Showing posts with label Joe Dante. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Dante. Show all posts

Sunday, October 17, 2021

Mini Reviews for October 4 - 17, 2021

Sorry for skipping next week; these past two weeks have been super hectic. But here I am! I'm back, baby!


Movies

Trick 'r Treat (2007)
Trying to stitch together the pieces of an anthology films into the veneer of a single narrative film doesn't ultimately help the problems of inconsistency that plague almost all anthology films, but the good parts here are very good, and this has a really long, impishly mean streak that I thought was great. Maybe a tad over-hyped, but in the context of most anthology films, this is up there. Grade: B

 

 

 

Light Sleeper (1992)
Another one of these Paul Schrader movies. The climactic violence isn't as steeped in irony as the climaxes in the best of his movies in this format tend to be, but Susan Sarandon is, as always, such a force to be reckoned with on the screen that she handily becomes the best iteration of the "pure-hearted woman is a redemptive foil to the troubled man" trope that Schrader trots out in every one of these. That trope is a problematic one that Schrader consistently has trouble making work, so it's no small feat what Sarandon does here with her role: fierce, believably kind, and, incredibly, able to own a scene alongside Willem Dafoe's animal sexuality and cavernous face. I cannot fathom the power of a person who can go toe-to-toe with Dafoe and not just crumble. Grade: B+

A Nightmare on Elm Street: The Dream Child (1989)
This is pretty dumb, and the series mythology is just leaden at this point, five movies in. But I dunno, the main draw for me to the Nightmare on Elm Street movies is the gonzo effects and surreal framing of the kills, and this movie pulls out all the stops here. Characters jumping into comic books and becoming animated? Freddy using his own severed arm as a seatbelt? A girl getting food shoveled into her face until she inflates like a balloon? Weird, wild stuff, and a supercut of the dream scenes in this movie would be a pretty good experimental film. Grade: B-

 

Sans Soleil (1983)
This movie's narration is full of some of the most nonsensical of French philosopher nonsense, while also being surprisingly orientalist—like, half of it is basically the philosophy grad student's version of "the Japanese sure are different, amirite?" What makes this movie hard to dismiss is that this narration is set to some absolutely stunning montage footage. It maybe would have been something on the level of Koyaanisqatsi if it had simply been scored rather than been tied to these insufferable words. In fact, the score we have here is pretty spectacular: full of textured ambient sounds and kosmische musik style early electronic atmospherics. Shame about the spoken word. Grade: B-

 

Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981)
Marginally better than the original, which isn't hard. This is a fairly competent retread/revision of the first one, tightening up the first movie's amateurism somewhat into a decent parade of sex and kills involving admirably irritating teens. But the flimsiest of the Big Three slasher franchises remains flimsy, and I remain only slightly interested in continuing after this point. Grade:C+

 

 

 

Friday the 13th Part III (1983)
People keep saying that this movie is a huge step down from the first two, but I dunno, this just seems in the same ballpark of "meh" to me—though that being said, I kept falling asleep during the back half, butI'm not sure if that was my fault or the movie's (I was pretty tired!). Also, I don't know why this bothers me any more than the litany of other stupid things in this franchise, but why does the title switch from using Arabic to Roman numerals in this one? I'll excuse plot inconsistencies, but typographical inconsistencies? You gotta draw the line somewhere. Grade: C

 

The Howling (1981)
This fits snugly alongside Piranha as a Joe Dante/John Sayles collab that sneaks social satire and a smirking sensibility into a movie that uses its low budget to impressive ends. It's not quite as ambitious or as funny as Piranha, nor is it as balls-to-the-wall gonzo as other Joe Dante projects, but the effects are very, very good—some really gooey werewolf transformations and some really tactile gore. And the pitch-black cynicism of the ending is delicious. Of the wave of werewolf movies that hit theaters in 1981, I definitely prefer An American Werewolf in London, but this is solid. Grade: B

Sunday, June 6, 2021

Mini Reviews for May 31 - June 6, 2021

Potty training sucks. Luckily, not all of the movies I watched this week do!

