herself also appears in, and we see an entire audience fall for this movie—laughter and applause and everything. The thing is, this Dean Martin movie looks dreadful. I've not seen it, but those who have assure me it is. That's this Hollywood's tension in microcosm: not exactly one man's trash becoming another man's treasure but the ugliness and banality being part and parcel of treasure. This goes all the way down in every piece of the movie, and that open-handed posture that simultaneously de-mythologizes and revels in mythology can be really deeply troubling because it never allows you to fully settle in to any kind of peace with the world as presented. Stuntman Cliff (Brad Pitt) is both magnetically handsome and saves the day, and yet he also almost certainly murdered his wife; the screen violence that inspires the Manson family is the very thing that heroically stops them; Wrecking Crew is stale and lousy, but it gives everyone in that theater joy. At every turn, Hollywood shrugs off any clean interpretive (and moral) framework. Tarantino often makes his male characters his surrogates, imbuing them with his own loquacious tongue and deep love of pop-culture arcana. But at least in that Wrecking Crew scene and in terms of his project with Hollywood in particular, the Tarantino stand-in is absolutely Robbie's Tate, who (seemingly aware of her movie's shortcomings yet nonetheless optimistic) pores over the audience and measures her own emotions by the authentic human reactions around her. There's something so achingly human about Once Upon a Time in Hollywood's insistence on presenting joy and ugliness together in such a way that (given Tarantino's unusually unobtrusive hand this time around) refuses to defend or ignore either. It simply languishes in the tension between the two, finding an off-kilter beauty in watching human beings navigate that tension as it veers from queasy to intriguing to warm to downright frightening. I admire the moral fortitude of cancel culture, which can view the holistic social import of an artwork or artist with distilled clarity, but as someone who keeps getting tangled up in the magnetism of "problematic" favorites to an extent that the breaks are never so clean, I've got to admit that the muddy tension Hollywood dramatizes is somewhere I spend a decent amount of time in my head, which makes the movie kind of profound to contemplate even while I acknowledge all the ways people are justifiably pissed at this movie. The interpretive slipperiness is the point, I guess is what I'm saying. Grade: A-

Crawl (2019)
This movie knows exactly what it needs to be—an exciting 87 minutes about surviving a hurricane and a congregation of alligators at the same time—and is exactly that, no more, no less. There's maybe five minutes at the beginning of the movie setting up some of the emotional stakes and the skill set of the protagonist (she's estranged from her father, she's a swimmer), but then it's off to the races, and literally within thirty seconds of the hurricane/gators conflict resolving, *BLAM* cut to credits. It's a little dumb but a lot of fun. Grade: B+




Goodbye Christopher Robin (2017)
At the end of this movie, my wife said that this movie felt like ten other movies she'd already seen, and all those movies were better, which is a pretty nice summation of what makes this movie so tedious. There are shades of Finding Neverland here so thick that you can barely see the A. A. Milne biography through the tropes; like the worst biopics, Goodbye Christopher Robin takes a person with a legitimately interesting, unique life and makes his story feel generic and schematic. It spends far too much energy on too-cute-for-their-own-good allusions to Winnie the Pooh (the characters often speak in iconic lines from Milne's books) and not nearly enough on, for example, exploring the actually fascinating and thorny ethical ramifications of Milne's having used his son's imaginative world to advance his own career. The movie gestures toward some complicated dynamics in this realm, I guess, but it's clear it's more interested in being cute and cozy than being engaging. Grade: C-

Golden Exits (2017)
With things like Queen of Earth and Her Smell, Alex Ross Perry has gotten something of a reputation for creating characters with these explosive psychologies that blow up in frantically caustic scenes. What's fascinating about Golden Exits is how it inverts that, having characters repress their psychological impulses to such extreme degrees that the drama of the film kind of folds in on itself to create a series of ellipses more than the exclamations of ARP's other recent output. We're still dealing with acerbic upper-middle-class white folks, but the decision for most of the characters to leave most of their feelings unrequited (even the few that physically consummate immediately become emotionally disconnected) turns that acid into something really poignant and suggestive—all the more so because ARP's other movies have made it absolutely clear that for characters this bitter, the alternative (tortured shouting matches) offers no fulfilling answers either. More than any of ARP's other work, Golden Exits sketches the full tragedy of this particular brand of immaturity: caught between the (verbal) violence of action and the maddening infinitude of possible outcomes born out of passivity. It's the least-hooky of his movies, but it's also probably my favorite. Grade: A

