Two reasons why this list is so short: 1) I didn't have a ton of time to read/watch/listen to things this week; 2) What time I did have, I mostly spent watching O.J.: Made In America (review forthcoming, but spoilers: it's phenomenal). As it is, though, I still got time to finish up one season and watch one movie. Enjoy!
Movies
The Fits (2016)
Enigmatic and oblique—I would say "to a fault," although there's no question that this movie would not be nearly so striking if it were more straightforward. As it is, this coming-of-age boxing/dance/experimental jazz exhibition is as mesmerizing as it is frustrating. Tone is something this movie absolutely lands, flirting with both horror and transcendental otherworldliness without committing entirely to either or abandoning completely its foothold in cinematic realism. It's all very interesting in a mysterious, minimalist way, and I'm not exactly sure what else I'm wanting here, but still, there's something missing in that enticing cocktail I've just described. Grade: B
Television
Adventure Time, Season 3 (2011-2012)
The two pleasures that set the third season of likely the best children's television since the debut of SpongeBob Squarepants apart from its other two similarly excellent seasons are these: 1) the feeling that the show is leveraging its off-the-cuff absurdity into world-building that manages to give the show an increasingly strong feeling of place that doesn't undercut the fundamental fun of that absurdity to begin with; and 2) the series's newfound penchant for exploring melancholy, enigmatic, and even spiritual content in its more adventurous episodes, best exemplified by the Firewolf/Snow Golem buddy comedy "Thank You" and the spook-romance/mystery "Ghost Princess," two of the show's best episodes ever. These are exciting expansions on the show's already vibrant palette, presenting the series yet again as one that's willing to push its borders without losing what's made it work to begin with. Outside of these expansions, Season 3 presents business as usual, and of course with Adventure Time, that usual business is excellent. Grade: A
At this point, nothing more than the musings of a restless English teacher on the pop culture he experiences.
Sunday, September 25, 2016
Sunday, September 18, 2016
Mini-Reviews for September 12 - September 18, 2016
More reviews, mostly of movies, as always.
Also of note, though, is that I read Ta-Nehisi Coates's Between the World in Me, which is a book that practically begs discussion but is also so personal and live-wire that it feels like an ill-fit for a traditional blurb-with-grade book review. But if you want to talk about that one, too, please do!
Movies
Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping (2016)
Popstar is a strange beast in that it's both a satiric mockumentary of a very Justin Bieber-like character and a showcase for a typical (and typically hilarious) batch of Lonely Island songs, resulting in the plot requiring this clueless rube to have risen to pop superstardom by performing accidentally hilarious Lonely Island song. Which doesn't quite make sense, even in this film's reality. The obvious forebear here is This Is Spinal Tap, a movie which manages the extremely difficult task of making the music both side-splittingly funny while also believably outgrown from these particular musicians in these specific circumstances. Popstar doesn't ever do this, and, to its credit, it never pretends to. The lack of a rigorous reality doesn't change the fact that the movie is, after all, very funny. Grade: B+
Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World (2016)
In ten (heck, maybe even five) years' time, Lo and Behold, the newest Werner Herzog documentary, may look prophetic; there's also just as much chance that it'll look as goofy as some of the predictive sci-fi from the '50s does now. Herzog's making a gamble by making a movie full of people analyzing and prognosticating something as volatile and rapidly evolving as the internet. Even now, for someone as ignorant of cutting-edge technology as myself, it's hard to sort the kooks from the genuine experts among Herzog's colorful menagerie of interview subjects. Do we face a future of isolation within an augmented reality? Will a solar flare fling our internet-oriented society into an apocalyptic hellscape? I don't even know if its silly or prudent to contemplate these questions. Of course, Herzog has an out for the prospective silliness, though: as always, he's at least as much interested in talking to vibrant and off-beat personalities as he is the actual content of his