Merry Christmas! Let's talk about movies and stuff!
Movies
Moana (2016)
The usual issues with modern Disney features persist here, from the rather plastic-y skin textures to the haphazard plotting—the latter especially rears its head here, as the existential threat to Moana's homeland is basically ignored for the duration of the second and third acts, making for a movie of confused stakes. But you know what? Moana is still really freaking good! It's the best Disney musical since Mulan, maybe even Aladdin—"How Far I'll Go" has only "Let It Go" to contend with for the best Disney song of the past decade, and the rest of the songs (and yes, unlike Frozen, there are actually lots of songs!) are no slouch either. It's even got a song where Jemaine Clement reprises his Flight of the Conchords David Bowie role, only this time as a crab, and if that doesn't get you pumped, there's not a lot I can say for you. Animation-wise, Disney CG has never looked better, from the phenomenal water animation (you know Disney's on its game when it even beats out Pixar in technical wonder—sorry Finding Dory) to the ingenious integration of 2D hand-drawn with computer-rendered 3D. Plus, as much as I was out-thinking the movie up at the top of this review, Disney films are always more of heart-over-head endeavors, and on that metric, Moana delivers in spades. I'll be darned if I wasn't majorly verklempt by the reprise of "How Far I'll Go." This is a feeling that's been percolating in me for a while now, but after this year and especially after Moana, it's solidified: Disney has surpassed Pixar as the American animation studio whose features I look forward to most each year. Grade: A-
Florence Foster Jenkins (2016)
It's a solid biopic with an appropriately hammy Meryl Streep performance, and a big part of the biopic's solidity has to do with the nice tightrope that performance walks. Streep's acting these days tends to suck all the air out of the room, but that's kind of a function of her character here, a singer whose skills (or lack thereof) are no match for her ambitions as an opera hall star. Knowing nothing of the real-life basis for this movie, I can't weigh in on how well Streep's character fits the specifics of this woman's legacy. But with Ms. Jenkins, the movie character, Streep has found a role uniquely suited to her late-career acting tics, and that's pretty cool. Grade: B+
I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House (2016)
A horror movie with scares of the arthouse variety, not ones that jump out and say "Boo!" but instead ones that walk up softly behind you and ask you how your day was in a low whisper, and it only slowly dawns on you that they have forked tongues or something. All of which is to say that I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House will not make you jump, but it might make your skin crawl just a bit. Only a bit—this thing's pretty slow, and while generously crafted, maybe a bit too mannered for its own good. Grade: B
Sunset Song (2015)
Every inch of this film is gorgeous—it's a painterly, languishingly detailed depiction of rural Scotland that by sheer visual weight alone justifies the occasional note of nostalgia. That, and the movie is also really well-acted. The plot itself isn't handled quite as deftly, and this piece is really, really obviously an adaptation of a novel, what with the copious voiceover and artistic jumps in time—the whole thing is just so literary, which is fine if your story is, you know, a work of literature, but as a piece of cinema, it risks feeling just a bit airless at times. It doesn't help that its story—centering on the abuses, struggles, and quiet triumphs that its women face—already deals in archetypes to such an extent that it can be stiff. But I'm being overly negative here: this is a good movie with consistently great technical work, and if you're looking for a richly textured period piece, look no further. Grade: B+
Big Star: Nothing Can Hurt Me (2012)
As a tribute to one of the greatest cult bands in rock history, Nothing Can Hurt Me works well; it works just as well as a salute to the bygone years of Stax Records and the scrappy, blockbuster Memphis music scene of the '60s and '70s. The movie ambles through the Big Star chronology (including the post-breakup solo efforts of Alex Chilton and Chris Bell) with a little too much looseness to ever give the movie any sort of urgency, and as a piece of documentary filmmaking, it's not going to blow any minds as far as technical craft goes. It's just a solid and loving profile with some interesting Memphis talking heads thrown in, to boot. Grade: B