Dark Night (2016)
Like Tim Sutton's previous film, Memphis, Dark Night has a terrific eye for imagery and shaggy place-setting. Also like that earlier film, Dark Night never really coheres into much more than a ambling collection of its parts. Unlike Memphis, though, it has a concept audacious enough (making this about the Aurora Dark Knight Rises shooting) that it's hard to let it slide how little this adds up to anything—congratulations, you've made a film about a mass shooting that never holds together enough to say something about that mass shooting. Either that, or I'm missing something. But the imagery is super nice, and there are a few pretty good moments. Grade: C+



The Devil's Candy (2015)
Solid horror movie with a really great use of both heavy metal and oil paintings, which is not a combination I was imagining I'd see in a movie any time soon. The Devil's Candy is at its best when it's dealing with the hallucinogenic montages that inform its protagonist's paintings and at its worst when it focuses on its pretty by-the-book human villain, and honestly, there's probably a little more screentime given to that villain than I would have liked. But luckily, it's a movie more about scary paintings than an evil, mentally ill man (sigh), so the scales tip in the right direction overall. Grade: B




Books

The Porpoise by Mark Haddon (2019)
Any novel that sets out to adapt Shakespeare's Pericles, Prince of Tyre has to deal with the unavoidable problem that it has to adapt Pericles, Prince of Tyre, a decidedly strange and not all that good play. Mark Haddon (The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time) tries to solve this issue in two ways. First, he rights the play's somewhat cavalier disregard for its female characters (who are basically disposed of an act-by-act basis) by making the majority of the POV characters these women and fleshing out what happens to them once the play is done with their involvement; for example, a large part of the novel involves the chronicling of the life of Antiochus's daughter, who does not even get a name in the play (she's called "Angelica" here), after Pericles leaves her with her abusive father. This works reasonably well, and the story feels better off for its efforts in this regard. On top of this, though, is the second way that Haddon tries to patch together a novel from Pericles, which is that he adds layers upon layers of metatextuality and postmodern anachronisms that result in a novel that seems self-aware and conscious of the play's shortcomings. There is, for example, a Russian-nesting-doll structure of who is telling the story that creates increasingly fanciful plotting and settings as you get deeper into the structure; there is also, for another example, a sizeable sequence that involves the ghost of William Shakespeare escorting a recently dead George Wilkins (who likely wrote a good chunk of the Pericles play) into the afterlife. It's all very interesting, but at least from where I'm sitting, it's not interesting in a way that actually ameliorates the narrative shortcomings of the original story, and as the novel progresses, it becomes increasingly clear that these structural games are the conceit of the novel and that the book doesn't have a ton to offer outside of that. Don't get me wrong: there are some fantastic sequences, and the seventy-five-ish pages of the book are gripping (uncoincidentally, these are the ones that deal most with Angelica, who is the most compelling character here by a mile). But I just don't find the whole coming together in any satisfying way. Grade: B-

Music

Miles Davis - Tutu (1986)
Wikipedia tells me that this was originally supposed to be a Prince/Davis collab, which makes sense given the extent to which synths and drum machines hang over the compositions here. I kinda wish Prince had been on this album, because as it is, these instrumentals have that oil-slick '80s smoothness without a lot of the human grit that someone like Prince could do with that sound. I'm not as familiar with Miles's '80s output as I'd like to be, but even just from this album, it's kind of wild that Davis, who not only survived but thrived on a number of sea changes in the music industry prior to this, including the rock-and-roll explosion that killed many of his post-bop peers' careers, is pretty clearly playing catch-up with the 1980s, the decade that fell Stevie Wonder, David Bowie, Neil Young, the Rolling Stones, Joni Mitchell, and a number of other musicians of similar '70s muscularity who imploded artistically in the Spandex Decade. Must have been something in the water. Tutu is no Never Let Me Down, and there's a lot to recommend about its electro-pop iteration of jazz fusion. I like the record. But as a synecdoche for the ways that established artists tried to adjust their posture toward new recording technology, it's telling. Grade: B

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Mini Reviews for April 22-28, 2019

Rervierws.

