Showing posts with label Sidney Lumet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sidney Lumet. Show all posts

Sunday, September 16, 2018

Mini Reviews for September 10 - 16, 2018

Remember that Sheryl Crow line that goes, "I've been living on coffee and nicotine"? Well, this semester, I've basically been living on Adventure Time and Sufjan Stevens.

Movies


Upgrade (2018)
Lots of fun without ever becoming exemplarily so. I love the silly Eagle-Eye-meets-The-Six-Million-Dollar-Man concept, and even if the execution isn't always quite as go-for-broke silly in tandem with what its premise seems to demand, it's at least a handsomely made B picture with the decency to substitute good ol' fashioned energy for my longed-for goofiness. The movie also has one truly inspired technical mechanic: during the fight scenes, the camera tilts and rotates with each punch thrown, which makes each scene a lot more visceral and interesting than I imagine they would be otherwise, given the fight choreography. I probably won't remember much else about the movie, but at least that camera thing is cool. Grade: B



Minding the Gap (2018)
Minding the Gap is a movie that figures out what it is in real time as the film's 93 minutes unfold. The movie's opening sections amount to little more than home video footage of director Bing Liu recording the love he and his two close friends have for skateboarding, and you would be forgiven for finding those early pieces of the movie a little rote and tedious, because they kind of are. But then something happens: these three boys begin to grow up, and as the adult world encroaches on their lives, Liu slowly finds a purpose for this project and begins to interrogate the adults he and his friends are becoming—adults who are coming to grips with the systemic unfairness of the worlds in which they grew up and then participating in those same systems. It's not just the BIG ISSUE that rears its head in the film's harrowing back half—essentially, Liu starts documenting the cycles of domestic abuse in which he and his friends came of age—but the little things, too: the way that the boys' skateboarding landscapes become increasingly bedraggled as the infrastructure of their hometown of Rockford, Illinois, crumbles; the way that the camera catches the slow falling apart of one of the boys' houses over the course of the film; the way the boys still casually assume that each others' lives are the same as they've ever been long after we as viewers recognize that they are not. It all accumulates until the movie ends on profound disquiet, and the once-dull early skateboarding footage that plays over the credits is both a bitter nostalgia and a eulogy for the previously unquestioned mythology that shaped the boys' adolescence. It's a film about time and heritage in both their affirming and destructive modes, and, by the end, as moving a coming of age as I've seen in a long while. Grade: A-


Before the Devil Knows You're Dead (2007)
It's about the intersection of incompetence and Murphy's Law, and it should be a lot funnier than it is—though there's a moment near the end of the movie where P.S. Hoffman's character asks, at a very NOT GOOD time, "We good?" and Ethan Hawke's character gives a reaction shot worthy of an Academy Award all its own, and it's comedy gold. Apart from that, though, the movie is punishingly bleak, a mode that's not always a bad fit for the movie, especially when it's exploring the interlocking layers of dysfunction within the central family, and there's an almost sadistic glee that the movie takes in revealing even greater depths of dysfunction each time it switches POVs. But it's also not always a great fit, especially because, as I said, it takes just a tad too seriously a premise and plot that's begging for just a taste of black comedy. Anyway, Hoffman and Hawke are great, though, and the movie is quite a ride, even if it's a bumpy one at times. Grade: B


The King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters (2007)
This documentary saga of the fight for the highest Donkey Kong score of all time is so very obviously constructed—amazing how the documentary crew was filming on both ends of Billy Mitchell's villainous phone calls, huh? But it doesn't really matter; Mitchell is a terrific heel, and to watch this doc is to experience the intersection of a mid-2000s indie documentary with, like, The Real Housewives. It's a lot of fun. Plus, this movie's a sort of unintentional artifact of the early speedrunning/competitive play community, which I'm low-key obsessed with. Grade: B+





Foreign Correspondent (1940)
If I'm going to be watching one of Hitchcock's WWII propaganda films, I prefer the high-concept high-wire of Lifeboat, and to be honest, neither film handles its propaganda elements particularly gracefully (though perhaps it's unfair to wish elegance on propaganda, and perhaps I'm not being grateful enough for the ways that these movies are so totally and shamelessly anti-fascist and anti-Nazi—TAKE NOTES, modern blockbuster media!). Still, Foreign Correspondent has two tremendously entertaining sequences, one set in a mill and one involving one of the most frightening plane crash sequences I've ever seen. It's hard to complain too much about a movie with those pieces. Grade: B