Movies

Nomadland (2020)
When I reviewed the other Cloé Zhao feature I've seen, The Rider, I wondered if that film would have been better as a pure documentary rather than the docu-fiction hybrid that we got. Nomadland basically confirms that I was right, being a movie that basically does take a documentary (a nonfiction book, actually—a book documentary, I guess) and smears a coating of narrative filmmaking over it, obscuring the most interesting material here, i.e. the stories of the actual "nomads" that get told. The Rider at least had a nonprofessional actor as the lead, which lent a kind of verisimilitude to the scripted parts. But having big-time Hollywood folks like Frances McDormand and (to a lesser extent, given he's not quite as much of a Movie Star) David Strathairn playing roles that try to make them fit in as they more or less parade through real nomadic encampments and scenes of actual abject poverty is so unbelievably distracting from whatever ostensible gritty realism that the documentary style is supposed to lend that I cannot imagine what the point of having them there is other than to indulge in poverty tourism. Being charitable and assuming that this wasn't just vanity on the part of McDormand and Zhao (who are both among the producers of this film), I'm going to just have to chalk this up to a bad miscalculation, one that, unfortunately, the movie never recovers from for me. A documentary would have preserved Zhao's impressive eye for landscapes and maybe would have also managed to find true compassion for the people it documents, since it would have no millionaire screen presences to get in the way of their lives. Maybe the movie would have even found some way to advocate for these people—something the movie as-is bizarrely sidesteps as it imbues the lives of people who have been destroyed by global capitalism and specifically the 2008 housing crisis with a rugged, apolitical romanticism. Grade: C

The Nest (2020)
The writer-director of Martha Marcy May Marlene (it's taken me all ten years since that movie's release to get that title right on the first try) returns with a movie that's far less mysterious and ominous and instead is just plain bracing. Basically, a charismatic huckster tries to bluster his way into business success in the deregulation gold rush of the '80s and in the process destroys his marriage. It very much feels like an arc of a lost Mad Men character updated for the Reagan/Thatcher era, and given that Mad Men is my favorite TV show of all time, that's not a slight. It does feel a lot more obvious than MMMM, though, so I doubt it will hold my imagination like that one did. But this is still a solid watch. Grade: B+

The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984)
I know this is a cult classic or whatever, but I guess I'm not part of the cult because I found this extremely tedious. It has all the pieces of an enjoyably weird movie (bizarre and dense mythology, camp, fun cast, etc.) but the execution is just so inert. My first exposure to this movie was actually years ago via the Scott Adams/Adventure International text-adventure tie-in game, and that game sucked, too, so maybe I should have heeded the warning. Grade: C-

 

 

 

Body Double (1984)
"Vertigo + Rear Window, but make it explicitly about pornography this time!" is a premise that seems almost certainly taken from Hitchcock's own fantasies, so it's hard to fault De Palma for making a movie that so, uh, nakedly rips off Hitchcock (though it is probably the most shameless Hitch rip-off that I've seen from De Palma). That said, outside the meta games with film history/Hollywood, I'm not 100% sure this movie has much going on under all of its very potent Freudian signifiers. That's not a huge concern when it's as fast-paced and energetic as it is, but still, I kinda wish there were meat on the bones of this movie that didn't immediately turn into self-reflexive post-modern circles. Credit where it's due, though: that self-reflexivity gives us the best moment in the film, i.e. the credits sequence where we see a more or less documentary-like depiction of the filming of a nude scene—as much as Hollywood likes to make movies about Hollywood, I've never seen a scene like that one before, and it's mesmerizing. Grade: B

Piranha (1978)
A neat intersection of the sensibilities of Roger Corman, Joe Dante, and John Sayles, in almost equal measures. You've got the cheapo gore and nudity from Corman; the smirking, sadistic games from Dante; the working-class protagonists and political anger from Sayles. It's not, like, the best '70s movie about killer aquatic life, of course, but it's way better than a Jaws cash-in made for like $3 has any right to be. Grade: B

 

 