Movies

Her Smell (2019)
Her Smell hits almost all the beats of a traditional musician biopic (on paper, there's not a lot separating the plot of this movie from, say, Walk the Line), but what sets it truly apart as something special, not just among the stale annals of musician biopics but among 2019 cinema in general is just how much it lingers over the unexplored margins of these beats. In fact, Her Smell does almost nothing but linger; consisting of just five protracted scenes, the movie takes pieces that usually amount to just a few minutes of screentime (the pre-show green room, the recording booth, the rural "sobering up" cabin, etc.) and spends dozens of minutes allowing these scenes to spool out in haphazard and unpredictable ways that force us viewers to reckon with characters caught in the ligature of their lives—always in motion, always unsteady, always precarious. And hoo boy, is it a ride. Those who squirm at Alex Ross Perry's typical chamber misery beware: Her Smell has all the excruciatingly detailed human cruelty of Listen Up Philip with the unflinching, fevered style of Queen of Earth; I started the movie assuming I was watching these characters (especially Elizabeth Moss's Becky) at their lowest, only to be shown again and again just how much lower they could all go—rendered both exhilarating and oppressive by the cavernous space Perry gives these scenes. And yet... somehow this manages to be Perry's most hopeful movie thus far. It's a movie that shows the true work of recovery in the way that those hoary biopic tropes so rarely do, and by the end, there's something legitimately uplifting about the film. Exhausting at every turn, for sure, but that's the point, isn't it? It can't be easy. Grade: A-

High Life (2019)
In the same way that Interstellar and Tarkovsky's Solaris consciously evoked 2001: A Space Odyssey in order to revise it in significant ways, Claire Denis pointedly recalls both of those movies with High Life and comes out the other side with something that feels both bleeding-edge fresh and also in conversation with a pretty rich tradition of arthouse sci-fi. Via these austere space epics, there's a real, decades-long discourse being had about the nature of humanity's relationship with itself and the way that relationship refracts inward and fractures in key places within the context of 1. sexual encounters, 2. reproduction, and 3. eons of time. Whereas 2001 positions humanity as a mere mythological construct and both Tarkovsky and Nolan advance an essentialist view of human nature, one reflected at every turn (sometimes to ironic/hollow effect, particularly in Tarkovsky's work) by the physical universe, Denis answers the question of the human identity with an absurdly tactile response, that human beings are sacks of fluid tenuously held together by some vertebrae and social constructs. I'm being kind of academic here, so let me be clear: this idea is very, very scary and gross as rendered here—it's a film rife with rape (really: two rape scenes, and a sort of systematic rape/destroyed body autonomy throughout) and despair and spilled guts. It leans into the trappings of sci-fi horror a lot more than its most immediate cinematic precedents, perhaps because of the intrinsic terror of considering human life as a purely biological growth, and there are long sections of this movie that feel like a waking nightmare in the vein of David Lynch cross-pollinated with Alien. At the same time, the cross-cutting of this horror with the benign purity of the scenes of a father (Robert Pattinson) with his daughter gives us an existentialism-brand hope in the sense that it basically argues that life's meaning isn't solely mired in the visceral muck of our biology but also in what we build on top of that biology; to put it another way, it matters whether or not our bodies create a sex-fascist sperm cult, or a nurturing family. For all the despair of the movie, there's a cock-eyed, urgent optimism at work here, not nihilism. It's not going to be everyone's cup of tea, and it wasn't even always mine, but when it was mine, I loved it. Grade: B+