Television


Adventure Time, Season 9 (2017)
(note: I wrote this before watching the final season)
The series's commitment to surrealism, both in its use of imagery and in its use of pseudo-hip lingo, remains a delight, and the characters remain tons of fun. But at this point, it's clear that Adventure Time is winding down and, moreover, needs to be winding down. I'll miss the show, and it's not quite spinning its wheels, but there's nothing about this season that suggests that there's enough gas in the tank to continue on past its next (and final) season. There are no new characters, few surprises, and nothing about the series's penchant for strange non-sequitur that feels especially non-sequitur-ish in the context of what came before; even the miniseries that kicks off the season, "Elements," feels just like a shuffling of the pieces we've already been given, not anything entirely fresh. If it sounds like I'm being critical, please don't take it that way; I'm still enjoying these Land of Ooo hijinks a great deal. It's just that every show has its life cycle, and Adventure Time's is definitely coming to its logical expiration date. Grade: B


Adventure Time, Season 10 (2017-18)
There are a few ways to end a long-running series. One is to expand upon and subvert what has come before—you can see this in Lost and The X-Files, as well as some more beloved ending like Mad Men and Breaking Bad. Another way is to make the ending a reunion of sorts, throwing in as many references and cameos to past plots and characters as possible—Cheers did this, as well as, uh, The X-Files again. As it turns out, Adventure Time elects to go out X-Files-style, adopting both approaches for its final episodes. Fortunately for all of us, Season 10 of Adventure Time is a lot better than The X-Files's original final season (its 9th). Its mythology expansions are both interesting and poignant—there's a cycle of episodes that reveal some pretty surprising stuff about Jake's past that somehow doesn't feel like the gigantic retcon that it is—and its reunions/payoffs are a beautiful salute to itself, one of the best TV series of the past decade, culminating in a finale that's both a climactic showdown and a moving tribute to everything that made Adventure Time so special. It's a little overstuffed and busy, and some of the plots feel like they probably should have been developed over the course of an old-school-Adventure-Time-style 20-40 episode season rather than the truncated 16 here. But on the whole, it's as thoughtful and sweet and inventive as I could have wanted the ending of this show to be, and there's one particular moment in the finale involving a song that I'd rank alongside the closing scene of "I Remember You" as one of the show's most emotionally effective minutes. It's fitting, I suppose, that a show with the word "Time" in its title would be, in the end, so preoccupied with the way that life changes over long eras and that it would recognize that the run of a TV show itself from pilot to finale is as much of an era as the eons that span this series's actual plot; but to have Adventure Time conclude with a rumination on the passage of time and the temporal nature of all things really caught me off guard in the best way possible. "Time is an illusion that helps things make sense, so we are always living in the present tense. It seems unforgiving when a good thing ends, but you and I will always be back then." So long, Adventure TimeGrade: B+

Music


Sufjan Stevens - All Delighted People EP (2010)
Aw yeah, here we go. I was worried for a second after my measured feelings about Illinois that I wasn't going to get too excited about any future Sufjan released, but this is entirely my cup of tea. Something of a concept album (or EP, I guess, though it's an hour long, which I know is the point, he's playing around with our format definitions, but come on) involving the theological problem of evil/pain and the main melody of Simon & Garfunkel's "The Sound of Silence," a description that is not even scratching the surface of how bonkers and grandiose and effective this record is. Sufjan is using an orchestra again, but this time, he's turning the collective sound of the instruments into a veritable cacophony swirling around a dissonant electric guitar, against which a typical Sufjan chorus of voices must shout—as fitting a musical metaphor for the album's central ideas as any. It's a record that whips between the cosmic and the personal; on one end of the album are the grand abstractions of the title track, and at the other end, a direct address to Sufjan's own sister, Djoharia, and all the pain she has experienced, and the juxtaposition is as striking and beautiful as the music itself. I love every second of it, and while I suppose there are people who are going to look at the pomp of the album's instrumentation and the sprawl of its track length (we're dealing with an 11-minute title track and a 17-minute closer here), let me remind everyone that I have a long-running series on this very blog about my undying love for progressive rock. Grade: A