films, and Lo and Behold certainly doesn't skimp on that angle, filled to the brim with excited and slightly unhinged talking heads that range from the comically gruff early-internet pioneers to the world's leading hacker. In fact, this large cast presents the film's largest flaw, which is that each of these people are so intriguing that I wish Herzog had maybe adopted a less panoramic ambition (the movie is divided into a handful of small, titled sections) and instead focused more in-depth on one of these people, Grizzly Man-style. As it is, the film is a whirlwind trip through some very interesting ideas that maybe don't get the depth they warrant. I, for one, would have watched a feature-length doc on the hacker alone. Still, as food-for-thought documentaries go, the one we got is pretty good. Grade: B+
House of D (2004)
Writer/director David Duchovny is a better writer than director, and he's not a great writer to begin with. So what you've got here is an inconsistently written film full of shots and directorial flourishes that try their hardest to imbue the film with cinematic personality but only manage to call attention to Duchovny's clumsy touch with a camera. But, as evidenced by the Duchovny-scripted X-Files episodes (particularly the baseball/E.T. fantasy, "The Unnatural," which feels in a weird way like this movie's precedent), the guy can also have a great ear for nostalgia and sentiment, which results in some absolutely lovely coming-of-age plotting and tender emotional beats, bolstered by a great performance by a young Anton Yelchin (R.I.P.). A lot of this movie doesn't work at all—the framing device starring Duchovny himself goes on for far too long and, at the end, dials back so hard some of the actual climax's emotions that it seems like the movie is ashamed of its own tragedy, and then we're treated to a scene of Robin Williams' mentally handicapped character explaining the movie's themes (urg...). But a lot of it does, and when it works, it works very well. Call it a draw. Grade: B-
American Psycho (2000)
It's a testament to the electricity of Christian Bale's performance that this movie doesn't become tedious. The satire is thuddingly obvious—those white-collar financial dudes sure are brutal, aren't they?—until the movie's final act, when it morphs into something different and almost poignant (again, still largely thanks to Bale's performance), and the plotting, even in the end, is straightforward and repetitive without always putting that repetition to analytical use. More than most other movies I can think of, American Psycho works by virtue of individually phenomenal scenes rather than any sort of greater whole. But those scenes are awesome. Do you like Huey Lewis & the News? Not really, but I love watching Christian Bale talk about them. Grade: B+
Walkabout (1971)
Two movies into his filmography, and I'm still not quite on director Nicolas Roeg's wavelength, in that many people seem to think his movies are the best things ever whereas I've just been merely coolly impressed. As with Don't Look Now (the other one I've seen), Walkabout teeters on the edge of full-on experimental film with tons of unconventional freeze-frames, cross-cutting, and symbolic imagery. This time, however, its relatively conventional story—girl and her brother must survive in the Australian wilderness—pulls it back from that precipice a few paces, and by the end of the movie, we're in comfortable enough filmmaking territory that Roeg sees fit to include a poem in voiceover over the film's final shots. An engaging, striking movie if not one to go straight to the record books. Grade: A-
Music
Joanna Newsom - Ys (2006)
This is only the second Newsom I've heard, the other being last year's superb Divers, with which it's a fascinating companion. That same lyrical density that, I'm assuming, stretches throughout Newsom's whole career highlights this whole record, but gone are Divers's melodic sensibilities and intricately arranged atmostpherics, replaced instead by labyrinthine, almost classical instrumentation, fronted by Newsom's mesmerizing harp, that winds these songs around themselves in fantastic mazes of narrative, both lyrical and musical. Oh yeah, and all the songs are over 7 minutes long—this record's pretty much got my name on it. Grade: A-
Also of note, though, is that I read Ta-Nehisi Coates's Between the World in Me, which is a book that practically begs discussion but is also so personal and live-wire that it feels like an ill-fit for a traditional blurb-with-grade book review. But if you want to talk about that one, too, please do!