 

if.... (1968)
Absolutely gonzo British New Wave cinema—a satire of the hegemonic postwar Western order, embodied by an insular prep school. Malcolm McDowell is lightning onscreen, and the direction feel alternatingly charmingly shaggy and hard-nosedly experimental in the way that a lot of New Wave cinema (regardless of country) tends to be. It also feels unusually perceptive of this movie to, in 1968, basically call out the white counterculture as largely being motivated by a combination of fetishization/appropriation of nonwhite revolutionaries (Che and Mao posters are prominently displayed in dorms, of course) and reactionary impulses that happened to briefly align with progressive causes. The meaning of the ending (*spoilers*: a school shooting, albeit one cloaked in allegorical touches like an actual military being there to oppose the shooters) has perhaps drifted away from the original intent of the filmmakers in the decades since, at least for this American viewer, given the prevalence of actual school shootings in this country, but I can at least still respect the vision here. Grade: A-

Sunday, August 9, 2020

Mini Reviews for August 3-9, 2020

Reviewin'.

Movies

Slay the Dragon (2020)
Gerrymandering and the modern Republican Party are both awful, and I'm glad there's a whole film dedicated to those two unshakable facts. But that said, this movie includes a brief clip of the Last Week Tonight episode about gerrymandering, which made me realize that the whole movie kind of feels like that John Oliver segment stretched to feature length, with very little to show for the extra length. These kinds of activist documentaries are never going to engage me formally, but I'd at least like to think they aim to be more informative than a half-hour HBO clip. On the plus side, though, this movie is entirely free of Oliver's extremely forced jokes, so maybe this would have actually been my preferred method of getting this information if I'd seen it before the Last Week Tonight episode. Grade: C+

Junun (2015)
Honestly, it's just nice to spend an hour watching Johnny Greenwood jam with his pals from India (plus one pal from Israel) while Paul Thomas Anderson does basically the equivalent on the filmmaking side. I don't have any deep thoughts. This was just pleasant, and I enjoyed it. Grade: B+








Matinee (1993)
A delightful, mostly frothy salute to William Castle (literally everything with a very Castle-esque John Goodman is a great time) that also somehow manages to argue by the end that movies acclimate people to the horrors of nuclear proliferation and the military industrial complex? Some seriously wild thematic turns, especially in the penultimate shot of the film, where a cutesy coming-of-age moment occurs in the context of a military base with literal armed helicopters and jets flying overhead. Having grown up partly on an air force base, I can testify first-hand to the astounding degree to which living within walking distance of industrial death machines can be normalized, and in conjunction with that, there's really something to Goodman's final monologue about how films help people accept almost certain annihilation at the hands of the kinds of people who populate Dr. Strangelove—if not the b-movie schlock peddled by William Castle then certainly the likes of your average U.S.-military-affiliated action blockbuster like Independence Day or whatever. Wild thematic turns, I say. Mad. Grade: B+

La Chinoise (1967)
A bunch of college kids get into Maoism and try to start a revolution. Basically a feature-length exploration of the limitations of bourgeois folks to instigate radical change—the revolution in this movie fails, in part, because these kids' backgrounds (their parents are all like bankers and stuff) give them no organic class solidarity with the people they actually need to link up with to start a movement (and, as a side note, it's probably worth pointing out that arguably Godard runs into this problem himself with his writing and direction, given the somewhat iffy way that, for example, a Black character is briefly tokenized by the film). It's a strikingly clear-eyed film, too. College activism can be so inspiring and important, but I also don't think I've ever seen a more apt deconstruction of that kind of activism, either, and what this movie depicts is uncomfortably close to the ways in which I've seen mini-movements surrounding people like those in this film (including myself) fail. I mean, I haven't seen botched assassination attempts, but the basic group dynamics and ultimate collapse ring extremely true—a bunch of college-educated white people failing to realize systemic change because they are busy yelling at each other about theorists and whether or not Johnny Guitar is problematic hits very close to home for me and likely does for a lot of people on the internet, I'd guess. Grade: A-

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Mini Reviews for October 7-27, 2019