Sufjan Stevens - The Age of Adz (2010)
And to imagine that Sufjan would release something even better that very year. The Age of Adz is a masterpiece, full stop, a revisiting of the themes of All Delighted People (released just two months prior to Adz) but filtered through a confessional interiority; it's an album about Sufjan himself (his name is explicitly invoked at numerous times during the record), his sexuality, his own selfishness and sophomoric tendencies, and the imperfections of his belief in the power of language itself to reconcile these issues. This is an album whose first track ends with the line, "Words are futile devices," a searing self-critique by an artist who has often positioned his own words in a place of power over the world, using them to subjugate whole states at a time, to say nothing of his authoritative naming of his sister just a few months prior. It's blisteringly sad, a man chronicling the crumbling of his faith in the aesthetic institutions of his past at the same time he's using those aesthetics to interrogate the psychological trauma in his past that made him use that aesthetic philosophy as a refuse to begin with. "Stupid man in the window," Sufjan cries (presumably at himself) near the album's end, his voice fractured and masked by a vocoder, his own words mangled by the technology he's embraced. But in the end, the album argues, all this is solipsism, and solipsism is its own kind of trauma—a self-flagellation that only drives one further inward and further isolated. The real solution, not just to the interior problems of this album but also to the thorny theological ones in Adz's companion, All Delighted People, is not self-hate or isolation but collectivism—"Boy, we can do much more together," goes the album's extended, triumphant, singalong outro, and the message is clear: humanity, not words, is the true useful device. It's heaven, not hell, that's other people; the true potential of creation is in a radical embrace of togetherness, of community. It's an unlikely mirror image to Kanye West's My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, another 2010 album about the prison of one's own self-obsessed psychology; the difference is, Sufjan actually found a way out. Grade: A+

Monday, August 11, 2014

100 Years...100 Movies 85-87: A Night at the Opera, Platoon, 12 Angry Men

Hello all! I'm working my way through AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies list, giving thoughts, analyses, and generally scattered musings on each one. For more details on the project, you can read the introductory post here.

Did You Know?: In typing up each of these posts, I've written "blah blah blah" up here as a placeholder for the intro until I could think of something clever to say. Sometimes (as you may notice in this post), it may have been better if I had just left it at "blah blah blah."

85. A Night at the Opera (1935, Sam Wood)
Ah, A Night at the Opera. It's a Marx Brothers movie, and if you've seen one, you know what that entails: about 90 minutes of barely connected scenes built around the slapstick of Chico and Harpo and the one-liners/general smartassery of Groucho. That description isn't a slight; Marx Brothers movies are consistently hilarious, even if the whole isn't always a landmark of formal complexity, and I enjoy them immensely. Oh, and did I mention that there's usually some random, semi-serious plot for the kind of dopey Zeppo to bother with while his brothers have all the fun? No? Well, that's because A Night at the Opera doesn't have Zeppo. It's in fact the first non-Zeppo Marx Bros. film, which I suppose is worth noting since the lack of Zeppo's sincerity makes room for the rest of the Marxes' silliness to spread throughout the plot proceedings. More than any preceding Marx Bros. movie, A Night at the Opera incorporates Groucho, Harpo, and Chico into the actual mechanics of the (still pretty thin) story. That change of direction for the team results in a movie that is slightly more plotty than normal, although it's still a film that relies way more on individual pieces than on narrative suspense or anything. Those individual pieces come in bigger chunks, though; there's much more continuity between the various jokes, and we've even got a few scenes that unfold entirely in the service of one joke (e.g. the scene where everyone crams into the small room on the boat), which is a relative rarity in Marx Bros. movies up to this point. It's not an enormous change in style, but I do appreciate the increased attention to long(er)-form joke telling. For my money, it's the funniest, most consistent Marx Brothers movie, and the stylistic tweaking probably has a lot to do with that.