Movies
Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping (2016)
Popstar is a strange beast in that it's both a satiric mockumentary of a very Justin Bieber-like character and a showcase for a typical (and typically hilarious) batch of Lonely Island songs, resulting in the plot requiring this clueless rube to have risen to pop superstardom by performing accidentally hilarious Lonely Island song. Which doesn't quite make sense, even in this film's reality. The obvious forebear here is This Is Spinal Tap, a movie which manages the extremely difficult task of making the music both side-splittingly funny while also believably outgrown from these particular musicians in these specific circumstances. Popstar doesn't ever do this, and, to its credit, it never pretends to. The lack of a rigorous reality doesn't change the fact that the movie is, after all, very funny. Grade: B+
Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World (2016)
In ten (heck, maybe even five) years' time, Lo and Behold, the newest Werner Herzog documentary, may look prophetic; there's also just as much chance that it'll look as goofy as some of the predictive sci-fi from the '50s does now. Herzog's making a gamble by making a movie full of people analyzing and prognosticating something as volatile and rapidly evolving as the internet. Even now, for someone as ignorant of cutting-edge technology as myself, it's hard to sort the kooks from the genuine experts among Herzog's colorful menagerie of interview subjects. Do we face a future of isolation within an augmented reality? Will a solar flare fling our internet-oriented society into an apocalyptic hellscape? I don't even know if its silly or prudent to contemplate these questions. Of course, Herzog has an out for the prospective silliness, though: as always, he's at least as much interested in talking to vibrant and off-beat personalities as he is the actual content of his films, and Lo and Behold certainly doesn't skimp on that angle, filled to the brim with excited and slightly unhinged talking heads that range from the comically gruff early-internet pioneers to the world's leading hacker. In fact, this large cast presents the film's largest flaw, which is that each of these people are so intriguing that I wish Herzog had maybe adopted a less panoramic ambition (the movie is divided into a handful of small, titled sections) and instead focused more in-depth on one of these people, Grizzly Man-style. As it is, the film is a whirlwind trip through some very interesting ideas that maybe don't get the depth they warrant. I, for one, would have watched a feature-length doc on the hacker alone. Still, as food-for-thought documentaries go, the one we got is pretty good. Grade: B+
House of D (2004)
Writer/director David Duchovny is a better writer than director, and he's not a great writer to begin with. So what you've got here is an inconsistently written film full of shots and directorial flourishes that try their hardest to imbue the film with cinematic personality but only manage to call attention to Duchovny's clumsy touch with a camera. But, as evidenced by the Duchovny-scripted X-Files episodes (particularly the baseball/E.T. fantasy, "The Unnatural," which feels in a weird way like this movie's precedent), the guy can also have a great ear for nostalgia and sentiment, which results in some absolutely lovely coming-of-age plotting and tender emotional beats, bolstered by a great performance by a young Anton Yelchin (R.I.P.). A lot of this movie doesn't work at all—the framing device starring Duchovny himself goes on for far too long and, at the end, dials back so hard some of the actual climax's emotions that it seems like the movie is ashamed of its own tragedy, and then we're treated to a scene of Robin Williams' mentally handicapped character explaining the movie's themes (urg...). But a lot of it does, and when it works, it works very well. Call it a draw. Grade: B-
American Psycho (2000)
It's a testament to the electricity of Christian Bale's performance that this movie doesn't become tedious. The satire is thuddingly obvious—those white-collar financial dudes sure are brutal, aren't they?—until the movie's final act, when it morphs into something different and almost poignant (again, still largely thanks to Bale's performance), and the plotting, even in the end, is straightforward and repetitive without always putting that repetition to analytical use. More than most other movies I can think of, American Psycho works by virtue of individually phenomenal scenes rather than any sort of greater whole. But those scenes are awesome. Do you like Huey Lewis & the News? Not really, but I love watching Christian Bale talk about them. Grade: B+
Walkabout (1971)
Two movies into his filmography, and I'm still not quite on director Nicolas Roeg's wavelength, in that many people seem to think his movies are the best things ever whereas I've just been merely coolly impressed. As with Don't Look Now (the other one I've seen), Walkabout teeters on the edge of full-on experimental film with tons of unconventional freeze-frames, cross-cutting, and symbolic imagery. This time, however, its relatively conventional story—girl and her brother must survive in the Australian wilderness—pulls it back from that precipice a few paces, and by the end of the movie, we're in comfortable enough filmmaking territory that Roeg sees fit to include a poem in voiceover over the film's final shots. An engaging, striking movie if not one to go straight to the record books. Grade: A-
Music
Joanna Newsom - Ys (2006)
This is only the second Newsom I've heard, the other being last year's superb Divers, with which it's a fascinating companion. That same lyrical density that, I'm assuming, stretches throughout Newsom's whole career highlights this whole record, but gone are Divers's melodic sensibilities and intricately arranged atmostpherics, replaced instead by labyrinthine, almost classical instrumentation, fronted by Newsom's mesmerizing harp, that winds these songs around themselves in fantastic mazes of narrative, both lyrical and musical. Oh yeah, and all the songs are over 7 minutes long—this record's pretty much got my name on it. Grade: A-
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Mini-Reviews for September 5 - September 11, 2016
Really solid batch of stuff this week. Good for me!