It's been several weeks since I've made a blog post, and for those of you who don't know, this is because my brother died two weeks ago. It's been a difficult time for my family, and even though I was still reading books, watching movies, etc., I really didn't feel like writing about them until just a few days ago. I don't know how much my brother read this blog, but my relationship with him casts a long shadow over my reviews. Who I am as a viewer and critic is inextricable from my relationship with him. A lot of our childhood together was spent—as is the case with most siblings, I'd guess—sharing movies, music, and television. We watched Batman: The Animated Series and played "Batman and Robin" together (though neither of us liked being Robin); we rented The Iron Giant from Blockbuster and liked to joke about "coco-lax"; we spent a lot of time doing Toy-Story-inspired surgery on stuffed animals we had. When we were teens, there was a lot of arguing over media, particularly music: he was into blink-182 and Sum 41, whereas I was a budding indie-rock snob. We both liked Dark Side of the Moon, though, and I remember loaning him my CD a lot in high school at night so he could go to sleep to that beating heart. The music fights died down once we were no longer living together and subjecting each other to each other's taste, but I still think about those fights sometimes and the ways in which I've decided he was right and I was wrong (Rage Against the Machine, for example: I of course realize now that they rock).

When somebody close to you dies, the impulse is to try to conceptualize the entire person in your mind, since that's all you have left, but it's hard to the point of impossible to fit a whole human being inside your head because when they're alive, there's no need—what forms in the mind is the organic outgrowth of life and the afterimages of experiences. So when I think about my brother now, it's only pieces of who he is that come to me at a time. Right now, as I'm putting together this blog post, it's these little fragments of shared media that bob to the surface. We are everyone we have ever known, and our relationships with art are part of that, since our experience of art is the collection of these relationships' intersections with the now. To write a review is to remember what fragments you can, as incomplete of a reckoning of a whole life as that is.

Anyway, here are the reviews.

Movies

The Lighthouse (2019)
Man, how do I even describe The Lighthouse? I guess I can now call it a hallmark of writer/director Robert Eggers that his films are heavily steeped in a meticulous recreation of arcane English dialects; in the same way that The Witch had its characters speak in Puritan English, The Lighthouse has its Willem Dafoe character go full-on Captain Ahab/Mr. Krabs seaman English—whatever that's called. The degree to which that sounds goofier than The Witch is a good indication of the difference between the two projects: The Lighthouse is the unhinged-to-the-point-of-hilarity but no less frightening cousin to The Witch's relatively serious drama of isolation. There's a lot to, uhh, behold in The Lighthouse, from its deeply rattling evocation of post-Romanticism "weird" fiction like Melville and Lovecraft to its smotheringly lush late-1800s sea-shanty production to its fevered imagery and unstable reality to its (I kid you not) mermaid genitalia, but the absolute best of it all for me is the complete and total control Eggers and Dafoe have over the effect of this dialect. Long, careening scenes will take hairpin turns of tone bent around ornate speeches and turns of phrase: Dafoe goes from lamenting that Robert Pattinson's character doesn't like his cooking to delivering two minutes of the most elaborate, blistering maritime curse I've ever heard then finally to a small, tender word all in the space of like five minutes, and it's by turns riveting and funny and scary and kind of sad—amazingly, without ever feeling unnatural or out of place. It all just is, spewing forth from this totemic force of a man inside this totemic force of a movie, high and low brows crashing together like waves whipped up by a nor'easter emanating from the deepest well of the masculine psyche. The movie is, among other things, about all the ways in which we humans—but especially we males—cloak our basest urges in all sorts of hierarchies and rituals and how quickly these hierarchies and rituals become indistinguishable from those base urges themselves when we cling to them tight enough. Dafoe's intricate dialect is a vehicle of both his rigid rules for keeping up the lighthouse and also these deeply ancient curses and superstitions that envelope his rules like a force of nature. It's bewildering, terrifying, and very, very funny. Martin Scorsese says that Marvel movies are like amusement park rides, but honestly, none of them ever took me on a ride as wild and thrilling as this. Grade: A

The Raid: Redemption (Serbuan maut) (2011)
I care not a whit for any of the plot or human beings within this movie. But the action is very super good, y'all. I mean, that's the only thing people talk about with this movie, so it's not like I'm blowing any minds. Sometimes consensus is just right. Grade: B