86. *Platoon (1986, Oliver Stone)
This being the first Oliver Stone movie I've ever seen, I wasn't quite sure what to expect going in, although I knew the keywords of his work: protest, rage, conspiracy, violence, left-wing politics, etc. Well, as it turns out, those words do a pretty good job of describing Platoon, save "conspiracy" (though if you squint, I think there's a little of that going on, too, if only some intra-platoon conspiracy). Platoon is a furious primal scream of a film, a retroactive protest against everything the Vietnam War was, written and directed by a man who was actually there. As such, the movie feels a good deal more personal than any of the handful of Vietnam films that predate Platoon (though I could maybe be convinced that The Deer Hunter was similarly personal, even if it doesn't carry nearly the autobiographical weight of Oliver Stone's work). I wouldn't say the personal nature of the film necessarily makes it a better Vietnam movie than those that came beforeApocalypse Now is a pretty titanic work to usurp, after allbut I do appreciate the way Stone uses that narrative to illustrate the horror and utter meaninglessness of the Vietnam conflict. It's a bleak, bleak movie with only the faintest shades of hope in the end, and there's a lot of power in that sort of cinematic venom. I could nitpick this movie to deathSheen's narration, like most voiceovers, is a mistake, and the movie as a whole is enormously unsubtle (which, of course, begs the question of whether or not a protest film should even be subtle, to which my answer is... maybe)but honestly, the stark nihilism of Platoon is exactly the philosophical ground I prefer war movies to cover, and that goes a long way toward endearing it to me. Well, as much as a movie like this can endear itself to anyone. The point, after all, isn't charm or entertainment but terror; this is what humanity makes itself capable of, Platoon says as, in one of its most striking and unsubtle shots, the once-human eyes of an American soldier glow a demonic red. Please, Platoon begs, let's not make that of ourselves again.


87. 12 Angry Men (1957, Sidney Lumet)
You know that awkward moment when one of your favorite movies comes up on a list and you can't think of anything intelligent to say about it? Well, I do, 'cause it already happened when I tried to talk about Sunset Boulevard way back at #16 on the list, and heavens to Bette Davis if it isn't happening again here at #87. 12 Angry Men is a marvelous movie, one of the best, and it's also one of those rare Hollywood movies that's actually improved by preserving the staginess of its original, well, stage material. So please, if you haven't already, go watch it. Now, rather than give up like I did with Sunset Boulevard, I'm going to fill out this post by spitballing a few unconnected ideas about this movie. 1) This movie actually had a profound effect on my views on capital punishment. That the accused only barely escapes a sentence delivered on a (possibly) incorrect verdict shook me to the core when I first saw the movie. It was one of my first exposures to the sometimes insane difficulty of proving beyond a shadow of a doubt someone's guilt or innocence. 2) You know what's kind of depressing, though? There's a chance that the rousing rhetoric of Henry Fonda's "Juror #7" may have led the movie's jury astray. Or, at least, so argues this essay. Discuss. 3) Anyone out there ever seen a production of the original play? If so, how was it? 4) In a way, I feel like Richard Linklater's 2001 play/film Tape is a spiritual successor (or maybe even an unofficial remake) of 12 Angry Men. It certainly engages a lot of the same themes of perspective, consensus, and guilt, although the end product is more considerably more tortured and twisted than 12 Angry Men ever tries to be, which is probably why 12 Angry Men is such a much better movie. Also, video tape is a majorly crappy medium for making movies; just saying.

And that's it for this post. Do you have anything interesting to add about 12 Angry Men (or, heck, any of these movies)? Well, let me know. Otherwise, until next time!

You can read the previous post, #s 82-84, here.
Update: You can read the next post, #s 88-90, here.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

100 Years...100 Movies 64-66: Network, The African Queen, Raiders of the Lost Ark

Hello all! I'm working my way through AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies list, giving thoughts, analyses, and generally scattered musings on each one. For more details on the project, you can read the introductory post here.

...in which I can't think of any introduction whatsoever. So...

64. Network (1976, Sidney Lumet)
It's been said before, but I'll say it again because I remain amazed: Network is an astoundingly prescient film, one that even borders on prophetic. I mean, get this: Network not only predicts the rise of both reality TV and the 24-hour news cycle at least a decade before either was a major cultural force, it also understands these future trends deeply enough to critique the exploitation that runs rampant in each creation. Even in 2014, Network is still a relevant, wicked-sharp media satire, which is incredible considering that the major targets of its satire didn't even exist in 1976 [1]. All that prescience wouldn't wouldn't be worth nearly as much, though, if the movie weren't also hilarious and fantastically acted, two characteristics that go hand-in-hand. Network won three of the four acting categories at the Academy Awards (Fay Dunaway, Peter Finch, and Beatrice Straight), and it probably should have won a fourth for William Holden's performance if that had been possible (Finch and Holden were both nominated in the same category, Best Actor). It's loud, showy acting through-and-though, but goshdarnit, it works. I can't stress enough how much the acting helps to turn what is really a bitter, caustic, ugly movie into one of the funniest comedies in American film history. Even so, Network is angry, shrill, and more than a little smug, and I can see how that did (and still does) turn people offheck, I usually baulk against this sort of "television is the demise of civilization" tirade, because come on, there's a lot of great, intelligent, socially valuable TV out there, and that was true in the '70s, too [2]. And yet, for all the self-congratulatory airs of Network, there's still something pure about the righteous anger on display, pure enough that it sucks me in every time and reminds me that yes, this hatred of the disgusting reality of the media cycle is the reason why Network is one of my favorite movies ever.