Movies
Louder Than Bombs (2015)
Boldly melodramatic, stylistically adventurous, emotionally perceptive, Louder Than Bombs is trying very hard to break your heart. I mean, it's about a family dealing with the untimely death of its matriarch; you don't plot that unless you're trying to craft a tale about searing grief. But unlike a lot of "family tragedy" indies, Louder Than Bombs succeeds mightily. There's not any one thing to credit for its success—this is more of a case of having all its immaculate ducks in a row. The story is quiet but multifaceted, unapologetically literary, its performances (Devin Druid in particular—this guy's going places) are fantastic without being particularly showy, its cinematic style is recognizably "serious indie" while still being weird and risk-taking enough to avoid the anonymity and boredom that plagues so many films with that aesthetic (and the best shot of the movie [and maybe the year] consists of nothing more than a character staring directly at the camera). This is master-class filmmaking with none of the tossed-off ease that a lot of master-classics ooze. This one lets you know that people worked hard to make it, and boy, did it pay off. Grade: A
How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2014)
There isn't so much anything wrong with the How to Train Your Dragon movies outside of the solidly mediocre voice cast (my general dislike of Jay Baruchel includes his voice, it seems) and some typically ugly DreamWorks character design (the model for Hiccup's mother is completely dysfunctional for conveying emotion). Those are relatively minor issues. These movies are fine. But whatever the case, I've just never gotten very excited about anything in this franchise, and that goes doubly for this second entry, which trades the endearing boy-and-his-dog story for more epic, less-resonant battle-centric territory. I like the sweetness embedded in the movie's relationships, be it Hiccup with his mother, his dragon, or his friends (and the brief but poignant scenes with his parents together are highlights of both films); I like the landscapes, which are cool-looking. But it's just not adding up to much for me. Maybe I need a pet or something for this all to come together like it has for everyone else. Grade: B-
American Mary (2012)
It's a structural mess, and the acting could stand to be several magnitudes better. But the extent to which it identifies with legitimate social outcasts is rare and rather special, subverting its own premise of body horror by positing extreme body modification as freedom from restrictive biology—the trans parallels are undeniable, as is the commentary about violent, oppressive social norms. The titular Mary's journey from initial disgust to eventual full-on embrace of grotesque cosmetic surgery is a fantastic arc, even if its done a bit too much in fits and starts to be entirely convincing. Grade: B
The Double Life of Véronique (Podwójne życie Weroniki) (1991)
Beautiful, frightening, and profound in equal measure, and—dare I say it—better than at least two-thirds of the Three Colours trilogy, Krzysztof Kieślowski's film is an art-film version of a Ripley's Believe It Or Not. As always, what shines is Kieślowski's use of light: some of movie history's most arresting images come out of darkness, but Kieślowski and his cinematographer here, Sławomir Idziak, never fail to remind us that the basic component of movie-making (and our world at large) is lightness. Grade: A
The Big City (Mahanagar) (1963)
This is probably the best possible way to break me into Indian cinema: a movie with big emotional beats, familiar themes (hey there, gender roles!), and a handsome but not overly busy style. This is a work of social realism that's got plenty to say about society and gives a vibrant and sharply observed cross-section of the mid-century Calcutta middle class but also doesn't skimp on the heart, right down to the surprisingly sweet final minutes. The Apu Trilogy is the heavyweight in director Satyajit Ray's career, and having not seen that, I obviously can't say how it compares. But The Big City is plenty good in its own right and quite the bar for Apu to clear. Grade: A-
Only Angels Have Wings (1939)
The plotting is maybe a bit too meandering and diffuse to be truly riveting in the traditional sense, and the middle sections of this movie verge on the barely interesting. But the cast is so winning, the screenplay so sharp in moment-to-moment dialogue flourishes, and its heart both so big and so bristled that it's hard not to love at least something here. Slow at times, yes, but also at times one of the most purely enjoyable of its era: the ending in particular is the sort of effortlessly tossed-off pathos and perfectly pitched final dialogue and acting flourishes that old Hollywood was master of and nostalgic directors like Woody Allen and Peter Bodganovich have been trying to replicate since. Grade: A-
Television
Seinfeld, Season 8 (1996-1997)