Books
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child by Jack Thorne (2016)
You know one Harry Potter device I've always disliked? The Time-Turner. You know what I've always disliked even more than the Time-Turner? The Deathly Hallows epilogue. So I suppose it's a triumph of sorts that a book whose premise is basically to stretch the epilogue to a feature-length story involving Time-Turners was able to get me to like it even a little. I do like this book. A little. The Time-Turner stuff isn't anything great—don't get me wrong, I love a good time-travel/butterfly-effect story, but The Cursed Child isn't a good time-travel/butterfly-effect story; it's an average one in service of an even more average villain plot that sort of reminds me of how for a while, every Zelda game involved revealing that the game's villain was trying to resurrect Ganon. It's a tremendously unnecessary and undeserved story, but there's good here, too. For starters, while a lot of the returning cast (particularly poor Ron) gets flattened into their movie-version caricatures—and let us not speak of Ginny, who was never really anyone to begin with—Harry himself is rendered wonderfully and unsentimentally as an adult; maybe I'm just mean, but I get immense satisfaction out of the fact that a canonical entry in the series has finally embraced that Harry Potter is a bit of a self-involved douchebag. Even better is the way the story approaches the issue of the Hogwarts houses, always one of the most thematically troubling of Rowling's inventions in the original series—young Albus Severus Potter does, as he fears, land in the Slytherin house, and the results are the first time outside of the character of Draco Malfoy (who also returns to great effect here) that the series has paid anything more than cursory lip service to the idea that the members of Slytherin aren't automatically unrepentant minions of evil. In fact, the play's generosity toward characters of all stripes is its biggest strength, and its update of the original series's theme of friendship as a restorative and even life-saving force is welcome. This is a story about the outcast and the lonely—the converse, of course, of friendship and belonging—and in the play's best scene, Draco tells Harry that he envied Harry and his friends when they were students at Hogwarts. Harry, the play argues, will never truly understand the isolated misery that defines the lives of those (including his own son) he has scorned, and its this misery that drives people toward cruelty and darkness. It's a powerful idea and one that's considerably more morally sophisticated than most of what Rowling attempted in her novels. It's unfortunate that the play's not a better vehicle for these ideas, though—the recent Fantastic Beasts movie approaches some of these same themes with considerable more success as a story, which leaves The Cursed Child as the awkward, inferior Rowlingverse work of 2016. Cursed child indeed. Grade: B-
Music
Brian Eno - The Ship (2016)
At this point in his career, I'm not sure exactly what we're supposed to expect from a Brian Eno record, especially since I haven't listened to any of his post-'80s work. I know this much, though: The Ship is nice little rainy-afternoon album, with the spacious, ambient/electronic textures of its 21-plus-minute title track and 18-minute followup, "Fickle Sun (I)" taking a detour into spoken-word before arriving at a closing, cathartic cover of The Velvet Underground's "I'm Set Free." Even knowing nothing of Eno's career in the past 20 years, I suspect that nothing here is going to surprise fans. But the album's almost linear progression toward that point of catharsis shows a fantastic control of mood and pacing, and man, that "I'm Set Free" cover is super nice. Grade: B
At this point, nothing more than the musings of a restless English teacher on the pop culture he experiences.
Showing posts with label Harry Potter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harry Potter. Show all posts
Sunday, December 25, 2016
Sunday, December 4, 2016
Mini-Reviews for November 28 - December 4, 2016
Only got around to movies this week. Lots of B+ movies, too. That's alright, though.