65. *The African Queen (1951, John Huston)
For as long as The African Queen sat dormant on my Netflix queue, I had assumed that the film was a serious movie, the sort of straight-laced drama that tends to have Big Themes and attract Academy Awards, the kind of movie that's often kind of a bore to watch outside of the original cultural moment that birthed it. I'm not quite sure why I thought this (although its presence on both iterations of the AFI list surely bolstered this assumption of mine), and as it turns out, I was dead wrong. The African Queen is nuts. I mean, there's barely a serious bone in its cinematic body; to put it in perspective, I'm about to (sort of) discuss Raiders of the Lost Ark, and Raiders, with all its winking and exploding of heads, is only slightly sillier than The African Queen, as far as its prioritizing of swashbuckling over serious ideas (and realism) goes. No archaeologists-as-Errol-Flynn here, though; in The African Queen, the hero is clearly Katharine Hepburn's Rose Sayer, a Methodist missionary-turned-war-monger who, after her brother dies in the aftermath of a WWI-era German attack on their African village, becomes intent on turning the riverboat of friendly neighborhood captain Charlie Allnut (Humphrey Bogart) into a makeshift torpedo to blow the Germans' boat to kingdom come. Yeah, we're definitely not in the land of self-serious Hollywood. And that's not a criticism whatsoever. The African Queen is lots of fun, with both Hepburn and Bogart delivering charming performances. A welcome surprise of a film for me.


66. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981, Steven Spielberg)
You know, sometimes it's kinda hard to write about my favorite movies. Like, I'm not talking about writing about movies I merely loveif anything, this series has shown that I can yammer on for hundreds of words on movies I love. I mean those movies that have been a part of my life since childhood, movies I internalized deeply before I even knew what film criticism was. Maybe I'm too close to these movies to consistently find analytical footholds. Or maybe they are movies that I've already read so much critical discourse about that I'm paralyzed by the possibility of repeating those critics. I dunno. All that is to say that I have embarrassingly little to say about Raiders of the Lost Ark, even though it's one of my favorite movies ever. What makes writing about Raiders especially difficult is that it's also one of those movies that has little or no interest in making any sort of real-world point outside the joys of cinema culture itself, which, to be clear, is one of my favorite types of movies, but it also means that discussions are limited to the the purely allusive and technical aspects of the film. "Oh, this is cool because it alludes to x movie from Lucas's childhood," "Spielberg's direction is effective because of its efficiency with space," and the like. Those are valid, important discussions to have, but they aren't always discussions I feel especially equipped to engage in, particularly in the case of Indiana Jones, when the allusions refer to a cinematic form (i.e. adventure serials) whose heyday predates my birth by half a century. So yeah. I'm sorry for the lame "discussion about discussions" thing. I love, love, love this movie so much, but beyond gushing that sentiment, I'm all hot air.

That's all for now, folks! Until next time.

You can read the previous post, #s 61-63, here.
Update: The next post, #s 67-69, can be found here.

1] What's arguably more incredible, though, is that TV media rose (sank?) to the challenge of Network's colossal cynicism by actually making the sort of dreck the film cautions against. In a way, we have nobody but TV itself to thank for the intelligence of Network's screenplay. If television had become some completely high-brow medium in the years since '76, I think it's possible that we'd now dismiss Network as self-satisfied paranoia.

2] That's not to say that there isn't tons of crap out there, too, but overall I tend to prefer my film critiques of television (a dubious genre if there ever was one) to follow the path of Good Night, and Good Luck: TV is a medium with a rich potential, and it's sad that people don't always take advantage of that potential.