I'm one of these obnoxious people who thinks that Seinfeld loses its way a tad after Larry David left. The show becomes a little less controlled and a lot more zany, and not always in a funnier way—I'll go to bat for the crazy Mr. Peterman subplots and the Bizarro Jerry stuff, but Elaine getting on a plane that's hijacked by political extremists (try doing that one nowadays, guys) seems a bridge too far for this show's template. There's also this thing where we start getting a ton of episodes where the central comedic hook involves one or more of the cast acting like something they're not: Jerry and Kramer act like a testy married couple, Elaine acts like George, Jerry acts like a werewolf (?). These are all funny concepts, but I'm not kidding that at least one third of the episodes involve something like this. That said, the show is still very funny, even if it lacks the structural discipline of the Larry David years. These are, without a doubt, some of the show's best-known episodes, and often with good reason. "The Muffin Tops," "The Yada Yada," "The Abstinence"—these are all top-tier Seinfeld that gave birth to justifiably iconic memes and catchphrases. And even at the show's goofiest (maybe even because it gets so goofy), the show is pushing hard at the boundaries of the sitcom form: the camera swoops and dodges in more cinematic (albeit in intentionally amateur-looking) ways, and the locations and plots are increasingly more exotic, moving the form even further from its stage roots. By the late '90s, Seinfeld was at the height of its popularity, and it's always great to see a blockbuster show use its clout to be legitimately innovative. Grade: B+
Books
My Name Is Asher Lev by Chaim Potok (1972)
Chaim Potok's third novel and first book not related to his debut, high school required reading staple The Chosen (his second novel, The Promise, is a sequel to The Chosen), is ambitious and rife with potential pitfalls, plotting the childhood of Asher Lev, a fictitious painter whose life somewhat resembles Potok's (who was himself a painter). Luckily, Potok avoids these pitfalls gracefully, and the novel is much less a semi-autobiographical vanity project than it is a restrained, quietly heartbreaking rumination on the costs of become very good at a craft. As in The Chosen, Potok's affection for Hasidic Judaism and frustration with its limitations are highlights, and this time, the collision of Hasism with the modern art world makes for harrowing conflicts among the characters, culminating in a powerful and melancholy ending that I never thought this book would land. At times, Potok's prose is maybe a little too restrained, leaning a bit too hard into the spare formality that defines these characters' lives in a way that makes sections of the novel, especially in the early goings, a bit dry. But once the novel picks up speed in its latter pages, there's no stopping it. Grade: B+
Movies
Louder Than Bombs (2015)
Boldly melodramatic, stylistically adventurous, emotionally perceptive, Louder Than Bombs is trying very hard to break your heart. I mean, it's about a family dealing with the untimely death of its matriarch; you don't plot that unless you're trying to craft a tale about searing grief. But unlike a lot of "family tragedy" indies, Louder Than Bombs succeeds mightily. There's not any one thing to credit for its success—this is more of a case of having all its immaculate ducks in a row. The story is quiet but multifaceted, unapologetically literary, its performances (Devin Druid in particular—this guy's going places) are fantastic without being particularly showy, its cinematic style is recognizably "serious indie" while still being weird and risk-taking enough to avoid the anonymity and boredom that plagues so many films with that aesthetic (and the best shot of the movie [and maybe the year] consists of nothing more than a character staring directly at the camera). This is master-class filmmaking with none of the tossed-off ease that a lot of master-classics ooze. This one lets you know that people worked hard to make it, and boy, did it pay off. Grade: A
How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2014)
There isn't so much anything wrong with the How to Train Your Dragon movies outside of the solidly mediocre voice cast (my general dislike of Jay Baruchel includes his voice, it seems) and some typically ugly DreamWorks character design (the model for Hiccup's mother is completely dysfunctional for conveying emotion). Those are relatively minor issues. These movies are fine. But whatever the case, I've just never gotten very excited about anything in this franchise, and that goes doubly for this second entry, which trades the endearing boy-and-his-dog story for more epic, less-resonant battle-centric territory. I like the sweetness embedded in the movie's relationships, be it Hiccup with his mother, his dragon, or his friends (and the brief but poignant scenes with his parents together are highlights of both films); I like the landscapes, which are cool-looking. But it's just not adding up to much for me. Maybe I need a pet or something for this all to come together like it has for everyone else. Grade: B-
American Mary (2012)
It's a structural mess, and the acting could stand to be several magnitudes better. But the extent to which it identifies with legitimate social outcasts is rare and rather special, subverting its own premise of body horror by positing extreme body modification as freedom from restrictive biology—the trans parallels are undeniable, as is the commentary about violent, oppressive social norms. The titular Mary's journey from initial disgust to eventual full-on embrace of grotesque cosmetic surgery is a fantastic arc, even if its done a bit too much in fits and starts to be entirely convincing. Grade: B