Spring Breakers (2012)
Basically takes the cultural meme of Spring Break and transforms it into this dreamy allegory for the predatory excesses of suburban, majority-white culture. There are a lot of gestures in a lot of interesting directions that I wish were explored more thoroughly, like the parallels between the traditional youth group experience and the ecstatic heights of Spring Break hedonism; there's also the whiff of "having cake and eating it, too" here regarding how the movie portrays both blackness and femininity that makes me uneasy at times—on the one hand pointedly showing the ways in which these folks are exploited and coerced into their ultimately self-destructive social roles by those with more cultural power, while on the other hand indulging in a pretty gazey camera that lingers salaciously over nude female bodies and "gangbanger" caricatured African Americans (this would maybe be a little easier to swallow except for my memories of the movie's ad campaign using these specific elements to sell the movie way back when this first came out). But you know, that hypocritical posture toward the marginalized people whose plight it explicates is something that's also true of The Great Gatsby, and that's one of my favorite novels of all time (and clearly a heavy influence on this movie), so what can I say. Besides, it's really hard to say no to a movie with THAT James Franco performance and THAT Britney Spears singalong. Grade: B+

Anvil! The Story of Anvil (2008)
As a documentary, it's haphazardly put together, and parts of this movie practically scream of the filmmakers having primed the pump in order to address the film's narrative. It also softballs its subject matter, not nearly digging deeply enough into the tragic, even self-destructive elements of Anvil's continued drive (or delusion, depending on who you're asking) toward heavy metal stardom. Also, I dunno, even for a movie that obviously baits a This Is Spinal Tap comparison, some of the stuff just feels too cute and... I dunno, setting off my baloney sensor? Like, they visit Stonehenge? Their drummer is named Robb Reiner? These are either the greatest coincidences in music-doc history, or there's something fishy afoot. But honestly, whatever; I'd be lying if I didn't find this (esp. the central figure of "Lips" Kudlow and his relentless Canada Nice) endearing to a surprising degree. For all the doc's faults and foibles, there's a beating human element that's irresistible. Grade B-

La Pointe Courte (1955)
Though it's nowhere near as effective as Cléo from 5 to 7, the first feature from Agnès Varda most people seem to talk about, it's at least as interesting as that film is as an expression of the mid-century European New Wave. This predates Wild Strawberries by two years; The 400 Blows by four; Breathless and La Dolce Vita by five—and yet, it seems to anticipate a lot of what feels so distinctive about those films, from the abstraction of classic film tropes to the intentional, modernist shot composition. Getting somewhere first isn't worth everything, but just sayin', Varda arrives at the famous "Persona shot" in 1955. And plus, as a film divorced from its context, it's pretty good! The mix of traditional narrative film with pseudo-documentary footage is something I'm told Varda gets much better at later in her career, but as is, it's a really interesting, often compelling how this movie juxtaposes the discursive, very movie-ish conversations of the foregrounded marriage-in-crisis plot with the documentary-ish footage of the working-class goings on of the fishing village in which that plot takes place. I dig it. Grade: B+

Television

Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, Season 4 (2018-19)
The end. It's a sad day for me and the twelve other people who watch this show. Not too sad—the show was clearly running out of gas, as evidenced by the relative dearth of songs this season as well as the increasingly spotting plotting for all the show's secondary characters. Even Rebecca's arc, one that centers on her efforts to create a stable, healthy life in the context of her mental health struggles, is hit-and-miss. But where else on TV would you even get a season-long plot about the work of creating stability within a mental-health context? Where else on TV would this have been told through song? Where else on TV would you have gotten this winning combination of snark and raunch and heart and soul? Whether or not Crazy Ex-Girlfriend should have continued (it probably shouldn't have, both because the creators said they were done and because the series was definitely running short on ideas by the end), the television landscape is much poorer without this show giving its burst of idiosyncrasy each week, and I'll miss it badly. We were lucky to get the four years we did. Grade: B-