Movies
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (2016)
Part of what makes the Harry Potter books (and, by extension, movies) so warm and lived-in is that they are about 50 percent just hanging out with characters, which allows J. K. Rowling the opportunity to craft hugely endearing characters to foreground the mystery/epic qualities of the rest of the narrative. Fantastic Beasts allows itself no such breathing room, so it's not surprising that the characterizations suffer. This movie moves, and that's both good in that there's never a dull moment and bad in that it serves to highlight Rowling's weaknesses. Rowling's tendency to write only two dimensional characters is offset in her novels by the sheer amounts of charm she can bestow on them, but without the extended hangouts that lengthy novels allow, we're left with a stable of skilled and charismatic actors fleshing out what are otherwise thin people. That's the bad. The good is pretty much everything else. The movie is a marvel of the densely inventive world-building that made Hogwarts such a rewarding setting; the creature designs are appropriately fantastic and allow Rowling a great opportunity to imbue a rather dark story with some of her keen humor; the story is nuanced in a way that Harry Potter rarely was, even giving the prospective archvillain Grindelwald a coherent motivation beneath his evil schemes that feels much more human than Voldemort's "I'm evil, deal with it"; the plot's central metaphor of oppression, while obvious, is enormously affecting; and as much as I spent the first half of this review complaining about the characters, I'll be jiggered if the film doesn't still manage to find emotional resonance in every one of them, which I suppose sort of renders limp a lot of my earlier gripes about characterization. I suspect the few other minor gripes I have will strike fans as ineffectual, too—the seeds for the sequels feel a bit useless in this movie, for example, and I would have appreciated a sharper visual flair outside of the admittedly excellent creature designs. But on the whole, this is a promising and effective start to what looks to be a vital addition to the Potter franchise. Grade: B+
Love & Friendship (2016)
There have been good Jane Austen movies in the past, but Love & Friendship is the first I've seen since Clueless to have captured that precise combination of affection and bite that makes Austen so readable. It's of course laugh-out-loud funny (an extended sequence involving a misunderstanding of the number of Biblical Commandments [i.e. not ten] stands out) and in turns a vicious indictment of England's fatuous leisure class. But there's also genuine warmth within that indictment, and these characters, though we're asked to laugh at them mercilessly, are also ones you grow rather fond of. It's a trick that Austen managed in each of her novels, but it's one that's been much rarely achieved in film adaptations. As always, Jane Austen's plotting-by-summary makes for a slightly awkward transition into motion picture (as large chunks of exposition are grafted into the speech of the characters)—even a writer as talented as Whit Stillman hasn't found a way around that one. On the whole, though, it's a joy of a movie likely to please Austen fans for years. Grade: B+
Lights Out (2016)
Based on an elegant premise first debuted in a 2013 short of the same name (a monster that can only attack in the dark), Lights Out is a formal wonder. Its plot's emphasis on darkness gives the film an phenomenal attention to detail in both lighting and shot composition, as we viewers hunt for any little corner of the frame that may contain darkness and hence the monster. It's the most effective horror device I've seen since It Follows, and the movie is pretty much guaranteed a legendary status because of it. There's also subtext aplenty, though, and while I normally welcome some good old-fashioned subtext in horror (this one's very unsubtly about clinical depression), Lights Out takes this subtext to a frighteningly dark place that is exactly what the modern, social-justice use of the word "problematic" was created for. So that that as you will. Grade: B+
The Garden of Words (言の葉の庭) (2013)
Some of the most drop-dead gorgeous animation I've ever seen is somewhat wasted bringing to life a dull (and, frankly, uncomfortable) plot. But at only 46 minutes, it's really not much plot to endure as the price for basking in that stunning animation. Grade: B
That Touch of Mink (1962)
Did you know that women are too weak to withstand the magnetic attraction of cold, hard cash? Did you know that men—especially the men with the cold, hard cash—must rush in to save women from their weakness? Learn these facts and many more in the timelessly regressive That Touch of Mink. The most joyless Cary Grant performance I've ever seen anchors a slightly less joyless Doris Day for a solid 99 minutes of few laughs. I'll give it this much: the climactic chase sequence is pretty funny. Outside of that, though, it's not so great. Grade: C
Stagecoach (1939)
I'm a sucker for ensemble movies in which the ensemble becomes an ad hoc family, and Stagecoach is a great one in that regard. The sheer warmth with which these characters are drawn is marvelous, and by the end, when these people start looking out for each other, the unironic optimism in human nature on display is, after decades of cynical revisionist westerns, a welcome reminder of the reasons general audiences fell in love with westerns to begin with. Grade: A-
Movies