The Double Life of Véronique (Podwójne życie Weroniki) (1991)
Beautiful, frightening, and profound in equal measure, and—dare I say it—better than at least two-thirds of the Three Colours trilogy, Krzysztof Kieślowski's film is an art-film version of a Ripley's Believe It Or Not. As always, what shines is Kieślowski's use of light: some of movie history's most arresting images come out of darkness, but Kieślowski and his cinematographer here, Sławomir Idziak, never fail to remind us that the basic component of movie-making (and our world at large) is lightness. Grade: A
The Big City (Mahanagar) (1963)
This is probably the best possible way to break me into Indian cinema: a movie with big emotional beats, familiar themes (hey there, gender roles!), and a handsome but not overly busy style. This is a work of social realism that's got plenty to say about society and gives a vibrant and sharply observed cross-section of the mid-century Calcutta middle class but also doesn't skimp on the heart, right down to the surprisingly sweet final minutes. The Apu Trilogy is the heavyweight in director Satyajit Ray's career, and having not seen that, I obviously can't say how it compares. But The Big City is plenty good in its own right and quite the bar for Apu to clear. Grade: A-
Only Angels Have Wings (1939)
The plotting is maybe a bit too meandering and diffuse to be truly riveting in the traditional sense, and the middle sections of this movie verge on the barely interesting. But the cast is so winning, the screenplay so sharp in moment-to-moment dialogue flourishes, and its heart both so big and so bristled that it's hard not to love at least something here. Slow at times, yes, but also at times one of the most purely enjoyable of its era: the ending in particular is the sort of effortlessly tossed-off pathos and perfectly pitched final dialogue and acting flourishes that old Hollywood was master of and nostalgic directors like Woody Allen and Peter Bodganovich have been trying to replicate since. Grade: A-
Television
Seinfeld, Season 8 (1996-1997)
I'm one of these obnoxious people who thinks that Seinfeld loses its way a tad after Larry David left. The show becomes a little less controlled and a lot more zany, and not always in a funnier way—I'll go to bat for the crazy Mr. Peterman subplots and the Bizarro Jerry stuff, but Elaine getting on a plane that's hijacked by political extremists (try doing that one nowadays, guys) seems a bridge too far for this show's template. There's also this thing where we start getting a ton of episodes where the central comedic hook involves one or more of the cast acting like something they're not: Jerry and Kramer act like a testy married couple, Elaine acts like George, Jerry acts like a werewolf (?). These are all funny concepts, but I'm not kidding that at least one third of the episodes involve something like this. That said, the show is still very funny, even if it lacks the structural discipline of the Larry David years. These are, without a doubt, some of the show's best-known episodes, and often with good reason. "The Muffin Tops," "The Yada Yada," "The Abstinence"—these are all top-tier Seinfeld that gave birth to justifiably iconic memes and catchphrases. And even at the show's goofiest (maybe even because it gets so goofy), the show is pushing hard at the boundaries of the sitcom form: the camera swoops and dodges in more cinematic (albeit in intentionally amateur-looking) ways, and the locations and plots are increasingly more exotic, moving the form even further from its stage roots. By the late '90s, Seinfeld was at the height of its popularity, and it's always great to see a blockbuster show use its clout to be legitimately innovative. Grade: B+
Books
My Name Is Asher Lev by Chaim Potok (1972)
Chaim Potok's third novel and first book not related to his debut, high school required reading staple The Chosen (his second novel, The Promise, is a sequel to The Chosen), is ambitious and rife with potential pitfalls, plotting the childhood of Asher Lev, a fictitious painter whose life somewhat resembles Potok's (who was himself a painter). Luckily, Potok avoids these pitfalls gracefully, and the novel is much less a semi-autobiographical vanity project than it is a restrained, quietly heartbreaking rumination on the costs of become very good at a craft. As in The Chosen, Potok's affection for Hasidic Judaism and frustration with its limitations are highlights, and this time, the collision of Hasism with the modern art world makes for harrowing conflicts among the characters, culminating in a powerful and melancholy ending that I never thought this book would land. At times, Potok's prose is maybe a little too restrained, leaning a bit too hard into the spare formality that defines these characters' lives in a way that makes sections of the novel, especially in the early goings, a bit dry. But once the novel picks up speed in its latter pages, there's no stopping it. Grade: B+
Sunday, September 4, 2016
Mini-Reviews for August 29 - September 4, 2016
The new semester has hit me like a semi, but apparently I've still had time to squeeze in some pop culture. Thank goodness for long weekends, though.