The Happening (2008)
I'm not going to say that people "misunderstood" The Happening upon its release, because so much of what's here defies the typical sort of appraisal: the dialogue has the almost-human surreality of one of those AI-generated scripts ("We ate tiramisu together, that is it"); Mark Wahlberg and Zooey Deschanel give two of the most idiosyncratic and unnatural performances of 21st-century mainstream cinema; the score is ham-fisted to the point of self-parody; Shyamalan's motif of wind blowing through trees feels laughably flimsy. There's nothing here that's conventionally entertaining, that's for sure, and it's no surprise that audiences and critics bristled at this deeply off-beat horror-melodrama-thriller oddity. But I dunno... I kind of liked it. Kind of. I'm not fully with the re-appraisers who want to call this an outsider masterpiece or whatever, but like most of Shyamalan's movies, there's this undeniable energy to the whole thing that's pretty compelling when it isn't just confounding. The way this threads the needle between an evocation of '50s-style B-movie kookiness, an almost arthouse level of seriousness regarding the lived experience of humanity on the brink, and (intentional?) absurdist comedy is just so undeniably its own thing. To be honest, the alchemy of it all feels just a few clicks away from the otherworldly camp that David Lynch taps into, and if people hadn't taken The Sixth Sense so po-facedly seriously and did the whole "Next Spielberg" jig, we might be talking about Shyamalan more in that vein. Maybe. Like Lynch, it's easy to chuckle at the window dressing, like the off-kilter dialogue and weird acting, but its themes (in this case, ecological collapse and the horrifying unpredictability of human self-destruction) are so unrelentingly bleak and unshakeably tethered to my own real-world terrors that it's hard to feel comfortable sitting unambiguously in the "so-bad-its-good" enjoyment mode. Tell me, what on earth are you even supposed to do with First Reformed as filtered through Plan 9 from Outer Space? Grade: B-

The People Under the Stairs (1991)
This movie definitely bites off more than it can chew as far as ideas go. There's so much crammed into this gleefully dark satire that there are a lot of elements that feel half-baked—including the titular people under the stairs themselves, who are never as engaging or interesting or developed as the children protagonists or the maniacal villains. But holy moly, what works here works. I'm all about this movie's hatred of vulture landlords, and I'm especially all about this movie's villains as the Reagans from Hell. Plus, the "'80s family movie, but a Hard R rating" is a very fun vibe. As a movie, it's a LOT, but gloriously so. Grade: B+



Gremlins 2: The New Batch (1990)
Demented and gonzo to an absurdly delightful degree: I almost died of happiness when the gremlins break out into a big musical number to the tune of "New York, New York." The chief pleasure here is just how anarchic it is (very); the movie opens with an animated bit involving the classic Looney Tunes opening, but with Bugs and Daffy fighting for control over the segment, and this is a pretty great microcosm for the level this is working on—quite explicitly a live-action cartoon. As a result, the movie is a little less sharp in its satirical targets than its predecessor's shredding to pieces of Christmas Americana, but '80s NYC yuppies and real estate barons are still worth the chaos that's wreaked on their world here. In a 2019 in which Donald Trump is leading a quasi-fascist regime seemingly bent on destroying everything I like about America, I can see how some people might feel like this movie softballs its depiction of its very Donald-Trump-in-the-'80s-esque villain (he has a semi-sympathetic redemption arc); however, it is a marvelously bitter pill that The New Batch ends with this theoretically reformed villain cashing in his newfound goodwill by deciding to profit from the mass-manufacturing/exploitation of the first movie's small town. It's not just (as the first movie argues) that the concept of "Americana" is flimsy kitsch that can bear none of the weight of reality; it's that this kitsch is a pandering lie cooked up by a craven corporation, and any humanity that once existed within this concept has been wrung out for all the shareholder value it's worth. It's a good thing this movie is an all-time blast, or the cynicism would collapse under its own weight. Grade: A

Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982)
This movie's reputation as the supreme oddball of the Halloween franchise (taking place in a universe outside the continuity of the Michael Myers entries) led me to believe that it was going to be a lot more meta and self-reflexive in its posture toward the series as a whole. Instead, its relationship with the rest of the series boils down to a few cheeky references, and otherwise, this is a fun little one-off sci-fi horror movie reminiscent of The Stuff and that kind of thing. Most slasher franchises would probably be improved if they eventually just became anthology series like Season of the Witch was apparently trying to make of the Halloween series, so I applaud the attempt here, however unsuccessful. I guess there are already a couple other Halloween continuities we could try this with again, though—get on it, Universal! Grade: B+