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (2016)
Part of what makes the Harry Potter books (and, by extension, movies) so warm and lived-in is that they are about 50 percent just hanging out with characters, which allows J. K. Rowling the opportunity to craft hugely endearing characters to foreground the mystery/epic qualities of the rest of the narrative. Fantastic Beasts allows itself no such breathing room, so it's not surprising that the characterizations suffer. This movie moves, and that's both good in that there's never a dull moment and bad in that it serves to highlight Rowling's weaknesses. Rowling's tendency to write only two dimensional characters is offset in her novels by the sheer amounts of charm she can bestow on them, but without the extended hangouts that lengthy novels allow, we're left with a stable of skilled and charismatic actors fleshing out what are otherwise thin people. That's the bad. The good is pretty much everything else. The movie is a marvel of the densely inventive world-building that made Hogwarts such a rewarding setting; the creature designs are appropriately fantastic and allow Rowling a great opportunity to imbue a rather dark story with some of her keen humor; the story is nuanced in a way that Harry Potter rarely was, even giving the prospective archvillain Grindelwald a coherent motivation beneath his evil schemes that feels much more human than Voldemort's "I'm evil, deal with it"; the plot's central metaphor of oppression, while obvious, is enormously affecting; and as much as I spent the first half of this review complaining about the characters, I'll be jiggered if the film doesn't still manage to find emotional resonance in every one of them, which I suppose sort of renders limp a lot of my earlier gripes about characterization. I suspect the few other minor gripes I have will strike fans as ineffectual, too—the seeds for the sequels feel a bit useless in this movie, for example, and I would have appreciated a sharper visual flair outside of the admittedly excellent creature designs. But on the whole, this is a promising and effective start to what looks to be a vital addition to the Potter franchise. Grade: B+
Love & Friendship (2016)
There have been good Jane Austen movies in the past, but Love & Friendship is the first I've seen since Clueless to have captured that precise combination of affection and bite that makes Austen so readable. It's of course laugh-out-loud funny (an extended sequence involving a misunderstanding of the number of Biblical Commandments [i.e. not ten] stands out) and in turns a vicious indictment of England's fatuous leisure class. But there's also genuine warmth within that indictment, and these characters, though we're asked to laugh at them mercilessly, are also ones you grow rather fond of. It's a trick that Austen managed in each of her novels, but it's one that's been much rarely achieved in film adaptations. As always, Jane Austen's plotting-by-summary makes for a slightly awkward transition into motion picture (as large chunks of exposition are grafted into the speech of the characters)—even a writer as talented as Whit Stillman hasn't found a way around that one. On the whole, though, it's a joy of a movie likely to please Austen fans for years. Grade: B+
Lights Out (2016)
Based on an elegant premise first debuted in a 2013 short of the same name (a monster that can only attack in the dark), Lights Out is a formal wonder. Its plot's emphasis on darkness gives the film an phenomenal attention to detail in both lighting and shot composition, as we viewers hunt for any little corner of the frame that may contain darkness and hence the monster. It's the most effective horror device I've seen since It Follows, and the movie is pretty much guaranteed a legendary status because of it. There's also subtext aplenty, though, and while I normally welcome some good old-fashioned subtext in horror (this one's very unsubtly about clinical depression), Lights Out takes this subtext to a frighteningly dark place that is exactly what the modern, social-justice use of the word "problematic" was created for. So that that as you will. Grade: B+
The Garden of Words (言の葉の庭) (2013)
Some of the most drop-dead gorgeous animation I've ever seen is somewhat wasted bringing to life a dull (and, frankly, uncomfortable) plot. But at only 46 minutes, it's really not much plot to endure as the price for basking in that stunning animation. Grade: B
That Touch of Mink (1962)
Did you know that women are too weak to withstand the magnetic attraction of cold, hard cash? Did you know that men—especially the men with the cold, hard cash—must rush in to save women from their weakness? Learn these facts and many more in the timelessly regressive That Touch of Mink. The most joyless Cary Grant performance I've ever seen anchors a slightly less joyless Doris Day for a solid 99 minutes of few laughs. I'll give it this much: the climactic chase sequence is pretty funny. Outside of that, though, it's not so great. Grade: C
Stagecoach (1939)
I'm a sucker for ensemble movies in which the ensemble becomes an ad hoc family, and Stagecoach is a great one in that regard. The sheer warmth with which these characters are drawn is marvelous, and by the end, when these people start looking out for each other, the unironic optimism in human nature on display is, after decades of cynical revisionist westerns, a welcome reminder of the reasons general audiences fell in love with westerns to begin with. Grade: A-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