Movies
A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge (1985)
Far inferior to the original Nightmare but significantly better than its reputation as a lame-o, cash-in sequel. Freddy's Revenge lacks the nightmarish "are we awake or asleep" paranoia of the first as well as much of the Wes Craven-certified black humor, and the characters this time around are super boring. But there's a gore sensibility here that's paired really well with some dynamite practical effects (a late-film sequence involving Freddy emerging from some poor dude's body is a standout of both movies), and I'm a fan of the twist that it's not specifically Freddy but Freddy corrupting someone's dream persona that's the villain. Fun if not essential. Grade: B
Defending Your Life (1991)
This is sort of the cinematic distillation of "yeah, it's fine, I guess." The aggressively secular Judgement City has a few fun things to watch, particularly the sense of discovery early in the movie as Albert Brooks' character explores the purgatorial afterlife and all the weird conveniences that go with it: delicious food, convenient and theme-park-esque public transit. And I suppose the romance with Meryl Streep's character is cute enough. The movie falls into this peculiar space where there's not a whole lot "wrong" with it, but there's nothing all that exceptional either—the perks I just named are mildly pleasant at best. I've heard people talk highly of Albert Brooks's film output; maybe I'm just starting with the wrong movie. Grade: B-
A Summer's Tale (Conte d'été) (1996)
A disaffected (and musically ambitious) young man feels disaffected and alone, and the only thing that can bring him out of his malaise is the presence of a woman to give his life meaning. But uh oh! There are three women in his life, all interested in him—WHICH ONE WILL HE CHOOSE?? Look, I realize I'm being a very bad sport here, but seriously, who cares? The protagonist is a total drip and kind of a douchebag in that sensitive-in-his-ennui way, and while I'm certain this is half the point (he's repeatedly called out by said women), that doesn't change the fact that his emotional journey has been so thoroughly played out in, like, half of all indie movies ever. I've just lost the patience for this sort of thing. Sorry. Grade: C
L'attesa (2015)
Focusing an a contrived scenario played deadly straight is sort of art film's bread-and-butter, and L'attesa (aka The Wait) is no exception: a grieving mother (Juliette Binoche) whose son has just left her (and likely died, though this is never completely confirmed) receives a surprise visit from her son's girlfriend whom she has, to this point, not known existed and must decide what to tell the girl about the whereabouts of her boyfriend. The parameters of the plot are all precisely minimalist and its edges hazy in just the right portions of ambiguity to give it the tease of artistry, and if Binoche weren't so fantastic here and the cinematography not so gorgeous and immaculately framed, I'd be tempted to call it just a bit too calibrated. Grade: B+
Music
Kendrick Lamar - untitled unmastered (2016)
When earlier this year Kendrick Lamar dropped this surprise compilations of purported leftovers from the To Pimp a Butterfly sessions, the expectation (at least from me) was that it would be somewhat of an odds-'n-sods B-sides collection. What we got, however, is very much the Amnesiac to TPaB's Kid A: the smaller, weirder sibling to last year's career-defining tour-de-force statement, more opaque, more textured and murky. To Pimp a Butterfly is Lamar's conversation with Tupac, and, following suit, untitled unmastered is every bit a conversation as well, although this time, Kendrick seems to be in conversation with himself. It's not just an album in first-person: it's one broadcasted from the echoing depths of Lamar's own psyche, and as such, it's a much more interior, oblique listen that trades concrete situations and social dialogue for impression and disorientation. If To Pimp a Butterfly was about the specifics of how Kendrick Lamar has dealt with fame, untitled unmastered is about showing what it feels like to have to have dealt with it: one's a thesis, the other's an experience. Both are brilliant. Grade: A-
Movies