Ganja & Hess (1973)
The first Capital-G Great horror movie I saw this October. Spike Lee of course remade Ganja & Hess in 2014, but Lee's somewhat terrestrial preoccupations never manage to hook the deep mysticism of this original. Actually, it's 2012, with Red Hook Summer, that shows ol' Spike most dedicatedly carrying forward this movie's torch—a sprawling, searingly fervent reckoning of Christianity's role in colonialism and slavery, set to wall-to-wall gospel music. Bitter and evocative: eternal life is the price of vampirism, resurrection its perverse horror. But the magic is that oppression never overwhelms the film itself, which blooms into a liberated beauty from the husk of its plot. It is a profoundly spiritual experience—neither the social treatise of Spike's Red Hook Summer nor the neutered eroticism of his remake two years later—but rather inventing its own sublime cinematic language of cross-fades and double-exposures and slow-mo, seemingly from the ground up. Its radical freedom of style and substance forms the perfection of blaxploitation; Curtis Mayfield and stuff form the cultural memory of that movement, a monolith of groovy bass and bottomless cool for semi-ironic appropriation. But at least to me, the elliptical mysticism and self-made mythologizing of this movie (and, to a different degree, Sweet Sweetback) form a much more compelling soul to the whole scene. If you couldn't tell, I loved this. Grade: A

The Blood Spattered Bride (La novia ensangrentada) (1972)
The marketing promises a kind of Spanish giallo, but it plays like a grindhouse take on a Val Lewton picture. Ancient curses and lesbian vampires cooked in a visually rich slow-burn. I'm not always the biggest fan of exploitation cinema, but this is kind of the platonic ideal of it for me: in which it's a trojan horse for the marginalized to wield the lurid tropes of the genre as weapons against its own audience, right up to that final shot, which is probably the most shocked I've been by a movie this whole horror season. It's a pretty nasty movie, and I wish it had made as much space for onscreen queer sexuality as it makes for onscreen sexual violence, but as an indictment of masculine sexual entitlement/aggression, it's damning—not to mention pretty riveting. Grade: B+

Daughters of Darkness (Les lèvres rouges) (1971)
I'm writing this review a couple weeks after I actually saw this movie, and I honestly don't remember the plot hardly at all. But I do remember Delphine Seyrig's wonderful performance—a more sympathetic, vampire iteration of Mrs. Danvers from Rebecca—and I do remember the pretty lush scenery and cinematography, which itself feels like a vampire old-soul version of cinematic styles gone by. Anyway, I remember enjoying this overall. Grade: B






The Velvet Vampire (1971)
A really dope score and some very cool hallucinogenic/dream imagery buoy this movie a bit for me, and there's a deep sadness to the ending that I wasn't expecting. But I guess I'm not really invested enough in vampire stories to begin with to be all that entranced by a revisionist one. Then again, I did love Ganja & Hess, so I dunno why I'm not more excited. Grade: B-







Music

Lover by Taylor Swift (2019)
The first half of this album is fantastic, and things like "Cruel Summer" and "Miss America and the Heartbreak Prince" are some of the best Taylor Swift's ever been at pure pop music: shiny, pristine, hooky, thoughtful. But there's a lot of pretty weak material buried deep in this record, too, material like the lead single "Me!" and the honestly pretty dumb pileup of Britishisms that is "London Boy," and the fact that anything can be buried deep in this album speaks to the biggest issue, which is that it's just too long and, with that, has some really awful track sequencing—the supremely goofy "London Boy" goes right into "Soon You'll Get Better," a song about her mother's battle with breast cancer? Who thought that was a good idea? I'm probably in the minority in thinking that Lover as a whole is a step down from her previous record, Reputation; it lacks that album's thorniness or the arch-villain camp or the thematic complexity. But it's certainly not a weak album, and if we're going just on the basis of high points, Lover has several very high ones. Grade: B