A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge (1985)
Far inferior to the original Nightmare but significantly better than its reputation as a lame-o, cash-in sequel. Freddy's Revenge lacks the nightmarish "are we awake or asleep" paranoia of the first as well as much of the Wes Craven-certified black humor, and the characters this time around are super boring. But there's a gore sensibility here that's paired really well with some dynamite practical effects (a late-film sequence involving Freddy emerging from some poor dude's body is a standout of both movies), and I'm a fan of the twist that it's not specifically Freddy but Freddy corrupting someone's dream persona that's the villain. Fun if not essential. Grade: B
Defending Your Life (1991)
This is sort of the cinematic distillation of "yeah, it's fine, I guess." The aggressively secular Judgement City has a few fun things to watch, particularly the sense of discovery early in the movie as Albert Brooks' character explores the purgatorial afterlife and all the weird conveniences that go with it: delicious food, convenient and theme-park-esque public transit. And I suppose the romance with Meryl Streep's character is cute enough. The movie falls into this peculiar space where there's not a whole lot "wrong" with it, but there's nothing all that exceptional either—the perks I just named are mildly pleasant at best. I've heard people talk highly of Albert Brooks's film output; maybe I'm just starting with the wrong movie. Grade: B-
A Summer's Tale (Conte d'été) (1996)
A disaffected (and musically ambitious) young man feels disaffected and alone, and the only thing that can bring him out of his malaise is the presence of a woman to give his life meaning. But uh oh! There are three women in his life, all interested in him—WHICH ONE WILL HE CHOOSE?? Look, I realize I'm being a very bad sport here, but seriously, who cares? The protagonist is a total drip and kind of a douchebag in that sensitive-in-his-ennui way, and while I'm certain this is half the point (he's repeatedly called out by said women), that doesn't change the fact that his emotional journey has been so thoroughly played out in, like, half of all indie movies ever. I've just lost the patience for this sort of thing. Sorry. Grade: C
L'attesa (2015)
Focusing an a contrived scenario played deadly straight is sort of art film's bread-and-butter, and L'attesa (aka The Wait) is no exception: a grieving mother (Juliette Binoche) whose son has just left her (and likely died, though this is never completely confirmed) receives a surprise visit from her son's girlfriend whom she has, to this point, not known existed and must decide what to tell the girl about the whereabouts of her boyfriend. The parameters of the plot are all precisely minimalist and its edges hazy in just the right portions of ambiguity to give it the tease of artistry, and if Binoche weren't so fantastic here and the cinematography not so gorgeous and immaculately framed, I'd be tempted to call it just a bit too calibrated. Grade: B+
Music
Kendrick Lamar - untitled unmastered (2016)
When earlier this year Kendrick Lamar dropped this surprise compilations of purported leftovers from the To Pimp a Butterfly sessions, the expectation (at least from me) was that it would be somewhat of an odds-'n-sods B-sides collection. What we got, however, is very much the Amnesiac to TPaB's Kid A: the smaller, weirder sibling to last year's career-defining tour-de-force statement, more opaque, more textured and murky. To Pimp a Butterfly is Lamar's conversation with Tupac, and, following suit, untitled unmastered is every bit a conversation as well, although this time, Kendrick seems to be in conversation with himself. It's not just an album in first-person: it's one broadcasted from the echoing depths of Lamar's own psyche, and as such, it's a much more interior, oblique listen that trades concrete situations and social dialogue for impression and disorientation. If To Pimp a Butterfly was about the specifics of how Kendrick Lamar has dealt with fame, untitled unmastered is about showing what it feels like to have to have dealt with it: one's a thesis, the other's an experience. Both are brilliant. Grade: A-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)